Statements and Speeches
WASHINGTON
– Today, Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on
Federal Financial Management, held the hearing, “Preventing Abuse of the
Military’s Tuition Assistance Program.”
For
more information on the hearing or to watch a webcast of the hearing, please
click HERE.
A copy of Sen.
Carper’s opening statement, as prepared for delivery, follows:
“As we gather
here for today’s hearing, our nation’s debt stands at $14.1 trillion. Ten years
ago on this date, it stood at less than half that amount -- $5.7 trillion. If
we remain on our current course, it may double again by the end of this decade.
This level of debt is simply not sustainable. In Washington, DC, we need to
establish a culture of thrift, not a culture of spendthrift. We need to look in
every nook and cranny of federal spending – domestic, defense and entitlements,
along with tax expenditures – and find places where we can do more with less.
This subcommittee has spent the last half-dozen years trying to do just that.
“The purpose of
our hearing today is to look at yet another area of government spending and ask
the question, ‘Is it possible to achieve better results for less money? If not, then how can we achieve better
results for the same amount of money that we’re spending today?’
“Most of us
understand that we can’t simply cut our way out of debt, tax our way out of
debt or save our way out of debt. We also need to grow our way out of debt.
That means we need to invest in ways that will grow our economy and make us
more competitive as a nation – building a better educated, more productive
workforce, reversing the deterioration of our nation’s infrastructure and
funding the kind of research and
development that will enable us to out innovate the rest of the world once again.
“If we're really
serious about out-innovating the rest of the world, we need to start by
out-educating them. This means a major focus on early childhood education and
continuing to transform our K-12 public schools so that fewer students drop out
and those who do graduate are able to read, write, do math, use technology and
go on to become productive members of our society. And, it means ensuring that
the post-secondary education that Americans receive truly will make them more
productive workers and citizens.
“For years, with
our service academies, with programs like ROTC and the GI Bill, we've sought to
raise the skill levels of those who serve in our armed forces, as well as the
skill levels of those who later return to civilian life. In addition, we offer
our active duty military another lesser know education benefit called the
Tuition Assistance Program.
“Under this
program, American taxpayers supply $250 per credit toward the cost of a service
member’s tuition for a maximum of $4,500 per year. In Fiscal Year 2000, the
Department of Defense spent $157 million on tuition payments for this program.
By 2009, that number had risen to $517 million, a threefold increase in just
nine years.
“This program
does require service members to continue their active duty service while they
complete their courses. As you might expect, this requirement somewhat limits
the choices available to active duty service personnel as they head out on
detachments and deployments in Afghanistan, Iraq and other places around the
world.
“Active duty
service members have the option to enroll in distance learning courses at any
school that offers such courses. For-profit schools that operate almost
entirely online have become the frequent choice of many military personnel who
have opted for the distance learning option. At the Dover Air Force Base in
Delaware, the most popular school is a for-profit. This for-profit university
has enrolled twice as many Dover airmen as the two local colleges that offer
courses on base.
“That fact
probably should come as no surprise. Since distance learning services are in
high demand, for-profits have sought to fill our military’s need for
post-secondary education in part because of the accessibility of their classes
and the variety of courses offered. While some for-profits return real value
for taxpayers’ money, serious questions have arisen with respect to the
recruiting practices of some for-profits and to the quality of the education
they provide.
“Over the past
year or two, Senator Harkin’s Health Education Labor and Pensions (HELP)
Committee and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), have sought to put a
spotlight on both of these areas. In addition, Senator Harkin’s Committee found
a disturbing trend in that many for-profit institutions depend heavily on
federal student aid dollars, but fail to consistently provide a quality
education.
“With many
for-profit schools, far too many students are provided minimal instruction and
support, and they drop out. Others that may actually graduate have subsequently
had difficulty finding the kind of jobs that would enable them to pay off their
sizeable student loans and support their families.
“The Department
of Education is addressing issues of default rates and accountability in the
for-profit industry through regulation.
“While some
folks contend that these efforts by the Department would cut off higher
education access to many of our most vulnerable citizens, I disagree with that
thinking. The Department of Education’s regulations would only cut off access
to programs at schools that are clearly offering a bad product – an education
that costs too much, offers little instruction and training and oftentimes,
saddles students with mountains of debt that is difficult, if not impossible,
for them to repay.
“Currently, the incentives
at many for-profit colleges are misaligned. The institutions are rewarded for
enrolling more students but they have little, if any, incentive to make sure
that their graduates are prepared for the workforce and are able to enter
careers that enable them to manageably repay their student loan debt and begin
to live the American dream.
“Having said
that, let me say as clearly as I can that this is not an issue solely at
for-profit institutions. There are many community colleges experiencing similar
issues with extremely low degree completion rates and very high default rates.
And to be fair, there are also a number of for-profit institutions that offer a
quality education and have a history of success with placing students in
well-paying jobs.
“Student aid
spending needs to be at or near the top of our list, not just because of the
amount we spend on these programs, but also because the future and dreams of
our students depend on spending that money wisely. Nowhere is that need more
evident than with our troops participating in the Tuition Assistance Program.
“Over the past
year, several reports have described troubling stories of how some schools come
close to abusing our veterans and active duty military personnel. The accounts
of abuse range from deceptive recruitment practices by the school recruiters,
to schools’ hollow promises about the transferability of credits, to students
becoming saddled with unnecessary debt.
“I have four
core principles that I try to incorporate into everything I do – treat others
as you would want to be treated; if it’s not perfect, make it better; never
give up; always do the right thing. The idea that some schools take advantage
of our service members offends all four of my core principles.
“We demand so
much of our men and women in uniform and their families. We must also demand
more of our schools and get better results from our government. We are here
today to learn about the current safeguards against abuse of the Tuition
Assistance Program, how well they work and how we can improve them. We are also
here today because I believe we have a moral imperative to ensure that the
Department of Defense is doing everything it can to prevent these kind of
abuses.”
###