page views since 01/17/03
Table of Contents
Bureau of Transportation
Statistics
1. Reporting of Airline
Delays and Cancellations under 14 CFR Part 234
Federal Aviation
Administration
2. Fuel System Vent
Fire Protection
3. Improved Survival
Equipment for Inadvertent Water Landings
4. Retrofit of Improved
Seats in Air Carrier Transport Category Airplanes
5. Drug Enforcement
Assistance
6. Revision of Part
108, Aircraft Operator Security
7. Revision of Part
107, Airport Security
8. Aging Aircraft
Safety
9. Aircraft Ground
Deicing and Anti-Icing Program
10. Corrosion
Prevention and Control Program
11. Revised Access To
Type III Exits
12. National Air Tour
Safety Standards
13. Training and
Checking In Ground Icing Conditions - (Deicing - Part 135)
14. Revision of
Emergency Evacuation Demonstration Procedures to Improve Participant Safety
15. National Parks Air
Tour Management
16. Flight Crewmember
Duty Limitations and Rest Requirements
17. False and
Misleading Statements Regarding Aircraft Parts
18. Identical Security
Measures
19. Noise Limitations
for Aircraft Operations in the Vicinity of Grand Canyon National Park
20. Prohibition of the
Transportation of Devices Designed as Chemical Generators as Cargo in Aircraft
21. Licensing and
Safety Requirements for Launch
22. Revised Standards
for Cargo or Baggage Compartments in Transport Category Airplanes
23. Child Restraint
Systems
24. Screening of
Checked Baggage on Flights Within the United States (CAPPS)
25. Policy Regarding
Airport Rates and Charges
26. Certification of
Screening Companies
27. Revisions to
Digital Flight Data Recorder Regulations for Boeing 737 Airplanes and for Part
125 Operations
28. Collision Avoidance
Systems for Cargo Airplanes
29. Improved
Flammability Standards for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation Materials Used in
Transport Category Airplanes
30. Certification of
Airports
31. Air Tour Operations
in State of Hawaii
32. Regulation of
Aircraft Fractional Ownership Programs
33. Flight Simulation
Device Initial and Continuing Qualification and Use
34. Certification of
Pilots, Aircraft, and Repairmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft
35. Revisions to
Passenger Facility Charge Rule for Compensation to Air Carriers
36. Aircraft Security
and Screening of Passengers and Accessible Property
37. Criminal History
Background Checks
38. Screeners
Qualifications, Training and Testing
39. Enhanced Security
Procedures for Operations at Certain Airports in the Washington D.C.
Metropolitan Area
40. Security Programs
for Charter Operations Using Aircraft 12,500 Pounds and Over
41. Transponder
Continuous Operation
42. Reduced Vertical
Separation Minimum in United States Domestic Airspace
43. Security
Considerations for the Flightdeck on Foreign Operated Transport Category
Airplanes
44. Picture
Identification Requirements
45. Limitation on
Construction or Alteration in the Vicinity of the Private Residence of the
President of the United States
46. Revocation of Pilot
Certificates or Denial of an Application Based on Security Disqualification
47. Revisions to
Cockpit Voice Recorder and Digital Flight Data Recorder Regulations
Federal Highway
Administration
48. Federal Lands
Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the National Park Service and
the Park Roads and Parkways Program
49. Federal Lands
Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Bureau of Indian Affairs
and the Indian Reservation Roads Program
50. Federal Lands
Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife Service
and Refuge Roads Program
51. Federal Lands
Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Forest Service and the
Forest Highway Programs
52. Statewide
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning
53. NEPA and Related
Procedures for Transportation Decisionmaking, Protection of Public Parks,
Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges, and Historic Sites
54. Design-Build
Contracting
55. Railroad-Highway
Crossing Projects
56. National Bridge
Inspection Standards
57. Designation of
Dromedary Equipped Truck Tractor-Semitrailers as Specialized Equipment
58. Statewide
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning
Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration
59. Commercial Driver's
License Standards; Biometric Identifier
60. Qualification of
Drivers; Vision
61. Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations; General Transportation of Hazardous Materials
62. Minimum Training
Requirements for Operators and Training Instructors of Multiple Trailer
Combination Vehicles
63. Training for
Entry-Level Drivers of Commercial Motor Vehicles
64. Commercial Driver
Physical Fitness As Part Of The CDL Process
65. Railroad-Highway
Grade Crossing Safety
66. Unified
Registration System
67. Hours of Service of
Drivers; Drivers Rest and Sleep for Safe Operations
68. English Language
Requirement; Qualifications of Drivers
69. Transportation of
Household Goods; Consumer Protection Regulations
70. Application by
Certain Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers to Operate Beyond U.S. Minicipalities
and Commercial Zones on the U.S.-Mexico Border
71. Safety Monitoring
System and Compliance Initiative for Mexican Motor Carriers Operating in the
United States
72. General
Requirements; Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Intermodal Container Chassis
and Trailers
73. Rules of Practice
for Motor Carrier Proceedings; Investigations; Disqualifications and Penalties
74. Post Accident
Controlled Substances and Alcohol Test Results; Reporting Requirements for the
Fatality Analysis Reporting System
75. Safety Requirements
for Operators of Small Passenger Carrying Commercial Motor Vehicles Used in
Interstate Commerce
76. Interstate School
Bus Safety
77. New Entrant Safety
Assurance Process
78. Certification of
Safety Auditors, Safety Investigators, and Safety Inspectors
79. Parts and
Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Certification of Compliance with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs)
80. Limitations on the
Issuance of Commercial Driver Licenses with a Hazardous Materials Endorsement
81. Penalties, Inspection,
and Decal Display Requirements for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers
82. Hazardous Material
Route Plans
83. Hours of Service of
Drivers; Supporting Documents
84. Registration
Enforcement
Federal Railroad
Administration
85. Whistle Bans at
Highway-Rail Grade Crossings
86. Standards for
Development and Use of Processor-Based Signal and Train Control Systems
87. Locational
Requirement for Dispatching of United States Rail Operations
88. Application of
Random Testing and Other Alcohol and Drug Regulations to Employees of Foreign
Railroads
89. Minimum Standards
for Temperature in the Locomotive Cab
Federal Transit
Administration
90. Bus Testing Program
91. NEPA and Related
Procedures for Transportation Decision-Making; Protection of Public Works, Wildlife
and Waterfowl Refuges, and Historic Sites
92. Clean Fuels Formula
Grant Program
93. Statewide
Metropolitan Transportation Planning
94. Statewide
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning
Maritime Administration
95. Cargo Preference
Regulations-Carriage of Agricultural Exports
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration
96. Crashworthiness
Ratings
97. Flammability of
Interior Materials in School Buses
98. Platform Lift
Requirements
99. Fuel Economy
Standards- Rights and Responsibilities of Manufacturers in the Context of
Changes in Corporate Relationships
100. FMVSS: Head
Restraints (Height and Distance Requirements)
101. Frontal Offset
Protection
102. Reporting of
Information and Documents About Potential Defects Retention of Records That
Could Indicate Defects
103. TREAD; Tire Safety
Information
104. Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards; Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems; Controls and
Displays
105. Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems
106. Operation of Motor
Vehicles by Intoxicated Persons
107. Light Truck
Average Fuel Economy Standard, Model Year 2005-10
108. Event Data
Recorders
109. Consumer
Information Regulations; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Rollover
Resistance
110. Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems
111. FMVSS No. 208
Advanced Air Bag Petitions for Reconsideration (Part 1)
Office of the Secretary
112. Direct Air Carrier
Responsibility for Returning Stranded Charter Passengers
113. Enforcement Policy
on Rebating
114. Price Advertising
115. Procedures for
Transportation Workplace Drug-Testing Programs
116. Accessibility of
Passenger Vessels to Individuals with Disabilities
117. Transportation for
Individuals with Disabilities (Accessibility Guidelines)
118. Domestic Passenger
Manifest Information
119. Computer
Reservations System Regulations
120. Aviation Data
Requirements Review and Modernization Program
121. Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and other Non-Profit Organizations
122. Response to
Comments: Procedures for Compensation of Air Carriers
123. Withdrawal of
Proposed Rulemaking Actions; Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age, Charter
Transportation, Notice of Terms of Contract of Carriage Part 399--Statement of
General Policy, Simplified Airline Counter Sign Notices, Rules of Practice in
Board Proceedings--Fees and Charges for Special Services; and Statements of
General Policy, Baggage Liability Notices in International Air Transportation,
Price Advertising, Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug Testing
Programs, and Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities.
Research and Special
Programs Administration
124. Consolidation of
Specifications for High-Pressure Seamless Cylinders and Rewrite (Section 610
Review)
125. Safeguarding Food
from Contamination During Transportation
126. Response Plans for
Onshore Oil Pipelines
127. Applicability of
the Hazardous Materials Regulations to Loading, Unloading, and Storage
128. Pipeline Safety:
Recommendations to Change Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards
129. Hazardous
Materials: Revisions to Standards for Infectious Substances
130. Hazardous
Materials: Transportation of Oxygen Cylinders on Aircraft
131. External Product
Piping on Cargo Tanks Transporting Flammable Liquids
132. Hazardous
Materials: Reduction of Registration Fees
133. Pipeline Safety:
Pipeline Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas (Gas Transmission
Pipeline Operators)
Transportation Security
Administration
134. Imposition and
Collection of Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fees
135. Aviation Security
Infrastructure Fees
136. Civil Aviation
Security Rules
137. Security Programs
for Aircraft with a Maximum Certificated Takeoff Weight of 12,500 Pounds or
More
138. Request for
Comments: Private Charter Security Rules
139. Fingerprint-Based
Criminal History Records Checks: Regular Escorted Access
140. Protection of
Sensitive Security Information for All Modes of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard
141. Discharge-Removal
Equipment for Vessels Carrying Oil
142. Escort Vessels for
Certain Oil Tankers
143. Escort Vessels in
Certain U.S. Waters
144. Marine
Transportation - Related Facility Response Plans, and Response Equipment for
Hazardous Substances
145. Tank Vessel
Response Plans for Hazardous Substances
146. Implementation of
the 1995 Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW)
147. Salvage and Marine
Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response Plans for Oil
148. Emergency Response
Plans for Passenger Vessels
149. Improvements to
Marine Safety in Puget Sound-Area Waters
150. Lease Financing
for Vessels Engaged in the Coastwise Trade
151. Tank Level or
Pressure Monitoring Devices
152. Standards for
Living Organisms in Ship's Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters
153. Automatic
Identification System Carriage Requirement
154. Penalties for
Non-Submission of Ballast Water Management Reports
Bureau of Transportation
Statistics |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Bureau of Transportation
Statistics |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Reporting
of Airline Delays (Part 234) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2139-AA09 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would modify the
reporting requirements in 14 CFR Part 234 to require air carriers that file
airline service quality performance reports under Part 234 to collect and
report the causes of airline delays and cancellations. Currently, there is a
lack of data on the causes of airline delays and cancellations. This
rulemaking would fill the data gaps for airline delays and cancellations and
provide this information to the public and other interested parties. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||
2. |
|
||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Fuel Sys
Protection |
|||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AA49 |
|||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 02/02/1995; End of Comment Period 06/02/1995. |
|||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes to require fuel vent
system protection during post-crash ground fires and to require design
features that would ensure shutoff of the engine fuel supply at the fuel tank
during engine shutdown. |
|||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/06/1982 |
|||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 54591 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flotation
Devices |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AC72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 06/30/1988; End of Comment Period 11/28/1988. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement
the requirement in the Airport and Airway Safety Act of 1987 that the
Department initiate rulemaking to consider standards for life preservers and
rafts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/30/1987 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Retrofit
of Improved Seats |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AC84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/17/88; End of Comment Period 10/14/88; Reopening of
Comment Period 10/30/98; End of Reopened Comment Period 01/09/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate of the Airport and Airway Safety Act of 1987 that the
Department initiate rulemaking by April 28, 1988, to consider requiring all
air carrier aircraft to replace existing seats with new designs that would be
more crashworthy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/30/1987 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Drug Enf
Assistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AD16 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 03/12/1990; End of Comment Period 05/11/1990. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would revise
certain requirements covering registration of aircraft, certification of
pilots, and penalties associated with registration and certification
violations. This rulemaking would also respond to the Federal Aviation
Administration Drug Enforcement Act of 1988 (the Act). The revised
requirements would assist law enforcement agencies' efforts to stop drug
trafficking in general aviation aircraft. The FAA is currently considering
seeking modifications to the Act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/18/1988 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
6. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Security/Carriers Part 108 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AD45 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 08/01/1997; End of Comment Period 11/1/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
existing airplane operator security rules. It would revise certain
applicability provisions, definitions, and terms; reorganize these rules into
subparts containing related requirements; and incorporate some requirements
already implemented in air carrier approved security programs. Specifically,
this proposal would increase the number of air carriers that must have security
programs to include all that enplane from or deplane into a sterile area.
Further, it would clarify the following: training requirements for air
carrier security personnel; procedures for transporting passengers under
armed escort; procedures for allowing law enforcement personnel to fly armed;
and procedures for air carriers to acknowledge receipt of Federal Aviation
Administration security directives. It would require air carriers to
implement and test security contingency plans. As these rules should apply to
operators of rotorcraft as well as fixed-wing aircraft, this proposal would
change the title of these rules from "Airplane Operator Security"
to "Aircraft Operator Security." The intent is to enhance security
for the traveling public, air carriers, and persons employed by or conducting
business at public airports by increasing awareness of and compliance with
civil aviation security measures. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/02/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 66 FR 37330 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
7. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Security/Airports Part 107 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AD46 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 08/01/1997; End of Comment Period 11/1/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
existing airport security rules. It would revise certain applicability
provisions, definitions, and terms; reorganize these rules into subparts
containing related requirements; and incorporate some requirements already
implemented in airport security programs. It also would incorporate certain
new measures that would provide for better security. Specifically, it would
clearly define the areas of the airport in which security interests are the
most critical and where security measures should be the most stringent. It
would modify access control requirements by allowing secondary access media,
modify escort procedures for individuals without access authority, and expand
the requirement for an identification system to include a challenge system.
Further, it would clarify the following: training requirements for airport
security personnel; the role of the airport security coordinator; procedures
for airport operators to comply with Federal Aviation Administration security
directives; procedures for responding to and evaluating threats; and the need
to review and test security contingency plans. The intent is to enhance
security for the traveling public, air carriers, and persons employed by or
conducting business at public airports by increasing awareness of and
compliance with civil aviation security measures. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 66 FR 37274 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Aging
Aircraft |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AE42 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/05/1993; End of Comment Period 02/02/1994; Reopening
Comment Period 02/08/1994; End of Reopened Comment Period 3/04/1994. NPRM/2:
Publication Date 4/02/1999; End of Comment Period 8/02/1999; Reopening of
Comment Period 8/18/1999; End of Reopened Comment Period 10/08/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requires
airplanes operated under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part
121, U.S.-registered multiengine airplanes operated under 14 CFR part 129,
and multiengine airplanes used in scheduled operations under 14 CFR part 135
to undergo inspections and records reviews by the Administrator or a
designated representative after their 14th year in service and at specified
intervals thereafter. These inspections and records reviews will ensure that
the maintenance of these airplanes' age-sensitive parts and components has
been adequate and timely. The final rule also prohibits operation of these
airplanes after specified deadlines unless damage-tolerance-based inspections
and procedures are included in their maintenance or inspection programs.
Operators of airplanes initially certificated with nine or fewer passenger
seats, however, may incorporate service-history-based inspections instead of
damage-tolerance-based inspections and procedures in those airplanes'
maintenance or inspection programs. This final rule does not apply to
airplanes operated between any point within the State of Alaska and any other
point within the State of Alaska. This rule represents a critical step toward
compliance with the Aging Aircraft Safety Act of 1991 and helps to ensure the
continuing airworthiness of aging airplanes operating in scheduled service. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/28/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Deicing
(Part 121 operators) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AE70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/23/1992; End of Comment Period 8/7/1992. Interim Final
Rule: Publication Date 09/29/1992; End of Comment Period 4/15/1993. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking established a
requirement for part 121 certificate holders to develop an FAA-approved
ground deicing/anti-icing plan and to comply with that plan any time
conditions are such that frost, ice, or snow could adhere to the aircraft's
wings, control surfaces, or propellers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/08/1992 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Corrosion
Control |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AE92 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
that the maintenance or inspection programs for all airplanes operated under
part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, all U.S. -registered
multiengine airplanes operated in common carriage by foreign air carriers or
foreign persons under 14 CFR part 129, and all multiengine airplanes used in
scheduled operations under 14 CFR part 135 include FAA-approved corrosion
prevention and control programs. Such programs are needed because existing
maintenance and inspection programs may not provide comprehensive, systematic
measures to prevent and control corrosion. The rulemaking would form a part
of the FAA's response to the Aging Aircraft Safety Act of 1991. These actions
are intended to control the detrimental effects of corrosion and the
resulting airplane structural material loss. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/28/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||
11. |
|
||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Type III
Exits |
|||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF01 |
|||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 1/30/1995; End of Comment Period 5/1/1995. |
|||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have
adjusted recently adopted requirements for access to Type III emergency exits
(typically smaller over-wing exits) in transport category airplanes with 60
or more passenger seats. These adjustments reflect additional data derived
from a series of tests conducted at the FAA's Civil Aeromedical Institute
(CAMI) subsequent to the adoption of these requirements and are intended to
relieve an unnecessary economic burden. This rulemaking was withdrawn because
CAMI research on the issues is still ongoing and the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) is currently considering a recommendation for a
harmonized proposal on the issues addressed by Notice No. 95-1. ARAC will
make its recommendation after completion of a FAA research program to study
access to Type III exists. The FAA has determined that it should wait and see
if some future regulatory action including the broader scope of this
harmonized proposal would better server the public interest. |
|||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/30/1992 |
|||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 22363 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Air Tour
Safety |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: In this rulemaking, the FAA will
respond to NTSB recommendations. FAA is seeking information on air tour and
sightseeing operations that are currently allowed to operate under less
stringent regulations than those applied to other types of commercial
operations. Over the past decade, the number of these operations, and the
number of accidents and incidents associated with these operations, have
increased. Hot air balloons and gliders would not be included. (Note: This
rulemaking was formerly called "Sightseeing Operations.") |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/25/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||
13. |
|
||||||||
Popular
Title:
Deicing-Part 135 |
|||||||||
RIN
2120-AF09 |
|||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 12/30/1993; End of Comment Period 04/15/1994. |
|||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requires part 125
and 135 certificate holders to provide pilot testing on conducting operations
in ground icing conditions. This rulemaking also requires part 125 and 135
certificate holders to check airplanes for contamination before takeoff when
ground icing conditions exist. |
|||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/26/1993 |
|||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 67 FR 54946 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
14. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Emergency
Evacuation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF21 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/18/1995; Correction 08/25/1995; End of Comment Period
10/16/1995. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This final rule would improve participant
safety during full-scale emergency evacuation demonstrations of transport
category airplanes by permitting certain alternative procedures that would
allow a person conducting the demonstrations to react more readily should a
mishap occur. The rule would not impose any additional cost. The purpose of
the rule is to make full-scale emergency evacuation demonstrations safer for
participants, to codify existing practices, and to ensure that each operator
demonstrates the effectiveness of crewmember training by conducting at least
a partial evacuation demonstration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/08/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
15. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: 5,000-Foot
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF46 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 04/27/01; End of comment period 06/11/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FAA is codifying title VIII
of Public Law 106-181, National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 (the
Act), as a new part of its regulations, 14 CFR part 136. This action
finalizes, in cooperation with the National Park Service, a 5,000-ft. above
ground level (AGL) altitude that completes the definition of "commercial
air tour operation" as required by the Act. If an operator conducts an
operation below 5,000 ft. AGL over a national park, and that operation
otherwise meets the statutory definition of a commercial air tour operation,
that operator is defined as a commercial air tour operator and is required to
meet the requirements of the Act and new part 136. This rulemaking is being
reclassified as non-significant and will be deleted from the next report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/05/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flight
Crewmember Duty Time |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF63 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/20/1995; End of Comment Period 03/19/1996; Comment Period
Extended 3/20/1996; End of Extended Comment Period 6/19/1996. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
pilot rest and duty requirements for pilots by ensuring they receive adequate
rest opportunities while assigned to reserve status and by preventing lengthy
duty periods that could contribute to acute and cumulative fatigue. The
rulemaking will propose a definition of "rest period." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
17. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: False
Statements Plane Parts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action proposes additional
rules that would prohibit certain false or misleading statements regarding
civil aircraft, airframes, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances,
component parts, and materials, including standard parts, that are used, or
may be used, on civil aircraft. The proposal would also permit increased
inspection by the FAA of records regarding the quality of aircraft parts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/22/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
18. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Ident.
Security |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 11/23/1998; End of Comment Period 03/23/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Antiterrorism and Effective
Death Penalty Act of 1996 (P. L. 104-132) requires the Administrator to
accept a foreign air carrier's program only if the Administrator finds that
the security program provides for identical security measures to those
provided by U.S. air carriers serving the same airport. The actual measures
to be used would be identified through changes to the nonpublic security
program of the foreign air carriers. Secretary Slater informed Congress by letter
dated June 12, 2000 that action on this rulemaking has been completed. A copy
of that letter is in the docket. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/24/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
19. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: GCNP
Phaseout rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/31/1996; End of Comment Period 03/31/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
noise efficiency limitations for certain aircraft operations at Grand Canyon
National Park (GCNP). It would establish standards for quiet technology that
are reasonably achievable, as mandated by Congress. The standards for quiet
technology would help the National Park Service (NPS) achieve its statutory
mandate to provide for the substantial restoration of natural quiet and
experience in the GCNP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/31/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
20. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Chemical
Generators |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG35 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 08/27/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would ban the
transportation in certain aircraft of devices designed to chemically generate
oxygen that pose a risk of fire. The ban also applies to newly-manufactured
chemical oxygen generators that have never been filled with chemicals and
those that have been discharged to reduce human error in identifying which
canisters are dangerous. This rule complements a December 1996 RSPA
rulemaking prohibiting the transportation of these generators in passenger
carrying aircraft. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
None |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Licensing
Space Launches |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM
published 10/25/00; End of comment period 2/22/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
commercial space transportation regulations governing licensing and safety
requirements for launch from Federal and non-Federal launch sites. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/17/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
67 FR 49456 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||
22. |
|
||||||||
Popular
Title: Rev'd
Cargo/Baggage |
|||||||||
RIN
2120-AG42 |
|||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 06/13/1997; End of Comment Period 9/11/1997. Final Rule
Request for Comments: Publication Date 02/17/1998; End of Comment Period
06/17/1998. |
|||||||||
Summary: Following completion of the
rulemaking with respect to transport category airplanes, this rulemaking
would have upgraded fire safety standards for cargo or baggage compartments
in certain transport category airplanes by eliminating class D compartments
altogether. Compartments that could no longer be designated as Class D would
have had to meet the standards for Class C or Class E compartments, as
applicable. Certain other transport category airplanes would not have to meet
them for use in air carrier, commuter, on-demand, or commercial service. The
FAA determined to withdraw the 135 rulemaking, based on the existing safety
record for these aircraft and a cost/benefit analysis in the light of
comments filed in the proceeding. |
|||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/14/1996 |
|||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 57352 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
23. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Child
Restraint Systems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG43 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 02/18/1998; End of Comment Period 6/18/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would consider
the use of child restraint systems in aircraft during all phases of flight
(i.e., taxi, takeoff, landing, or any other time the seat belt sign is
illuminated). Specifically, the agency would consider information about
existing child restraint systems, the development of new and improved child
restraint systems, and the ease with which existing or new child restraint
systems can be used. The Department is currently considering and coordinating
options for appropriate action. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/29/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
24. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: CAPS/CAPPS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG51 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 04/19/1999; End of Comment Period 06/18/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have
required air carriers to use the Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening
System (CAPPS) where available to screen passenger baggage, or otherwise to
conduct passenger-bag matching. The rule would have applied to aircraft with
61 seats or more. This is a TSA project and TSA is now handling this
withdrawal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/08/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
25. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Airport
Rates |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG58 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPP:
Publication Date 08/12/1998; End of Comment Period 10/13/1998; End of
Extended Comment Period: 03/01/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: In June 1996, the FAA adopted a
policy for evaluating the reasonableness of landing fees and other charges
paid by air carriers to airports. The current action is to consider
replacement provisions for the portions of the 1996 Policy Statement vacated
by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. The Court disallowed a portion
of the policy that had to do with historic cost valuation of airport
property. FAA has determined that the issues in this policy statement should
be addressed in conjunction with the issues involved in congestion pricing in
airports. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/01/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
26. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Screening
Co. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 01/05/2000; End of Comment Period 04/04/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking is in response to
a recommendation by the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and
Security and to a Congressional mandate in the Federal Aviation
Reauthorization Act of 1996. The rulemaking was intended to improve the
screening of passengers, accessible property, checked baggage, and cargo and
to provide standards for consistent high performance and increased screening
company accountability. The rulemaking is being withdrawn because of changed
circumstances. Any further action will be taken by TSA. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/09/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
27. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Data
Flight Data Recorder/B-737 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 11/18/1999; End of Comment Period 12/20/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The rulemaking would amend the
digital flight data recorder (DFDR) regulations for transport category
airplanes to add a requirement for all Boeing 737 (B-737) series airplanes to
record additional flight data parameters. It is based on safety
recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
following the investigations of two accidents and other incidents involving
B-737 aircraft. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/15/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
28. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: TCAS
Collision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG90 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 11/01/2001; End of Comment Period 12/31/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require the
installation and use of a traffic alert and collision avoidance system on
certain cargo airplanes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/22/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
29. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Therm/Acoustic |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG91 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 09/20/2000; End of Comment Period 01/18/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action would establish new
flammability standards. They address flame propagation and entry of an
external fire into the airplane. The new standards are intended to reduce the
incidence and severity of cabin fires, particularly those in inaccessible
areas where thermal/acoustic insulation materials are typically installed.
They would also provide an increased level of safety in post-crash fires by
delaying entry of flames into the cabin. The new standards would apply to new
type designs and newly manufactured airplanes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Secretarial/Head
of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/22/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Part
139-Certification of Airports |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG96 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 06/21/2000; Correction 08/21/2000; Comment Period Extended
08/22/2000; End of Comment Period 09/19/2000; End of Extended Comment Period
11/03/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would revise the
airport certification regulation and establish certification requirements for
airports serving scheduled air carrier operations in aircraft designed for
more than 9 passenger seats but less than 31 passenger seats. In addition,
this rule would amend a section of an air carrier operation regulation to
conform with changes to airport certification requirements. The FAA
Reauthorization Act of 1996 authorized the FAA to certificate airports (with
the exception of those in Alaska) that serve scheduled passenger operations
of air carriers operating aircraft designed for more than 9 passenger seats
but fewer than 31. The Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century mandated that the FAA issue an NPRM on operating certificates for
such airports within 60 days (of April 5, 2000) and a final rule 1 year after
the close of the NPRM comment period. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
31. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Air Tour
Operations in Hawaii |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH02 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would extend SFAR
71, which established certain procedural, operational and equipment
requirements for air tour operators in the State of Hawaii. The FAA intends
to issue a national air tour safety proposal in the near future, but until
that rulemaking becomes final, there is a need to extend SFAR 71 to ensure
the continuing safe environment for conducting air tours in Hawaii. During
the 9 year period between 1982 and 1991, there were 11 air tour accidents
with 24 fatalities in Hawaii. The apparent causes of the accidents ranged
from engine power loss to encounters with adverse weather. On September 26,
1994, the FAA published an emergency final rule as SFAR 71. The rule
established additional operating procedures, including minimum safe altitudes
(and associated increases in visual flight rules weather minimums), minimum
equipment requirements and operational limitations for air tour aircraft in
the State of Hawaii. SFAR 71 was subsequently extended until October 26,
2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/26/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
32. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Fractional |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH06 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 7/18/01; End of Comment Period 10/16/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would update and
revise the regulations governing operations by aircraft in fractional
ownership programs. This action is undertaken because the FAA has determined
that current regulations do not adequately define fractional ownership
programs and do not clearly allocate responsibility and authority for safety
and compliance with the regulations. The revisions would define fractional
ownership programs and their various participants, allocate responsibility
and authority for safety of flight operations for purposes of compliance with
the regulations, and ensure that fractional ownership program aircraft operations
maintain a high level of safety. Elements of this rulemaking would provide in
certain of the regulations applicable to fractional ownership programs a
level of safety equivalent to certain regulations that apply to on-demand
operators. The rulemaking would also change some regulations that apply to
on-demand operators meeting certain criteria to permit these operators an
alternate means of compliance for certain commercial operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/06/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Simulator
Qualification |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2120-AH07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
FAA regulations to establish flight simulation device qualification
requirements for all certificate holders in a new part. The basis of these
requirements currently exists in different parts of the FAA's regulations and
in advisory circulars. The changes would consolidate and update flight
simulation device requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/01/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
67 FR 60284 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
34. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Light-Sport Aircraft Certification |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH19 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Approved 01/04/2002; Publication Date 02/05/2002; End of Comment
Period 05/06/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
requirements for the certification, operation, and maintenance of light-sport
aircraft, including powered parachutes and weight-shift-control aircraft. For
the operation of light-sport aircraft, the rulemaking would establish a sport
pilot certificate and a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot
rating. It would also establish requirements for student pilots and private
pilots to operate these aircraft, and to revise the recreational pilot
certificate to align it with privileges proposed for the new sport pilot
certificate. It would also establish a new repairman certificate with ratings
for individuals who would inspect and maintain light-sport aircraft. In
addition, it would create a new category of special airworthiness certificate
for light-sport aircraft that meet a consensus standard. This action is
necessary to address advances in sport and recreational aviation technology, gaps
in the existing regulations, and several petitions for rulemaking. The
intended effect of this action is to provide a safe and economical means to
certificate light-sport aircraft and the pilots who fly them. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/14/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
35. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Passenger
Facility Charge Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH43 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
passenger facility charge (PFC) regulation by changing the amount and unit of
collection that a carrier may retain for collecting and handling (including
remitting) PFC revenue. It would allow carriers to keep $0.10 of each PFC
they collect in calendar years 2002 through 2004. From 2005 forward, the
amount would increase to $0.11 for each PFC collected. This action is
necessary to implement the statutory requirement that the Secretary of
Transportation (whose authority has been delegated to the Administrator of
FAA) establish by regulation a uniform amount that carriers may retain that
reflects the average necessary and reasonable expenses for collecting and
handling PFCs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/30/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
36. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Security
and Screening of Passengers and Property |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action requires certain
aircraft operators to search aircraft and screen crewmembers, passengers, and
their accessible property prior to departure. This action is being taken to
counter possible threats in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks. FAA is not going to take any further action on this matter. The
Transportation Security Administration has assumed subject matter
jurisdiction, but it is not sure it will proceed with a rule at this time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/12/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
37. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Criminal
Background Checks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final Rule
with Request for Comments: Publication Date 12/06/2001; End of Comment Period
01/07/2002; End of Comment Period Reopened 1/25/2002; End of Reopened Comment
Period 3/11/2002. Final Rule: Publication Approved 11/19/2001; Publication
Date 12/06/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule requires each airport
operator and aircraft operator that has adopted a security program under part
107 and part 108, respectively, to conduct fingerprint-based criminal history
record checks for individuals if they have not already undergone criminal
history record checks. This rule will ensure that individuals in these
positions do not have disqualifying criminal offenses. The FAA expects any
further action in this rulemaking to be taken by TSA. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/22/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
38. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Screeners
Qualifications |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking provides
additional qualifications, training, and testing of individuals who screen
persons and property that are carried in passenger aircraft. Responsibility
for this action has been assigned to TSA. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/12/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||
39. |
|
||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Metro DC
Airports |
|||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH62 |
|||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Approved 02/13/2002; Publication Date 02/19/2002; End of
Comment Period 04/22/2002. |
|||||||||||||
Summary: This action requires persons
operating to or from certain airports within the Washington, D.C.
Metropolitan Area to conduct those operations in accordance with security
procedures approved by the Administrator. This action is being taken to
restore aircraft operations at airports within the Washington D.C.
Metropolitan Area while countering possible threats in the wake of the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. |
|||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Emergency |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/18/2001 |
|||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: 67 FR 7538 |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
40. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Programs
for Charter Operations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH66 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final Rule
with Request for Comments: Publication Date 2/22/2002; End of Comment Period
4/23/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule requires that certain
aircraft operators using aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weigh
of 12,500 pounds or more carry out security measures. This rule requires that
certain aircraft operators conduct criminal history records checks on their
flightcrew members, and restrict access to the flight deck. These measures
are necessary to comply with Congressional mandates and to enhance security
in air transportation. This rulemaking is now being handled by TSA RIN
2110-AA04. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/27/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
41. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Transponder Continuous Operation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH67 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
instrument and equipment requirements for airplanes operated in domestic,
flag, and supplemental operations. Specifically, the rulemaking would require
affected airplanes to have the capability to help assure immediate activation
of the designated air traffic control (ATC) hijack alert code, and continuous
transmission of that code to ATC during a hijack situation. This action would
respond to the heightened threat to U.S. civil aviation. The FAA believes
that this capability would help provide ATC personnel with more time to
initiate a national security response to a potential airplane hijack
situation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
42. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Domestic
RVSM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH68 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Approved 05/10/2002; Publication Date 05/10/2002; End of Comment
Period 08/08/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would permit
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum flights in the airspace over the
contiguous 48 States of the United States and Alaska and that portion of the
Gulf of Mexico where the FAA provides air traffic services. This reduction of
vertical separation minima would only be applied between those aircraft that
meet stringent altimeter and auto-pilot performance requirements. This
rulemaking would enhance airspace capacity and to assist aircraft operators
to save fuel and time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/13/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
43. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flightdeck
Security (Part 129) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule/2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 06/21/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This final rule amends a previous
rule requiring improved flightdeck security and operational and procedures
changes to prevent unauthorized access to the flightdeck on
passenger-carrying aircraft operated by foreign carriers under the provisions
of part 129. This final rule is intended to ensure that the same flightdeck
security enhancements apply to foreign air carriers as apply to U.S. air
carriers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/15/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule/2:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule/2: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Picture ID
Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH76 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would revise the
pilot certificate requirements to require a person to carry a photo
identification acceptable to the Administrator when exercising the privileges
of a pilot certificate. Additionally, it would require a pilot certificate
holder to present a photo identification when requested by the Administrator,
an authorized representative of the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), or a law enforcement
officer. These measures are intended to address security concerns regarding
the identification of pilots. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/24/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
45. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Crawford
Texas Airspace |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH83 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would limit the
construction of any new object or the alteration of any existing object in
the vicinity of the private residence of the President of the United States
that would exceed 50 feet AGL and is within a 3 nautical miles (NM) radius of
the Presidentís private residence, unless otherwise approved by the
Administrator of the FAA. This rule is being adopted for purposes of national
defense and will assist in protecting the President of the United States. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/26/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
46. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Cert.
Revocation for Security |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would expressly provide
the authority to revoke a pilot certificate or deny an application for a
pilot certificate based on a written determination by the Under Secretary of
Transportation for Security that an individual poses a security risk related
to aviation. This rule would address the security concerns of who should hold
a pilot certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and is
necessary to enhance security in air transportation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/11/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Cockpit Voice
Recorder |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH88 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and digital flight data recorder (DFDR)
regulations for certain air carriers, operators, and aircraft manufacturers.
It would increase the duration of CVR and flight data recorder (FDR)
recordings; increase the data recording rate of certain DFDR parameters;
require physical separation of the DFDR and CVR; improve the reliability of
the power supply to both the CVR and DFDR; and, if data-link communication
equipment is installed, require that all data-link communication equipment is
installed, require that all data-link communications received by an aircraft
be recorded. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
48. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: FLS: NPS
Roads |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE52 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/01/1999; End of Comment Period 11/01/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA-21) requires the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency to develop, to
the extent appropriate, safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management
systems for roads funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP). The
Secretary of Transportation has delegated the authority to the FHWA to serve
as the lead agency within the U.S. DOT to implement the FLHP. The roads
funded under the FLHP include park roads and parkways, forest highways,
refuge roads, and Indian reservation roads. This rulemaking would provide for
the development and implementation of pavement, bridge, safety, and
congestion management systems for transportation facilities under the
National Park Service jurisdiction and funded by the FLHP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
49. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: FLS: BIA
Roads |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/01/1999; End of Comment Period 11/1/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA-21) requires the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency to develop, to
the extent appropriate, safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management
systems for roads funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP). The
Secretary of Transportation has delegated the authority to the FHWA to serve
as the lead agency within the U.S. DOT to implement the FLHP. The roads
funded under the FHLP include park roads and parkways, forest highways,
refuge roads, and Indian reservation roads. This rulemaking would provide for
the development and implementation of pavement, bridge, safety, and
congestion management systems for transportation facilities providing access
to Indian lands and funded under the FHLP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
50. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: FLS: FWS
Roads |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE54 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/01/1999; End of Comment Period 11/01/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA-21) requires the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency to develop, to
the extent appropriate, safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management
systems for roads funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP). The
Secretary of Transportation has delegated the authority to the FHWA to serve
as the lead agency for the U.S. DOT to implement the FLHP. The roads funded
under the FHLP include park roads and parkways, forest highways, refuge
roads, and Indian reservation roads. This rulemaking would provide for the
development and implementation of pavement, bridge, safety, and congestion
management systems for transportation facilities serving the National
Wildlife Refuge System funded under the FHLP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
51. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: FLS Forest
Highways Program |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE55 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/01/1999; End of Comment Period 11/01/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA-21) requires the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency to develop, to
the extent appropriate, safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management
systems for roads funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP). The
Secretary of Transportation has delegated the authority to the FHWA to serve
as the lead agency within the U.S. DOT to implement the FLHP. The roads
funded under the FHLP include park roads and parkways, forest highways,
refuge roads, and Indian reservation roads. This rulemaking would provide for
the development of pavement, bridge, safety, and congestion management
systems for transportation facilities providing access to and within the
National Forests and highways funded under the FLHP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register Citation
for NPRM: None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
52. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Transportation Planning |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE62 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication 5/25/2000; End of Comment Period 9/23/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA withdrew the
proposed rulemaking in which the agencies proposed to amend the requirements
on statewide and transportation planning. This withdrawal is based on the
level of critical comment received, the development of alternate means for
implementing the topics addressed in the NPRM and the pendency of
reauthorization of the surface transportation program. The agencies withdrew
this proposed rulemaking except for those sections that relate to
"consultation with non-metropolitan local officials," which is
addressed in the SNPRM published on June 19, 2002, at 67 FR 41648. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 59219 |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
53. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: NEPA and
Related Procedures |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE64 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/25/2000; End of Comment Period 9/23/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA withdrew
this proposed rulemaking proceeding that proposed to update and revise the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementation regulation for
projects funded or approved by the FHWA and the FTA. The agencies intended to
modify the regulation to reflect experience gained in administering these
requirements and substantial changes in legislation that occurred since the
regulations were issued in 1987. The agencies have determined that the
proposed changes generated such a diversity and disparity of comments that
substantial further work is necessary to develop new proposals and accommodate
these comments. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 59225 |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
54. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Design-Build
Contracting |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE79 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/19/2001; End of Comment Period 12/19/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would revise FHWA
regulations to implement design-build contracting as mandated by the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). TEA-21 requires the
Secretary to issue regulations to allow design-build contracting for selected
projects. This regulation would list the criteria and procedures that will be
used by the FHWA in approving the use of design-build contracting by State
Transportation Departments (STDs). This regulation would not require the use
of the design-build contracting, but would allow STDs to use it as an
optional technique in addition to traditional contracting methods. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
55. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Railroad-Highway Crossing Projects |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE81 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have
clarified that installation projects for passive crossing control devices,
done solely to meet the minimum crossing signing requirements of Federal law
or regulation, do not preempt or displace State laws concerning the adequacy
of such devices. The agency terminated this rulemaking project and will
address the issue raised by the Supreme Court through other actions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Court
Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/28/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
56. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: NBIS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE86 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/26/2001; End of Comment Period 12/26/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would examine
whether to revise the regulation on National Bridge Inspection Standards
(NBIS) to incorporate current, state-of-the-art bridge inspection practices
that public authorities may be using. It has been fourteen years since the NBIS
regulations were updated. The experience, material, and technology changes
over time dictate that the FHWA take a fresh look at these regulations. The
FHWA has received some unsolicited comments from engineers, inspectors,
transportation planners, and others recommending a number of changes to the
FHWA's NBIS regulations. In revising these regulations the FHWA is
considering incorporating a number of the FHWA policy memorandums and
technical advisories into the regulation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/31/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Army Drom
Box |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE94 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would consider
including, as specialized equipment, dromedary equipped truck
tractor-semitrailer combination vehicles when hauling munitions for the U.S.
Department of Defense (DOD). This rulemaking is in response to a petition
from the U.S. DOD, specifically the Department of the Army, that would help
expedite the movement of munitions for the military, especially in times of
national emergency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/22/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Planning -
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2125-AE95 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/25/00; End of Comment Period 09/23/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA jointly
issued a NPRM on May 25, 2000 (RIN 2125-AE62) which proposed revisions to the
regulations governing the development of transportation plans and programs
for urbanized (metropolitan) areas and statewide transportation plans and
programs. These revisions are a product of statutory changes made by the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) enacted on June 9,
1998, and generally would revise existing regulatory language to make it
consistent with current statutory requirements. The FTA and FHWA received
numerous comments to the docket in response to this NPRM. The agencies are
proposing an additional option concerning consultation with local officials. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
67 FR 41648 |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
59. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: CDL - Biometric
Identifier |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA01 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 5/15/89; End of Comment Period 7/14/89. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Truck and Bus Regulatory
Reform Act of 1988 required the DOT Secretary to issue regulations
establishing minimum uniform standards for a biometric identification system
for commercial motor vehicle (CMV) operators. In 1989, the agency (then the
Federal Highway Administration) published an ANPRM to request comments on a
pilot demonstration project using biometric identifiers that included retinal
eye scans and fingerprint technologies. After considering comments to the
ANPRM, the FHWA determined that technology had not progressed to the point
where a nationwide identification system could be cost-effective and provide the
benefits for which a system was intended. In 1991 the FHWA published a Notice
of Information summarizing the results of the pilot study and the comments to
demonstrate how the technologies studied fell short of the demands in the
commercial licensing environment at the time. Section 4011(c) of the TEA-21,
49 USC 31308 amended, requires each commercial driver's license (CDL) issued
by the States after January 1, 2001, to have unique identifiers (which may
include biometric identifiers). The FMCSA established a pilot study to
collect over 16,000 sample digital facial images and sets of fingerprints
from volunteers in California, Georgia and West Virginia. California provided
the lead for this study. The pilot study has been completed, and the
contractor is finalizing the study results. The final report is expected in
November 2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/18/1988 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register Citation
for NPRM: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
60. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: CDL;
Vision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 2/28/92; End of Comment Period 4/28/92; Request for
Comments: Publication Date 6/05/96; Interim Final Rule: Publication
Date12/08/98; End of Comment Period 2/08/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: As part of a review of the
medical qualification standards applicable to interstate CMV drivers, the
agency (then the Federal Highway Administration) requested comments on the
need, if any, to amend its driver qualification requirements relating to the
vision standard. A temporary waiver program was initiated and was concluded
on March 31, 1996, to permit the FHWA to observe and collect data on the
driving experience of a group of vision-deficient drivers who meet certain
preconditions. The agency considered further research to develop
comprehensive performance-based visual standards for all commercial drivers.
Information about the proposed research plan and public hearing on the
subject was published in the Federal Register on June 5, 1996, at 61 FR
28547. The FMCSA entered into a contract with a medical center to develop
medically-based recommendations for amending the current Federal vision
requirements. Recommendations were delivered in October 1998. The FMCSA is
further evaluating and considering these recommendations to decide what, if
any, further proposals should be made concerning the vision standard. Based
on the findings of the medical panel, the FMCSA anticipates publishing an
NPRM to amend its regulation governing the visual field requirement in the
vision standard. Section 4007 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21, Public Law 105-178) enacted effective June 9, 1998, changes
the agency's authority to issue waivers and exemptions. Procedures to
implement the new authority were published on December 8, 1998 (63 FR 67600).
FMCSA is now considering all requests for exemptions from the vision requirements
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/01/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
61. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: General
Transportation of HM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 6/17/93; End of Comment Period 8/16/93. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement
the statutory requirements of 49 USC 5109 and 49 USC 5105. Section 5109
addresses the establishment of motor carrier safety permit regulations for
motor carriers transporting Class A or B explosives, liquefied natural gases,
hazardous materials designated as extremely toxic by inhalation, or highway
route controlled quantity radioactive materials. Section 5105 requires
inspection of vehicles transporting those radioactive materials before each
trip. The rulemaking would incorporate those provisions into the safety
permit regulations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/16/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
62. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Training
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 01/05/1993; End of Comment Period 3/16/1993. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
minimum training requirements for operators of multiple trailer combination
vehicles and the instructors who train these operators. This rulemaking is
mandated by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/18/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
63. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Training
for Entry-Level Drivers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA09 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 6/21/93; End of Comment Period 8/20/93; Report to Congress
2/05/96; Notice of Availability of Report 4/25/96. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will examine the
need to require training of all entry-level drivers of commercial motor
vehicles. FMCSA has submitted a report to Congress (2/05/96) on the
effectiveness of private sector efforts to ensure adequate training of all
entry-level drivers. This report included a cost-benefit study of requiring
training of entry-level drivers. Public comments have been solicited on the
report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/18/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
64. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Physical
Fitness - CDL Process |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 7/15/94; End of Comment Period 11/4/94. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would include the
certification of fitness to operate a CMV in the commercial driver's license
(CDL) process. Incorporating the commercial driver fitness determination into
State-administered CDL procedures could allow elimination of the requirement
that CMV drivers carry a separate medical certificate. The CDL would be
evidence that the CMV driver is physically fit as well as operationally
qualified to operate CMVs safely. This action addresses the driver's physical
qualifications as they relate to the CDL process; it does not address whether
those standards are correct or should be changed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/15/1993 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
65. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Railroad-Highway Crossing |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA18 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 7/30/98; End of Comment Period 11/27/98. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action would prohibit
operators of commercial motor vehicles from driving onto a railroad grade
crossing unless there is sufficient space to drive completely through the
crossing without stopping. The intent of this action is to reduce the
incidence of collisions between trains and CMVs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/26/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
66. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: URS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA22 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 8/26/96; End of Comment Period 10/25/96. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action is in response to the
requirements of section 103 of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination
Act of 1995, which added 49 USC 13908. This section requires the Secretary to
complete a rulemaking proceeding to replace the current DOT identification
number system, the single State registration system, the
registration/licensing system and the financial responsibility system, with a
single, on-line Federal system. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/01/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
67. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hours of
Service |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA23 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 11/5/96; End of Comment Period 3/31/97; NPRM: Publication
Date 5/2/00; End of Comment Period 12/15/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would revise the
regulations for commercial motor vehicle driver rest requirements and duty
period limitations for safe highway transportation. A broad rulemaking is
required by the ICC Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA). Other congressional
actions prior to the ICCTA require modifications to current rules. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/29/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
68. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: English
Language |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA31 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
publication date 8/26/97; End of comment period 10/27/97. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The current regulation is little
changed from the original rule adopted in 1936. The American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU) has written to the Department asserting that the regulation, as
written, is overly broad and subject to arbitrary enforcement, causing
potential interference with constitutional guarantees of due process and
equal protection. The ACLU requested an opportunity to submit a comprehensive
analysis of this issue. The ANPRM was intended to provide the ACLU with such
an opportunity and to open this issue for public comment. The rulemaking
would modify the current FMCSA regulation to require drivers to possess the
basic functional communication/comprehension ability necessary to ensure
safety, consistent with applicable law. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/26/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
69. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Household
Goods |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA32 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/15/98 ; End of Comment Period: 7/14/98; Extension and
Reopening of Comment Period: 8/12/98 ; End of Extended and Reopened Comment
Period:10/13/98. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would amend the
regulations governing the interstate transportation of personal effects or
property used, or to be used, in a private residence (household goods). FMCSA
regulations specify how motor carriers who transport household goods by motor
vehicle in interstate commerce (movers) must assist their individual
customers who ship household goods. FMSCA is updating the regulations to make
them easier to understand and to help consumers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/15/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
70. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Mexican
Motor Carriers |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/03/2001; End of Comment Period 07/02/2001. Interim Final
Rule: Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period 04/18/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking changes FMCSA
regulations to govern applications by Mexican carriers to operate beyond
municipalities and commercial zones at the United State-Mexico border. It
also revises the application form, OP-1MX, to be filed by these Mexican motor
carriers. The revised form requires additional information about the
applicant's business and operating practices to allow the FMCSA to determine
if the applicant could meet the safety standards established for operating in
interstate commerce in the United States. Carriers that had previously
submitted an application would have to submit the updated form. These changes
are needed to implement part of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/07/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
71. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Mexican
Motor Carriers |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA35 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/03/2001; End of Comment Period 07/02/2001. Interim Final
Rule: Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period 04/18/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FMCSA proposes to implement a
safety monitoring system and compliance initiative to ensure that
Mexican-domiciled carriers conducting operations anywhere in the United
States (U.S.) comply with applicable safety regulations and conduct safe
operations. This NPRM would revise the safety fitness regulations at 49 CFR part
385 to implement an enhanced safety oversight program designed to evaluate
the safety fitness of Mexican carriers within 18 months after receiving
conditional authority to operate in the U.S. This proposal is necessary to
implement the entry provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/07/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
72. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Intermodal
Chassis |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA38 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 2/17/99; End of Comment Period 4/19/99; End of Extended
Comment Period 8/30/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: In response to a petition for
rulemaking filed by the American Trucking Association, Inc. (ATA) and the ATA
Intermodal Conference, (the petitioners), the FHWA, the predecessor agency to
the FMCSA, agreed to consider revisions to the requirements in parts 390 and
396 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulations (FMCSRs) that place upon
motor carriers the responsibility for maintaining intermodal container
chassis and trailers. These regulations provide the requirements for the
inspection, repair and maintenance of commercial motor vehicles. The agency
is considering conducting a negotiated rulemaking for this rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/17/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
73. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Zero Base |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA39 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
rules of practice for motor carrier safety, hazardous materials, and other
enforcement proceedings, motor carrier safety ratings, driver qualification
proceedings and the schedule of penalties for violations of the FMCSRs and
the Hazardous Materials Regulations. It would also add provisions on
investigative authority and procedures and general motor carrier
responsibilities. These rules would increase the efficiency of the
procedures, enhance due process and the awareness of the public and regulated
community, and accommodate recent programmatic changes. The rules would apply
to all motor carriers, other business entities, and individuals involved in
motor carrier safety and hazardous materials administrative actions on the
effective date of the final rule. The rules would constitute the major part
of the administrative/procedural portion of the agency's zero-base revision
of the entire FMCSRs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/19/1992 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
74. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Post
Accident Controlled Substances |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA) is considering amending its controlled substances and
alcohol testing regulations to require employers subject to those
requirements to report certain information to State-employed Fatality
Analysis Reporting System (FARS) analysts concerning fatal crashes/accidents.
Currently, only the FMCSA and State officials with regulatory authority over
the employer or any of its drivers may obtain information concerning
controlled substances and alcohol testing results and records. This
rulemaking would propose to require employers to provide information to FARS
analysts, irrespective of their State authority, working under contract with
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The information
employers would be required to submit to the analysts would enable the NHTSA,
working in conjunction with the FMCSA, to compile and analyze data on the
incidence of commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers who test positive for
controlled substances and/or alcohol use in post-accident tests conducted
after fatal crashes. The data would also be used by the FMCSA to help assess
the effectiveness of its controlled substances and alcohol testing
regulations. This action is intended to improve the FMCSA's and NHTSA's CMV
crash data and assess the need for new initiatives to further reduce the use
of controlled substances and alcohol by CMV drivers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/20/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
75. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Camionetas |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA52 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 1/11/2001; End of Comment Period 4/11/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
FMCSRs to require that motor carriers operating commercial motor vehicles
designed or used to transport between 9 and 15 passengers (including the
driver) in interstate commerce comply with the safety regulations when they
are directly compensated for such services, and the driver travels a distance
greater than 75 air miles. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/09/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
76. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Interstate
School Bus Safety |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 10/22/01; End of Comment Period 1/22/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FMCSA is considering whether
to extend the applicability of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs) to all interstate school transportation operations (thus excluding
home-to-school or school-to-home transportation) by local,
governmentally-operated educational agencies. This action responds to section
4024 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), which
directs the FMCSA to determine whether the FMSCRs should apply to these
operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
77. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: New
Entrant |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2126-AA59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 05/13/2002; End of Comment Period 7/12/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule establishes minimum
requirements for new entrant motor carriers to ensure that they are
knowledgeable about applicable Federal motor carrier safety standards. The
new entrants remain in provisional status for 18 months during which time
they must successfully complete a safety audit. FMCSA was directed to issue
an Interim Final Rule by section 350(a)(10) of the FY 2002 DOT Appropriations
Act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/09/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
78. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Safety
Auditors |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA64 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule : Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period 05/20/2002;
Extension of Compliance 06/17/2002; End of Extended Compliance 07/17/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule requires that any
safety inspection, audit, or review be conducted by a certified investigator.
It would give the FMCSA authority to decertify an investigator for failure to
meet the prescribed certification standards. It is required by section 211 of
the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/09/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
79. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Parts and
Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA69 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 03/19/2002; End of Comment Period 05/20/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) so that motor carriers
ensure that each commercial motor vehicle (CMV) they operate in interstate
commerce displays a label certifying that the vehicle complies with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs) in effect on the
date of manufacture. This rulemaking would ensure that all motor carriers
operating CMVs in the United States use only vehicles that were certified by
the manufacturer as meeting all applicable Federal safety performance
requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/01/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: USA
PATRIOT Act Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FMCSA amends the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to prohibit States from issuing or
renewing a commercial driver's license with an endorsement to operate a motor
vehicle transporting a hazardous material unless the Department of Justice
has first conducted a background check on the applicant, and DOT has
determined, based upon that investigation, that the applicant does not pose a
security risk warranting denial of the license. The interim final rule
responds to section 1012 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act
of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/26/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
81. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Penalty,
Inspection and Decals |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to incorporate the
requirement, codified in parts 365 and 385 of the agency's regulations, that
all commercial motor vehicles operated by Mexico-domiciled motor carriers
holding authority to transport property or passengers beyond the commercial
zones of U.S. municipalities on the United States-Mexico border display a
Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) decal issued by the CVSA-certified
inspector. Adding this requirement to part 396 will enable FMCSA to assess
civil penalties against Mexico-domiciled long-haul motor carriers that
operate vehicles without the necessary CVSA decal. This rule would also
clarify that carriers will be required to obtain the necessary inspection
decal before proceeding beyond border ports of entry. By providing for more
effective enforcement of the inspection and decal requirements, this rule
will help ensure that these motor carriers operate safe vehicles in the United
States. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/09/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
82. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Route
Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA75 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
hazardous materials carriers to prepare and sign a route plan. The plan must
be in the possession of the driver of any Table 1 hazardous material
(explosives, radioactive materials, and poison by inhalation hazard
materials). It was terminated because RSPA has addressed the problem; it will
be deleted from the next Regulatory Agenda. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/13/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
83. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Supporting
Documents |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA76 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date:4/20/1998; End of Comment Period: 6/19/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The rulemaking would amend the
hours-of-service recordkeeping requirements to clarify what supporting
documents motor carriers must have to validate hours of service records. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/26/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Registration Enforcement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2126-AA78 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This emergency rulemaking would
amend FMCSA regulations to require that a motor carrier subject to the
registration requirements under 49 U.S.C. 13902 may not operate a commercial
motor vehicle in interstate commerce unless it has registered with FMCSA.
Motor carriers would be further prohibited from operating beyond the scope of
their registration. If an unregistered carrier's motor vehicle is discovered
in operation or being operated beyond the scope of the carrier's
registration, such motor vehicle will be placed out-of-service and the
carrier may be subject to additional penalties. The States are currently
required to enforce these registration requirements as a condition for
receipt of Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program funds. Amending the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to specifically include the
out-of-service (OOS) provisions will help ensure that all carriers subject to
49 U.S.C. 13902: (1) are apprised of and comply with applicable FMCSR's, (2)
operate only within the scope of registration, and (3) operate safe vehicles
within the United States. This would also allow the agency to more accurately
identify and monitor the safety fitness of motor carriers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/01/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
85. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Whistle
Bans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2130-AA71 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 01/13/00; End of Comment Period 05/26/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: Pub. Law 103-440 requires the
Secretary to prohibit local whistle bans, except where there is no
significant risk of accidents, alternative safety measures are adequate, or
where use of a horn as a warning is impractical. After publishing an NPRM,
FRA participated in extensive public hearings to gather comments and is now
preparing a final rule to implement the statute. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/02/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
86. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Positive
Train Control |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2130-AA94 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM: Publication
Date 08/10/2001; End of Comment Period 11/08/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking seeks to
facilitate the introduction of positive train control technology by providing
performance-based standards for new signal and train control systems. FRA
moved radio communications to RIN 2130-AB19, a nonsignificant rulemaking. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
87. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Dispatch
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2130-AB38 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 12/11/2001; End of Comment Period 02/11/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The interim final rule added a
requirement to FRA rail safety rules to require that dispatching of trains
traveling on U.S. soil be carried out by personnel located on U.S. soil. The
rule permits exceptions for emergency situations and very short segments of
U.S. trackage that are essentially a part of a foreign (e.g., Canadian)
system. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/01/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
88. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Control of
Alcohol and Drug Use |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2130-AB39 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/11/2001; Extension of Comment Period 08/28/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action would apply FRA's
random testing and other alcohol and drug requirements to employees of a
foreign railroad whose primary reporting point is outside the United States,
and who perform train service or dispatching service in the United States.
Such employees are currently exempt from random testing, pre-employment
testing, and requirements for employee self-referral and co-worker report
policies. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
89. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Temperature |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2130-AB46 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend
current minimum temperature requirements and establish maximum cab
temperature requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/10/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
90. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Bus
Testing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2132-AA30 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/25/1989; End of Comment Period 07/24/1989. Interim Final
Rule: Publication Date 08/23/1989; Comment Period Reopened 11/30/1989;
Interim Final Rule-Second 10/09/1990; Interim Procedures 09/13/1991; Interim
Final Rule-New Vehicle Types 07/28/1992; Interim Final Rule-Partial
Effectiveness Postponed 10/13/1992; Interim Final Rule-Comment Period Closed
1/29/93; Interim Final Rule-Partial Effectiveness Postponed 02/23/1993;
Notice of Meeting 02/26/93. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement a
statutory provision that requires any new bus model purchased after September
30, 1989, be tested at a facility established by the Secretary, by law, in
Altoona, Pa. FTA has published a series of seven interim final rules to
implement this requirement. FTA is considering whether to have to apply bus
testing requirements to new vehicle types and systems (e.g., bus rapid
transit). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/02/1987 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
91. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: NEPA and
Related Procedures |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2132-AA43 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/25/2000; End of Comment Period 9/23/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA withdrew
this proposed rulemaking proceeding that proposed to update and revise the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementation regulation for projects
funded or approved by the FHWA and the FTA. The agencies intended to modify
the regulation to reflect experience gained in administering these
requirements and substantial changes in legislation that occurred since the
regulations were issued in 1987. The agencies have determined that the
proposed changes generated such a diversity and disparity of comments that
substantial further work is necessary to develop new proposals and
accommodate these comments. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 59225 |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
92. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Clean
Fuels |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2132-AA64 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 8/28/2001; End of Comment Period 10/21/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement a
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century provision requiring FTA to
establish a new clean fuels grant program. The rulemaking would establish
procedures for recipients to use in applying for grants under this program. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 67 FR 40099 |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
93. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Transportation Planning |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2132-AA66 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication 5/25/00; End of Comment Period 9/3/00. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA withdrew the
proposed rulemaking in which the agencies proposed to amend the requirements
on statewide and transportation planning. This withdrawal is based on the
level of critical comment received, the development of alternate means for
implementing the topics addressed in the NPRM and the pendency of
reauthorization of the surface transportation program. The agencies withdrew
this proposed rulemaking except for those sections that relate to
"consultation with non-metropolitan local officials," which is
addressed in the SNPRM published on June 19, 2002, at 67 FR 41648. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 59219 |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
94. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Planning-
SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2132-AA75 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/25/00; End of Comment Period 09/23/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The FHWA and the FTA jointly
issued a NPRM on May 25, 2000 (RIN 2132-AA66), which proposed revisions to
the regulations governing the development of transportation plans and
programs for urbanized (metropolitan) areas and statewide transportation
plans and programs. These revisions are a product of statutory changes made
by the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) enacted on
June 9, 1998, and generally would revise existing regulatory language to make
it consistent with current statutory requirements. The FTA and FHWA received
numerous comments to the docket in response to this NPRM. The agencies are
proposing an additional option concerning consultation with local officials. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/09/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
67 FR 41648 |
Maritime Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maritime Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Agricultural Exports |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2133-AB37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 1/28/99; End of Comment Period 3/29/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would update and
clarify the cargo preference regulations to increase regulatory compliance.
MARAD issued the cargo preference regulations to implement the requirements
of section 901 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended. Departments,
agencies, and shippers who must comply with the Act must follow the cargo
preference regulations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/01/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
96. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Crashworthiness Ratings |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AA03 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 1/22/81; End of Comment Period 4/22/81; Request for
Comments: Publication Date 5/20/97; End of Comment Period 8/18/97. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action would require
manufacturers to disseminate crashworthiness performance information
concerning their cars to the public. This information would provide consumers
with comparative information on the crashworthiness performance of new car
models. NHTSA is planning on withdrawing the proposal because it is being
addressed through the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP). |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/22/1981 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||
97. |
|
||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Bus
Flammability |
|||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AA44 |
|||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 11/04/1988, End of Comment Period 1/3/89; Request for
Comments: Publication Date 02/26/91; End of Comment Period 4/29/91. |
|||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking considered
upgrading Standard No. 302's flammability resistance requirements for school
bus interiors. After reviewing the available information, NHTSA is
considering withdrawing this rulemaking and evaluating whether (1) the risks
presented by school bus fires pose a minimal safety problem, (2) the agency's
upgrading of Standard No. 217's emergency exit requirements will allow faster
evacuation from school buses and will reduce the already minimal safety
problem due to fire, (3) significant costs would have resulted from upgrading
Standard No. 302, and (4) further research would have been necessary before a
test protocol and criteria regarding the conditions vital for survivability
in a fire could have been proposed, utilizing scarce agency resources which
could be put to more effective uses elsewhere. |
|||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/12/1988 |
|||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
98. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Wheel
Chair Lifts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AD50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 02/26/1993; End of Comment Period 04/27/1993. SNPRM: Publication
Date 7/27/00; End of Comment Period 10/25/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
two new safety standards: an equipment standard specifying requirements for
platform lifts; and a vehicle standard for all vehicles equipped with such
lifts. The purpose of the two standards is to prevent injuries and fatalities
during lift operation and to promote uniformity of Federal standards and
guidelines for platform lifts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/29/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
99. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Fuel
Economy Standards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AG97 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 01/22/2001; End of Comment Period 3/22/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would define the
rights and responsibilities of manufacturers under the agency's corporate
average fuel economy program in the context of changes in corporate
relationships. It addresses the rights and responsibilities of predecessors
and successors, as well as the rights and responsibilities of manufacturers
in other situations where there have been changes in corporate relationships,
e.g., changes in control. Among other things, it would address how fuel
economy credits are allocated in these types of situations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/27/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
100. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Head
Restraints (Height and Distance Req) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AH09 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 01/04/2001; End of Comment Period 03/05/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would upgrade the
standard for head restraints for passenger cars and for light multipurpose
vehicles, trucks and buses. The rule would establish higher minimum height
requirements for head restraints and add a requirement limiting backset, i.e.,
the distance between a person's head and his or her head restraint. The
proposal would also extend the requirement for head restraints to rear
outboard designated seating positions; establish new strength requirements
for head restraints; and place limits on the size of gaps and openings in
head restraints. In addition, it would modify the dynamic compliance test and
amend test procedures. The rulemaking would harmonize the standard with the
counterpart regulation of the Economic Commission for Europe to an extent. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
101. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Frontal
Offset |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AH73 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish a
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard for high speed frontal offset crash
testing. The frontal offset test is a crash test for automobiles and light
trucks in which the subject vehicles are run into a deformable honeycomb
barrier. The barrier contacts only 40 percent of the front of the vehicle
stimulating an off-center frontal collision. The agency is considering adding
the offset test to the frontal occupant protection standard to measure
vehicle structural integrity and reduce the number and severity of lower-body
injuries. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/22/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
102. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Early
Warning Reporting Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI25 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 1/22/01; End of Comment Period 3/23/01; NPRM: Publication
Date 12/21/01; End of Comment Period 2/4/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement
the "early warning reporting requirements" of the Transportation
Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act. Under this
proposal, motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment manufacturers would be
required to report information and to submit documents on customer
satisfaction campaigns and other activities that may assist in identifying
defects related to motor vehicle safety. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 67 FR 45821 |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
103. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Tire
Safety Information |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI32 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 12/01/00; End of Comment Period 1/30/01; NPRM: Publication
Date 12/19/01; End of Comment Period 2/19/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would improve the
labeling of tires to assist consumers in identifying tires that may be the
subject of a safety recall. It also would increase public awareness of the
importance and methods of observing motor vehicle tire load limits and
maintaining proper tire inflation levels for the safe operation of a motor
vehicle. It would apply to all new and retreaded tires for use on vehicles
with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less and to all
vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10, 000 pounds or less, except
for motorcycles and low speed vehicles. This rulemaking is being issued in
response to the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and
Documentation (TREAD) Act of 2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
104. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Tire
Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI33 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule/2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication date 7/26/01; End of comment period 9/6/01. Final Rule/1:
Publication Date 05/29/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: In response to TREAD, NHTSA has
added a new requirement that tire pressure monitoring systems be installed in
passenger cars, and in light trucks, multipurpose passenger vehicles, and
buses. The rule is in two parts. During the period between November 1, 2003,
and October 31, 2006, manufacturers may choose between two methods of
compliance. The second part of this final rule will be issued by March 1,
2005, and will establish performance requirements for the period beginning on
November 1, 2006. In the meantime, NHTSA will leave the rulemaking docket
open for the submission of new data and analyses concerning the performance
of TPMSs. NHTSA also will conduct a study comparing the tire pressures of
vehicles without any TPMS to the pressures of vehicles with TPMSs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule/2:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule/2: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
105. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Child
Restraint Systems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/02/2002; End of Comment Period 9/2/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would make a
number of revisions to the Federal safety standard for child restraint
systems, including new dynamic side impact protection requirements, updated
test dummy specifications and test procedures used to test child restraints,
and extension of the standard so that it would apply to child restraints
recommended for use by children up to 65 pounds. This action is intended to
make child restraints even more effective in protecting children from the
risk of death or serious injury in motor vehicle crashes. This rulemaking
responds to the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and
Documentation Act of 2000, which directed NHTSA to initiate a rulemaking
proceeding by November 1, 2001, for the purpose of improving the safety of
child restraints. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
106. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Intoxicated Persons |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI44 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA-21) established a grant program under which states
could qualify for incentive funds if they enacted and enforced a law that
provides that any person with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 percent or
greater while operating a motor vehicle in the state is deemed to have
committed a per se offense of driving while intoxicated or an equivalent per
se offense. NHTSA published a final rule implementing that incentive grant
program. Section 351 of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Appropriations
Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 (PL 106-346) contains a new provision requiring
the withholding of certain Federal aid highway funds from a state, beginning
in fiscal year 2004, if the state has not enacted and is not enforcing such a
law. The rulemaking would amend the regulation implementing the incentive
grant program established in TEA-21 to reflect the new sanctions provisions
established in the DOT appropriations act for FY 2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/09/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
107. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Light
Truck Avg Fuel Economy Std 2005-10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Request
for Comments: Publication Date 02/07/2002; End of Comment Period 4/8/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This request for comments asks
questions about model years (MY) 2005-2010 light truck fuel economy
standards. The agency is beginning to develop a proposal for light truck
average fuel economy standards for model years after 2004, as required by
statute. The purpose of this request for comments is to acquire information
to assist the agency in developing the proposal for those years. NHTSA plans
to cover some or all of model years 2005 to 2010 in the proposal. The agency
is seeking information that will help it assess the extent to which
manufacturers can improve light truck fuel economy during those years, the
benefits and costs to consumers of fuel economy improvements, the benefits to
the nation of reducing fuel consumption, and the number of model years that
should be covered by the proposal. NHTSA is also seeking comments on possible
modifications and/or reforms to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy program as
it applies to both passenger cars and light trucks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/06/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
108. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Event Data
Recorders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Request for Comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: Over the past several years,
NHTSA has been actively involved with Event Data Recorders (EDRs) in motor
vehicles. EDRs collect vehicle and occcupant-based crash information. The
agency's involvement has included sponsoring two working groups, using data
from EDRs in crash investigations, and conducting research and development.
Particularly since one working group has completed its work and the other is
nearing completion of its work, NHTSA is requesting comments on what future
role the agency should take related to the continued development and
installation of EDRs in motor vehicles. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/12/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Request for Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Request for Comments: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
109. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Rollover
Resistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI81 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Request
for Comments: Publication Date 07/03/2001; End of Comment Period 08/17/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Recall
Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation Act of 2000 requires NHTSA to
develop a dynamic test on rollovers by motor vehicles for the purposes of a
consumer information program, to carry out a program of conducting such
tests, and, as these tests are being developed, to conduct a rulemaking to
determine how best to disseminate test results to the public. In response,
this rulemaking is using the results of NHTSA's evaluation of numerous
driving maneuver tests for the dynamic rollover consumer information program
that Congress mandated for the American public beginning in the 2003 model
year. NHTSA also is considering several alternative methods for using the
dynamic rollover test results in its consumer information for vehicle
rollover resistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
110. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Child
Restraint Systems Side Impact |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI83 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 05/01/2002; End of Comment Period 07/01/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Transportation Recall
Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation Act of 2000 directed NHTSA to
initiate a rulemaking for the purpose of improving the safety of child
restraints and specified various elements that must be considered in the
rulemaking. NHTSA has two rulemaking proceedings that together address all
but side and rear impact protection requirements for children in child
restraint systems. NHTSA is addressing side impact protection in this
rulemaking, starting with an ANPRM because there are uncertainties in too
many areas to issue an NPRM. These areas include: (a) the determination of
child injury mechanisms in side impacts, and crash characteristics associated
with serious and fatal injuries to children in child restraints; (b)
development of test procedures, a suitable test dummy and appropriate injury
criteria; and (c) identification of cost-beneficial countermeasures.
Uncertainties in these areas, together with the statutory schedule for this
rulemaking, make it difficult for the agency to assess and make judgments
concerning the benefits and costs of a rulemaking on side impact protection.
Though the ANPRM, the agency expects to obtain additional information that
will help it decide whether it is possible and appropriate to issue an NPRM
in the near future and/or identify additional work that needs to be done.
Also in response to the Act, the ANPRM requests comments on the
appropriateness of proposing to incorporate a rear impact test procedure into
Standard No. 213, for rear-facing child restraints systems. Note: This
rulemaking used to be part of RIN 2127-AI34. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
111. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Advanced
Air Bag Petitions |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2127-AI85 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final Rule
with Response to Petitions for Reconsideration: Publication Date 12/18/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: In May 2000, NHTSA issued a final
rule amending the occupant crash protection standard to require future
airbags to be designed so that they would create less of a safety risk and to
provide advanced airbag technology. In December 2001, NHTSA responded to the
first round of petitions for reconsideration. NHTSA received additional
petitions for reconsideration, which will be addressed in a second response. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/18/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
112. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Stranded
charter passengers |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AA40 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
publication date 7/11/80; End of comment period 9/25/80; End of reply comment
period 10/10/80. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This proposed rule would have
made direct air carriers responsible for returning charter passengers
stranded by strikes or other interruptions of their services. Because this
requirement was articulated later in a separate rulemaking, however, the NPRM
is now moot and is being withdrawn. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/11/1980 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 61996 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
113. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Rebating |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AB39 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/21/1988; End of Comment Period 12/20/1988; Comment Period
Extended: Publication Date 02/03/1989; End of Extended Comment Period
02/21/1989. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Federal Aviation Act
specifically prohibits rebating of international airline ticket prices.
Nevertheless, since 1978, the Department has allowed rebating. This
rulemaking would change the Department's regulations to more accurately
reflect its current enforcement policy. The rule also would revoke an
existing Policy Statement on the advertising of rebates that is contrary to
the Department's enforcement policy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/01/1988 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
114. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Price
Advertising |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AB50 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/26/1989; End of Comment Period 09/25/1989. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend DOT's
rule and policy statement with respect to air transportation price
advertising under 14 C.F.R. Parts 380 and 399. The rulemaking would allow
advertisers to list separately those government-imposed charges that are
levied on a per-passenger basis. It is being withdrawn because it is not
necessary. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/12/1989 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 61996 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
115. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Workplace
Drug-Testing Programs |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AB71 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/13/1990; End of Comment Period 08/13/1990. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking concerned the
question of to whom reports of negative drug test results may be sent. It was
withdrawn after the Department issued an NPRM under RIN 2105-AC49, Update of
Drug and Alcohol Procedural Rules. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/01/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 61996 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||
116. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Accessibility-passenger
vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AB87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Department's Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) final rule, published September 6, 1991, reserved
portions of the rule concerning passenger vessels. The ADA covers passenger
vessels, but issuing accessibility requirements for vessels involves complex
issues unlike those affecting land transportation. This rulemaking would
address these issues and propose feasible requirements to make passenger
vessels accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities. Timing
of this rulemaking is dependent on action by the Access Board to adopt
accessibility guidelines for passenger vessels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/26/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
117. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AC06 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 6/20/1994; End of Comment Period 8/19/1994. Interim Final
Rule: . |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action was intended to amend
the rules implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act by adopting the
revised accessibility guidelines issued by the Access Board (59 FR 31676) as
interim final rules. The rule would also conform the Department's rules
implementing section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. It is being
withdrawn as obsolete, since there is another, more recent, regulatory action
that will update the guidelines. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/03/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 61996 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
118. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Domestic
Passenger Manifest |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AC62 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 03/13/1997; End of Comment Period 05/12/1997; Comment Period
Reopened: Publication Date 05/30/1997; End of Comment Period 06/20/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requested
information concerning operational and cost issues related to U.S. air
carriers collecting basic information (e.g., full name, date of birth and/or
social security number, emergency contact and telephone number) from
passengers traveling on flights within the United States. This rulemaking
responds to difficulties with notification in the aftermath of domestic
aviation crashes, would implement new requirements for family assistance, and
would fulfill a recommendation contained in the final report of the White
House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security that urges the Department to
explore immediately the costs and effects of a comprehensive passenger
manifest requirement on the domestic aviation system. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/01/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||
119. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: CRS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AC65 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 9/10/97; End of Comment Period 11/10/97; Notice Extending
Comment Period 10/30/97; Request for Reply Comments 11/07/97; End of Extended
Comment Period 12/09/97; Notice Extending Reply Comment Period 1/23/98; End
of Extended Reply Comment Period 2/3/98. SANPRM: Publication Date 7/24/00;
End of Comment Period 9/22/00; End of Reply Comment Period 10/23/00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will determine
whether DOT should continue or modify its existing rules governing airline
computer reservations systems (CRSs). Among other things, this rulemaking
will address the impact of changes to the industry and consider whether to
adopt rules governing the use of the Internet for airline distribution. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/25/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
120. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Aviation
Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AC71 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 07/15/1998; End of Comment Period 09/14/1998; End of Reply
Comment Period 10/13/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requested public
comments from reporting carriers and aviation data users on the nature,
scope, source, and means for collecting, processing, and distributing airline
traffic, fare, and financial data. Specifically, it invited comments on
whether existing airline traffic, fare, and financial data should be amended,
supplemented, or replaced; whether selected forms and reports should be
retained, modified, or eliminated; whether the Department should require all
aviation data to be filed electronically; and how the aviation data system
should be reengineered to enhance efficiency and to reduce costs for both the
Department and the airline industry. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/15/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
121. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Uniform
Administrative Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AC83 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 03/16/2000; End of Comment Period 05/15/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action implemented changes
to OMB Circular A-110 that were issued by OMB on October 8, 1999, providing
uniform guidance for administering grants to institutions of higher
education, hospitals, and other nonprofit organizations. The change provides
guidance on making data produced under awards available to the public. The
regulation is essentially a word-for-word issuance of the requirements in OMB
Circular A-110. An Interim Final Rule was issued because of the limited
ability to change the requirements from those in the Circular. We are
awaiting guidance from OMB as to what, if any, changes are needed in the
government-wide common final rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/01/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||
122. |
|
||||||||
Popular
Title:
Compensation of Air Carriers Procedures |
|||||||||
RIN
2105-AD06 |
|||||||||
Stage: Final Rule/4 |
|||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule/1 with Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/29/2001; End of Comment
Period 10/29/2001. Final Rule/2 with NPRM: Publication Date 01/02/2002; End
of Comment Period 01/16/2002. Final Rule/3 with Request for Comments:
Publication Date 04/16/2002. |
|||||||||
Summary: On September 22, 2001, President
Bush signed into law the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization
Act ("the Act"). The Act makes available to the President funds to
compensate air carriers, as defined in the Act, for direct losses suffered as
a result of any Federal ground stop order and incremental losses beginning
September 11, 2001, and ending December 31, 2001, resulting from the September
11 terrorist attacks on the United States. In order to fulfill Congress'
intent to expeditiously provide compensation to eligible air carriers, the
Department used procedures set out in Program Guidance Letters to make
initial estimated payments amounting to about 50 percent of the authorized
funds. On October 29, 2001, the Department published a final rule and request
for comments establishing application procedures for air carriers interested
in requesting compensation under this statute. This rulemaking amends the
rule and otherwise responds to the comments the Department received. It also
allows indirect air carriers and wet lessors to submit an application for
compensation by February 8, 2002. |
|||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/22/2001 |
|||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule/4:
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule/4: 67 FR 54058 |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||||||||||||||
123. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2105-AD16 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This document withdraws the
following rulemakings, proposed by the Office of the Secretary, that have
been superseded by more recent rulemakings or other actions that make the
proposed actions no longer necessary or appropriate: Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Age, Charter Transportation, Notice of Terms of Contract of Carriage
Part 399--Statement of General Policy, Simplified Airline Counter Sign
Notices, Rules of Practice in Board Proceedings--Fees and Charges for Special
Services; and Statements of General Policy, Baggage Liability Notices in
International Air Transportation, Price Advertising, Procedures for
Transportation Workplace Drug Testing Programs, and Transportation for
Individuals with Disabilities. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/20/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 61996 |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
124. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: High
Pressure Cylinders |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AA92 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/30/1998; End of Comment Period 05/28/98; Extension of
Comment Period 05/28/99; End of Extended Comment Period 09/30/99. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend
certain requirements in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to
establish four new cylinder specifications and to remove several obsolete
specifications. It would also revise the requirements for approval of
cylinder requalifiers, independent inspection agencies, and nondomestic
chemical analysis and tests; revise the cylinder requalification, maintenance
and repair requirements; and revise the requirements for hazardous materials
that are authorized to be offered for transportation in cylinders. After
receiving public comment, RSPA decided to withdraw this rulemaking. Issues
such as approval for cylinder requalifiers, independent inspection agencies,
and non-domestic chemical analyses and tests will be addressed in a final
rule under RIN 2137-AD58. Cylinder manufacturing issues will be addressed in
a separate rulemaking action. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/23/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 6667 |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
125. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Sanitary
Food |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 02/20/91; End of Comment Period 03/21/1991. NPRM:
Publication Date 05/21/93; End of Comment Period 10/18/93. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will implement
the Sanitary Food Transportation Act of 1990 requirement that DOT issue
regulations to: (1) prohibit use of a tank, rail tank car, or cargo tank to
transport food if such vehicle is also used to transport a nonfood product
other than a nonfood product determined by the Secretary to be acceptable;
(2) prohibit use of any other rail or motor vehicle to transport food, if
such vehicle is also used to transport nonfood products determined by the
Secretary to be unacceptable; and (3) require the use of dedicated vehicles
to transport asbestos and extremely dangerous products. DOT submitted draft
legislation to Congress in April of 1997 that would make the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) of HHS, rather than DOT, the lead agency on this topic.
DOT would have retained highway and rail inspection responsibilities and
notified FDA of apparent problems. This proposed legislation was part of
DOT's NEXTEA II bill and was introduced as H.R. 1720 and S. 1234 in 1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/21/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
126. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Oil
Pipeline Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC30 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 01/05/1993; End of Comment Period 02/19/1993;
Notice of Public Meeting 06/15/1994; Notice of Public Hearing 1/21/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
regulations requiring response plans for certain onshore oil pipelines. They
are mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990. The purpose of these requirements is to improve
response capabilities and minimize the impact of onshore oil spills from
pipelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/12/1992 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
127. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Applicability of HMR to Loading and Unloading |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC68 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 07/29/96; End of Comment Period 11/30/96. SANPRM:
Publication Date 04/27/99; Extension of Comment Period 07/26/99; End of
Comment Period 08/25/99. NPRM: Publication Date 08/28/2001; End of Extended
Comment Period 02/01/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would clarify the
applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to specific
functions and activities, including hazardous materials loading and unloading
operations and storage of hazardous materials during transportation. RSPA
intends to list in the HMR pre-transportation and transportation functions to
which the HMR apply. Pre-transportation functions are functions performed to
prepare hazardous materials for movement in commerce by persons who offer a
hazardous material for transportation or cause a hazardous material to be
transported. Transportation functions are functions performed as part of the
actual movement of hazardous materials in commerce, including loading,
unloading, and storage of hazardous materials that is incidental to their
movement. RSPA also proposes to clarify that "transportation in
commerce," for purposes of applicability of the HMR, begins when a
carrier takes possession of a hazardous material and continues until the
carrier delivers the package containing the hazardous material to its
destination as indicated on shipping papers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/05/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
128. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hazardous
Liquids |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking was initiated to
address 30 recommendations made by the National Association of Pipeline
Safety Representatives. Eighteen of those recommendations have already been
addressed in other rulemakings. This rulemaking will take action on the
remaining twelve recommendations. It will decline to adopt 7 recommendations
as unsupported and will propose changes consistent with 5 recommendations.
The changes will modify existing regulations to clarify language and assure
conformance with current practice. On 8/27/02, the General Counsel
reclassified this rulemaking from significant to nonsignificant. This change
will be reflected in the next semi-annual regulatory agenda. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/27/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
67 FR 56970 |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
129. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Infectious
Substances |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 09/02/98; End of Comment Period 12/01/98. NPRM: Publication
Date 01/22/01; End of Comment Period 04/23/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would provide for
the transport of infectious medical waste in bulk packages, remove the
blanket exception for transporting biological products and diagnostic
specimens and revise the definition, hazardous communication, and packaging
requirements for other infectious substances to make them consistent with
international transportation requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: International
Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/17/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 67 FR 57635 |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
130. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Oxygen
Cylinders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD33 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
oxygen cylinders to be placed in an outer container that meets certain
thermal and heat protection requirements when transported in cargo
compartments on aircraft. A separate rulemaking addressing the use of
passenger owned cylinders of oxygen during a flight is under RIN 2105-AC29.
This rulemaking is closely related to an FAA determination in 2120-AG35
(Prohibition of the Transportation of Devices Designed as Chemical Generators
as Cargo in Aircraft). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
131. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Wetlines
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD36 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: ANPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM: . |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would reduce the
risks associated with the retention of flammable liquids in unprotected
product piping on cargo tank motor vehicles during transportation (wetlines).
It responds to an NTSB recommendation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/19/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for ANPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for ANPRM:
None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
132. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hazmat
Registration Fees |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/07/00; End of Comment Period 02/02/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would reduce the
hazmat registration fee for all persons who transport or offer for
transportation certain categories and quantities of hazmat, replaces the
reference to the standard industrial classification (SIC) with the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS), and clarify the registration
fee for not-for-profit organizations. This rulemaking appears in the agenda
as a nonsignificant rule. Because of the overwhelming public interest in this
rulemaking, RSPA is upgrading the rule to significant. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/06/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
133. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: PIM - Gas
Pipelines |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD54 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would address gas
transmission lines in high consequence areas, direct assessment, and an
overall integrity management program. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/19/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
134. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Security
Service Fees |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA01 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 12/31/2001; Notice: Publication Date 02/19/2002;
Interim Final Rule: End of Comment Period 03/01/2002; Reopening of Comment
Period 03/28/2002; End of Reopened Comment Period 04/30/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking imposed a $2.50
security service fee on airline passengers for tickets sold starting in
February 2002 as required by the Aviation and Transportation Security Act
(ATSA). This rule implements the specific requirements for collection and
remittance. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/27/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register Citation
for Disposition of Comments: None |
Transportation
Security Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
135. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Aviation Security Infrastructure
Fees |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN 2110-AA02 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Interim Final Rule: Publication
Date 02/20/2002; Correction 02/25/2002; Notice: Publication Date 02/28/2002;
Interim Final Rule: End of Comment Period 03/18/2002; Extension of Comment
Period 03/20/2002; End of Comment Period Extension 04/02/2002; Notice: Publication
Date 05/01/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would provide
additional guidance for completing Appendix A of the Interim Final Rule
regarding the Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee. That rule requires
carriers to provide information on their costs related to passenger and
property screening for 2000. This guidance would not impose any additional
requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 12/30/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Disposition of
Comments: None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
136. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Transfer
of functions from FAA to TSA |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA03 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 02/22/2002; End of Comment Period 03/25/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking transfers the
FAA's rules governing civil aviation security to TSA. This rulemaking also
amends those rules to enhance security as required by recent legislation.
This rulemaking also requires additional qualifications, training, and
testing of individuals who screen persons and property that are carried in
passenger aircraft. It is intended to improve the quality of screening
conducted by aircraft operators and foreign air carriers. This rule is being
adopted to improve the qualifications of individuals performing screening,
and thereby to improve the level of security in air transportation. This will
help ensure a smooth transition of aviation security from the FAA to TSA and
avoid disruptions in air transportation due to any shortage of qualified
screeners. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
137. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: 12,500
Pounds or More |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA04 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 02/22/2002; End of Comment Period 04/23/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule requires that certain
aircraft operators using aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weigh
of 12,500 pounds or more carry out security measures. This rule requires that
certain aircraft operators conduct criminal history records checks on their
flightcrew members and restrict access to the flight deck. These measures are
necessary to comply with Congressional mandates and to enhance security in
air transportation. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/15/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
138. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Private
Charter Security |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA05 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Approved 06/10/2002; Publication Date 06/19/2002; End of
Comment Period 7/19/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule amends the rules
applying to private charter aircraft to increase the level of security
required in private charter operations. Aircraft operators using aircraft
with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 95,000 pounds or more, except a
government charter, will now be required to ensure that passengers and their
accessible property are screened before boarding. Given the current security
risks, the potential for damage these larger aircraft can cause, and the need
to protect areas that are designated as sterile, TSA believes it is now
appropriate to require these operators to ensure that passengers and their
accessible property are screened. Individuals are required to submit to
screening prior to boarding a private charter aircraft under this rule. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/22/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
139. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Criminal
History/Escorted Access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
rules applying to airports and aircraft operators that require
fingerprint-based criminal history records checks (CHRC) for certain
individuals with access to secured areas in airports. It would require
individuals who regularly have escorted access to secured areas to undergo
CHRC and to wear an individual badge. Also, it would amend the standards for
"escorting" to reduce the likelihood that persons under escort in
secured areas could threaten or endanger security. It would respond to a
statutory mandate and it would enhance aviation security. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/24/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||
140. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Information Protection for All Modes |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
regulation governing the protection of sensitive security information (SSI)
to expand the regulation's coverage to security information related to
non-aviation modes of transportation. The current regulation covers
information primarily related to aviation security. This rulemaking would
make several revisions to the regulation. In addition, in order to implement
its new statutory authority to protect sensitive security information in all
modes of transportation, TSA will amend the SSI regulation to specifically
cover information in all modes regulated by the Department of Transportation
and relevant entities in those modes that may create and receive SSI. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/13/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register Citation
for NPRM: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
141. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Spill
Equipment Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AD66 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM :
Publication Date 8/30/91; End of Comment Period 10/19/91. NPRM: Publication
Date 9/29/92; Extended Comment Period 10/26/92; End of Comment Period
11/16/92. Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 12/22/1993; Correction
1/26/94; End of Comment Period 2/22/94. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This OPA 90 rulemaking would
require vessels carrying oil in bulk as cargo to carry discharge removal
equipment, install spill prevention coamings, and install emergency towing
arrangements. This rule also would require vessels to have a prearranged
capability to calculate damage stability in the event of a casualty. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/27/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
142. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Tanker
Escort |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 7/7/92; End of Comment Period 9/8/92; Comment Period
Reopened 3/26/93; Notice of Public Hearings 4/29/93; Correction 5/19/93; End
of 2nd Comment Period 6/24/93; Notice of availability of Part 1 of study
1/10/94. Final Rule: Request for Comments 8/19/94; Partial suspension crash
stop criteria 11/1/94; Partial suspension effective date 11/17/94; End of
comment period 1/30/95; Notice of availability of Part 2 study 2/1/95. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requires escort
vessels for certain oil tankers transmitting Prince William Sound, Alaska,
and Puget Sound, Washington. It is mandated by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
(OPA 90). The regulations will reduce the chances of a tanker running aground
or colliding as a result of loss of propulsion or steering control, thereby
potentially reducing the risk of an oil spill. On November 1, 1994, the
crash-stop provision in 33 CFR 168.50(g)(2) was suspended and comments
requested. USCG now intends to publish an SNPRM to remove that provision. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/19/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||
143. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Escorts in
U.S. Waters |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE56 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 4/27/93; End of Comment Period 6/28/93; Request for Comments
12/21/94; End of Comment Period 2/13/95. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking sought comment on
where an escort should be required for vessels navigating in the waters of
the United States (excluding Prince William Sound and Puget Sound) and which
vessels should be required to comply with an escort rule. This rule would
have addressed carriage of oil and hazardous substances (including PWS and
PS). |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
144. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Haz Mat
Fac. Response Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 5/3/96; End of Comment Period 9/3/96. NPRM: Publication Date
3/31/2000; End of Comment Period 6/21/00; End of Extended Comment Period
8/30/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
response plans for any marine transportation-related (MTR) facility that,
because of its location, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial or
significant and substantial harm to the environment by discharging a
hazardous substance. These regulations are mandated by the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990 (OPA90), which requires the President to issue regulations requiring
the preparation of hazardous substance response plans. NOTE: Related RIN
2115-AE88 (Vessel Response Plans). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/27/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
145. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: HazMat
Vessel Response Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE88 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 5/3/1996; End of Comment Period 9/3/1996. NPRM: Publication
Date 03/22/1999; Comment Period Extended 6/15/1999; End of Comment Period
6/21/1999; End of Extended Comment Period 8/30/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
response plans for: (1) certain tank vessels operating on navigable waters of
the United States or (2) any marine transportation-related (MTR) facility
that, because of its location, could reasonably be expected to cause
substantial or significant and substantial harm to the environment by
discharging a hazardous substance. These regulations are mandated by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90), which requires the President to issue
regulations requiring the preparation of hazardous substance response plans.
NOTE: The ANPRM for this rule included the related RIN 2115-AE87 (Facility
Response Plans). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/18/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
146. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: '95 Amends
to Internat'l Conv on STCW |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF26 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Notice of
Meeting and Comment Period: Publication Date 8/2/95; End of Comment Period
9/29/95. Notice of Inquiry: Publication Date 11/13/95; End of Comment Period
1/12/96. NPRM: Publication Date 3/26/96; Notice of Public Meetings 4/8/96;
End of Comment Period 7/24/96; Notice of Intent 2/4/97. Interim Rule:
Publication Date 6/26/97; End of Comment Period 12/23/97; Correction 7/25/97;
Correction 7/28/97. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking amended the
current domestic rules on licensing and documentation of personnel serving on
U.S. seagoing vessels. The Interim Rule implements the International
Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for
Seafarers, 1978 (STCW), as amended in 1995. The Final Rule awaits evaluation
of the Interim Rule, and STCW becoming fully effective. STCW becomes fully
effective for all such personnel in August 2002, and we would like to gain
experience under it before we compose a Final Rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/01/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
147. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Salvage
and Equipment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Partial Suspension 2/12/98; Partial Suspension 1/17/01. NPRM:
Publication Approved 04/26/2002; Publication Date 05/10/2002; End of Comment
Period 8/8/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Coast Guard suspended the
effective dates of portions of the vessel oil spill response plan final rule
(61 FR 1052; 1/12/96, 2115-AD81) because of confusion and widespread
misunderstanding regarding the regulatory language. This action will better
define the terms "salvage expertise and equipment" and "vessel
firefighting capability" requirements. It will also reconsider the
24-hour deployment requirements of the final rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/01/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
148. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: ERP for
Passenger Vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF61 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 2/26/98; End of Comment Period 6/28/98. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have
required passenger vessel owners and operators operating small passenger
vessels and passenger vessels in domestic service to develop, maintain, and
implement plans for responding to collisions, groundings, fires, and other
emergencies on passenger vessels. The plans would have addressed issues such
as passenger egress, crew training, and emergency resources on vessels and in
a vessel's operating area. The ANPRM was withdrawn but its proposals will
become part of the new security rulemakings applicable to all vessels that
will respond to issues raised by the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/30/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : 67 FR 54759 |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||
149. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Puget
Sound |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF68 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 12/24/1998. End of Comment Period 5/24/99; Notice of Meeting
5/8/99. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would consider
potential safety measures that the Coast Guard could take to improve marine
safety in Puget Sound-area waters. The potential measures include extended
tug escort requirements for certain vessels and a dedicated pre-positioned
rescue vessel. This project is being treated as a long term action so that
Coast Guard can focus on the new security rules. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/30/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
150. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Lease
Financing for Vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2115-AG08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/2/01; End of Comment Period 7/2/01; Comment Period
Extended 5/29/01; End of Extended Comment Period 9/4/01; Comment Period
Reopened 12/14/01; End of Reopened Comment Period 1/28/02. SNPRM: Publication
Date 08/09/2002; End of Comment Period 10/08/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
regulations on the documentation of vessels engaged in the coastwise trade.
This rule would address statutory amendments eliminating certain barriers to
seeking financing by lease for U.S. flag vessels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/20/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
151. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Tank Level
Pressure Monitoring |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/1/01; End of Comment Period 11/30/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The USCG is establishing a
performance standard and use requirement for tank level /pressure monitoring
devices that signal when a vessel is leaking oil that might otherwise go
undiscovered. The Coast Guard is reopening this project per writ of mandamus
by the D.C. Circuit Court directing the Coast Guard to implement provisions
of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. It was previously RIN 2115-AD69. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/18/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: 67 FR 58515 |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
152. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Ballast
Water Treatment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG21 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 3/4/02; End of Comment Period 6/3/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: Congress, in the Nonindigenous
Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (NANPCA), as amended by
the National Invasive Species Act of 1996 (NISA), directed the Coast Guard to
issue regulations and guidelines for ballast water management. This
rulemaking would define a ballast water treatment goal and an interim
performance standard for all ballast water methods being considered for use as
an alternative to mid-ocean ballast water exchange. It is one of several
Coast Guard efforts related to the overall regulation of ballast water
management. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/21/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
153. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: ID System
Carriage |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG36 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will implement an
Automatic Identification System (AIS) carriage requirement pursuant to The
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). It will cover
SOLAS vessels and non-SOLAS vessels operating on designated waters (i.e.,
Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) areas, coastal zones, inland waterways and other
major waterways). AIS automatically exchanges navigational and positional
information in ship-to-ship and ship-to shore-to ship modes. Safety of Life
at Sea (SOLAS) is a treaty, to which the U.S. is a signatory. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/28/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
154. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Ballast
Water Penalties |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
penalties (as enunciated in NISA) for failure to submit Ballast Water
Management Reports, required under 33 CFR 151, Subpart D. It would also
broaden the class of vessels needing to submit reports, in order to gain
better understanding of how Ballast Water Management is working at preventing
the spread of aquatic invasive species. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/01/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |