Thirty years after being imprisoned by the United
States government because of the happenstance
of his ancestry, Norman Y. Mineta helped
change forever the inner workings of the United States
House of Representatives. Over a 20-year career in the
House, the San Jose Congressman worked to make the
federal lawmaking process more accountable. From the
federal budget to the nation’s highway system, Mineta
and his generation of reform-minded legislators redefined
expectations on Capitol Hill. With the moral authority
derived from having been unjustly incarcerated as a child,
Mineta convinced Congress to address wartime internment
and helped the country understand the sins of its past.
Norman Yoshio Mineta was born in San Jose,
California, on November 12, 1931, the youngest of five
children, to Kunisaku and Kane Mineta. His father,
Kunisaku, had arrived from Japan by himself as a teenager
29 years earlier, finding work in a number of jobs before
saving up enough money to start his own insurance
business in San Jose.1 Mineta’s family settled in the heart
of the city’s largely Japanese neighborhood. Because
California law prevented Asian immigrants from owning
property in the state, a local attorney held the house in
his name until he signed everything over to Mineta’s
eldest sister, who was a U.S. citizen by birth, when she
turned 21.2
Growing up, Mineta attended the San Jose public
schools, and every day after class he spent an hour learning
Japanese. Over dinner the Minetas would discuss the day’s
events, and at night their neighbors would often come
over to talk about issues facing the community. “My dad
was the breadwinner, the community leader, the father
who encouraged all of us to participate in community
activities,” Mineta later remembered. His mother, Kane,
was equally active in San Jose’s social life, serving on the
Parent-Teacher Association, volunteering with the church,
and raising money for the American Red Cross.3
But the San Jose community his parents had nurtured
was ripped apart on December 7, 1941, when Japan
bombed the American military base at Pearl Harbor,
Hawaii. Federal officials panicked and ordered the U.S.
military to relocate 120,000 Japanese Americans living
on the mainland to prison camps often hundreds of miles
away from their homes.4
Within six months after Pearl Harbor, the government
had suspended the Minetas’ business license, seized
their bank accounts, and moved them out of San Jose.
Neighbors disappeared. Mineta’s father worried he would
never see his family or his home again. Dressed in his Cub
Scout uniform, Mineta and his parents were first sent to
the Santa Anita racetrack outside Los Angeles, forced to
live in small barracks and shower near the horse stables.
Even as a boy, Mineta felt the heavy weight of injustice,
questioning the presence of armed guards. In the fall of
1942, the government moved the Minetas to a new site in
Heart Mountain, Wyoming, their home for the next three
years. It was cold and cramped, but they carved out some
semblance of a community.5
After the war, the Minetas returned to San Jose and
began the arduous task of rebuilding their lives. Slowly
they and their neighbors reopened businesses and, as the
Congressman said years later, “[regained] our standing
in the community.” They worked to move on from their
imprisonment, focusing their energy on the future. Mineta
estimated that it took 20 years for his community to
recapture what it had lost in 1942.6 Sixty years later, he was
asked if his internment influenced his decision to go into
public service. “No question it did,” he replied.7
Back home, Mineta enrolled at San Jose High School
and served as student body president during his senior year. He stayed close to home for college, graduating from the
University of California, Berkeley, in 1953 before serving
three years as an Army intelligence officer during the
Korean War.8 When he returned to San Jose, Mineta joined
his father’s insurance firm and began exploring a possible
entry into local politics.9 Mineta had two sons, David and
Stuart, with his first wife. When he married his second
wife, Danealia, the Congressman welcomed two stepsons,
Bob and Mark Brantner.
Early in his life, Mineta had been a staunch Republican.
After all, he later said, “It was the damn Democrats that
stuck us in those damn camps.”10 But in the 1960s, Mineta
grew frustrated with the GOP’s approach to the great social
issues of the day and left the party.11 From 1962 to 1964,
Mineta served on San Jose’s human relations commission,
and from 1966 to 1967, he sat on the board of directors
of the city’s housing authority. That year he jumped to the
city council, where he served double duty as vice mayor
from 1968 to 1971.12
In the spring of 1971, Mineta entered a crowded
15-candidate field to succeed San Jose’s outgoing mayor.
Mineta’s career in local government gave him wide name
recognition, and he won the support of a number of
San Jose’s service organizations. In the two decades since
Mineta finished college, San Jose and surrounding Santa
Clara County had transformed from farm country into
a textbook case of suburban sprawl. Its population had
tripled, stressing the public services provided by local
government.13 On Election Day, Mineta took an early lead
and never lost it, tallying 62 percent of the vote despite
anemic turnout.14 “It’s been full circle,” Mineta said of his
victory 30 years after being interned.15
As mayor, Mineta clamped down on San Jose’s runaway
development. He worked to funnel growth back toward
the city’s center, tightening zoning requirements and
passing a “pay-as-you-grow” tax to cover the cost of
additional public services.16
By the early 1970s, Mineta had become part of a
new generation of leaders working to redefine political
power in America, calling for greater transparency and
accountability. He belonged to a number of national
organizations, negotiating with the federal government
to protect grants to public housing and transportation
initiatives. In July 1972, he was one of 16 mayors to meet
with President Richard M. Nixon about the costs of rapid
development and the possibility that the federal government
would kick back billions in revenue to the cities.17
Like his jump to the mayor’s office, Mineta moved
to the House after the incumbent, Republican Charles
S. Gubser, decided to retire. And once again Mineta’s
work in San Jose’s local government gave him an early
advantage. California’s 13th District leaned Republican,
but Mineta’s success in managing the city’s growth, paired
with his work on the national circuit, made him widely
popular at home. The district stretched south and east
away from San Francisco Bay, encompassing Santa Clara
County. It also sat astride the southeastern edge of Silicon
Valley, the creative tech corridor that became an economic
juggernaut by the time Mineta retired. His Republican
challenger, George W. Milias, was a well-liked former state
assemblyman who had the misfortune of once serving in
the Nixon administration. With the Watergate scandal
dominating the headlines, Milias could not escape from
Nixon’s shadow, and Mineta won with almost 53 percent
of the vote. Mineta’s first election was the closest of his
career. He took anywhere from 58 percent (in 1978) to 70
percent (in 1986) of the vote in every subsequent election.18
In his first term, Democratic leadership placed Mineta
on the Public Works and Transportation Committee, a
seat he held for his entire career; he became chairman
during the 103rd Congress (1993–1995). During the 94th
Congress (1975–1977), Mineta also served on the Post
Office and Civil Service Committee before transferring
to the Budget Committee, where he spent the next six
years (1977–1983). In only his second term, Mineta was
appointed by new Speaker Thomas P. (Tip) O’Neill of
Massachusetts to the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence, serving on the highly secretive panel until he
stepped down in 1985. Beginning in 1983, Mineta also
spent a decade on the Science and Technology Committee
(later named the Science, Space, and Technology
Committee), a key assignment for a Member representing part of Silicon Valley. In 1993 Mineta stepped down from
Science, Space, and Technology to take over the gavel of
the Public Works Committee.19
As part of the largest Democratic wave in years, Mineta
was one of the most promising prospects in a crowd of
bright lawmakers. On average, the Watergate Babies,
as his highly motivated class of 1975 was called, were
15 years younger than the existing membership. They
saw themselves as a political vanguard, and collectively
they embodied the deep distrust voters had toward their
government.20 Mineta’s generation of lawmakers valued
accountability and accessibility, but perhaps none more
so than him. “It goes back to my own experience in terms
of the evacuation and the internment of those of Japanese
ancestry,” he said years later. “We didn’t have access to our
political leaders at the time.”21
In the 1970s, however, it was the criminal activities of
the Nixon White House, the ongoing war in Vietnam, and
the old, impenetrable seniority system on Capitol Hill. The
new Members promised to reform all of it and to restore
confidence in the government.22 “We came to Congress on
a tide of change,” Mineta told the Los Angeles Times in the
summer of 1975, “and there was a sense of euphoria about
the Age of Aquarius having hit Capitol Hill.”23
For the first 30 days of the new Congress, the reformminded
freshmen seemed on course to redefine the art of
the possible. They ousted three long-standing committee
chairs, brought other chairmen to heel, and weakened
the influence of the Ways and Means Committee.24 In
June, after House Democrats failed to override a series of
presidential vetoes, Mineta’s cohort elected him president
of the Democratic freshman class for a six-month term,
hoping the former military intelligence analyst and “selfdescribed
activist” could organize the freshmen into a
potent voting bloc.25 “Procedural changes have nothing to
do with whether the lot of the unemployed gets better or if
education gets better,” he said. “In terms of what we have
been able to get through, it bothers me that we haven’t had
the programs that benefit people out in the streets.”26
In one of his first acts as leader of the freshman class,
Mineta drew up a “six-point plan” he hoped would harness
the restless energy of the young legislators. Nearly every
recommendation sought to empower the rank and file.
Mineta called for fact-finding roundtables with policy
experts and “opinion leaders,” regular meetings between
freshman officers and the Democratic leadership, stricter
oversight of committee activities, a commitment to
developing policy in the Democratic Caucus, the creation of
national “truth squads” to promote Democratic legislation,
and the publication of a freshman newsletter.27 It was “a
pledge,” he said, “not to allow things to go on as usual, to
reassert Congress as a coequal branch of government.”28
Mineta helped manage expectations and built rapport
between the older and younger generations. While some
freshmen talked about removing Carl Albert of Oklahoma
from the speakership, Mineta was one of a handful of new
California Democrats to reaffirm his commitment to the
existing leadership.29 Mineta was known around the Hill
as “energetic, competent, and levelheaded” without being
overbearing. He and Speaker Albert had a personal history
that dated back to the 1950s. Mineta’s brother-in-law
knew the Speaker “real well,” and Mineta’s sister babysat
for the Albert family.30 Midway through his first term as he
was running for re-election in June of 1976, Mineta had
Majority Leader O’Neill come out to California to help
campaign. During a lull in the trip, while O’Neill and a
group of legislators relaxed around a hotel pool in San Jose,
Mineta broke some surprising news: “Tip,” he said, “I just
heard on the radio that Carl Albert is retiring. Let me be
the first one to support you for Speaker.”31
Still, he kept leadership on its toes. The way Mineta saw
it, years of Democratic control in the House had nurtured
a class of party leaders who lost touch with the rank and
file. “When was the last time Carl Albert or Tip O’Neill
had opposition?” Mineta was quoted as saying in a frontpage
article in the New York Times.32
Television, which pulled back the curtain on the
political system, became a sticking point between the
two generations. “Albert and O’Neill did not grow up in
television land,” Mineta pointed out. “They can go in and
tell a few jokes and buy a few rounds of drinks and people
love them and they get re-elected. But we’re the products of a different era and a different system.” It was a system
that rewarded new ways of thinking.33 “More and more
demands are being made by the public,” Mineta said.
“Watergate heightened the accountability syndrome.”34
Mineta’s early congressional career illustrated just
how successful his class was at reforming internal House
procedure, especially the committee system. With O’Neill
serving as Speaker and the seniority system under attack,
Mineta’s leadership prospects improved rapidly. In only
his second term during the 95th Congress (1977–1979),
Mineta was appointed chairman of the Public Works and
Transportation Committee’s Subcommittee on Public
Buildings and Grounds, marking the start of a long
reign as a subcommittee chairman. In fact, from 1977
until he became chairman of the full Public Works and
Transportation Committee in 1993, Mineta served as
chairman of four Public Works subcommittees over the
course of eight consecutive Congresses : the Subcommittee
on Public Buildings and Grounds (95th Congress), the
Subcommittee on Oversight and Review (96th Congress
[1979–1981]), the Subcommittee on Aviation (97th–100th Congresses [1981–1989]), and the Subcommittee
on Surface Transportation (101st–102nd Congresses
[1991–1995]).
Mineta’s leadership extended to the Budget Committee
as well. Traditionally, the White House managed the
federal budget, but after entitlement spending exploded
and the Vietnam War dragged on, Congress began formally
monitoring legislation that affected the ebb and flow of the
country’s finances.35 Almost from the start, Mineta was at
the forefront of the House’s new oversight responsibility.
In the 96th and 97th Congresses, he held the gavel of
Budget’s Task Force on the Budget Process (the committee
called its subcommittees Task Forces), giving him a
powerful bird’s-eye view of how the federal government
managed its money.36
Even with his growing profile, Mineta did not hesitate
to keep the pressure on his own party. “I see a vacuum
right now,” he told the Washington Post just a few days after
the 96th Congress convened. “Just a lot of tinkering and
holding patterns.”37
It was around that time that Mineta saw his stock rise
considerably. In early 1979, he was part of a “damage
assessment squad” that squeezed House leadership for
answers as to why California Democrats missed out on
preferred committee assignments.38 Later that year the
Washington Post named Mineta as a likely candidate for
Transportation Secretary.39 By 1980, he was short-listed
for either chairman of the House Budget Committee or
the Democratic Whip’s office.40 Writing a year later, David
Broder, one of the country’s leading political journalists,
noted that, “At 49, Norman Mineta of California is
perhaps the most widely admired Democrat to enter the
House of Representatives in the 1970s. . . . Many of his
contemporaries regard him as a future prospect for Speaker
of the House.”41
Mineta was soon ensconced in party leadership. He
was a utility player on the Democratic Whip team, having
been named Deputy Whip-at-Large in the 97th Congress
(1981–1983); he quickly moved up a rank and spent the
rest of his House career as Deputy Whip.42 Moreover,
in late 1980, Speaker O’Neill appointed Mineta to the
powerful Democratic Steering and Policy Committee,
where he helped shape the House’s legislative agenda.43
The California Democrat later had roles in the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee and flirted with a run
for party Whip.44
If Mineta’s early entry into leadership signaled a new era
in party mechanics, his work in committees reinforced his
generation’s influence on policy. The Budget Committee,
created a few years earlier in 1974, was somewhat
uncharted territory for the House, but that sort of
independence seemed to fit Mineta’s legislative style. “The
new members are very selective,” he said in May 1977.
“A number of us feel that we don’t have to go along with
the New Deal approach of throwing money at a problem,
hoping it will go away. We want to target our resources.”45
The federal budget process was an arcane, but
immensely powerful, mechanism, and over the course
of his four years as chairman of the Budget Process Task
Force, Mineta became an ardent supporter of Congress’s
oversight responsibilities. On Capitol Hill, he became a counterweight to the budget philosophy in the Ronald
Reagan administration, warning that if Congress didn’t
assert itself and make a few changes to the budget process
it risked being replaced by White House economists or
what he called “a toothless balanced budget constitutional
amendment.” Mineta’s solutions included a mix of
reforms to binding resolutions, the reconciliation and
appropriations processes, and the act of impounding
unspent funds.46
As Task Force chairman, Mineta loathed the idea of
a balanced budget amendment. “The Constitution is a
marvelously simple document, defining only the most
basic human rights and the most fundamental structures
of government,” he observed in testimony submitted
to the House Judiciary Committee. A balanced budget
amendment was neither of those things, he said, and
would “only … cheapen the highest law of our Nation.”
In fact, Mineta argued that a balanced budget amendment
would strip Congress of the very control it wanted (the
ability to run deficits was key).47 Instead, Mineta advocated
for sunset laws giving legislators the ability to phase out
spending and tax programs deemed unnecessary.48 “It’s
more the badness, not the bigness, of government that is
bothering people,” Mineta said as far back as 1976.49
Mineta was front and center during budget negotiations
with the Reagan administration. In 1979 he helped
shepherd the Democrats’ budget through the House. A
year later, he was a member of the “Gang of Five” and, in
1982, part of the “Gang of Four,” leading the House effort
to protect domestic spending. As Speaker O’Neill readily
admitted in 1980, a no vote from Mineta could sway any
number of other Democrats.50
When Mineta’s term on Budget expired, he moved to
the Science and Technology Committee. Smartphones
and laptops were still decades away, but many of the
products coming out of his district were going increasingly
mainstream. Mineta was at the forefront of changes to
intellectual property law as it applied to the tech industry.
As early as 1983, back when Silicon Valley was known
as “California’s so-called Silicon Valley,” he introduced
legislation to protect the revolutionary designs of computer
chips being made in his district.51 “Technology is moving
so fast the government has no ability to keep track of it,”
Mineta said a few years later.52 By the early 1990s, Mineta
and his Republican colleague from nearby Stanford,
Thomas Campbell, had won “reputations as torch-bearers
for Silicon Valley companies.”53 Mineta, Vice President Al
Gore once said, “was Silicon Valley before Silicon Valley
was cool.”54
Mineta, however, made his most lasting contributions
on the Public Works and Transportation Committee, first
at the head of its Aviation and Surface and Transportation
Subcommittees and then as full committee chairman.
Mineta had pioneered smart-growth policies back in San
Jose, making Public Works something of a natural home
for the former mayor. The committee was also deceptively
powerful. With control over the nation’s infrastructure,
it could authorize any number of new projects—roads,
federal buildings, airports—which meant a fresh source of
jobs for each district.55
Mineta first led the Subcommittee on Public Buildings
and Grounds, but jumped to the Subcommittee on
Oversight and Review after one term, bringing with him
the drive for openness and accountability. “Oversight
requires patient and detailed and continuing effort,” he
said during the subcommittee’s organizational meeting
in early 1979, “but I am absolutely convinced that it
need not be dull or unimaginative.”56 His jurisdiction
spread far and wide across every policy area of every
one of the subcommittees : water pollution, public mass
transit, aviation safety, flood control, America’s highways,
disaster relief, and public buildings and grounds. The
subcommittee held 12 open hearings and heard from
nearly 240 witnesses over a combined 34 days.57
Mineta jumped to the Subcommittee on Aviation in the
next Congress, starting what would become an eight-year
reign as chairman. His subcommittee work reads like a
deeply researched market summary of the airline industry,
one that prioritized safety and its long-term viability. More
than anything, Mineta wanted to make sure the Federal
Aviation Administration and other regulatory agencies had the
resources they needed to ensure the safety of airline passengers.
Mineta tallied a number of early legislative victories on
Aviation, often using his expertise in the budget process
to his advantage. As part of the budget reconciliation
in 1981, Congress agreed to the Airport Development
Authorization Act, which included $450 million for new
and improved airports. A year later, Mineta helped attach
the Airport and Airway Improvement Act to the Tax
Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, providing
nearly $20 billion from an industry trust to help limit
“wide-spread congestion and delays” at America’s airports.58
Over the next six years, two dozen bills that went before
Mineta’s Aviation Subcommittee became law.
When Mineta took over the gavel of the Subcommittee
on Surface Transportation during the 101st Congress (1989–1991), the future of America’s roads in “the post-Interstate
period” became his most immediate concern. Mineta also
considered “high speed transportation corridors,” pipeline
safety, sanitary food, and hazardous waste transportation.
After two days of hearings, Mineta also worked to include
transportation protections in the landmark Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.59 “The Americans With Disabilities
Act gives us a unique opportunity to complete the work that
we first started when we passed the Civil Rights Act some
twenty-five years ago,” he said in his opening statement
during the bill’s first hearing.60
Along with a number of smaller bills that became
law during the next Congress, Mineta’s major legislative
victory in 1991 was the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act, which addressed an issue he had wrestled
with since his time as mayor.61 It was a huge, “revolutionary”
law that gave state and local governments more control over
the roadways in their districts and authorized vast amounts
of money—$151 billion over six years—for a number of
different projects. It set the foundation for the National
Highway System (NHS) by combining the interstate
highway system with a web of other federally funded roads.62
After years of success at the subcommittee level, Mineta
sought the chairmanship of the full committee before the
start of the 102nd Congress (1991–1993), challenging
the sitting chairman, 77-year-old Glenn M. Anderson of
California, who had represented the Long Beach area since
1969. Mineta’s bid was partly successful: The Democratic
Caucus voted Anderson out, but handed the committee to
Robert Roe of New Jersey instead. Roe, however, was not
keen on fighting Mineta and retired after just one term as
committee chairman.63
Mineta pooled his two decades of experience on Public
Works and Transportation and took over the gavel as
chairman of the committee for the 103rd Congress. Having
led four different subcommittees during his tenure on Public
Works, he was fluent in the policy and deeply connected to
the issues.
As chairman, Mineta ruled a vast and influential empire.
Public Works and Transportation was the largest committee in
the House during the 103rd Congress, bigger than either the
spending or tax-writing committees. Seven other Californians
served with him (three Democrats and four Republicans),
and 30 of the 50 states as well as the U.S. Virgin Islands
and the District of Columbia were represented on the
committee.64 His jurisdiction included flood control, roads,
bridges, dams, public buildings—everything from airports
to post offices to the Smithsonian Institution.
Mineta’s focus as committee chairman was to prepare the
government to meet the sure-to-be weighty demands
of the upcoming 21st century. More than anything, he
felt the need to make up for lost time. The Cold War
had dominated America’s discretionary spending for
decades, and money that might have gone to improve the
country’s infrastructure went elsewhere. “Maintenance, new
technologies, and leadership suffered often because,
in real terms, we had to try to do more with less,”
Mineta remembered.
Looking forward, he identified two lingering hurdles.
“The first challenge,” he reiterated, “is to make up for a
quarter century of trending downward in infrastructure
investments, a trend which has seen the Federal
commitment as a share of Gross Domestic Product
decline by half. The second challenge is to look ahead to
plan for the future with flexibility, with less interference
from Washington into local decision-making, and with
justification and public scrutiny at the national level for
the policies we recommend and enact.”65
Given the size and scope of the committee’s jurisdiction,
Mineta saw a tsunami of legislation during the 103rd
Congress. House Parliamentarians referred almost 400
bills to Public Works and Transportation, which resulted
in 165 hearings and markups; 53 of the 62 bills the
committee reported to the full House became law. The
panel also approved 168 committee resolutions covering
everything from erosion control studies to improvements
to federal buildings.66
While some of the legislation was as simple as naming post
offices or courthouses, Mineta’s committee could generate
large amounts of goodwill simply by approving a new road or
bridge for a Member’s district. Mineta guarded this jurisdiction
closely, and in 1993, during the annual appropriations process,
he got into a very public turf war with Representative Bob Carr
of Michigan, who chaired the Appropriations’ Subcommittee
on Transportation. Congressional authorizers like Mineta
determine which agencies and which programs receive
federal funding, while appropriators like Carr dole out
money for the upcoming fiscal year.
In the House, it is considered bad form for appropriators
to clear funding for projects that have not been vetted
by an authorizing committee. But in late June, Mineta
accused Carr of including hundreds of millions of dollars
for the upcoming fiscal year that the Public Works and
Transportation Committee had never approved. Mineta
quickly convinced the Rules Committee to remove all
unauthorized earmarks from the funding bill. Within
the month, House leaders were forced to pull it from the
floor completely after Mineta doubled down on what
he called “backroom political deal-making.”67 House
leaders eventually sent the bill back to the Appropriations
Committee for changes.68
By September tensions were still high, and the House
had yet to vote on the transportation bill. Mineta cast the
fight as one about “process and rules”; Carr said it was all
about “ego.”69 Unable to forge a compromise between the
two lawmakers, Speaker Tom Foley of Washington and
House leadership ultimately sided with Mineta.70 “The
episode,” wrote the Congress-watchers at CQ Almanac,
“appeared to give the Public Works Committee veto power
over new highway projects, allowing it to block funding for
any specific project not included in one of the committee’s
authorization bills.” It was, CQ said, “a sweeping victory.”
Mineta agreed to reform part of how his committee
approved projects, but for the most part the chairman from
San Jose had substantially increased his influence.71
The very next year Mineta ran headlong into an
obstinate Senate over a popular highway bill. Back when he
chaired the Surface Transportation Subcommittee during
the 102nd Congress, Mineta had cleared a bill that created
the National Highway System, which targeted federal
funding for the most heavily used and most commercially
important roads in America. Congress had until 1995 to
determine which highways would fall under the NHS,
and while most routes had already been selected, Mineta’s
committee wanted to add a host of new routes to the
system. After sifting through Member requests for nearly
300 new road and transit programs, Mineta unveiled a $2
billion bill in mid-May 1994. Demonstrating just how
popular Mineta’s committee was, the full House approved
the highway bill two weeks later by a huge 400-vote
majority. The Senate, however, balked at the bill, and talks
between the two chambers failed.72
Outside his immediate committee jurisdiction, Mineta
worked to correct what he considered one of America’s
worst injustices : the forced internment of Japanese
Americans during World War II. For Mineta, this was
about as personal an issue as he dealt with in Congress.
In the late 1970s, Mineta passed a bill crediting the time
internees spent in the camps toward their civil service
retirement benefits. Around the same time, a grassroots
movement started to pressure the government to formally
apologize for its policy of internment and ask for redress.
Working alongside Hawaiian Senators Daniel K. Inouye
and Spark M. Matsunaga, and California Representative
Robert T. Matsui, Mineta helped pass a bill to study the
wartime relocation and internment to generate awareness
and develop policy.73
Out of that study came the Civil Liberties Act of
1988, authorizing the government to pay $20,000 to
every surviving internee ($1.2 billion total). It also required a formal apology for the policy of internment,
had the Justice Department clear criminal records
from internment, and set aside millions to fund public
education initiatives.74 Mineta was the first person to testify
before the House Judiciary Committee about the effect
of internment, underscoring the “shame” and “damaged
honor” felt by two generations of Japanese Americans for
being wrongfully imprisoned.75 It was an intensely personal
bill, but Mineta voted present during its final passage to
avoid a conflict of interest.76
After Republicans swept the 1994 elections and took
the majority in the House for the first time in decades,
Mineta retired from Congress on October 10, 1995. He
worked in the policy shop of a major defense contractor
after leaving the House, and in 2000 President Bill Clinton
named him Commerce Secretary. After two years in the
Clinton administration, Mineta joined the George W.
Bush administration as Transportation Secretary—the
only Democrat in Bush’s Cabinet—serving from 2001
until 2006. “There are no Democratic or Republican
highways,” Mineta liked to say, “no such thing as
Republican or Democratic traffic congestion.”77 Shortly
after Mineta stepped down, President Bush awarded him
the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his years of public
service. Norman Mineta died on May 3, 2022, in Edgewater, Md.
View Record in the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress
[ Top ]