Health Care Quality:
HHS Should Set Priorities and Comprehensively Plan Its Efforts to Better Align Health Quality Measures
GAO-17-5: Published: Oct 13, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 13, 2016.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-7114
clowersa@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Hurdles to measuring and rewarding quality health care
Medicare and other health care payers are increasingly examining the quality of the services people receive—and adjusting payments accordingly. But payers don’t agree on which quality measures to track, making it difficult to improve the quality of care and burdening doctors and other providers with reporting different data to different payers. While the Department of Health and Human Services is working to better align its health care quality measures across programs and private payers, we recommend that it set key priorities for these efforts and develop more meaningful measures.
General Overview of a Health Quality Measure: Blood Pressure Control
Illustration of how to calculate physician performance to measure blood pressure control
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-7114
clowersa@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
While the full extent of misalignment among health care quality measures is unknown, it can have adverse effects on providers and efforts to improve quality of care. Misalignment occurs when health care payers require providers to report on measures that focus on different quality issues or define the measures using different specifications. GAO identified three studies that provided some information on the extent of misalignment. For the most part, these studies examined the number of measures that were used in common, among a narrow selection of public and private payers, and found that with few exceptions, only a small proportion of measures were commonly used by these payers. The Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) agrees that misalignment exists, and some experts note that it adds to providers' administrative burden and often results in quality information that is not comparable.
GAO's interviews with HHS officials and experts indicate that three interrelated factors drive misalignment of health care quality measures, as described in the table.
Factors Driving Misalignment of Health Care Quality Measures
Factor |
Description |
Dispersed decision-making |
Among public and private payers and other stakeholders, each entity independently decides which quality measures it will use and which specifications should apply to those measures. |
Variation in data collection and reporting systems |
Payers may choose different measures, modify existing measures, or leave details about measure specifications up to providers in order to accommodate differences in data that providers collect and the systems they use to collect these data. |
Few meaningful measures |
Although hundreds of quality measures have been developed, relatively few are measures that payers, providers, and other stakeholders agree to adopt, because few are viewed as leading to meaningful improvements in quality. |
Source: GAO interviews with Department of Health and Human Services officials and experts. | GAO-17-5
HHS has various ongoing efforts that address different aspects of misalignment of quality measures and the three factors that drive it. For example, HHS has begun to address dispersed decision-making by negotiating with private payers to adopt a core set of measures. To address variation in data systems, HHS is taking steps to develop electronic quality measures—those that allow providers to report data electronically—and standardize the data collected under these measures. CMS has also taken steps to address the paucity of meaningful measures through efforts to develop new measures that focus on key quality concerns. However, HHS has not prioritized development of electronic quality measures specifically for the core measures CMS negotiated with private payers, which could delay the implementation of this alignment effort. Further, CMS has not comprehensively planned how to target the development of new, more meaningful measures that address misalignment, and it has not set timelines and methods to track its progress. Federal internal control standards and leading principles for planning call for agencies to prioritize their efforts and assess their progress in achieving their objectives. Without comprehensive planning, CMS cannot ensure that it will achieve its objective of reducing misalignment.
Why GAO Did This Study
Both the federal government and private payers, such as health plans, increasingly use quality measures to encourage providers to improve health care quality. In addition to its ongoing programs that use quality measures to assess provider performance, HHS has proposed to begin implementing the CMS Quality Payment Program, in January 2017. However, if measures are misaligned across these programs, the misalignment could create administrative burden for providers.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 includes a provision for GAO to examine the use of quality measures across HHS programs and private payers, with a focus on reducing burden. In this report, GAO examined (1) what is known about the extent and effects, if any, of quality measure misalignment; (2) key factors that can contribute to misalignment; and (3) HHS's efforts to address any misalignment. GAO conducted a literature review to identify related studies; reviewed HHS documents; and interviewed HHS officials and experts from 16 organizations that represent a range of perspectives, including providers and payers.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that HHS (1) prioritize its development of electronic quality measures and related data elements for the core measures it and private payers have agreed to use, and (2) comprehensively plan, including setting timelines for, its efforts to develop more meaningful quality measures. HHS concurred with the recommendations.
For more information, contact A. Nicole Clowers at (202) 512-7114 or clowersa@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: To make it more likely that HHS will achieve its goals to reduce quality measure misalignment and associated provider burden, the Secretary of HHS should direct CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology to prioritize their development of electronic quality measures and associated standardized data elements on the specific quality measures needed for the core measure sets that CMS and private payers have agreed to use.
Agency Affected: Department of Health and Human Services
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: To make it more likely that HHS will achieve its goals to reduce quality measure misalignment and associated provider burden, the Secretary of HHS should direct CMS to comprehensively plan, including setting timelines, for how to target its development of new, more meaningful quality measures on those that will promote greater alignment, especially measures to strengthen the core measure sets that CMS and private payers have agreed to use.
Agency Affected: Department of Health and Human Services
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Oct 27, 2016
-
Opioid Addiction:
Laws, Regulations, and Other Factors Can Affect Medication-Assisted Treatment AccessGAO-16-833: Published: Sep 27, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 27, 2016.
Oct 20, 2016
-
Breast Cancer Education:
HHS Has Implemented Initiatives Aimed at Young WomenGAO-17-19: Published: Oct 20, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2016.
Oct 17, 2016
-
Medicare:
CMS's Round 2 Durable Medical Equipment and National Mail-order Diabetes Testing Supplies Competitive Bidding ProgramsGAO-16-570: Published: Sep 15, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 17, 2016.
Oct 13, 2016
-
Health Care Quality:
HHS Should Set Priorities and Comprehensively Plan Its Efforts to Better Align Health Quality MeasuresGAO-17-5: Published: Oct 13, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 13, 2016.
Oct 6, 2016
-
Skilled Nursing Facilities:
CMS Should Improve Accessibility and Reliability of Expenditure DataGAO-16-700: Published: Sep 7, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 6, 2016.
Sep 29, 2016
-
Medicaid Fee-For-Service:
State Resources Vary for Helping Beneficiaries Find ProvidersGAO-16-809: Published: Aug 29, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 29, 2016.
Sep 28, 2016
-
NIH Biomedical Research:
Agencies Involved in the Indirect Cost Rate-Setting Process Need to Improve ControlsGAO-16-616: Published: Sep 7, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 28, 2016.
Sep 21, 2016
-
High-Containment Laboratories:
Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate RiskGAO-16-642: Published: Aug 30, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 21, 2016.
Sep 15, 2016
-
Long-Term Care Workforce:
Better Information Needed on Nursing Assistants, Home Health Aides, and Other Direct Care WorkersGAO-16-718: Published: Aug 16, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 2016.
Sep 14, 2016
-
Health Care:
Results of Recent Undercover Testing for Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Coverage, and Review of Market Concentration in the Private Insurance MarketsGAO-16-882T: Published: Sep 14, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 14, 2016.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here