Federal Aviation
Administration
2. Improved Survival Equipment for
Inadvertent Water Landings
3. Retrofit of Improved Seats in Air Carrier
Transport Category Airplanes
4. Drug Enforcement Assistance
6. Corrosion Prevention and Control Program
7. National Air Tour Safety Standards
8. Revision of Emergency Evacuation
Demonstration Procedures to Improve Participant Safety
9. Flight Crewmember Duty Limitations and
Rest Requirements
10. False and Misleading Statements
Regarding Aircraft Parts
11. Noise Limitations for Aircraft
Operations in the Vicinity of Grand Canyon National Park
12. Prohibition of the Transportation of
Devices Designed as Chemical Generators as Cargo in Aircraft
13. Licensing and Safety Requirements for
Launch
15. Screening of Checked Baggage on Flights
Within the United States (CAPPS)
16. Policy Regarding Airport Rates and
Charges
17. Hazardous Materials Training
Requirements
18. Certification of Screening Companies
20. Collision Avoidance Systems for Cargo
Airplanes
23. Air Tour Operations in State of Hawaii
24. Regulation of Aircraft Fractional
Ownership Programs
25. Flight Simulation Device Initial and
Continuing Qualification and Use
26. Certification of Pilots, Aircraft, and
Repairmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft
27. Revisions to Passenger Facility Charge
Rule for Compensation to Air Carriers
28. Aircraft Security and Screening of
Passengers and Accessible Property
29. Screeners Qualifications, Training and
Testing
31. Transponder Continuous Operation
32. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum in
United States Domestic Airspace
33. Security Considerations for the
Flightdeck on Foreign Operated Transport Category Airplanes
35. Revocation of Pilot Certificates or
Denial of an Application Based on Security Disqualification
36. Revisions to Cockpit Voice Recorder and
Digital Flight Data Recorder Regulations
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flotation
Devices |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AC72 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 06/30/1988; End of Comment Period 11/28/1988. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would implement
the requirement in the Airport and Airway Safety Act of 1987 that the
Department initiate rulemaking to consider standards for life preservers and
rafts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/30/1987 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
3. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Retrofit
of Improved Seats |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AC84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 05/17/88; End of Comment Period 10/14/88; Reopening of
Comment Period 10/30/98; End of Reopened Comment Period 01/09/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate of the Airport and Airway Safety Act of 1987 that the
Department initiate rulemaking by April 28, 1988, to consider requiring all
air carrier aircraft to replace existing seats with new designs that would be
more crashworthy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/30/1987 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
67 FR 62293 |
4. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Drug Enf
Assistance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AD16 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 03/12/1990; End of Comment Period 05/11/1990. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would revise
certain requirements covering registration of aircraft, certification of
pilots, and penalties associated with registration and certification
violations. This rulemaking would also respond to the Federal Aviation
Administration Drug Enforcement Act of 1988 (the Act). The revised
requirements would assist law enforcement agencies' efforts to stop drug
trafficking in general aviation aircraft. The FAA is currently considering
seeking modifications to the Act. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/18/1988 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for
Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
5. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Aging
Aircraft |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AE42 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 10/05/1993; End of Comment Period 02/02/1994; Reopening Comment
Period 02/08/1994; End of Reopened Comment Period 3/04/1994. NPRM/2:
Publication Date 4/02/1999; End of Comment Period 8/02/1999; Reopening of
Comment Period 8/18/1999; End of Reopened Comment Period 10/08/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requires airplanes
operated under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121,
U.S.-registered multiengine airplanes operated under 14 CFR part 129, and
multiengine airplanes used in scheduled operations under 14 CFR part 135 to
undergo inspections and records reviews by the Administrator or a designated
representative after their 14th year in service and at specified intervals
thereafter. These inspections and records reviews will ensure that the
maintenance of these airplanes' age-sensitive parts and components has been
adequate and timely. The final rule also prohibits operation of these
airplanes after specified deadlines unless damage-tolerance-based inspections
and procedures are included in their maintenance or inspection programs.
Operators of airplanes initially certificated with nine or fewer passenger
seats, however, may incorporate service-history-based inspections instead of
damage-tolerance-based inspections and procedures in those airplanes'
maintenance or inspection programs. This final rule does not apply to
airplanes operated between any point within the State of Alaska and any other
point within the State of Alaska. This rule represents a critical step toward
compliance with the Aging Aircraft Safety Act of 1991 and helps to ensure the
continuing airworthiness of aging airplanes operating in scheduled service. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/28/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
6. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Corrosion
Control |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AE92 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
that the maintenance or inspection programs for all airplanes operated under
part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, all U.S. -registered
multiengine airplanes operated in common carriage by foreign air carriers or
foreign persons under 14 CFR part 129, and all multiengine airplanes used in
scheduled operations under 14 CFR part 135 include FAA-approved corrosion
prevention and control programs. Such programs are needed because existing
maintenance and inspection programs may not provide comprehensive, systematic
measures to prevent and control corrosion. The rulemaking would form a part
of the FAA's response to the Aging Aircraft Safety Act of 1991. These actions
are intended to control the detrimental effects of corrosion and the
resulting airplane structural material loss. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/28/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
67 FR 62142 |
7. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Air Tour
Safety |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: In this rulemaking, the FAA will
respond to NTSB recommendations. FAA is seeking information on air tour and
sightseeing operations that are currently allowed to operate under less
stringent regulations than those applied to other types of commercial
operations. Over the past decade, the number of these operations, and the
number of accidents and incidents associated with these operations, have
increased. Hot air balloons and gliders would not be included. (Note: This
rulemaking was formerly called "Sightseeing Operations.") |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/25/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
8. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Emergency
Evacuation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF21 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 07/18/1995; Correction 08/25/1995; End of Comment Period
10/16/1995. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This final rule would improve
participant safety during full-scale emergency evacuation demonstrations of
transport category airplanes by permitting certain alternative procedures
that would allow a person conducting the demonstrations to react more readily
should a mishap occur. The rule would not impose any additional cost. The
purpose of the rule is to make full-scale emergency evacuation demonstrations
safer for participants, to codify exisiting practices, and to ensure that
each operator demonstrates the effectiveness of crewmember training by
conducting at least a partial evacuation demonstration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/08/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
9. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flight
Crewmember Duty Time |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AF63 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/20/1995; End of Comment Period 03/19/1996; Comment Period
Extended 3/20/1996; End of Extended Comment Period 6/19/1996. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
pilot rest and duty requirements for pilots by ensuring they receive adequate
rest opportunities while assigned to reserve status and by preventing lengthy
duty periods that could contribute to acute and cumulative fatigue. The
rulemaking would propose a definition of "rest period." FAA earlier
had planned to publish an SNPRM by 3/31/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
10. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: False
Statements Plane Parts |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action proposes additional
rules that would prohibit certain false or misleading statements regarding
civil aircraft, airframes, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances,
component parts, and materials, including standard parts, that are used, or
may be used, on civil aircraft. The proposal would also permit increased
inspection by the FAA of records regarding the quality of aircraft parts. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/22/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
11. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: GCNP
Phaseout rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG34 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/31/1996; End of Comment Period 03/31/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
noise efficiency limitations for certain aircraft operations at Grand Canyon
National Park (GCNP). It would establish standards for quiet technology that
are reasonably achievable, as mandated by Congress. The standards for quiet
technology would help the National Park Service (NPS) achieve its statutory
mandate to provide for the substantial restoration of natural quiet and
experience in the GCNP. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/31/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
None |
12. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Chemical
Generators |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG35 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 08/27/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have banned
the transportation in certain aircraft of devices designed to chemically
generate oxygen that pose a risk of fire. The ban applies to
newly-manufactured chemical oxygen generators that have never been filled
with chemicals and those that have been discharged to reduce human error in
identifying which canisters are dangerous. This rule complements a December
1996 RSPA rulemaking prohibiting the transportation of these generators in
passenger carrying aircraft. It is being withdrawn because RSPA action has
eliminated need for rulemaking. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
None |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
13. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Licensing
Space Launches |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: SNPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM
published 10/25/00; End of comment period 2/22/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
commercial space transportation regulations governing licensing and safety
requirements for launch from Federal and non-Federal launch sites. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/17/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for SNPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for SNPRM:
67 FR 49456 |
14. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Child
Restraint Systems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG43 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 02/18/1998; End of Comment Period 6/18/1998. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would consider
the use of child restraint systems in aircraft during all phases of flight
(i.e., taxi, takeoff, landing, or any other time the seat belt sign is illuminated).
Specifically, the agency would consider information about existing child
restraint systems, the development of new and improved child restraint
systems, and the ease with which existing or new child restraint systems can
be used. The Department is currently considering and coordinating options for
appropriate action. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/29/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
15. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: CAPS/CAPPS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG51 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 04/19/1999; End of Comment Period 06/18/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would have
required air carriers to use the Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening
System (CAPPS) where available to screen passenger baggage, or otherwise to
conduct passernger-bag matching. The rule would have applied to aircraft with
61 seats or more. TSA assumed subject matter jurisdiction for this project,
but published a notice in the Federal Register that no further action would
be taken. See 67 FR 67382, November 5, 2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/08/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
16. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Airport
Rates |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG58 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPP:
Publication Date 08/12/1998; End of Comment Period 10/13/1998; End of
Extended Comment Period: 03/01/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: In June 1996, the FAA adopted a
policy for evaluating the reasonableness of landing fees and other charges
paid by air carriers to airports. The current action is to consider
replacement provisions for the portions of the 1996 Policy Statement vacated
by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. The Court disallowed a portion
of the policy that had to do with historic cost valuation of airport
property. FAA has determined that the issues in this policy statement should
be addressed in conjunction with the issues involved in congestion pricing in
airports. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/01/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
17. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hazmat
Training Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG75 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would propose to
amend its hazardous materials (hazmat) training requirements for air carriers
and commercial operators certificated to operate under part 121 or part 135.
In addition, the rulemaking would propose that repair stations certificated
under part 145 document for the FAA that persons handling hazmat for
transportation have been trained as required by the Deparment of
Transportation's Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMRs). The FAA is updating
its regulations because hazmat transport and the aviation industry have
changed significantly since the FAA promulgated its hazmat training standards
to ensure uniform compliance with training requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/18/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
18. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Screening
Co. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 01/05/2000; End of Comment Period 04/04/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking is in response to
a recommendation by the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and
Security and to a Congressional mandate in the Federal Aviation
Reauthorization Act of 1996. The rulemaking was intended to improve the
screening of passengers, accessible property, checked baggage, and cargo and
to provide standards for consistent high performance and increased screening
company accountability. The rulemaking is being withdrawn because of changed
circumstances. TSA assumed responsibility for the issues in this rulemaking,
but terminated further actions in RIN 2110-AA16, published Nov. 5, 2002, 67
FR 67382. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/09/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
19. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Digital
Flight Data Recorder/B-737 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 11/18/1999; End of Comment Period 12/20/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The rulemaking would amend the
digital flight data recorder (DFDR) regulations for transport category
airplanes to add a requirement for all Boeing 737 (B-737) series airplanes to
record additional flight data parameters. It is based on safety
recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
following the investigations of two accidents and other incidents involving
B-737 aircraft. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/15/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
20. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: TCAS
Collision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG90 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 11/01/2001; End of Comment Period 12/31/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require the
installation and use of a traffic alert and collision avoidance system on
certain cargo airplanes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/22/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
21. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Therm/Acoustic |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG91 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 09/20/2000; End of Comment Period 01/18/2001. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action would establish new
flammability standards. They address flame progagation and entry of an
external fire into the airplane. The new standards are intended to reduce the
incidence and severity of cabin fires, particularly those in inaccessible
areas where thermal/acoustic insulation materials are typically installed.
They would also provide an increased level of safety in post-crash fires by
delaying entry of flames into the cabin. The new standards would apply to new
type designs and newly manufactured airplanes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/22/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
22. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Part
139-Certification of Airports |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AG96 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 06/21/2000; Correction 08/21/2000; Comment Period Extended
08/22/2000; End of Comment Period 09/19/2000; End of Extended Comment Period
11/03/2000. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would revise the
airport certification regulation and establish certification requirements for
airports serving scheduled air carrier operations in aircraft designed for
more than 9 passenger seats but less than 31 passenger seats. In addtion,
this rule would amend a section of an air carrier operation regulation to
conform with changes to airport certification requirements. The FAA
Reauthorization Act of 1996 authorized the FAA to certificate airports (with
the exception of those in Alaska) that serve scheduled passenger operations
of air carriers operating aircraft designed for more than 9 passenger seats
but fewer than 31. The Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century mandated that the FAA issue an NPRM on operating certificates for
such airports within 60 days (of April 5, 2000) and a final rule 1 year after
the close of the NPRM comment period . |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
23. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Air Tour
Operations in Hawaii |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH02 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would extend SFAR
71, which established certain procedural, operational and equipment
requirements for air tour operators in the State of Hawaii. The FAA intends
to issue a national air tour safety proposal in the near future, but until
that rulemaking becomes final, there is a need to extend SFAR 71 to ensure
the continuing safe environment for conducting air tours in Hawaii. During
the 9 year period between 1982 and 1991, there were 11 air tour accidents
with 24 fatalities in Hawaii. The apparent causes of the accidents ranged
from engine power loss to encounters with adverse weather. On September 26,
1994, the FAA published an emergency final rule as SFAR 71. The rule
established additional operating procedures, including minimum safe altitudes
(and associated increases in visual flight rules weather minimums), minimum
equipment requirements and operational limitations for air tour aircraft in
the State of Hawaii. SFAR 71 was subsequently extended until October 26,
2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/26/1994 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
24. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Fractional |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH06 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 7/18/01; End of Comment Period 10/16/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would update and
revise the regulations governing operations by aircraft in fractional
ownership programs. This action is undertaken because the FAA has determined
that current regulations do not adequately define fractional ownership
programs and do not clearly allocate responsibility and authority for safety
and compliance with the regulations. The revisions would define fractional
ownership programs and their various participants, allocate responsibility
and authority for safety of flight operations for purposes of compliance with
the regulations, and ensure that fractional ownership program aircraft
operations maintain a high level of safety. Elements of this rulemaking would
provide in certain of the regulations applicable to fractional ownership
programs a level of safety equivalent to certain regulations that apply to
on-demand operators. The rulemaking would also change some regulations that
apply to on-demand operators meeting certain criteria to permit these
operators an alternate means of compliance for certain commercial operations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/06/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
25. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Simulator
Qualification |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the FAA
regulations to establish flight simulation device qualification requirements
for all certificate holders in a new part. The basis of these requirements
currently exists in different parts of the FAA's regulations and in advisory
circulars. The changes would consolidate and update flight simulation device
requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/01/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
67 FR 60284 |
26. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Light-Sport Aircraft Certification |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH19 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Approved 01/04/2002; Publication Date 02/05/2002; End of Comment
Period 05/06/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
requirements for the certification, operation, and maintenance of light-sport
aircraft, including powered parachutes and weight-shift-control aircraft. For
the operation of light-sport aircraft, the rulemaking would establish a sport
pilot certificate and a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot
rating. It would also establish requirements for student pilots and private
pilots to operate these aircraft, and to revise the recreational pilot
certificate to align it with privileges proposed for the new sport pilot
certificate. It would also establish a new repairman certificate with ratings
for individuals who would inspect and maintain light-sport aircraft. In
addition, it would create a new category of special airworthiness certificate
for light-sport aircraft that meet a consensus standard. This action is
necessary to address advances in sport and recreational aviation technology,
gaps in the existing regulations, and several petitiions for rulemaking. The
intended effect of this action is to provide a safe and economical means to
certificate light-sport aircraft and the pilots who fly them. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/14/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
27. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Passenger
Facility Charge Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH43 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
passenger facility charge (PFC) regulation by changing the amount and unit of
collection that a carrier may retain for collecting and handling (including
remitting) PFC revenue. It would allow carriers to keep $0.10 of each PFC
they collect in calendar years 2002 through 2004. From 2005 forward, the
amount would increase to $0.11 for each PFC collected. This action is
necessary to implement the statutory requirement that the Secretary of
Transportation (whose authority has been delegated to the Administrator of
FAA) establish by regulation a uniform amount that carriers may retain that
reflects the average necessary and reasonable expenses for collecting and
handling PFCs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/30/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
28. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Security
and Screening of Passengers and Property |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action requires certain
aircraft operators to search aircraft and screen crewmembers, passengers, and
their accessible property prior to departure. This action is being taken to
counter possible threats in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks. FAA is not going to take any further action on this matter. The
Transportation Security Administration has assumed subject matter
jurisdiction as part of RIN 2110-AA03. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/12/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
29. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Screeners
Qualifications |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking provides
additional qualifications, training, and testing of individuals who screen
persons and property that are carried in passenger aircraft. TSA has assumed
subject matter jurisdiction for this rulemaking as part of RIN 2110-AA03. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/12/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
30. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Metro DC
Airports |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH62 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Approved 02/13/2002; Publication Date 02/19/2002; End of
Comment Period 04/22/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action requires persons
operating to or from certain airports within the Washington, D.C.
Metropolitan Area to conduct those operations in accordance with security
procedures approved by the Administrator. This action is being taken to
restore aircraft operations at airports within the Washington D.C.
Metropolitan Area while countering possible threats in the wake of the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Emergency |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/18/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
31. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Transponder Continuous Operation |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH67 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
instrument and equipment requirements for airplanes operated in domestic,
flag, and supplemental operations. Specifically, the rulemaking would require
affected airplanes to have the capability to help assure immediate activation
of the designated air traffic control (ATC) hijack alert code, and continuous
transmission of that code to ATC during a hijack situation. This action would
respond to the heightened threat to U.S. civil aviation. The FAA believes
that this capability would help provide ATC personnel with more time to
initiate a national security response to a potential airplane hijack
situation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
32. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Domestic
RVSM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH68 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Approved 05/10/2002; Publication Date 05/10/2002; End of Comment
Period 08/08/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would permit
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum flights in the airspace over the
contiguous 48 States of the United States and Alaska and that portion of the
Gulf of Mexico where the FAA provides air traffic services. This reduction of
vertical separation minima would only be applied between those aircraft that
meet stringent altimeter and auto-pilot performance requirements. This
rulemaking would enhance airspace capacity and to assist aircraft operators
to save fuel and time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/13/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
33. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Flightdeck
Security (Part 129) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH70 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule/2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 06/21/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This final rule amends a previous
rule requiring improved flightdeck security and operational and procedures
changes to prevent unauthorized access to the flightdeck on
passenger-carrying aircraft operated by foreign carriers under the provisions
of part 129. This final rule is intended to ensure that the same flightdeck
security enhancements apply to foreign air carriers as apply to U.S. air
carriers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/15/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule/2:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule/2: None |
34. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Crawford
Texas Airspace |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH83 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would limit the
construction of any new object or the alteration of any existing object in
the vicinity of the private residence of the President of the United States
that would exceed 50 feet AGL and is within a 3 nautical miles (NM) radius of
the Presidentís private residence, unless otherwise approved by the
Administrator of the FAA. This rule is being adopted for purposes of national
defense and will assist in protecting the President of the United States. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/26/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
35. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Cert.
Revocation for Security |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rule would expressly provide
the authority to revoke a pilot certificate or deny an application for a pilot
certificate based on a written determination by the Under Secretary of
Transportation for Security that an individual poses a security risk related
to aviation. This rule would address the security concerns of who should hold
a pilot certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and is
necessary to enhance security in air transporation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/11/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
36. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Cockpit
Voice Recorder |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2120-AH88 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and digital flight data recorder (DFDR)
regulations for certain air carriers, operators, and aircraft manufacturers.
It would increase the duration of CVR and flight data recorder (FDR)
recordings; increase the data recording rate of certain DFDR paramaters;
require physical separation of the DFDR and CVR; improve the reliability of
the power supply to both the CVR and DFDR; and, if data-link communication
equipment is installed, require that all data-link communication equipment is
installed, require that all data-link communications received by an aircraft
be recorded. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/30/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |