Congressional Budget OfficeSkip Navigation
Home Red Bullet Publications Red Bullet Cost Estimates Red Bullet About CBO Red Bullet Press Red Bullet Careers Red Bullet Contact Us Red Bullet Director's Blog Red Bullet   RSS
PDF
A
CBO
STUDY

 
 
Evaluating Military Compensation
 
June 2007


Cover Graphic



Notes

Unless otherwise indicated, the years referred to in this study are calendar years.

Numbers in the text and tables may not add up to totals because of rounding.

The cover photograph shows a Marine Corps officer receiving the first lieutenant rank insignia during a promotion ceremony in Ar Ramadi, Iraq. The photograph was taken by Cpl. Tom Sloan and was provided courtesy of the U.S. Marine Corps.





                
Preface

One factor that affects whether people join or remain in the military is how the compensation they expect to receive compares with that of civilian jobs. To recruit and retain members of the armed forces, the Department of Defense (DoD) must offer a pay package that is competitive with opportunities in the civilian sector and that adequately compensates personnel for the difficulties of serving in the military. In the late 1990s, lawmakers and DoD began making a concerted effort to increase cash and noncash elements of military compensation, in part because of declining retention among service members.

This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study—prepared at the request of the Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee—offers an overview of military compensation, particularly that of active-duty enlisted personnel. It considers various ways to measure military compensation and to compare military and civilian pay, as well as issues raised by such comparisons. The study also examines the connection between the components of military compensation and DoD's recruiting and retention. Finally, it discusses options to make military compensation more efficient. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.

Carla Tighe Murray of CBO's National Security Division wrote the study under the general supervision of Matthew S. Goldberg and J. Michael Gilmore. Victoria Liu, Allison Percy, Matthew Schmit, and Jason Wheelock contributed to the analysis. Nabeel Alsalam provided data on civilian workers, and Cary Elliott provided data on federal civilian employees. Thomas DeLeire, Robert Dennis, Arlene Holen, Sarah Jennings, and Donald Marron offered helpful comments, as did John Enns of the Naval Postgraduate School. (The assistance of an outside reviewer implies no responsibility for the final product, which rests solely with CBO.)

Christian Howlett edited the manuscript, and Christine Bogusz proofread it. Cindy Cleveland produced drafts of the manuscript and the tables. Maureen Costantino prepared the report for publication and designed the cover. Lenny Skutnik printed the initial copies, Linda Schimmel coordinated the print distribution, and Simone Thomas prepared the electronic version for CBO's Web site.

Peter R. Orszag
Director
June 2007




CONTENTS


Introduction and Summary
      Defining Military Compensation
      Comparing Military and Civilian Compensation
      Factors That Complicate Military–Civilian Comparisons
 
Military Pay, Promotions, and Rank
 
Estimates of Military Compensation
      Total Compensation for Enlisted Personnel by Years of Experience
      Cash Earnings for Selected Occupations
 
Comparing Increases in Military and Civilian Pay
      The "Gap" Between Changes in Basic Pay and Civilian Earnings
      Issues in Using the "Pay Gap" to Evaluate Military Compensation
      Increases in Regular Military Compensation Versus the Employment Cost Index
 
Comparing Levels of Military and Civilian Pay
      Cash Compensation
      Noncash and Deferred Benefits
      General Limitations of Military–Civilian Comparisons
 
Linking Military Compensation to Recruiting and Retention
      Effectiveness of Using Pay to Resolve Occupational Shortages or Surpluses
      Effects of Cash and Noncash Compensation on Recruiting and Retention
 
Options to Increase the Visibility and Efficiency of Military Compensation
      Integrating the Components of Total Compensation
      Increasing Cash Relative to Noncash Compensation
 
Appendix A: Total Compensation for the Median Enlisted Member
 
Appendix B: How Pay Changes with Deployment
 
Appendix C: Types of Occupation- or Skills-Based Compensation
 

Tables
   
1.  Summary of Five Recent Studies of Military Compensation
2.  Estimated Average Compensation for Enlisted Personnel in 2006, by Pay Grade and Family Status
3.  Army Specialties and Comparable Civilian Occupations
A-1.  Breakdown of Compensation for the Median Enlisted Member With and Without a Family, 2006
   
Figures
   
1.  Distribution of Active-Duty Enlisted Personnel, by Pay Grade, 2006
2.  Average Monthly Pay for Selected Enlisted Occupations in the Army, December 2005
3.  Differences Between Military and Private-Sector Pay Raises Since 1982
4.  Annual Earnings of Enlisted Personnel Compared with Those of Civilian Workers or Federal Employees, 2006
5.  Ratio of Annual Cash Earnings in the Army to Civilian Earnings for Selected Occupations
6.  Pay Increases and Personnel Levels for Selected Army Enlisted Occupations With Shortages
7.  Pay Increases and Personnel Levels for Selected Army Enlisted Occupations Without Shortages
   
Boxes
   
1.  The Employment Cost Index and Other Measures of Growth in Civilian Compensation
2.  Compensating Service Members for Combat
3.  Personal Discount Rates

Table of Contents Next Page