N/A=Not Applicable
0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good
4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Nonconformances
are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of
Agency resources |
|
Poor |
Overall
compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract
requirements |
|
Fair |
Overall
compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract
requirements |
|
Good |
Overall
compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
|
Excellent |
There are
no quality problems |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable
0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good
4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Ability to
manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements,
despite use of Agency resources |
|
Poor |
Ability to
manage cost issues requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of
contract requirements |
|
Fair |
Ability to
control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of
contract requirements |
|
Good |
Management
of cost issues does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
|
Excellent |
There are
no cost management issues |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable
0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good
4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Delays are
jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency
resources |
|
Poor |
Delays require
major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
|
Fair |
Delays
require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
|
Good |
Delays do
not impact achievement of contract requirements |
|
Excellent |
There are
no delays |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Response
to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective |
|
Poor |
Response
to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective |
|
Fair |
Response
to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective |
|
Good |
Response
to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective |
|
Excellent |
Response
to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable
0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good
4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Noncompliance
is jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite Agency
intervention |
|
Poor |
Overall
compliance requires major Agency intervention to ensure achievement of
contract requirements |
|
Fair |
Overall
compliance requires minor Agency intervention to ensure achievement of
contract requirements |
|
Good |
Overall
compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
|
Excellent |
There are
no compliance issues |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Inadequate
safety program/equipment/training is ineffective and jeopardizes the
achievement of the contract requirements |
|
Poor |
Overall
compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure corrective action when
safety deficiencies are identified |
|
Fair |
Overall
compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure corrective action when
safety deficiencies are identified |
|
Good |
Safety
program/equipment/training and corrective action of safety deficiencies are
usually effective |
|
Excellent |
There are
no compliance issues with safety standards |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
|
Unsatisfactory |
Nonconformances
are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of
Agency resources |
|
Poor |
Overall
compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract
requirements |
|
Fair |
Overall
compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract
requirements |
|
Good |
Overall
compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
|
Excellent |
There are
no problems |
|
Outstanding |
The
contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies
adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
performance levels described as "Excellent". |