I have always believed in you, supported you until now. That statement, which seeks to further widen the divisiveness of our country, as well as ignore the implications of an article where Kavanaugh wrote about
-
-
-
“Whether the Constitution allows indictment of a sitting president is debatable,” Judge Kavanaugh wrote in a 1998 law review article. The
#GOP has lost all semblance of reason, accountability and respect for the#RuleOfLawhttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/09/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-trump.html … -
A convenient candidate for someone who thinks he’s above the law!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Way to issue a statement that really brings people together. I’m your constituent. You still haven’t responded to any of my extremely civil calls or letters.
-
Me neither! Omaha resident here...he doesn’t care!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Reminder
@BenSasse we hold the Lex Luthor comments only for@GovRicketts See: https://youtu.be/2_jqALy1Gu8 (thank you@iamjohnoliver)
New conversation -
-
-
How soon you forget about the Republicans and how they wouldn't even grant Merrick Garland a hearing. You have no room to talk about the left and their response to Kavanaugh!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But seriously— where’s your statement? Why haven’t you called me back about the babies in detention camps? How are you qualified to represent me and Nebraskans?? The.worst.
-
He’s never called me back either - and I’ve called several times.
-
It's almost like Republicans don't care about voters.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
History will judge you all very harshly if you vote to confirm a
#SCOTUS who lied under oath multiple times. He should be indicted not confirmed. Aside from the fact he was nominated by a un-indicted co-conspirer#NoToKavanaugh#NoKavanaugh#KavanaughLied#StopKavanaughpic.twitter.com/KqcUSWmg0EThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am more concerned about his views on the executive branch’s power. Presidents are not above the law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are a hypocrite, you refused to even meet with Merrick Garland. How do you justify that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why, Senator, would you say such things about the left at this time. Great job in being the divider, just as trump always does. Wow.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Senator, you can’t make a serious positive statement about Kavanagh without getting in some jabs to own the libs? Very mature? Is Kavanagh good for Republicans or good for America?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anti-anti-Trump to the bitter end. Sasse hackery is near Rubio status.
-
He calls that a serious statement!?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He is, by all accounts, a believer in empowering executive branch, and that sitting presidents shouldn't be bothered by being subject to the law. Do you seriously think he is the right person at this time? Also he is clearly partisan.
-
So much for 'checks an balances'.
-
But ben Sasse is a constitutional warrior and he talked a lot about the principle of separation of powers, at least while Obama was president. Yawn.
-
Sasse: Obama's Supreme Court nominee 'dead on arrival'
-
When did he say that?
-
"I think that the president's nominee to the Supreme Court is obviously dead on arrival," Sasse said during a brief media availability at the UNL College of Law. March 2016
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.