The Negroes’ Temporary Farewell: Jim Crow and the Exclusion of African Americans from Congress, 1887–1929
On December 5, 1887, for the first time in almost two decades, Congress convened without an African-American Member. “All the men who stood up in awkward squads to be sworn in on Monday had white faces,” noted a correspondent for the Philadelphia Record who witnessed 317 Members of the 50th Congress (1887–1889) take the oath of office on the House Floor. “The negro is not only out of Congress, he is practically out of politics.”1 Although three black Representatives served in the very next Congress, the total number of African Americans serving on Capitol Hill diminished significantly as the congressional focus on racial equality faded in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
![John Mercer Langston](https://webharvest.gov/congress117th/20221111041419im_/https://historycms2.house.gov/assets/40981.jpeg?wd=190)
In the decade after the 1876 presidential election, the Republican-dominated state governments in the South, which had provided the basis for black political participation during Reconstruction, were undermined by former Confederates and their sympathizers who rebuilt the Democratic Party and seized control of southern state governments by brutally suppressing black voters and eliminating the power of the Republican Party below the Mason-Dixon line. The electoral crisis of 1876 also revealed fissures within the GOP, as many party stalwarts focused on commercial issues rather than on the civil rights agenda previously pursued by the Radical Republicans. This period marked the beginning of a “multi-generational deterioration” of the relationship between black and white Republicans.2 By the 1890s, most African Americans had either been barred from or abandoned electoral politics as extralegal violence and economic reprisals became a constant threat.
![Puck Illustrated Airship](https://webharvest.gov/congress117th/20221111041419im_/https://historycms2.house.gov/assets/40991.jpeg?wd=280)
Jim Crow
![The Jim Crow Minstrel](https://webharvest.gov/congress117th/20221111041419im_/https://historycms2.house.gov/assets/40967.jpeg?wd=190)
Virtually all the political advances afforded freedmen during Reconstruction were rolled back and eradicated during the years after 1890. In the South, the races were separated even more systematically and rigidly than during slavery. Many blacks were reduced to a second-class citizenship that the white ruling class repeatedly exploited for political and economic purposes. As C. Vann Woodward wrote in 1955, in one of the first scholarly reinterpretations of this period, Jim Crow laws “did not assign the subordinate group a fixed status in society. They were constantly pushing the Negro farther down.”5
Footnotes
1“The Negro in Politics,” 12 December 1887, Washington Post: 5.
2Michael K. Fauntroy, Republicans and the Black Vote (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007): 41.
3C. Vann Woodward, The Strange Career of Jim Crow (1955; repr., New York: Oxford University Press, 2002): 82.
4A rich historical literature details this process. Aside from The Strange Career of Jim Crow, see Woodward’s seminal work, The Origins of the New South, 1877–1913 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 1951) and Edward Ayers, The Promise of the New South: Life After Reconstruction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). For African-American political activism in the South from slavery into the Jim Crow and Great Migration eras, see Steven Hahn’s A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles from Slavery to the Great Migration (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2003).
5Woodward, The Strange Career of Jim Crow: 108.