What decisions did Peter make relative o the Russia investigation? That is important info before you make such a claim. If he made no decisions that hurt Trump, then you are making a false claim.
-
-
-
Are you serious? You really can't be serious. I will Stop Trump! Spies in the campaign. FISA warrants with Clinton paid dossier. McCabe leaking and lying after his wife received 640 thousand dollars. The hoax is over!
-
Show me the decisions that Peter made that demonstrates bias or just back off. Trump and his group of criminals met with Russians and lied about it. His own son committed treason and he and his dad lied about that. He’s doing what all guilty people do. Wake up!
-
What you are ignoring Sandra is that Trump’s 4th amendment rights may have been completely trampled here. The FBI does not have the right to open a CI investigation without probable cause. You should ask if Peter acted consistent to the Constitution when deciding to start this.
-
In other words, why is the DOJ so desperate to hide or cover up the documents preceding the official start date. Why is Rosenstein choosing cover up over clean up ???
-
Because they are following important rules about not leaking information in an ongoing investigation. And they know that GOP reps are partisan hacks and will leak further. Like Chaffetz did with the Comey memo .
-
1) The DOJ/FBI leak as often as Congress. 2) Both cases are irrelevant though as neither Comey, Strzok, Sessions, Rosenstein can declare their activities fall outside the Constitution. Congress has oversight of current investigations, by law. DOJ not above law.
-
If the Congressmen were exercising oversight, then that would be fine. But that’s sadly not the case. I’m concerned that they are involved in covering things up...like the Russian contributions to the NRA who funneled contributions their way.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
George had loose lips, which was bad, but you know Jim he wasn't the only one getting friendly with the Russians in Trump World now was he?https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/12/01/timeline-events-related-russia-investigation/914959001/ …
-
The FBI investigation involving the Trump campaign and Russian didn't rest solely on Peter Strzok no matter how much you wish it did. Not everyone gets their news from Fox, Jimbo. Some of your Ohio constituents actually get the news.http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-opened-russia-probe-after-papadopoulos-told-australian-diplomat-of-clinton-dirt-2017-12 …
-
Seems interesting to me that the so called "Russians" who approached the Trump campain to try to get them to take the bait of "we have damaging information on HC", are the very informants our FBI, CIA, ect. had paid. Sounds like a set-up.
-
Also, the Downer meeting is suspicious. It was Downer who asked Papadopoulos to meet him on May 10 in London. He really had no good reason. Why was Bill Priestap FBI in London at that time? Did he meet with Downer before that meeting to coach him or pay him? Doesn't add up.
-
There’s a lot of unknowns... but Sarah is one good, investigative reporter!
-
She is one of my favorites. She uses facts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Why is
@HillaryClinton getting a free pass because she "claims" she did not know about the C, for confidential when she says herself, she has had extensive training? She lied again!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC373ASBXs8 … -
It's Cookie Monster's fault. He told her "C" is for "Cookie."
-
I can think of other things C stands for.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
which fact would that be? The one Hillary lied, or the one she lied?
-
But Trump Russia
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.