Security Assistance:
Guidance Needed for Completing Required Impact Assessments Prior to Presidential Drawdowns
GAO-17-26: Published: Oct 20, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2016.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-5257
merrittz@gao.gov
Charles Michael Johnson, Jr
(202) 512-7331
johnsoncm@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
In fiscal years 2011 through 2015, the President authorized 13 drawdowns to provide security assistance and build foreign partner capacity to France, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and countries in West and Central Africa (see fig.). According to Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of State (State) data, the total value of articles and services authorized for these drawdowns was $321.5 million.
Authorized Recipients of Presidential Drawdowns, Fiscal Years 2011-2015
State and DOD implemented some, but not all, steps in their stated processes for planning and implementing drawdowns, but the military departments did not conduct required impact assessments. State implemented three steps in the process for which it was responsible, such as preparing justification packages for planned drawdowns. DOD implemented some parts of its stated process. For example, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA), which is the lead DOD entity for drawdowns, worked with the military departments to identify resources for the drawdowns from fiscal years 2011 through 2015. However, the Army and Air Force—which together delivered about 96 percent of the dollar amount of drawdown aid during that time—did not conduct required impact assessments. Specifically, the two military departments had not assessed the potential impact of drawdowns on military readiness and budgets during drawdown planning, as required by DOD guidance. Neither of the military departments has assigned responsibility for conducting the assessments, and DSCA did not determine whether the assessments had been completed. Without these assessments, DOD is not in a position to identify and, if needed, mitigate potential negative impacts of a drawdown on military readiness.
Why GAO Did This Study
The President has special legal authorities that allow him to direct the “drawdown” of defense articles and services to provide assistance in response to an international crisis. Examples of this aid include deliveries of vehicles, food, and medical equipment, and the use of military airlift, among other articles and services. The President may authorize up to $325 million each year in drawdowns under three authorities in the Foreign Assistance Act.
A House Armed Services Committee report accompanying a bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 included a provision for GAO to review drawdown authorities. This report (1) describes the use of drawdown authorities to provide security assistance and build partner capacity and (2) evaluates the extent to which State and DOD followed their stated processes for planning and implementing drawdowns. GAO reviewed guidance and documents relevant to drawdowns, analyzed drawdown data from fiscal years 2011 through 2015, and interviewed State and DOD officials.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that (1) the Secretaries of the military departments develop guidance that assigns responsibility for the preparation of impact assessments, and (2) the Director, DSCA, develop an internal control mechanism to determine whether the military departments have completed the required impact assessments before moving forward with drawdown planning and execution. DOD concurred with each of GAO's recommendations.
For more information, contact Charles Michael Johnson, Jr., at (202) 512-7331 or johnsoncm@gao.gov or Zina Merritt at (202) 512-5257 or merrittz@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: To implement DOD guidance requiring the military departments to prepare readiness and Operation and Maintenance (O&M;) budget impact assessments during drawdown planning, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretaries of the military departments to develop guidance that assigns responsibility for the preparation of impact assessments and includes direction on how such assessments should be conducted as part of drawdown planning.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: To implement DOD guidance requiring the military departments to prepare readiness and O&M; budget impact assessments during drawdown planning, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Director, DSCA, to develop an internal control mechanism to determine whether the military departments have completed the required impact assessments before moving forward with drawdown planning and execution.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »
Nov 1, 2016
-
Defense Intelligence:
Additional Steps Could Better Integrate Intelligence Input into DOD's Acquisition of Major Weapon SystemsGAO-17-10: Published: Nov 1, 2016. Publicly Released: Nov 1, 2016.
Oct 31, 2016
-
DOD Inventory of Contracted Services:
Timely Decisions and Further Actions Needed to Address Long-Standing IssuesGAO-17-17: Published: Oct 31, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2016. -
Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex:
DOD Partially Used Best Practices for Analyzing Alternatives and Should Do So Fully for Future Military Construction DecisionsGAO-16-853: Published: Sep 30, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2016.
Oct 26, 2016
-
Presidential Travel:
Estimated Costs for a Specific Presidential Trip to Illinois and FloridaGAO-17-24: Published: Oct 11, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 26, 2016. -
Joint Information Environment:
DOD Needs to Strengthen Governance and Management [Reissued on October 25, 2016]GAO-16-593: Published: Jul 14, 2016. Publicly Released: Jul 14, 2016.
Oct 24, 2016
-
Military Personnel:
Performance Measures Needed to Determine How Well DOD's Credentialing Program Helps Servicemembers [Reissued on October 21, 2016]GAO-17-133: Published: Oct 17, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 17, 2016.
Oct 20, 2016
-
Security Assistance:
Guidance Needed for Completing Required Impact Assessments Prior to Presidential DrawdownsGAO-17-26: Published: Oct 20, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2016.
Oct 17, 2016
-
Global Positioning System:
Observations on Quarterly Reports from the Air ForceGAO-17-162R: Published: Oct 17, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 17, 2016.
Oct 12, 2016
-
DOD Civilian and Contractor Workforces:
Additional Cost Savings Data and Efficiencies Plan Are NeededGAO-17-128: Published: Oct 12, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 12, 2016.
Sep 26, 2016
-
Waste Management:
DOD Has Generally Addressed Legislative Requirements on the Use of Burn Pits but Needs to Fully Assess Health EffectsGAO-16-781: Published: Sep 26, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 2016.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here