|
![print fridnly view](/congress109th/20061114055931im_/http://democraticwhip.house.gov/virtualApplicationResources/images/main/print_friendly.gif)
TRANSCRIPT
Hoyer to Congress - Accept the Senate's Bipartisan Pay-As-You-Go Budget Rule
March 29, 2004
MR. HOYER: I ASK UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO REVISE AND EXTEND MY REMARKS. I THANK THE GENTLELADY, THE SPEAKER, FOR HER RECOGNITION. MR. SPEAKER, THIS WEEK WE ARE
GOING TO SEE JUST HOW COMMITTED OUR REPUBLICAN FRIENDS ARE TO THE IRRESPONSIBLE BUDGET THAT THEY PASSED FOUR DAYS AGO. TOMORROW DEMOCRATS WILL OFFER A MOTION TO INSTRUCT HOUSE CONFEREES ON FISCAL 2005 BUDGET RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE
SENATE'S BIPARTISAN PAY-AS-YOU-GO BUDGET ENFORCEMENT RULES. THOSE RULES WOULD REQUIRE US TO FIND OFFSETS FOR BOTH NEW SPENDING AS WELL AS TAX CUTS. AS A MATTER OF FACT ONE OF THE REAL AUTHORS OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO, CONGRESSMAN GEORGE MILLER, IN
THE 1990'S IS HERE, WHICH LED TO THE MOST FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATION'S PERFORMANCE IN HISTORY UNDER BILL CLINTON. AND WITH THE PROJECTED BUDGET DEFICIT OF MORE THAN $500 BILLION THIS YEAR, IT'S FAIR TO
ASK, WHAT COULD BE MORE REASONABLE THAN THAT? AFTER ALL, OUR BIPARTISAN AGREEMENT TO PAY-AS-YOU-GO RULES IN 1990 LED TO THE STEADY DECREASE OF OUR DEFICITS THROUGHOUT THAT DECADE, AND
FOUR CONSECUTIVE YEARS OF BUDGET SURPLUSES BETWEEN FISCAL 1998 AND 2001. THE FIRST TIME THAT HAS HAPPENED IN 80 YEARS. BUT IN THEIR BUDGET RESOLUTION
OUR REPUBLICAN FRIENDS PRETEND THAT WE CAN GET OUR FISCAL HOUSE BACK IN ORDER BY APPLYING SO-CALLED PAY-AS-YOU-GO RULES TO SPENDING ONLY. TAX CUTS, THEY BELIEVE, ARE A
FREEBIE. EVEN THOUGH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE HAS ESTIMATED THAT 40% OF OUR DEFICIT IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO REVENUE REDUCTIONS. WHO'S GOING TO PAY THAT BILL?
OUR CHILDREN WILL PAY THAT BILL. OUR GRANDCHILDREN WILL PAY THAT BILL. AND EVEN THOUGH THE RESPECTED CHAIRMAN OF THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE, MY FRIEND FROM FLORIDA, CONGRESSMAN YOUNG, SAID IN FEBRUARY, AND I QUOTE, NO ONE SHOULD EXPECT
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIT REDUCTION AS A RESULT OF AUSTERE, NONDEFENSE DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS. THE NUMBERS SIMPLY DO NOT ADD UP. SO SAID BILL YOUNG, CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FROM
FLORIDA. SO I URGE MY REPUBLICAN FRIENDS, JOIN US. JOIN US IN THIS EFFORT TO RESTORE FISCAL SANITY TO OUR NATION'S BUDGET. VOTE FOR THIS IMPORTANT DEMOCRATIC MOTION TO INSTRUCT. THAT'S NOT SO HARD. AND REMEMBER, YOU'VE DONE IT
BEFORE. LAST YEAR A MERE 96 HOURS AFTER YOU PASSED YOUR FISCAL 2004 BUDGET RESOLUTION, YOU TURNED RIGHT AROUND, 180 DEGREES, AND VOTED FOR THE DEMOCRATIC MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES TO REJECT THE DEEP CUTS CALLED FOR IN
YOUR BUDGET FOR EDUCATION, FOR VETERANS, MEDICARE, MEDICAID, AND OTHER AREAS. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BUDGET COMMITTEE, MR. NUSSLE, EVEN STOOD ON THIS FLOOR AND RAILED AGAINST OUR MOTION FOR HALF AN
HOUR. FOR HALF AN HOUR HE RAILED AGAINST OUR MOTION. BEFORE HE AND MOST OF THE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FLIP-FLOPPED AND HELPED PASSED IT BY A VOTE OF -- LISTEN TO THIS MY COLLEAGUES -- 3 9-22 -- 39-22.
THAT WAS THE DEMOCRATIC MOTION PASSING. WHY? BECAUSE THE REPUBLICANS WANTED TO PRETEND THEY WERE ACTUALLY FOR THE MOTION TO INSTRUCT'S PRIORITIES WHEN THEIR BUDGET CLEARLY DENIED THAT. CONTRADICTED IT.
DID NOT PROVIDE FOR THOSE PRIORITIES. SO I URGE MY REPUBLICAN FRIENDS, SUPPORT THE ADOPTION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO RULES WHICH HELPED DEMOCRATS PRODUCE A BUDGET FOR FISCAL 2005 THAT WAS BOTH FAIR AND RESPONSIBLE. OUR DEMOCRATIC SUBSTITUTE WOULD
BALANCE THE BUDGET WITHIN EIGHT YEARS. YOURS WOULD ACTUALLY INCREASE OUR DEFICITS. OUR DEMOCRATIC BUDGET WOULD PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY. OUR DEMOCRATIC BUDGET WOULD MATCH THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET ON DEFENSE SPENDING TO ENSURE OUR
NATIONAL SECURITY AND PROVIDE NEARLY $6 BILLION MORE OVER FIVE YEARS FOR HOMELAND SECURITY TO ENSURE THAT OUR PEOPLE HERE AT HOME ARE SAFER. OUR DEMOCRATIC BUDGET WOULD PROVIDE TAX RELIEF FOR HARD
WORKING FAMILIES. AND OUR BUDGET, THE DEMOCRATIC BUDGET, EVEN AS IT RAINES -- REINS -- REIGNS IN DEFICITS, WOULD PROVIDE MORE RESOURCES THAN THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET FOR EDUCATION, VETERANS, JOB
TRAINING, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND INFRASTRUCTURE. THE LAST BEING EXTRAORDINARILY EFFECTIVE JOBS PRODUCER. FINALLY, MR. SPEAKER, WE ALSO WILL CONSIDER THIS WEEK AS I HAVE SAID THE TRANSPORTATION RE-AUTHORIZATION BILL.
WHICH WILL PASS, I PREDICT, WITH WIDE BIPARTISAN SUPPORT. BUT LEAVE BOTH DEMOCRATS AND SOME REPUBLICANS SHAKING THEIR HEADS. THIS IS NOT ONLY A BILL ABOUT INFRASTRUCTURE, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO OUR ECONOMY, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO THE
SAFETY OF THIS NATION, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO EVERY AMERICAN, IT'S ALSO A JOBS BILL. DEMOCRATS AND SOME REPUBLICANS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE, MR. DON YOUNG OF ALASKA HIMSELF, SUPPORT A FUNDING LEVEL OF $375
BILLION, WHICH WOULD HAVE CREATED 1.7 MILLION NEW JOBS. WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? BECAUSE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 75 YEARS SINCE HERBERT HOOVER, THE FIRST TIME, THIS IS THE
FIRST ADMINISTRATION IN 3/4 OF A CENTURY THAT WILL END ITS FOUR-YEAR TERM HAVING LOST JOBS NET IN THIS ECONOMY. THAT'S WHY WE HAVE OVER 2.5 MILLION PEOPLE UNEMPLOYED, EIGHT MILLION PEOPLE -- 2.5
MILLION JOBS LOST, 8.5 MILLION PEOPLE UNEMPLOYED. YET THE PRESIDENT WHO HAS THE WORST RECORD OF JOB CREATION SINCE HERBERT HOOVER THREATENED A VETO OF THAT JOBS BILL, CREATING A FUNDING LEVEL THAT
WILL CREATE 1.1 MILLION FEWER NEW JOBS. I URGE MY REPUBLICAN FRIENDS,
STOP IGNORING THE PLIGHT OF THE UNEMPLOYED WHO HAVE SUFFERED UNDER YOUR FAILED POLICIES. SINCE DECEMBER, MORE THAN ONE MILLION JOBLESS WORKERS HAVE EXHAUSTED THEIR REGULAR STATE
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS WITHOUT RECEIVING TEMPORARY FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. WHY? BECAUSE REPUBLICANS ALOUD -- ALLOWED THE FEDERAL PROGRAM TO EXPIRE. DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR
THE LAST SIX MONTHS, EXTEND THAT PROGRAM, AS WE DID UNDER THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION, AS WE DID UNDER BUSH ONE. THEY HAVE REFUSED TO DO SO. BEFORE WE LEAVE WASHINGTON THIS WEEK FOR A TWO-WEEK RECESS, WE SHOULD PASS AN IMMEDIATE
EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FEDERAL JOBLESS BENEFITS. IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO. IT'S THE MORAL THING TO DO. AND I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU, IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO FOR OUR ECONOMY AS WELL. THERE'S NO EXCUSE FOR FAILING
TO ACT. MADAM SPEAKER, I HOPE THAT WHEN THE MOTION TO RECOMMIT -- EXCUSE ME, TO INSTRUCT ON THE BUDGET RESOLUTION IS MADE TO HAVE A RESPONSIBLE, EFFECTIVE, HISTORICALLY EFFECTIVE
PAY-AS-YOU-GO PROCESS TO DISCIPLINE OUR BUDGET SO THAT AMERICA'S CHILDREN AND AMERICA'S GRANDCHILDREN AND AMERICA'S ECONOMY WILL NOT BE PUT DEEPER INTO DEBT AND THAT
WE WILL HAVE AN EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT PROCESS WHICH WILL, LIKE AMERICA'S FAMILIES, MAKE TOUGH DECISIONS SO THAT WE WILL HAVE A BETTER FUTURE FOR OUR COUNTRY.
I YIELD BACK THE BALANCE OF MY TIME.
|
|
|