page views since 01/17/03
Table of Contents
Research and Special
Programs Administration
94. Safeguarding
Food from Contamination During Transportation
95. Response
Plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines
96. Applicability
of the Hazardous Materials Regulations to Loading, Unloading, and Storage
97. Hazardous
Materials: Transportation of Oxygen Cylinders on Aircraft
98. External
Product Piping on Cargo Tanks Transporting Flammable Liquids
99. Hazardous
Materials: Reduction of Registration Fees
101. Security
Requirements for Offerors and Transporters of Hazardous Materials
Research and Special Programs
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
94. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Sanitary
Food |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 02/20/91; End of Comment Period 03/21/1991. NPRM:
Publication Date 05/21/93; End of Comment Period 10/18/93. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will implement
the Sanitary Food Transportation Act of 1990 requirement that DOT issue
regulations to: (1) prohibit use of a tank, rail tank car, or cargo tank to
transport food if such vehicle is also used to transport a nonfood product
other than a nonfood product determined by the Secretary to be acceptable;
(2) prohibit use of any other rail or motor vehicle to transport food, if
such vehicle is also used to transport nonfood products determined by the
Secretary to be unacceptable; and (3) require the use of dedicated vehicles
to transport asbestos and extremely dangerous products. DOT submitted draft
legislation to Congress in April of 1997 that would make the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) of HHS, rather than DOT, the lead agency on this topic.
DOT would have retained highway and rail inspection responsibilities and
notified FDA of apparent problems. This proposed legislation was part of
DOT's NEXTEA II bill and was introduced as H.R. 1720 and S. 1234 in 1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/21/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
95. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Oil
Pipeline Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC30 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 01/05/1993; End of Comment Period 02/19/1993;
Notice of Public Meeting 06/15/1994; Notice of Public Hearing 1/21/1997. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
regulations requiring response plans for certain onshore oil piplines. They
are mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990. The purpose of these requirements is to improve
response capabilities and minimize the impact of onshore oil spills from
pipelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
04/12/1992 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
96. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Applicability of HMR to Loading and Unloading |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AC68 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 07/29/96; End of Comment Period 11/30/96. SANPRM:
Publication Date 04/27/99; Extension of Comment Period 07/26/99; End of
Comment Period 08/25/99. NPRM: Publication Date 08/28/2001; End of Extended
Comment Period 02/01/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would clarify the
applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to specific
functions and activities, including hazardous materials loading and unloading
operations and storage of hazardous materials during transportation. RSPA
intends to list in the HMR pre-transportation and transportation functions to
which the HMR apply. Pre-transportation functions are functions performed to
prepare hazardous materials for movement in commerce by persons who offer a
hazardous material for transportation or cause a hazardous material to be
transported. Transportation functions are functions performed as part of the
actual movement of hazardous materials in commerce, including loading,
unloading, and storage of hazardous materials that is incidental to their
movement. RSPA also proposes to clarify that "transportation in
commerce," for purposes of applicability of the HMR, begins when a
carrier takes possession of a hazardous material and continues until the
carrier delivers the package containing the hazardous material to its
destination as indicated on shipping papers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/05/1996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
97. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Oxygen
Cylinders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD33 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Undetermined |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
oxygen cylinders to be placed in an outer container that meets certain
thermal and heat protection requirements when transported in cargo
compartments on aircraft. A separate rulemaking addressing the use of
passenger owned cylinders of oxygen during a flight is under RIN 2105-AC29.
This rulemaking is closely related to an FAA determination in 2120-AG35
(Prohibition of the Transportation of Devices Designed as Chemical Generators
as Cargo in Aircraft). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/01/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Undetermined:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Undetermined: None |
98. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Wetlines
Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD36 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: ANPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would reduce the
risks associated with the retention of flammable liquids in unprotected
product piping on cargo tank motor vehicles during transportation (wetlines).
RSPA had earlier planned to publish an NPRM by July 2002. This rulemaking
responds to an NTSB recommendation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/19/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for ANPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for ANPRM:
None |
99. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hazmat
Registration Fees |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD53 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 12/07/00; End of Comment Period 02/02/01. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would reduce the
hazmat registration fee for all persons who transport or offer for
transportation certain categories and quantities of hazmat, replaces the reference
to the standared industrial classification (SIC) with the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS), and clarify the registration fee for
not-for-profit organizations. This rulemaking appears in the agenda as a
nonsignificant rule. Because of the overwhelming public interest in this
rulemaking, RSPA is upgrading the rule to significant. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/06/1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
100. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: PIM - Gas
Pipelines |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD54 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would address gas
transmission lines in high consequence areas, direct assessment, and an
overall integrity management program. RSPA withdrew this rule from OMB to
make changes to it to conform with the new Pipeline Reauthorization Act of
2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/19/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
101. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Hazmat
Security |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2137-AD67 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/2/2002; End of Comment Period 6/3/2002; Comment Period
Extended 5/23/2002; End of Extended Comment Period 7/3/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
new requirements to enhance the security of hazardous materials transported
in commerce. Shippers and carriers of certain highly hazardous materials
would be required to develop and implement security plans. In addition, all
shippers and carriers of hazardous materials would be required to assure that
their employee training includes a security component. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/01/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
Transportation Security
Administration |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
102. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Security
Service Fees |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA01 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 12/31/2001; End of Comment Period 03/01/2002;
Reopening of Comment Period 03/28/2002; End of Reopened Comment Period
04/30/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: TSA previously imposed a $2.50
security service fee on airline passengers for tickets sold starting in
February 2002 as required by the Aviation and Transportation Security Act
(ATSA). This rulemaking would implement the specific requirements for
collection and remittance. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/27/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
103. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Aviation
Security Infrastructure Fees |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA02 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Interim
Final Rule: Publication Date 02/20/2002; Correction 02/25/2002; End of
Comment Period 03/18/2002; Extension of Comment Period 03/20/2002; End of
Comment Period Extension 04/02/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would provide
additional guidance for completing Appendix A of the Interim Final Rule
regarding the Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee. That rule requires
carriers to provide information on their costs related to passenger and
property screening for 2000. This guidance would not impose any additional
requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/30/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
104. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Transfer
of functions from FAA to TSA |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA03 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 02/22/2002; End of Comment Period 03/25/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking transfers the
FAA's rules governing civil aviation security to TSA. This rulemaking also
amends those rules to enhance security as required by recent legislation.
This rulemaking also requires additional qualifications, training, and
testing of individuals who screen persons and property that are carried in
passenger aircraft. It is intended to improve the quality of screening
conducted by aircraft operators and foreign air carriers. This rule is being
adopted to improve the qualifications of individuals performing screening,
and thereby to improve the level of security in air transportation. This will
help ensure a smooth transition of aviation security from the FAA to TSA and
avoid disruptions in air transportation due to any shortage of qualified
screeners. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
12/01/2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: None |
105. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: 12,500
Pounds or More |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA04 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final Rule:
Publication Date 02/22/2002; End of Comment Period 04/23/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
that certain aircraft operators using aircraft with a maximum certificated
takeoff weigh of 12,500 pounds or more carry out security measures. This
rulemaking would require that certain aircraft operators conduct criminal
history records checks on their flightcrew members and restrict access to the
flight deck. These measures are necessary to comply with Congressional
mandates and to enhance security in air transportation. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/15/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register Citation
for Disposition of Comments: None |
106. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Private
Charter Security |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA05 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Disposition of Comments |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Publication Date 06/19/2002; End of Comment Period 7/19/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This document amends aviation
security requirements concerning passenger and accessible property screening
in certain private charter passenger operations. TSA issued the existing
standard in June 2002, which requires private charter operators using
aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 95,000 pounds or more,
to ensure that passengers and their carry-on baggage are screened prior to
boarding. TSA is amending the rule to adopt an international standard, and so
now private charter operations in aircraft with a maximum certificated
takeoff weight greater than 45,500 kg (100,309.3 pounds), or with a passenger
seating configuration of 61 or more will be subject to this rule. As a result
of this change, additional aircraft are now covered by the rule that were not
previously subject to it. TSA is establishing a new compliance date for
operators of these aircraft, in order to provide them sufficient time to
develop procedures required by this rule and the security program. Also,
under this amendment, non-TSA screeners are permissible in certain
circumstances. Finally, if an operator cannot complete the required training
for screeners by December 1, 2002, the rule now provides for an extension of
time to complete the training. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
05/08/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates for
Disposition of Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Disposition of Comments: 67 FR 41635 |
107. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Criminal
History/Escorted Access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the rules
applying to airports and aircraft operators that require fingerprint-based
criminal history records checks (CHRC) for certain individuals with access to
secured areas in airports. It would require individuals who regularly have
escorted access to secured areas to undergo CHRC and to wear an individual
badge. Also, it would amend the standards for "escorting" to reduce
the likelihood that persons under escort in secured areas could threaten or
endanger security. It would respond to a statutory mandate and it would
enhance aviation security. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/24/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
108. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title:
Information Protection for All Modes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
regulation governing the protection of sensitive security information (SSI)
to expand the regulation's coverage to security information related to
non-aviation modes of transportation. The current regulation covers
information primarily related to aviation security. This rulemaking would
make several revisions to the regulation. In addition, in order to implement
its new statutory authority to protect sensitive security information in all
modes of transportation, TSA will amend the SSI regulation to specifically
cover information in all modes regulated by the Department of Transportation
and relevant entities in those modes that may create and receive SSI. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
03/13/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
109. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Threat
Assessments-Citizen Pilot Certificates |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA14 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule with Request for
Comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action provides the process
by which the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will notify the
citizen holder of, or applicant for, a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
certificate, and the FAA, if the TSA has determined that the certificate
holder poses a security threat. This process, in the normal case, would offer
the certificate holder the opportunity to respond to the initial
notification. This rulemaking coordinates with FAA rulemaking 2120-AH84. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/30/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule with Request for Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule with Request for Comments: None |
110. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Threat
Assessments-Alien Pilot Certificates |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2110-AA17 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule with Request for
Comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This action provides the process
by which the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will notify the
alien holder of, or applicant for, a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
certificate, and the FAA, if the TSA has determined that the certificate
holder poses a security threat. This process, in the normal case, would offer
the certificate holder the opportunity to respond to the initial
notification. This rulemaking coordinates with FAA rulemaking 2120-AH84. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/30/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule with Request for Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule with Request for Comments: None |
U.S. Coast Guard |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
111. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Spill
Equipment Requirements |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AD66 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM :
Publication Date 8/30/91; End of Comment Period 10/19/91. NPRM: Publication Date
9/29/92; Extended Comment Period 10/26/92; End of Comment Period 11/16/92.
Interim Final Rule: Publication Date 12/22/1993; Correction 1/26/94; End of
Comment Period 2/22/94. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This OPA 90 rulemaking would
require vessels carrying oil in bulk as cargo to carry discharge removal
equipment, install spill prevention coamings, and install emergency towing
arrangements. This rule also would require vessels to have a prearranged
capability to calculate damage stability in the event of a casualty. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/27/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
112. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Tanker
Escort |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE10 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Notice |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 7/7/92; End of Comment Period 9/8/92; Comment Period
Reopened 3/26/93; Notice of Public Hearings 4/29/93; Correction 5/19/93; End
of 2nd Comment Period 6/24/93; Notice of availability of Part 1 of study
1/10/94. Final Rule: Request for Comments 8/19/94; Partial suspension crash
stop criteria 11/1/94; Partial suspension effective date 11/17/94; End of
comment period 1/30/95; Notice of availability of Part 2 study 2/1/95. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking requires escort
vessels for certain oil tankers transmitting Prince William Sound, Alaska,
and Puget Sound, Washington. It is mandated by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
(OPA 90). The regulations will reduce the chances of a tanker running aground
or colliding as a result of loss of propulsion or steering control, thereby
potentially reducing the risk of an oil spill. On November 1, 1994, the
crash-stop provision in 33 CFR 168.50(g)(2)was suspended and comments
requested. This rulemaking will be closed out by a final notice. Comments
received on the final rule and the crash stop suspension will be addressed in
a new rulemaking. Earlier, Coast Guard had scheduled an SNPRM that was to be
published by June 2, 2003. That schedule will be met by a new NPRM under a
new RIN 2115-AG51. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
09/19/1991 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Notice:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Notice: None |
113. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Escorts in
U.S. Waters |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE56 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 4/27/93; End of Comment Period 6/28/93; Request for Comments
12/21/94; End of Comment Period 2/13/95. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking sought comment on
where an escort should be required for vessels navigating in the waters of
the United States (excluding Prince William Sound and Puget Sound) and which
vessels should be required to comply with an escort rule. This rule would
have addressed carriage of oil and hazardous substances (including PWS and
PS). |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
Secretarial/Head of Operating Administration Decision |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
07/28/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
114. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Haz Mat
Fac. Response Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE87 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM: Publication
Date 5/3/96; End of Comment Period 9/3/96. NPRM: Publication Date 3/31/2000;
End of Comment Period 6/21/00; End of Extended Comment Period 8/30/99. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
response plans for any marine transportation-related (MTR) facility that,
because of its location, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial or
significant and substantial harm to the environment by discharging a
hazardous substance. These regulations are mandated by the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990 (OPA90), which requires the President to issue regulations requiring
the preparation of hazardous substance response plans. NOTE: Related RIN
2115-AE88 (Vessel Response Plans). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
10/27/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
115. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: HazMat
Vessel Response Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AE88 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM: Publication
Date 5/3/1996; End of Comment Period 9/3/1996. NPRM: Publication Date
03/22/1999; Comment Period Extended 6/15/1999; End of Comment Period
6/21/1999; End of Extended Comment Period 8/30/1999. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would require
response plans for: (1) certain tank vessels operating on navigable waters of
the United States or (2) any marine transportation-related (MTR) facility
that, because of its location, could reasonably be expected to cause
substantial or significant and substantial harm to the environment by
discharging a hazardous substance. These regulations are mandated by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90), which requires the President to issue
regulations requiring the preparation of hazardous substance response plans.
NOTE: The ANPRM for this rule included the related RIN 2115-AE87 (Facility
Response Plans). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/18/1990 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
116. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: '95 Amends
to Internat'l Conv on STCW |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF26 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Notice of Meeting
and Comment Period: Publication Date 8/2/95; End of Comment Period 9/29/95.
Notice of Inquiry: Publication Date 11/13/95; End of Comment Period 1/12/96.
NPRM: Publication Date 3/26/96; Notice of Public Meetings 4/8/96; End of
Comment Period 7/24/96; Notice of Intent 2/4/97. Interim Rule: Publication
Date 6/26/97; End of Comment Period 12/23/97; Correction 7/25/97; Correction
7/28/97. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking amended the
current domestic rules on licensing and documentation of personnel serving on
U.S. seagoing vessels. The Interim Rule implements the International
Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for
Seafarers, 1978 (STCW), as amended in 1995. The Final Rule awaits evaluation
of the Interim Rule. STCW became fully effective for all personnel in August
2002, and we would like to gain experience under it before we issue a Final
Rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
08/01/1995 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
117. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Salvage
and Equipment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: Final
Rule: Partial Suspension 2/12/98; Partial Suspension 1/17/01. NPRM: Publication
Date 05/10/2002; End of Comment Period 8/8/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Coast Guard suspended the
effective dates of portions of the vessel oil spill response plan final rule
(61 FR 1052; 1/12/96, 2115-AD81) because of confusion and widespread misunderstanding
regarding the regulatory language. This action will better define the terms
"salvage expertise and equipment" and "vessel firefighting
capability" requirements. It will also reconsider the 24-hour deployment
requirements of the final rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/01/1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
118. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Puget
Sound |
|||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AF68 |
|||||||||||||||||
Stage: Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 12/24/1998; End of Comment Period 5/24/99; Notice of Meeting
5/8/99. |
|||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would consider
potential safety measures that the Coast Guard could take to improve marine
safety in Puget Sound-area waters. The potential measures include extended
tug escort requirements for certain vessels and a dedicated pre-positioned
rescue vessel. This project is being treated as a long term action so that
Coast Guard can focus on the new security rules. |
|||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
01/30/1998 |
|||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Withdrawal :
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Withdrawal : None |
119. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Lease
Financing for Vessels |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG08 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: NPRM:
Publication Date 5/2/01; End of Comment Period 7/2/01; Comment Period
Extended 5/29/01; End of Extended Comment Period 9/4/01; Comment Period
Reopened 12/14/01; End of Reopened Comment Period 1/28/02. SNPRM: Publication
Date 08/09/2002; End of Comment Period 10/08/2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would amend the
regulations on the documentation of vessels engaged in the coastwise trade.
This rule would address statutory amendments eliminating certain barriers to
seeking financing by lease for U.S. flag vessels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/20/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Final Rule: None |
120. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Ballast
Water Treatment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG21 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: ANPRM:
Publication Date 3/4/02; End of Comment Period 6/3/02. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: Congress, in the Nonindigenous
Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (NANPCA), as amended by
the National Invasive Species Act of 1996 (NISA), directed the Coast Guard to
issue regulations and guidelines for ballast water management. This
rulemaking would define a ballast water treatment goal and an interim
performance standard for all ballast water methods being considered for use
as an alternative to mid-ocean ballast water exchange. It is one of several
Coast Guard efforts related to the overall regulation of ballast water
management. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/21/2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
121. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: ID System
Carriage |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG36 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will implement an
Automatic Identification System (AIS) carriage requirement pursuant to The
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). It will cover
SOLAS vessels and non-SOLAS vessels operating on designated waters (i.e.,
Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) areas, coastal zones, inland waterways and other
major waterways). AIS automatically exchanges navigational and positional
information in ship-to-ship and ship-to shore-to ship modes. Safety of Life
at Sea (SOLAS) is a treaty, to which the U.S. is a signatory. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action:
International Agreement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
02/28/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |
122. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Port Security
Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG37 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Port Security rulemaking will
implement the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) of 2002 and the International
Maritime Organization International Ship and Port Facility Security Code
(ISPFS Code) requirements that Captains of the Ports (COTPs) and port
stakeholders to develop security plans for all U.S. ports. For this
rulemaking, ěportsî include all areas located within or adjacent to a marine
environment through which maritime commerce is being conducted or people are
transported. Consistent with NVIC 9-02, Guidelines for Port Security
Committees and Port Security Plans Required for U.S. Ports, and parts A and B
of the International Code for Security of Ships and Port Facilities (ISPFS
Code), port security plans will be developed by Port Security Committees
headed by the COTPs. This rulemaking will benefit all persons and property
within the ports by requiring plans and procedures to prevent, deter, detect,
and respond to unlawful acts and terrorist activities. The MTSA waives the
requirement for public notice and comment prior to the issuance of a rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/25/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
123. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Facility
Security Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG38 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking will implement
the facility requirements in the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA)
of 2002 and the International Maritime Organization International Ship and
Port Facility Security Code (ISPFS Code). This rulemaking will require
security assessments and planning requirements for waterfront facilities and
cruise ship passenger terminals and passenger terminals that provide services
to ferries that are certified to carry more than 500 passengers. This
rulemaking will also include provisions for training, record keeping,
security equipment maintenance, and communications procedures. These
requirements address awareness, prevention, response, and consequence
management to reduce the security risk to facilities, ports, personnel, the
public, and the marine environment. The MTSA waives the requirement for
public notice and comment prior to the issuance of a rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/25/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
124. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Vessel
Security Plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG41 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Interim Final Rule |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: The Vessel Security rulemaking
will affect owners and operators of U.S. vessels, including Mobile Offshore
Drilling Units (MODUs) and public vessels, and foreign vessels calling on U.S.
ports. This rulemaking will not cover fixed and floating platforms or other
specific excluded vessels. Consistent with the Maritime Transportation
Security Act (MTSA) of 2002 and parts A and B of the IMO International Code
for Security of Ships and Port Facilities (ISPFS Code), the affected vessels
will be required to designate security officers, develop vessel security
plans based on security assessments and surveys, and implement security
measures and procedures specific to each vesselís operations and to indicated
Maritime Security (MARSEC) levels. Other proposed requirements include
provisions for training, record keeping, security equipment maintenance, and
communication procedures. This rulemaking will mandate industry practices to
advance safety and vital national security interests. The MTSA waives the
requirement for public notice and comment prior to the issuance of a rule. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
11/25/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for Interim Final Rule:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for Interim Final Rule: None |
125. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Popular
Title: Ballast
Water Penalties |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RIN
2115-AG50 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Previous
Stage:None |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This rulemaking would establish
penalties (as enunciated in NISA) for failure to submit Ballast Water
Management Reports, required under 33 CFR 151, Subpart D. It would also
broaden the class of vessels needing to submit reports, in order to gain
better understanding of how Ballast Water Management is working at preventing
the spread of aquatic invasive species. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting
action: Statute |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking
Project Initiated:
06/01/2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dates
for NPRM:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Register
Citation for NPRM:
None |