CBO
TESTIMONY
Statement of
Jan Paul Acton
Assistant Director
Natural Resources and Commerce Division
Congressional Budget Office
before the
Subcommittee on Oversight
Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
June 11, 1992
NOTICE
This statement is not available for public release until
it is delivered at 10:00 a.m. (EDT), Thursday, June 11, 1992. |
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for inviting
me to participate in your review of the Superfund cleanup program and its
associated trust fund, the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) is pleased to contribute to this timely effort to promote
a productive dialogue about the hazardous waste cleanup effort, before
the next Superfund reauthorization.
CBO's analysis leads me to the following observations:
-
Although the Superfund program is more than 11 years old, in many ways
it is still in its early stages. Barring major changes in policy, both
the trust fund and the cleanup effort will grow and remain sizable for
several decades.
-
The trust fund collected $10.2 billion in its first 11 years. At the end
of fiscal year 1991, the fund had a total balance of $4.0 billion and an
unobligated balance of $0.6 billion. Dedicated taxes account for two-thirds
of cumulative receipts, including $1.4 billion in 1991.
-
Federal expenditures under Superfund started slowly and have escalated
since the 1986 reauthorization. Obligations totaled $1.35 billion and outlays
were $0.88 billion during the first five years of the program. By contrast,
in fiscal year 1991 annual obligations amounted to $1.6 billion
and outlays reached $1.4 billion. Cumulative obligations and outlays over
the first 11 years totaled $8.8 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively.
-
Many sites have entered the Superfund remedial process, but few have finished
it. More than 1,200 sites have been placed on the National Priorities List,
but the broadest definition of completions used by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) includes only 80 sites. The majority are in the earlier stages
of remedial investigation or design.
-
Under the "enforcement-first" policy instituted by EPA in 1989, the share
of remedial activities undertaken by private parties has grown sharply.
Consequently, the trust fund has diminished in importance as a source of
cleanup resources. Increased private resources have helped the number of
remedial actions to grow almost 50 percent between 1989 and 1991.
-
Although these changes have increased the number of sites at later stages
of the process, individual sites are not getting cleaned up faster. In
the first two and a half years under "enforcement first," the projected
time to complete key stages in the process has grown by 18 to 24 months.
-
Although EPA has increased its enforcement efforts, it has made only modest
use of some settlement tools that the Congress provided in the 1986 reauthorization.
Only 58 de minimis settlements, 14 mixed-funding agreements, and
one nonbinding allocation of responsibility were reached or provided in
the succeeding five years.
This document is available in its entirety in PDF.