Kavanaugh’s majority unavailable record, the suspicion around the circumstances of his nomination, and his perjurious testimony before the Judiciary Committee are the only things needed to prove him unfit for SCOTUS. The rest proves him unfit for humanity.
-
-
-
This. All day. So many other issues even before the sexual assault allegations and testimony.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can’t wait to vote against you.
-
Lol yay you feel special now
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then you are not the voice of this Female PA voter. The Democratic Party should be embarrassed in their handling of this situation. The situation you created for Dr Ford should have been avoided.
-
There should have been an FBI investigation. It is precedent. Only the guilty are afraid of the fact finding process.
-
Anyone of the Senate Committee could have called for an FBI investigation, why didn't Senator Feinstein call for one as soon as the Dr.'s accusation was leaked? It is well within her right as an senator on the committee!
New conversation -
-
-
You are a lap dog for Chuck Schumer and you are part of the smear campaign. There’s a reason you are regarded as the least effective member of the Senate. You can’t think for yourself. You do as your told by Schumer. You don’t care about or for the people of Pennsylvania .
-
And you cannot see the truth no matter how it is presented. Shameful!
-
Obviously you are unfamiliar with Bob Casey & that’s a truth you need to familiarize yourself with.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
#walkaway Bob Casey. You know your party used this woman. She could have provided private testimony. Was never told she didn't have to travel to provide her testimony and someone claimed she was afraid to fly to prevent her from testifying on Monday. Walkway Bob Casey. -
REPS refused to have the FBI check out the allegations and gather facts . Why? Bush did with Anita Hill. Why not with Dr Ford? Repubs held up Merrick Garland for >year for 0 reason. Look it up. Look up Gorsuch, he sailed thru with no prob from Dems, why? He didn't assault anyone.
-
Excellent points!
-
He was investigated 6 times. Feinstein sat on this, she met with him. She could have brought it up then. You are being disingenuous
-
He was not investigated for the specific purposes of these allegations those 6 times. Who is being disingenuous?
-
You, these allegations are 30 years old, no one can back up her story, Feinstein could have started an investigation in July. Booker has already admitted to doing what kavanaugh is being accused of. Who is being disingenuous?
-
I was responding to your point about the 6 investigations. Nice to see you pivot away from that when a reasonable counterargument is presented.
-
Piss off, if you think these allegations are genuine and not a smear we have nothing to talk about. I'm tired of being nice
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.