|
Disclaimer: Not all the authors of the research papers and conference
presentations are affiliated with BLS. This information is provided
for your convenience and does not necessarily reflect the views or
policies of BLS.
Research Experimental Poverty Thresholds
Overview
Since 1995, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has been conducting
research on the development of experimental expenditure-based poverty
thresholds known as the National Academy of Science (NAS) Thresholds.
The early work was based on recommendations of the 1995 NAS report
Measuring Poverty: A New Approach, (Citro and Michael 1995).
More recently, the Interagency Technical Working Group (ITWG)
provided a framework for a second set of poverty thresholds as part
of the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM). The ITWG's
recommendations are outlined in the document "Observations from the
Interagency Technical Working Group on Developing a Supplemental
Poverty Measure" (PDF).
A guiding principle for the development of the SPM is that resources
and thresholds be consistently defined.
Both the NAS and ITWG documents refer to the U.S. Consumer Expenditure
Survey (CE) as the basis for these expenditure-based poverty
thresholds. The documents also note that BLS is responsible for
conducting research on expenditure-based poverty thresholds, and for
providing these thresholds to the U.S. Census Bureau for use in
producing research experimental poverty statistics. The ITWG
acknowledged that the BLS had produced the NAS thresholds in the
past and expected that the BLS would continue to play this role for
the SPM.
Within the BLS, the Division of Price and Index Number Research (DPINR)
conducts all expenditure-based poverty threshold research. Support
regarding the CE data is provided, as needed, by staff within the
Division of Consumer Expenditure Surveys. DPINR research is
conducted in consultation and cooperation with U.S. Census Bureau
researchers.
Research Experimental poverty thresholds are presented with a
caveat: what appears on this BLS web page does not reflect the
rigors of production quality thresholds or related statistics. For such
thresholds to be produced, a broader BLS endeavor would need to be
created that coordinates the development of improvements in, and the
production and dissemination of, expenditure-based SPM thresholds.
This effort would include support for: research economists to devise
and test suggested improvements in the thresholds and share this
research with the economics and statistics profession at large, as
well as the general public; IT staff to design, code, test, and
provide diagnostic statistics; statistical methods staff to develop
measures of data and statistical quality; and economists to analyze
the data, produce the thresholds and related statistics, and
disseminate the thresholds to the public. As part of this effort,
improvements in the CE Survey would need to be introduced to better
capture information to meet the needs of the SPM such as those
related to the receipt of in-kind benefits. Currently, BLS produces the
SPM thresholds using Consumer Expenditure (CE) Survey Interview data as an
experimental research product, since production quality thresholds cannot
not be produced within existing resources.
On this web page, recently produced BLS-DPINR Research Experimental
expenditure-based poverty thresholds are presented along with papers and
presentations related to these. Much of the research was conducted
by BLS in cooperation with U.S. Census Bureau staff and other
academic researchers. Again, as noted above, the thresholds
developed and described in the research papers and conference
presentations are not produced using standard BLS production
procedures.
This BLS website hosts the BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM
thresholds (see below), while the U.S. Census Bureau website hosts
the official measure (
https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty.html ) and
Research Experimental NAS poverty thresholds (
https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2016/demo/supplemental-poverty-measure/nas-2016.html
). On october 2018, the Bureau of the Census releases the SPM
poverty statistics based on the BLS-DPINR thresholds.
Background
The official poverty measure of the United States was first developed
in the early 1960s and adopted as "official" in 1969. The official
poverty threshold was determined to be the dollar value of a
minimally adequate diet times three. The multiplier of three was
used because 1955 Food Consumption Survey data showed that food
expenditures accounted for one-third of after-tax income for an
average family with children. An annual threshold of about $3,100
for a family with two adults and two children was set as the
standard of need for 1963, and has been fixed in inflation-adjusted
terms since then. The U.S. Census Bureau is responsible for
publishing official annual poverty thresholds, rates, and other
statistics.
The NAS recommendations provide the framework for a definition of the
SPM. However, research over the years has suggested modifications to
the NAS recommendations; the modifications are discussed in detail
in the ITWG document. The SPM is not intended to replace the
official poverty measure but is to be considered a work in progress,
with the expectation that there will be improvements to it over
time. Changes in the SPM are to be decided upon in a process led by
research economists, survey methodologists, and statisticians within
the U.S. Census Bureau in consultation with BLS and with other
appropriate data agencies and outside experts, and will be based on
solid analytical evidence.
BLS-DPINR Research Experimental Supplemental Poverty
Measure (SPM) Thresholds
BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM thresholds are based on consumer
unit out-of-pocket expenditures for food, clothing, shelter, and
utilities (FCSU), and a multiplier to account for the expenditures of
other basic goods and services, like those for household supplies,
personal care, and non-work related transportation. The Census
Bureau compares resources to thresholds to assess whether consumer
units can meet their needs as defined by the SPM thresholds. If a
consumer unit is unable to meet these needs, it is considered poor.
Currently the SPM resource measure counts not only money income that
can be used to meet out-of-pocket FCSU expenditures, but also the
value of in-kind benefits to meet FCSU needs through the use of these
benefits. In-kind benefits added to net income by the Census Bureau
include benefits from: Low Income Housing Energy Assistance Program
(LIHEAP), National School Lunch Program (NSLP), Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP), Women, Infants, and Children Program (WIC),
and rental assistance from government sources. SNAP benefit values
are implicitly included in food expenditures in calculating the SPM
thresholds; however, in-kind benefits from the other programs are not
considered. This is because the Consumer Expenditure Interview
Survey collects limited to no information on the receipt of these
additional benefits. Current research is ongoing to develop
approaches to account for these in-kind benefits in SPM thresholds.
Once these benefits are accounted for in SPM thresholds, consistency
in the thresholds and resources will be achieved.
For each threshold year, five years of quarterly U.S. Consumer
Expenditure Interview Survey data are used. Expenditures are updated to
annual threshold year dollars using the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U).
BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM thresholds are based on a range of
FCSU expenditures centered on the 33rd percentile for the estimation
sample of consumer units (CUs). The NAS-based thresholds are derived
using a percentage of the median of FCSU expenditures. Also, unlike
the earlier NAS-based thresholds that were based on spending by
families with two adults and two children, the SPM estimation sample
is composed of CUs with two children and any number of adults.
Equivalence scales are used to convert the estimation sample FCSU
expenditures to those of reference consumer units composed of two
adults and two children.
A three-parameter equivalence scale, proposed by Betson (1996), is used
to adjust FCSU expenditures for each consumer unit in the estimation
sample. The parameters allow for the differing needs of adults and
children and for economies of scale for consumption within the
consumer unit. A distinguishing feature of the three-parameter
equivalence scale is the adjustment for single parents; no
adjustment for single parents was included in the two-parameter
scale proposed by the NAS Panel. The three-parameter equivalence
scale has been used in the production of the NAS and SPM thresholds
in the past (e.g., Garner 2010). Directly below, we present the
three-parameter equivalence scale that is applied to the estimation
sample for the production of the BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM
thresholds:
Single adults with children scale = (1 + a +
β(K-1))f
Multiple adults with children scale = (A +
βK)f
where
a = parameter to account for the needs of the first child,
β = parameter to account for the needs of additional
children,
f = parameter to account for economies of scale within the
consumer unit,
A = number of adults within the consumer unit, and
K = number of children within the consumer unit
The parameters a, β, and f were estimated by
Betson to fit the cost of children literature, and when rounded, were
selected to be 0.8, 0.5, and 0.7, respectively.
Separate BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM thresholds for consumer
units with two adults and two children are produced for owners with
mortgages, owners without mortgages, and renters. The BLS-DPINR Research
Experimental SPM housing tenure thresholds are produced using the
equation below.
SPM Thresholdh = 1.2 * FCSU
E - (S + U) E + (S + U) h
1.2 = multiplier used to account for expenditures
for other basic goods and services, like those for household
supplies, personal care, and non-work related
transportation.
FCSU, S, and U refer to the means
of the sum of expenditures for food, clothing, shelter and
utilities, and the shelter and utilities portions of FCSU,
respectively, for the estimation of sample CUs within the
30th to 36th percentile range of FCSU
expenditures.
E refers to consumer units in the estimation sample
within the 30th to 36th percentile
range of FCSU equivalized
expenditures.
h refers to one of three housing tenure
groups:
Owners with mortgages Owners without
mortgages, or Renters.
To test for a significant change in the threshold from the previous
year, or to make a comparison between thresholds within a year, one
would conduct a Z-test. The test statistics are specified below, for
each type of comparison. First, to test for the statistical
difference in thresholds from one year to the next (e.g., SPM renter
thresholds in 2017 as compared to 2016), simply divide the difference in
the thresholds for time t and t-1 by the standard error of the
year-to-year difference.
Z Renters , t , t-1 = (SPM Renters
, t - SPM Renters , t-1 ) / Standard
error Renters , t, t-1
For a statistical comparison of thresholds within year t (e.g., renter
thresholds compared to owner without mortgage thresholds), simply
divide the difference in the two thresholds within the year by the
standard error of the difference between the two housing tenure
groups that is listed for the current threshold year.
Z Renters compared to Owners without mortgages , t
=
(SPM Renters , t - SPM Owner without
mortgages , t ) / Standard error Renters compared to
Owners without mortgages , t
Research Experimental SPM thresholds for 2009-2010 were first posted to
the BLS website in table format in November 2011. Thresholds for
2005-2008 were added shortly thereafter. Ever since, the time series
has been supplemented by an additional year's threshold each year
after the release of CE public use data.
The BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM thresholds and associated
standard errors can be found through the links below. Also
available are the expenditure shares of each of the components of
the thresholds. Please note that use of all of the significant digits
presented in the spreadsheets are necessary for inclusion in
calculations; precision will affect the resulting dollar value.
- BLS-DPINR Research Experimental SPM Thresholds with Housing
Tenure Shares (XLSX)
- Standard Errors (XLSX)
- Expenditure Shares (XLSX)
The weighted share distribution of consumer units by housing tenure for
the SPM thresholds for each year is included in the "BLS-DPINR
Research Experimental SPM Thresholds with Housing Tenure Shares"
file. This is included to facilitate the calculation of a weighted
average of the three SPM thresholds for users who are interested in
FCSU threshold that does not account for housing tenure. Note: The ITWG
included the recommendation for the production of three housing tenure
thresholds, not a single threshold. A weighted average of a particular
component of the SPM thresholds (i.e., food, clothing, shelter,
utilities) can be computed using the housing tenure distributional
weights along with the housing tenure specific component from the
"Expenditure Shares" file below. For example, a weighted average of
Shelter across the three housing tenure groups would be calculated
as follows:
S W = (P Owners with mortgages
* S Owners with mortgages * SPM Owners with
mortgages)
+(P Owners without mortgages * S Owners
without mortgages * SPM Owners without
mortgages)
+(P Renters * S Renters * SPM
Renters)
where
S W = weighted average of shelter share in
SPM threshold
P = weighted share distribution of consumer units by
housing tenure
S = shelter component share of SPM threshold for housing
group
SPM = SPM threshold for housing
group
Research Papers
- Alternative Poverty Measurement for the U.S.: Focus on Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds
(PDF)
Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Papers 510. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor Statistics. September, 2018.
- Controlling for Prices before Estimating SPM Thresholds and the Impact on SPM Poverty Statistics
(PDF)
Society of Government Economists. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Juan D Munoz Henao, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 19, 2018.
- Varying Economies of Scale in Housing: The Impact on Poverty Statistics
(PDF)
Society for the Study of Economic Inequality. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trudi Renwick, U.S. Census Bureau. February 15, 2017.
- Changing the Housing Share of Poverty Thresholds for the Supplemental Poverty Measure: Does Consumer Unit Size Matter?
(PDF)
Southern Economics Association. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trudi Renwick, U.S. Census Bureau. November 19, 2016.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds and Noncash
Benefits (PDF)
The Supplemental Poverty Measure Workshop, Brookings
Institution, Washington, DC, April 26, 2016. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
- Consistency in Supplemental Poverty Measurement: Adding
Imputed In-Kind Benefits to Thresholds and Impact on Poverty Rates
for the United States (PDF)
Joint Statistical Meetings, Seattle, WA, August 9, 2015. Thesia
I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measurement: Adding Imputed In-Kind
Benefits to Thresholds and Impact on Poverty Rates for the
United States (PDF)
Sixth ECINEQ Meeting, July 6, 2015. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measure Under Alternate Treatments of Medical Out-of-Pocket Expenditures
(PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. December 30, 2013.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measure: A Joint Project between
the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (PDF)
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau
of Labor Statistics. June 8, 2012.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Imputing School
Lunch and WIC Benefits to the Consumer Expenditure Survey Using
Current Population Survey (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Charles
Hokayem, Census Bureau. July 2012.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Imputing Noncash
Benefits to the Consumer Expenditure Survey Using Current
Population Survey-Parts I and II (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Charles
Hokayem, Census Bureau. September 2011.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measure: Examining the Incidence
and Depth of Poverty in the U.S. Taking Account of Taxes and
Transfers (PDF)
Kathleen Short, Census Bureau. June 2011.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Laying the
Foundation (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
2010.
- Setting and Updating Modern Poverty Thresholds (PDF)
BLS Working Papers. March 2010. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. David Betson, University of
Notre Dame.
- Housing and Poverty Thresholds: Different Potions for
Different Notions (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. David
Betson, University of Notre Dame. 2010.
- Note on Standard Errors and Other Relevant Statistics of
Experimental Poverty Thresholds Produced at the Bureau of Labor
Statistics: 2006 to 2008 (PDF)
BLS Working Papers. March 2010.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Identifying the Poor: Poverty Measurement for the U.S. from
1996 to 2005 (PDF)
The Review of income and wealth,
Volume 56, Issue 2, pages 237-258, June 2010. Thesia
I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census
Bureau.
- A Note on the Movement in Median FCSU Expenditures from 2006
to 2007 (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
2009.
- Reconciling User Costs and Rental Equivalence: Evidence from
the US Consumer Expenditure Survey (PDF
1.1 MB)
Thesia I. Garner and Randal Verbrugge,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2008.
- Creating a Consistent Poverty Measure over Time Using NAS
Procedures: 1996-2005 (PDF)
BLS Working Papers. April 2008.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short,
Census Bureau.
- Comparing Approaches to Value Owner-Occupied Housing Using
U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey Data (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Uri
Kogan, Northwestern University.
- What Do We Know About the Value of Owner Occupied Housing
Services? Rental Equivalence and Other Approaches (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. Uri Kogan, Northwestern
University.
- Developing a New Poverty Line for the USA: Are There Lessons
for India? (PDF)
BLS Working Papers. March 2005.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short,
Census Bureau.
- Personal Assessments of Minimum Income and Expenses: What Do
They Tell Us about 'Minimum Living' Thresholds and Equivalence
Scales? (PDF)
BLS Working Papers. March 2005.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short,
Census Bureau.
- The Role of Housing in Developing Poverty Thresholds
1993-2003 (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
2005.
- Experimental poverty measures: accounting for medical
expenditures (PDF)
Monthly Labor Review, Volume 125, No. 8. August 2002.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Owner-Occupied Shelter in Experimental Poverty
Measures (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. 2001.
- Report on Experimental Poverty Measures 1990 to
1997 (PDF)
Kathleen S. Short and John Iceland, Census Bureau.
Richard Bavier, Office of Management and Budget.
Thesia I. Garner and Patricia Rozaklis, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Donald J. Hernandez, SUNY at Albany.
2001.
- Experimental poverty measure for the 1990s (PDF)
Monthly Labor Review, Volume 121, No. 3. March 1998.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau. Stephanie Shipp, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Charles Nelson, Census Bureau.
Geoffrey Paulin, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- An experimental Consumer Price Index for the poor
(PDF)
Monthly Labor Review, Volume 119, No. 9. September 1996.
Thesia I. Garner, David S. Johnson, and Mary F.
Kokoski, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- "Is Everything Relative?" The Role of Equivalence Scales in
Poverty Measurement (PDF)
David M. Betson, University of Notre Dame.
Conference Presentations
- Moving to the Median and Expanding the Estimation Sample: The Case for Changing the Expenditures Underlying SPM Thresholds
(PDF)
Southern Economics Association. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Liana Fox, U.S. Census Bureau. November 20, 2018.
- Controlling for Prices before Estimating SPM Thresholds and the Impact on SPM Poverty
Statistics
(PDF)
Society of Government Economists. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Juan D Munoz Henao, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 20, 2018.
- Moving to the Median and Expanding the Estimation Sample: The Case for Changing the Expenditures
Underlying SPM Thresholds
(PDF)
Statistics
FCSM 2018 Research and Policy Conference. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Liana Fox, U.S. Census Bureau. March 7-9, 2018.
- Varying the Economies of Scale in Housing: Impact on
Supplemental Poverty Measure Statistics (PDF)
Seventh Meeting of the Society for the Study of
Economic Inequality, New York, NY. Jul. 17-19, 2017. Thesia
I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, U.S. Census
Bureau.
- Alternative Poverty Measurement for the U.S.: Focus on
Supplemental Poverty Thresholds (PDF)
Western Economic Association 13th International
Conference, Santiago, Chile. Jan. 3-6, 2017. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trudi Renwick, U.S. Census Bureau.
- Changing the Housing Share of Poverty Thresholds for the Supplemental Poverty Measure: Does Consumer Unit Size Matter?
(PDF)
Southern Economics Association. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trudi Renwick, U.S. Census Bureau. November 19, 2016.
- Supplemental Poverty Measurement (SPM) Thresholds and a
Missing Data Problem (PDF)
6th Annual BLS-Census Workshop on Empirical Research
using BLS-Census data, Washington, DC, June 6, 2016. Thesia I.
Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of
Labor Statistics.
- SPM Thresholds: Imputing Subsidies to the Consumer
Expenditure Survey for Poverty Measurement (PDF)
Society of Government Economists Annual Conference,
Washington, DC, May 13, 2016. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds and Noncash
Benefits (PDF)
The Supplemental Poverty Measure Workshop, Brookings
Institution, Washington, DC, April 26, 2016. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- Measuring Medical Expenses: MOOP in Thresholds vs. MOOP
Subtractions (PDF)
Measuring Poverty in the 21st Century Conference
Stanford Center on Poverty & Inequality, Stanford, CA, March
11, 2016. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- The Rationale for the Current Poverty Threshold (PDF)
Measuring Poverty in the 21st Century Conference
Stanford Center on Poverty & Inequality, Stanford, CA, March
11, 2016. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Imputing In-Kind
Government Transfers from CPS Public Use Data to CE (PDF)
Eastern Economic Association Annual Meetings,
Washington, DC, February 26, 2016. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measurement: Adding Imputed In-Kind
Benefits to Thresholds and Impact on Poverty Rates for the
United States (PDF)
Joint Statistical Meetings, Seattle, WA, August 9,
2015.Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Marisa Gudrais,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census
Bureau.
- Supplemental Poverty Measurement
Thresholds: Research at the BLS (PDF)
APDU Annual Conference, Rosslyn, VA. Sep. 17,
2014. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- The Supplemental Poverty Measure Under Alternate Treatments
of Medical Out-of-Pocket Expenditures (PDF)
Allied Social Science Association (ASSA) Meetings,
Philadelphia, PA. Jan. 4, 2014. Thesia I. Garner and
Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short,
Census Bureau.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM): Threshold
Issues (PDF)
Brookings/Census Bureau Meetings on
Improved Poverty Measurement, Washington, D.C. Nov. 7, 2011.
Thesia I. Garner and Marisa Gudrais, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Laying the
Foundation (PDF)
Allied Social Science Association Annual Meetings,
Denver, CO. Jan. 8, 2011. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Moving to a Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM): Research on
Thresholds for 2008 (PDF)
Southern Economics Association Annual Meeting,
Atlanta, GA. Nov 10, 2010. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Housing and Poverty Thresholds: Different Potions for
Different Notions (PDF)
Midwestern Economics Association Annual Meeting,
Evanston, IL. Mar 20, 2010. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. David Betson, University of Notre
Dame.
- Setting and Updating Modern Poverty Thresholds (PDF)
Annual Meeting of the Allied Social Science
Associations (ASSA), Atlanta, GA. Jan 3, 2010.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. David Betson,
University of Notre Dame.
- Poverty Threshold Alternatives/Choices (PDF
1.6 MB)
Brookings/Census Bureau Conference on
Improved Poverty Measurement. Oct 20, 2009.
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- National Academy of Sciences (NAS)-Based Poverty Thresholds:
Details of Alternatives and Choices in Specification
(PDF)
Joint Statistical Meetings, Washington, DC. Aug 3,
2009. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- Reconciling User Costs and Rental Equivalence: Evidence from
the US Consumer Expenditure Survey (PDF)
Annual Meeting of the Allied Social Science
Associations, San Francisco, CA. Jan 4, 2009.
Thesia I. Garner and Randal Verbrugge, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- Accounting for Housing Services in Consumption and
Income (PDF)
ASSA-SGE Annual Meetings, New Orleans, LA. Jan 6,
2008. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Sylvester Young, International Labour
Organization.
- Comparing Approaches to Value Owner-Occupied Housing Using
U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey Data (PDF)
ASSA-SGE Annual Meetings, Chicago, IL. Jan 7,
2007. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Uri Kogan, Northwestern University.
- What Do We Know About the Value of Owner-occupied Housing
Services? Rental Equivalence and Other Approaches (PDF)
Annual Meeting of the Southern Economics Association,
Charleston, SC. Nov 18, 2006. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
Uri Kogan, Northwestern University.
- The Role of Housing in Poverty Thresholds:
1993-2003 (PDF)
Annual Meeting of the Southern Economics Association,
Washington, DC. Nov 19, 2005. Thesia I. Garner,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Developing Poverty Thresholds (PDF)
JSM, Social Statistics Section, Minneapolis, MN. Aug
10, 2005. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
- Incorporating the Value of Owner-Occupied Housing in Poverty
Measurement (PDF)
Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kathleen S.
Short, Census Bureau. 2004.
- Owner-Occupied Shelter in Experimental Poverty Measurement
with a ?Look? at Inequality and Poverty (PDF)
Southern Economics Association Conference, Tampa, FL. Nov 18,
2001. Thesia I. Garner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Kathleen S. Short, Census Bureau.
Last Modified Date: November 20, 2018
|