Dossier is NOT fake. It’s true.https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/389522-clapper-more-and-more-of-steele-dossier-proving-to-be-true …
-
-
-
James Comey under oath admitted that the Russian Dossier was salacious.
-
Salacious doesn't mean not true. They are not mutually exclusive. The dossier IS salacious AND has been proven true (so far).
-
... they’ve no idea what they say. It’s pitiful. Instead of learning and understanding that life is about progress they pout, yell, moan, complain, curse, sit back and want life to be “the same as back then”... no internal motor to be better, learn or progress.
-
You are 100% right! Well said - followed!
-
Followed back!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You left out a few things: - A Republican initially commissioned and paid for the dossier - Nothing in the dossier has been disproved as false - At least 80% of the dossier has been PROVED TRUE *SO FAR* - Simpson prefers to testify publicly, so you can't lie about what was said
-
Your statement would be true if it weren’t for the fact that Priestap said the dossier was in its infancy of verification when presented to a FISA court, that’s a violation. Steele (Russian spyhired by FGPS) said it was unverified and criticized buzzfeedhttps://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/christopher-steele-admits-dossier-charge-unverifie/ …
-
No violation; it was disclosed as opp research to the FISA court, & it was supporting info rather than serve as the *basis* for the request, as admitted in the Nunes memo. The footnote takes up an entire page (page 11 from memory, but I could be wrong). /1
-
The redacted document is available online for your personal googling and verification. /end
-
This article contains a link to the redacted Page FISA applicationhttps://www.lawfareblog.com/document-justice-department-releases-carter-page-fisa-application …
-
FISA req: the evidence standard is probable cause that the person being spied on is working on behalf of a foreign agent and that those activities and that those activities are in violation of U.S. law.
-
A federal judge looked at all the evidence (some of which is still confidential) and decided that there WAS probable cause. And then a different federal judge made the same decision. Then a third. All were Bush appointees. So if you wanna go after someone, it should be them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would expect Nellie Ohr to do the same. Hopefully not, but that would be a surprise.http://Www.licensedtolie.com
-
“Thrown out!”
Face and creepy porn lawyer now have to pay Trump’s legals fees and if you donated to the gofundme, it's going to Trump! ironic
. Let’s not forget 1/1024th “Indian” Liz Warren “Pocahontas” wants her MIL, how embarrassing for the dems, they just don’t get it.
-
You are uninformed. The DNA showed from 1/60 to 1/1024. Also my cousin has a masters in native American Indian studies from UCLA. Your stats are wrong. Lies
-
Shes part native American if you read the report
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.