Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Vaccine. 2018 Dec 18;36(52):8047-8053. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.093. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

Influenza vaccine effectiveness among patients with high-risk medical conditions in the United States, 2012-2016.

Author information

1
Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, United States; Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States.
2
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States.
3
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
4
University of Michigan and Henry Ford Health System, United States.
5
Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, United States.
6
Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University Health Science Center College of Medicine, United States.
7
University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences and UPMC, United States.
8
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, United States. Electronic address: bflannery@cdc.gov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Annual influenza vaccination has been recommended for persons with high-risk conditions since the 1960s. However, few estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) for persons with high-risk conditions are available.

METHODS:

Data from the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network from 2012 to 2016 were analyzed to compare VE of standard-dose inactivated vaccines against medically-attended influenza among patients aged ≥6 months with and without high-risk medical conditions. Patients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza by RT-PCR. Presence of high-risk conditions and vaccination status were obtained from medical records. VE by influenza virus type/subtype and age group was calculated for patients with and without high-risk conditions using the test-negative design. Interaction terms were used to test for differences in VE by high-risk conditions.

RESULTS:

Overall, 9643 (38%) of 25,369 patients enrolled during four influenza seasons had high-risk conditions; 2213 (23%) tested positive for influenza infection. For all ages, VE against any influenza was lower among patients with high-risk conditions (41%, 95% CI: 35-47%) than those without (48%, 95% CI: 43-52%; P-for-interaction = 0.02). For children aged <18 years, VE against any influenza was 51% (95% CI: 39-61%) and 52% (95% CI: 39-61%) among those with and without high-risk conditions, respectively (P-for-interaction = 0.54). For adults aged ≥18 years, VE against any influenza was 38% (95% CI: 30-45%) and 44% (95% CI: 38-50%) among those with and without high-risk conditions, respectively (P-for-interaction = 0.21). For both children aged <18 and adults aged ≥18 years, VEs against illness related to influenza A(H3N2), A(H1N1)pdm09, and influenza B virus infection were similar among those with and without high-risk conditions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Influenza vaccination provided protection against medically-attended influenza among patients with high-risk conditions, at levels approaching those observed among patients without high-risk conditions. Results from our analysis support recommendations of annual vaccination for patients with high-risk conditions.

KEYWORDS:

Acute respiratory illness; High-risk medical conditions; Influenza; Vaccine; Vaccine effectiveness

PMID:
30420119
PMCID:
PMC6282182
[Available on 2019-12-18]
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.093

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for NIH Library Go
Loading ...
Support Center