|
|
|
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL
ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM
Report of a Subcommittee of
the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
on the Review of the Extramural Research Portfolio for Biomedical Research
May 2-3, 2000
Bethesda, MD
U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services
Public Health Service
National Institutes of Health
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ORGAN-SPECIFIC
RESEARCH
Cardiovascular/Cardiomyopathy
Program Portfolio
Endocrinology
Program Portfolio
Bone Disorders
Program Portfolio
Immunology and AIDS
Program Portfolio
Pancreatitis
Program Portfolio
Liver Injury
Program Portfolio
EMERGING CROSS-CUTTING
ISSUES
Metabolism
Program
Portfolio
Epithelial Cells
Cell-Cell Communication and Intracellular
Signaling
Mechanisms of Disease and Disease Monitoring
Model Systems
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
A: Subcommittee
for Review of Biomedical Research Portfolio
B: Experts in Biomedical Research
C: NIAAA Program Staff
D: NIAAA Staff and Guests
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
REPORT OF A SUBCOMMITTEE
OF THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholisms (NIAAA) Subcommittee for the Review of the Extramural
Research Portfolio for Biomedical Research met on May
2-3, 2000. The charge to the Subcommittee was to examine the appropriateness
of the breadth, coverage, and balance of the biomedical research portfolio,
identifying research areas that are well covered and others which are
either under-investigated or which otherwise warrant significantly increased
attention. The Subcommittee was asked also to provide specific advice
and guidance on the scope and direction of the Institutes extramural
research activities in the biomedical research area.
The Subcommittee for the Review of the
Extramural Research Portfolio for Biomedical Research consisted of a
chair, NIAAA Advisory Council member, and an advisory group of seven
individuals. Five of these individuals have demonstrated expertise in
alcohol-related areas, and four individuals have demonstrated expertise
in non-alcohol-related areas (see Appendix A).
The review process was initiated by having
experts (see Appendix B) in biomedical research prepare written assessments
of the state of knowledge, gaps in knowledge, and research opportunities.
NIAAA program staff (see Appendix C) presented
the current extramural portfolio, categorized into the areas of cardiovascular,
endocrinology, bone disorders, immunology, AIDS, pancreatitis, liver,
metabolism, and training and career development. All information was
shared with experts, selected NIAAA staff, and the chair and advisory
group before the meeting.
A summary of FY 99 biomedical research
awards is detailed below.
|
Biomedical Research
|
Percentage of Biomedical
Research to Total
|
Research Project Grants1
Research Centers
Research Careers
Research Training
Total
|
No.
155
4
13
20
192
|
Amount
(in thousands)
$32,029
6,732
1,387
1,612
$41,760
|
No.
26%
27%
19%
33%
26%
|
Amount
21%
28%
19%
24%
22%
|
1
includes SBIR awards and reimbursable funds.
On May 2-3, 2000, experts and NIAAA program
staff made abbreviated presentations of their material followed by discussion
among all of the participants, including representatives from other
NIH Institutes and guests (see Appendix D). After completing this process, the chair and
advisory group, with input from the experts, delineated the following
list of research priorities.
Back to Top
PRIORITIES RESULTING FROM REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL
RESEARCH PORTFOLIO
(1)
Determine the basis for tissue-specific differences in ethanol metabolism.
This can best be accomplished by using transgenics (knockouts of various
cytokines, ADH, etc.); examining the role of innate immune systems;
examining metabolite patterns and actions; and differentiating between
direct and downstream effects.
(2)
New models of ethanol injury need to be developed. Examination of existing
transgenics and emphasis on cofactors (priming, sensitization) can facilitate
this process.
(3) Biomedical
effects of moderate ethanol consumption, including pattern of consumption,
should be emphasized and requires the development of new models.
(4) Resources
for recording and organizing results of microarray analyses should be
made available.
(5) Additional
epidemiological studies are required to determine the biomedical consequences
of alcohol consumption, especially in the areas of alcohol metabolism
and genetics. Utilization of trans-NIH initiatives will be helpful.
Additional gaps in knowledge and research
opportunities were determined by experts in each of the areas covered
and are listed in the text of the report.
ORGAN-SPECIFIC RESEARCH
ALCOHOL ACTIONS ON THE CARDIOVASCULAR
SYSTEM
AND CARDIOMYOPATHY
State of Knowledge (Andrew P. Thomas, Ph.D.)
Effects of Alcohol on Cardiac Muscle Function
Cardiomyopathy
Alcoholism is now recognized as the most
frequent identifiable cause of heart muscle disease, and it has been
estimated that alcohol abuse may underlie as much as 50% of all cases
of congestive cardiomyopathy (Regan, 1990). Moreover, subclinical depression
of heart function is apparent in a large proportion of alcoholics (Rubin
and Urbano-Marquez, 1994). Alcoholic cardiomyopathy reflects a low-output
congestive heart failure, the clinical symptoms and pathology of which
are indistinguishable from other forms of dilated cardiomyopathy (Regan,
1990). The disease progresses from a preclinical (or asymptomatic) stage,
in which the contractile function of the heart is compromised, initially
manifest as a decreased diastolic function. These initial deficiencies
are compensated by a variety of mechanisms, including ventricular dilation
and cardiac hypertrophy. Eventually the compensatory mechanisms breakdown
and the disease progressed through cardiac decompensation to cardiac
failure. Alcoholic cardiomyopathy usually takes ten years or more of
excessive drinking to develop. Women are as sensitive as men to the
cardiac effects of alcohol (Fernandez-Sola et al., 1997). Subclinical
depression of function is also widespread in alcoholics (Regan, 1990).
The depression of cardiac contractile function and the increase in heart
mass is correlated with lifetime alcohol consumption, indicating that
the toxic effects develop in a dose-dependent fashion (Fernandez-Sola
et al., 1997). Reversal of alcoholic cardiomyopathy can occur with abstention
from alcohol, even after the development of end-stage congestive heart
failure (Guillo et al., 1997).
During acute exposure to alcohol in
vivo, there are two opposing effects. Indirect stimulation of the
heart can result from alcohol-induced elevation of catecholamines, whereas
the direct effect of alcohol on the heart muscle is to depress contractility
(Thomas et al., 1994). It has been shown that alcohol interferes with
the cardiac action potential and depresses the calcium transients that
underlie excitation-contraction coupling (Kojima et al., 1993). Since
a direct depression of contractile function is an early hallmark of
alcoholic heart disease, and compensatory mechanisms probably play a
role in the further development of the disease, the acute effects of
alcohol to interfere with cardiac excitation-contraction coupling may
contribute to the initiation of the processes leading to cardiomyopathy.
Elevated catecholamine levels may play a role in the hypertrophic response
to alcohol (Adams and Hirst, 1990). Another potential site of alcohol
action is in the generation of energy, with disruption of mitochondrial
function (Cunningham and Spach, 1994).
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
Alcohol abuse is associated with increased
risk for arrhythmia, and both acute alcohol intoxication and chronic
alcohol consumption can lead to arrhythmias (Regan, 1990). Arrhythmias
could result from effects of alcohol either at the level of the triggering
mechanisms (altered action potential firing) or by creating the substrate
through structural alterations in the cardiac tissue. The most common
rhythm disturbances observed in connection with alcohol abuse are atrial
fibrillation and ventricular dysrhythmia. In most cases, atrial fibrillation
brought on by acute alcohol consumption reverses within 24 hours of
cessation of alcohol intake (Zakhari, 1991). Several studies have reported
prolongation of the QT interval as a result of alcohol, even in alcoholic
patients without cardiac dysfunction (Rossinen et al., 1999), and this
is a known risk factor for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Such arrhythmias
are one of the major factors precipitating sudden death in alcoholics
(Regan, 1990). Electrocardiographic abnormalities in alcoholics are
associated with an adverse prognosis, especially for sudden cardiac
death (Day et al., 1993).
Potential mechanisms for alcohol-induced
arrhythmias can be divided into disturbances in the initiation of the
electrical depolarization, interference in the propagation of the electrical
impulses, and alterations in the normal path and sequence of electrical
excitation (Rosenqvist, 1998). Alcohol can also interfere with the regulation
of heart rate and impulse conduction by neurohormones (Zakhari, 1991).
Effects of Alcohol on Coronary Artery Disease,
Myocardial Infarction, and Atherosclerosis
A large number of epidemiology studies
have suggested that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with
reduced risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) (Goldberg et al., 1999).
Nonfatal acute myocardial infarction has been reported to be more prevalent
in abstainers than in drinkers consuming a broad range of alcohol, but
when CAD mortality is considered, the protective effect of alcohol is
restricted to light to moderate drinkers (Klatsky, 1994). This gives
rise to a U- or J-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and
CAD mortality with a value of 1-2 drinks per day apparently affording
optimal protection against CAD. It is clear from a wide variety of epidemiological
studies that sustained consumption of high levels of alcohol (>3
drinks per day) is associated with increased risk of sudden death from
other cardiovascular causes (Anderson et al., 1993).
It is likely that several mechanisms contribute
to the apparent reduction in CAD risk in those consuming light to moderate
alcohol amounts. Alcohol-induced increase in HDL can explain about half
of the protective effect of alcohol against CAD (Langer et al., 1992).
It has been noted that alcohol use is associated with elevated levels
of the apolipoproteins associated with the formation of HDL, which are
also closely correlated with reduced risk of CAD (Okamoto et al., 1988).
Alcohol may also reduce CAD risk through an antithrombotic effect (Rubin,
1999). Important targets for alcohol inhibition in platelets include
the thrombin-induced formation of the second messenger inositol trisphosphate
and the release of arachidonic acid. Low levels of alcohol can enhance
fibrinolysis, apparently by upregulating the expression of endothelial
cell tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) urokinase activity (Booyse
et al., 1999).
In addition to the apparent protective
effect of moderate alcohol consumption against CAD, moderate alcohol
use may improve the recovery after acute myocardial infarction.
Effects of Alcohol on Hypertension and
Stroke
Chronic, excessive alcohol consumption
is associated with hypertension, and this appears to be independent
of other known risk factors for hypertension (Hillbom, 1998). In contrast
to the effects of excessive consumption, a number of epidemiological
studies have reported that moderate alcohol consumption is associated
with a lower blood pressure than observed in abstainers (Hillbom, 1998).
Alcohol modifies the secretion of many
hormones and neurotransmitters that regulate cardiac function and vasculature,
which can result in changes in heart rate, force of contraction, vascular
resistance, and the distribution of blood flow (Hillbom, 1998). Ethanol
exposure increases sympathetic activity that can contribute to hypertension
(Russ et al., 1991). It has also been reported that alcohol decreases
the sensitivity of the baroreceptors, which provide feedback control
over blood pressure by lowering heart rate and vascular resistance (el-Mas
and Abdel-Rahman, 1993).
Alcohol can have direct effects on the
contractile properties of vascular smooth muscle to affect blood pressure
(Zakhari, 1991). Acute alcohol administration reduces intracellular
calcium levels and can cause relaxation of aortic tissue (Zhang et al.,
1992), whereas chronic alcohol exposure is associated with increased
calcium fluxes into aortic smooth muscle (Vasdev et al., 1991). Of interest
is the possible relationship between alterations in calcium fluxes and
the hypomagnesmia observed in alcoholics (Altura et al., 1996).
Alcohol has been reported to have both
positive (moderate drinking) and negative (heavier drinking) effects
with respect to the risk of stroke. There is a clear association between
heavy alcohol consumption and an increased incidence of stroke (Hillbom,
1999). It has been suggested that light alcohol consumption may have
a protective effect against ischemic stroke (Gorelick and Kelly, 1992).
A U- or J-shaped relationship was found between alcohol consumption
and relative risk of stroke, with decreases in stroke incidence of up
to 50% at alcohol consumption levels of 1-2 drinks per day. Nevertheless,
higher levels of consumption are universally found to increase the risk
of stroke (Anderson et al., 1993). The risk of stroke increased by 250-450%
at consumption levels in the order of 5 or more drinks per day (Rodgers
et al., 1993).
Several mechanisms are likely to contribute
to the increased incidence of stroke in heavy drinkers. Other cardiovascular
effects of alcohol described above are known risk factors for stroke.
In particular, there is a well-characterized relationship between hypertension
and enhanced risk of stroke. In addition, the effects of alcohol to
interfere with blood clotting may contribute to the increased likelihood
of hemorrhage. A further contributing factor may be alcohol-induced
cerebrovasospasm, which is a local contraction of the muscle wall of
blood vessels in the brain that can severely restrict or even block
blood flow (Barbour et al., 1993). Altura and coworkers have suggested
that the vasospasm induced by alcohol may result from a loss of cellular
magnesium (Altura et al., 1993).
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine
the molecular changes that are associated with the development of alcoholic
cardiovascular disease, using "gene-chip" array technology
to screen for unknowns, targeted molecular approaches, and functional
studies of specific components (particularly signal transduction, ion
channels, and effectors of apoptosis).
(2)
Determine the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie the protective
effects of moderate alcohol consumption (including CAD, atherosclerosis,
and recovery from acute myocardial infarction), focusing on expression
and function of signal transduction pathways.
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON CARDIOVASCULAR
RESEARCH
(Thomas F. Kresina, Ph.D.)
I. Overview
Research Funding
Currently, the NIAAA Cardiovascular Research
Portfolio supports 36 grants for a total of $5.5 million. Of these,
30 are basic research grants, five are career development awards and
one award is a fellowship. (Table 1)
Scope of Research Funding
The NIAAA Cardiovascular Research Portfolio
supports a wide range of research that includes both the apparent beneficial
effects of moderate alcohol consumption and the toxic effects of chronic
alcohol consumption on the cardiovascular system. As presented in Table
2, the scope of the portfolio comprises research addressing:
II. Summary of Research
The NIAAA Cardiovascular Research Portfolio
supports a balanced portfolio of research that includes both the possible
beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption and the toxic effects
of chronic alcohol consumption on the cardiovascular system. With regard
to the mechanisms of possible beneficial effects of alcohol consumption,
studies on coronary heart disease and atherosclerosis are investigating
intracellular signaling pathways, lipid metabolism and adherence proteins.
In ischemia-reperfusion /myocardial infarct studies, contractile function,
Ca channels, cytoskeleton and cell surface receptors are targeted. In
other studies, investigators are focused on fibrinolysis. Thus, the
NIAAA has an active portfolio in all the areas of proposed cardioprotection:
HDL cholesterol; platelet aggregation; reduced thromboxane synthesis;
vasodilatation; LDL oxidation and free radical scavenging. In this area,
recent studies have shown specific changes induced by alcohol in HDL
constituents as well as in enzymes and transfer proteins that regulate
HDL levels. Individuals who consume alcohol (1gm/kg/day) exhibit a significant
increase in HDL-cholesterol levels.
In a study of chronic alcohol consumption
and toxicity to the cardiovascular system, stress, hypertension, Ca
signaling and cardiac function are being investigated. Recent studies
have also shown that alterations in the concentration and composition
of plasma lipids and lipoproteins arise with alcohol toxicity. With
regard to ethanol-induced hypertension, tricuspid valve function has
been shown to be impaired as well as mitral valve insufficiency due
to alcohol consumption.
III. Future Directions and Initiatives
- Further studies on mechanisms of
possible beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption are needed.
Once biological mechanism(s) are elucidated, then novel therapeutic
approaches can be developed that provide cardioprotection.
- Further studies are needed to elucidate
the interaction of moderate drinking and cardiovascular medications
- Understanding the mechanisms of
alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy, hypertension and arrhythmia will lead
to possible novel therapeutic interventions
Table 1. Grant
Distribution by Funding Mechanism
Grant Mechanism |
# Grants
|
Percentage of $
|
Amount
|
R01
R29
R21
R03
SUBTOTAL RPG
K23/K01/K08
F31
Total
|
16
5
4
5
30
5
1
36
|
75
8
7
90
8
2
|
4,112,098
440,140
398,450
4,950,688
493,080
14,748
5,458,516
|
Table 2. Number
and Grant Support Level by Cardiovascular Category
Topic |
Number of Grants
|
Support Level
|
Moderate
Alcohol Consumption
Coronary artery disease'
Atherosclerosis
Ischemia-reperfusion/
Myocardial infarcts
Stroke/thrombolysis
Chronic Alcohol Consumption
Cardiovascular toxicity
|
8
11
3
14
|
$1,537,372
1,243,787
526,034
2,151,323
|
Table 3. Grant
Mechanism Distribution by Cardiovascular Category
Topic |
R01 |
R29 |
RO3 |
R21 |
K23/K01/K08 |
F31 |
Moderate
Alcohol Consumption
Coronary artery disease
Atherosclerosis
Ishemia-reperfusion
Myocardial infarction
Stroke/Thrombolysis
Chronic Alcohol Consumption
Cardiovascular toxicity
|
5
3
1
7
|
2
0
0
3
|
3
2
0
0
|
0
3
1
0
|
1
0
1
3
|
0
0
0
1
|
ETHANOL AND THE ENDOCRINE
SYSTEM
State of Knowledge (Mary
Ann Emanuele, M.D.)
Reproduction
In both males and females, the regulation
of reproduction involves the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis.
Males
Acute or chronic ethanol ingestion suppresses
HPG function resulting in, among other things, low serum testosterone,
i.e., hypogonadism. While alcohol affects hypothalamic luteinizing hormone
releasing hormone (LHRH) and pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) in the
adult (Cicero, 1982) and peripubertal male rat (Little et al., 1992),
direct inhibition of testosterone steroidogenesis has been implicated
as well (Johnston et al., 1981; Orpana et al., 1990). It is likely that
ethanol is acting at more than one site of the testosterone synthetic
pathway.
In testes, there are several potential,
alcohol-influenced mechanisms for damage involving opioids (Emanuele
et al., 1999), nitric oxide (Shi et al., 1998), the adrenergic system
(Rivier, 1999), elevated pituitary prolactin and brain proinflammatory
cytokines (Ogilvie et al., 1999), and perturbations in other hormonal
systems that interact with the HPG axis.
The impact of ethanol exposure on hypothalamic
LHRH in the male has been inconsistent and differs with the paradigm
used. While secretion of LHRH has been reported to both be unaffected
(Uddin et al., 1996) and reduced after ethanol (Ching et al., 1988;
Hiney and Dees, 1991; Ogilvie and Rivier, 1997), the ability of the
hypothalamus to synthesize LHRH appears to be unaltered by ethanol at
any dose (Uddin et al., 1996).
Although there is a decrease in testosterone
with ethanol exposure, the expected rise in serum LH does not occur,
implying a central neuroendocrine effect (Emanuele et al., 1991). Studies
in ethanol-fed rats have established that a decrease in LH blood levels
results from impairment of both LH production and LH secretion. While
there is less available data on FSH, the secretion of FSH does appear
to be reduced by ethanol while FSH synthesis is unaffected (Emanuele
et al., 1992).
Ethanol may increase opioids both directly
and indirectly. While endogenous opioid peptides may mediate some of
ethanols testosterone suppressive effects (Grattagliano et al.,
1997), ethanol can also cause testicular oxidative injury and increase
testicular apoptosis (Adams and Cicero, 1991).
Chronic ethanol exposure in the peripubertal
age group decreases fecundity, which may be mediated by testicular oxidative
injury leading to accelerated germ cell apoptosis in ethanol-exposed
fathers (Little et al., 1992).
Females
The major effect of chronic ethanol exposure
in adult female rats is disruption of estrous regularity manifested
mainly by a prolongation of diestrous (Eskay et al., 1981; Rettori et
al., 1987). When proestrous occurs, it appears to be hormonally normal.
Transient estradiol elevation (Lox et al., 1982), increase endogenous
opioid peptides tone (Froehlich, 1993), and IGF-1 decline (Steiner et
al., 1997) provide mechanistic bases for ethanols deleterious
effects on female reproduction. In females, as in males, the onset of
puberty is markedly disrupted by ethanol exposure, and one possible
mechanism might be endogenous opioid peptides (Creighton-Taylor and
Rudeen, 1991). Ethanols disruption of puberty may be in part owing
to interference with the synthesis and secretion of IGF-I (Srivastava
et al., 1995).
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis
Acute ethanol exposure activates the HPA
axis by inducing release of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) from
the hypothalamus (Rivier, 1996). The HPA response to ethanol is dose-dependent,
with activation at blood ethanol levels greater than 100 mg%, while
at 75 mg% blunted ACTH and cortisol responses to exogenously administered
CRF are noted, suggesting an attenuated ability of the HPA axis to respond
to physiological stress (Wand, 1993). This impairment may result from
ethanol-induced inhibition of arginine vasopressin, a secretogogue that
potentiates the action of CRF on ACTH release (Wand and Schumann, 1998).
Chronic ethanol exposure is associated
with increased as well as decreased HPA axis activity. The direct effects
of chronic ethanol exposure on the HPA axis are difficult to assess
due to concomitant problems, including malnutrition, depression, liver
disease, and other stress factors. Individuals who are actively drinking
and are non-depressed have been reported to have a two-fold increase
in urinary cortisol levels and blunted ACTH and cortisol responses to
CRF. These data support the contention that alcoholics have an abnormal
HPA axis. In rodents, chronic ethanol exposure is not accompanied by
elevations in ACTH and corticosterone, yet long-term influences in the
HPA axis occur, including stress-related attenuation. Possible mechanisms
include down-regulation of pituitary CRF receptors, increased corticosterone
feedback, loss of responsiveness of nerve terminals, and hyperactivity
of inhibitory neurons (Turnbull et al., 1999).
There is an increase in HPA axis activation
during ethanol withdrawal; cortisol levels are increased as a result
of elevation in cortisol burst amplitude and cortisol mass secreted
per burst. Excess CRF, cortisol, and other neuroactive steroids (Devaud
et al., 1996) enhance the magnitude of withdrawal symptoms, including
seizure activity. Also disrupted is the normal circadian pattern of
cortisol release and non-suppressability of the HPA axis to low doses
of dexamethasone in chronic alcoholics during withdrawal. This hypercortisolism
subsides over time with cortisol levels normalizing after 7-10 days
of abstinence (Wand, 1993).
In early abstinence, hypo-responsiveness
of the HPA axis is observed, with an attenuated hormonal responsiveness
at each level of the axis. The attenuation of the HPA axis is still
apparent after six months of abstinence.
A low-level cortisol response to ethanol
has been shown to characterize individuals at high risk for alcohol
abuse and dependence (Gianoulakis et al., 1996; Schuckit et al., 1988).
Prolactin
Chronic ethanol consumption is associated
with increased prolactin release in men (Majumdar, 1979). Acute effects
are more variable in women. Persistent hyperprolactinemia and associated
menstrual cycle disturbances have been reported in heavily drinking
women (Volpi et al., 1994). Inconsistent results on prolactin secretion
have been observed in animals given ethanol. There is a marked inhibition
of suckling-induced lactation in ethanol exposed post-partum female
rats, associated with diminished pup growth (Subramanian et al., 1991)
Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth
Factor-I
Ethanol exposure is associated with suppression
of the GH-IGF axis by lowering peripheral levels and altering the availability
of these hormones (Srivastava et al., 1995), with younger animals being
the most vulnerable (Steiner et al., 1997).
Thyroid Axis
Acute and chronic ethanol abuse appears
not to produce clinically relevant thyroid dysfunction (Garbutt et al.,
1995). However, chronic alcoholics often display the nonspecific chemical
features of the euthyroid sick syndrome, and resulting thyroid functions
tests are often misleading, particularly in malnourished alcoholics
with liver disease (Emanuele, 1997).
Leptin
Although not a traditional neuroendocrine
hormone, leptin has recently emerged as important to normal endocrine
functioning, particularly in the reproductive arena. Ethanol may have
alternating effects, acutely lowering leptin (Hiney et al., 1999) and
chronically raising it (Lin et al., 1998). There may be a slightly different
response in females since many studies have shown higher serum leptin
levels in females than in males, a difference greater than can be accounted
for by fat distribution alone.
Diabetes
Single bouts of ethanol exposure do not
worsen and may improve glucose tolerance in diabetics. Some studies
have indicated that isolated episodes of drinking with a meal may have
a beneficial effect by slightly lowering blood glucose excursions (Swade,
1997). This potentially beneficial effect was observed in both men and
women regardless of age. Studies of acute ethanol consumption in non-diabetic
individuals have yielded variable results, with increases, decreases,
or no change in glucose levels. However, daily drinking in moderate
amounts (i.e., 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg) clearly worsens diabetic control and
increases the prevalence of impotence, retinopathy, and possibly peripheral
neuropathy. The mechanisms underlying the hyperglycemia in chronically
imbibing diabetics are still not fully known.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Study
the role of oxidative injury and apoptosis as a common pathway in endocrine
alteration.
(2)
Examine differential sensitivity to humoral perturbations with age (adolescent
to adulthood).
Back to Top
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON ENDOCRINOLOGY
(Thomas F. Kresina, Ph.D.)
I. Overview
Research Funding
Currently, the NIAAA Endocrinology Research
Portfolio supports 31 grants for a total of $5.0 million. Of these 23
are basic research grants, two are career development awards and six
awards are fellowships. (Table 1)
Scope of Research Funding
The NIAAA Endocrine Research Portfolio
supports a wide range of research that includes the deleterious effects
of alcohol consumption upon the endocrine system as well as energy regulation,
metabolism, diet and oxidative stress. As presented in Table 2, the
scope of the portfolio comprises:
- Research addressing the effects of alcohol
on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis
- Research addressing the effects of alcohol
upon the opioid system
- Research addressing the role of oxytocin
on alcohol consumption
- Research addressing the effects of alcohol
on the male and/or female reproductive system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal
axis
- Research addressing endocrine-mediated
immune suppression by alcohol
- Research on the effects of alcohol upon
the endocrine mediators of osteogenesis and osteoporosis
- Research on the effects of alcohol and
glucose transport
- Research on the stress axis comprising
the HPA and sympatho-adrenal (SA) axes and alcohol
- Research on neuropeptides, energy regulation,
lipid metabolism and alcohol
II. Summary of Research
The NIAAA Endocrine Research Portfolio
is predominantly comprised of R01 grants (Table 1) that support a broad
range of research related to the integrated endocrine systems, including
the HPA axis, the mesocorticolimbic system and the renin-angiotensin
system (RAS). Alcohol's deleterious effects upon the endocrine system
are pervasive. A variety of endocrine functions are affected, and the
ensuing endocrinological imbalances range from metabolic and behavioral
defects, to reproductive or immune dysfunction, to osteoporosis or development
of cancer. Thus considerable effort is underway to identify the mechanisms
by which alcohol disrupts particular components of the endocrine system,
and to understand how the interrelationships between these pathways
and their target organ systems are perturbed. The NIAAA has focused
recent efforts on the neuroendocrine peptide regulation of alcohol consumption.
The NIAAA sponsored a workshop on April 28, 1999 entitled "Neuropeptides
and Alcohol Intake" which interfaced alcohol research, the opioids,
the classical neurotransmitters and the newly described network of peptides
and hormones that regulate food intake and energy metabolism. Although
many actions of alcohol on neurotransmitters have been reported, the
potential role of various peptides is a current area of research. Neuropeptide
Y (NPY), a hormone that can function as a neurotransmitter in the brain,
is known to stimulate appetitive behaviors. Recently, NIAAA-funded scientists
reported that mice rendered NPY-deficient by elimination of the NPY
gene consumed more alcohol than were NPY-intact mice. NPY-deficient
mice also were less sensitive to the sedative effects of alcohol than
controls. Both of these phenomena have been associated with increased
risk for alcoholism in humans. Conversely, mice genetically altered
to produce abnormally high levels of NPY showed a lower preference for
alcohol and were more sensitive to alcohols sedative effects.
These findings suggest that NPY is part of the neural circuitry involved
in responses to alcohol.
Based on such data, a RFA was released
in FY99 entitled "Peptide Regulation of Alcohol Intake" for
support of grants in the current fiscal year. The Areas of Research
of this RFA included the HPA axis, the opioid system, the RAS, food
intake and energy homeostasis peptides and alcohol intake.
III. Future Directions and Initiatives
Expanding the focus nucleated by the alcohol/peptide
RFA would be an appropriate future direction for the endocrine portfolio.
A genetic approach to the study of peptides, the endocrine system and
their action on alcohol intake would promote an ongoing institute initiative
on the use of transgenic animals and knockout mice to further study
alcohol addiction. Further initiatives can focus on endocrine dysfunction
and alcohol consumption in the induction of disease pathogenesis such
as obesity, diabetes or oncogenesis. This area of research is currently
not addressed in the endocrine portfolio. Furthermore, the study of
endocrine dysregulation due to alcohol consumption could be augmented
by collaborative initiatives with the immunology/host defense portfolios
where investigations involving interactions between endocrine and immune
systems in the context of alcohol consumption can be pursued. For example,
an initiative requesting research proposals on disease susceptibility
to infectious pathogens could focus on alcohol/HPA/immune system interactions
Table 1. Grant
Distribution by Funding Mechanism
Grant Mechanism |
# Grants
|
Percentage of $
|
Amount
|
R01
R21
R03
SUBTOTAL RPG
K02
F30/31/32
Total
|
21
1
1
23
2
6
31
|
91
1
2
94
3
3
|
4,543,558
94,226
80,218
4,718,002
141,669
127,950
4,987,621
|
Table 2. Number
and Grant Support Level by Endocrine Category
Topic |
Number of
Grants |
Support
Level |
HPA Axis
Opioid System
Oxytocin & alcohol
Alcohol & male reproduction
Alcohol & female reproduction
Endocrine & immunity
Osteogenesis
Glucose transport/Diabetes
Energy regulation & diet
|
13
3
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
|
$2,569,238
440,735
224,734
336,382
734,967
209,566
308,402
219,330
235,923
|
Table 3.
Grant Mechanism Distribution by Endocrine Category
Topic |
R01 |
R03 |
R21 |
K02 |
F30/31/32 |
HPA Axis
Opioid System
Oxytocin & alcohol
Alcohol & male reprod.
Alcohol & female reprod.
Endocrine & immunity
Osteogenesis
Glucose transport/Diabetes
Energy regulation & diet
|
10
2
1
2
3
1
1
1
0
|
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
|
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
|
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
|
3
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
|
SKELETAL RESPONSE TO ALCOHOL
State of Knowledge (Russell
T. Turner, Ph.D.)
Alcohol consumption is generally considered
a risk factor for osteoporosis based on the frequent finding of a low
bone mass, decreased bone formation rate, and increased fracture incidence
in alcoholics. Alcohol has also been shown to reduce bone formation
in healthy humans and animals, and to decrease proliferation of cultured
osteoblastic cells. On the other hand, it has been difficult to demonstrate
alcohol-induced bone loss and increased fracture rate in population-based
studies. Indeed, most studies have shown a positive association between
alcohol and bone mass and no change or a decrease in fracture risk.
Overall, the evidence generally supports a detrimental effect of chronic
alcohol abuse on the skeleton of a sub-population of men and a neutral
or generally beneficial effect of moderate alcohol consumption, especially
in women. This latter putative beneficial effect may be due to a reduction
in the age-related increase in bone remodeling associated with postmenopausal
bone loss.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine molecular mechanisms
of action.
(2) Develop interventions
to prevent and/or reverse bone loss.
NIAAA
PORTFOLIO ON OSTEOPOROSIS
(Vishnudutt Purohit, D.V.M.,
Ph.D.)
Background
Osteoporosis afflicts about 20-25 million
Americans and is linked to 1.5 million fractures every year. Women are
more susceptible than men to this condition. National health care cost
for osteoporotic women is estimated to be 5 billion dollars annually.
Chronic heavy alcohol consumption is a risk factor for osteoporosis
since it decreases bone mineral density, increases bone loss, and increases
rate of bone fractures. On the other hand, moderate alcohol consumption
appears to have beneficial effects as shown by increased bone mineral
density in postmenopausal women. NIAAA-funded researchers are investigating
the underlying mechanisms of the effects of moderate and heavy drinking
on bones.
Research Funding
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholism currently supports nine projects that investigate relationships
between alcohol and osteoporosis. The portfolio consists of 7 R01s,
1 R03, and 1 R21 that can be divided into five broad categories: moderate
alcoholrelated, adolescent-related, pregnancy-related, cellular
and molecular mechanisms, and stress-related studies (Table 1 and 2). In FY 1999, the total amount of funding
for these projects was $1.3 million.
Research Summary
Moderate Alcohol Consumption-Related
Projects: Two research projects
focus on the relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and bone
disorders. One project is investigating the effects of moderate alcohol
intake on bone metabolism in women by measuring the levels of parathyroid
hormone, collagen breakdown products, osteocalcin, vitamin D, and estrogen.
The hypothesis being tested is that moderate alcohol consumption increases
bone mineral density. The second project is evaluating relative risk/benefits
of moderate alcohol consumption on osteoporosis. The hypothesis under
consideration is that mineral content, density and biomechanical strength
of bone will be greater, and biological markers and mediators of bone
metabolism will be improved in monkeys consuming moderate amount of
alcohol.
Animal Model of Osteoporosis: A
rat model of osteoporosis is being developed to determine life long
consequences of ethanol consumption on bone growth in the young, bone
maintenance in middle age, and bone loss rate in aging animals. In addition,
consequences of long term ethanol consumption on the severity and the
rate of formation of ovariectomy-induced osteopenia are being investigated.
Adolescent-Related Project: Chronic
ethanol consumption is known to suppress hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular
axis that leads to decreased levels of plasma testosterone, an androgen
required to maintain bone mineral density in males. In this project
investigators hypothesize that suppression of reproductive axis by chronic
ethanol in peripubertal period results in long term bone disorders including
osteopenia.
Pregnancy-Related Project: This
study investigates effects of alcohol on calcium metabolism in pregnant
rats and their fetuses. Alcohol-induced perturbations in calcium metabolism
during pregnancy may have significant implications for the development
of osteoporosis.
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms:
Three active projects focus on
the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which ethanol impairs bone
cell proliferation and bone metabolism. Of these, one project is testing
a hypothesis that ethanol inhibits osteoblast proliferation by interfering
with a specific site in the tyrosine kinase phosphorylation pathway
that leads to activation of Ras gene. The second project focuses on
cellular and molecular mechanisms of alcohols effects on bone
and mineral metabolism. A rat model is being developed to evaluate dose
response for the long-term effects of alcohol on bone mass, bone cell
number, and bones mechanical properties. In addition, alcohols
effects on bone remodeling, recruitment of osteoblasts and osteoclasts,
and expression of genes related to osteoblast-derived cell signaling
peptides are being studied. Third project examines the hypothesis that
alcohol alters bone metabolism indirectly by elevating the secretion
of cytokines IL-1 and TNF, which have been shown to be involved
in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Both cytokines are known to mediate
bone loss due to estrogen deficiency by increasing bone resorption and
decreasing bone formation.
Stress-Related Project: This
project examines the combined effects of chronic ethanol consumption
and stress on bone quality, serum osteocalcin (a bone protein), and
biosynthesis of enzymes of the catecholamine pathway. The results of
this project may help to understand the mechanisms leading to osteoporosis
in humans who are heavy alcohol consumers and subjected to environmental
stressors.
Significant Findings
1.
Osteopenia caused by chronic alcohol administration in adolescent female
rats is not completely reversible.
2.
Chronic alcohol administration in adolescent, adult, and elderly female
rats reduces bone density, and peak bone mass in both cortical and cancellous
bones without affecting calcium regulating hormones. In adult female
rats, chronic alcohol also decreased the amount of bone surface containing
osteoblasts (bone forming cells) and wall thickness of tibia, a measure
of osteoblast activity. These results confirm a direct deleterious effect
of alcohol on bone forming cells.
3.
Chronic alcohol is injurious to the adolescent male rat skeletal system
and recovery is not complete after abstinence.
4.
Impairment of osteoblastic phospholipase D signal transduction plays
a critical role in mediating antiprolifertaive effect of ethanol on
osteoblast.
5.
As low as 3% of caloric intake of ethanol for four months impaired bone
metabolism in adult female rats, and this effect was related to a decrease
in the number of active osteoblasts.
Future Directions for Research
1. Examine
the effects of moderate alcohol consumption on bone parameters in postmenopausal
women with a consideration of a) patterns of drinking; b) types of alcoholic
beverages; c) dietary supplements; and d) hormonal therapy. Are the
reported beneficial effects mediated via hormones or growth factors?
2.
Study the interactive effects of chronic ethanol intake and the hormones
of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis on the skeletal system of human
adolescents. In addition, investigate the mechanisms by which alcohol
impairs bone formation in adolescent rats.
3.
Investigate the interactive effects of growth hormone-IGF-1 axis and
alcohol on bone remodeling process including effects on osteoblast proliferation
and functions.
4.
Identify the bone growth factors and bone cytokines that are directly
affected by alcohol.
5.
Identify signaling processes of osteoblast proliferation that are directly
affected by alcohol.
6.
Investigate the effect of alcohol on the functions of osteoclasts that
are involved in bone resorption.
Table 1.
Alcohol and Osteoporosis: Grant Distribution by Grant Mechanism
Grant Mechanism
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
R01
|
7
|
$1,174,747
|
R03
|
1
|
$49,965
|
R21
|
1
|
$97,034
|
Total
|
9
|
$1,321,746
|
Table 2.
Alcohol and Osteoporosis: Grant Distribution by Areas of Research
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Moderate alcohol consumption
|
2
|
$309,322
|
Animal model of osteoporosis
|
1
|
$165,770
|
Adolescents
|
1
|
$41,176
|
Pregnancy
|
1
|
$49,965
|
Cellular and molecular
mechanisms
|
3
|
$658,479
|
Stress
|
1
|
$97,034
|
Total
|
9
|
$1,321,746
|
Back to Top
CONSEQUENCES OF
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION ON
IMMUNE-ASSOCAITED DISEASES
State of Knowledge (Lynell
W. Klassen, M.D.)
While the association of alcohol abuse
with increased deaths from infections was made over 75 years ago, only
in the past 15 years has serious investigative efforts been made to
understand the role of alcoholic exposure on immune dysfunction. The
more recent studies from both humans and animals suggest that alcohol
produces significant alterations in immunoregulation. These abnormal
immunoregulatory effects produce either immunodeficiency or autoimmune
features and can lead to clinical disease. Complications associated
with chronic alcohol abuse have a variety of other abnormalities, which
can contribute to immune dysfunction, including malnutrition, vitamin
deficiency, and advanced tissue damage such as liver cirrhosis.
The present knowledge of immune abnormalities
that occur following significant alcohol exposure suggests the following
clinical consequences.
· Decreased host defenses
- increased susceptibility to and progression
of infections
· Decreased immunosurveillance
- increased cancer induction - increased
tumor growth and metastasis
· Increased autoimmune reactions
- enhanced organ destruction by cellular
mechanisms - presence of autoantibodies to normal
proteins
· Induction of neoantigen
- organ specific dysfunction/damage
· Altered inflammatory responses
- abnormal cytokine activity - non-specific
tissue damage and constitutional effects (fevers, weight
loss)
Experimental and clinical studies have
demonstrated that alcohol has multiple effects along the entire pathway
of immune recognition, activation, differentiation, proliferation, and
final effector activities.
Alcohol and Immunogens
Aldehyde-protein adducts derived from alcohol
metabolism can induce an immune response to both the adducted epitope
as well as to normal protein epitopes that have not undergone chemical
alteration. Circulating antibodies to these adducts have been detected
following chronic alcohol consumption. The detection of such adducts
in the livers of alcohol-fed rats suggest that these immune reactive
proteins may be important in producing an autoimmune-like reaction that
can cause damage. There is a clear potential for cellular cytotoxic
mechanisms to be directed against these protein adducts, thereby enhancing
liver damage. Similar protein-aldehyde adducts have been detected in
other tissues as a product of lipid peroxidation (Hill et al., 1998).
The finding of MAA adducts in atherosclerotic coronary arteries raises
the possibilities that alcohol-induced bioreactive proteins may accelerate
a variety of other disease processes.
Alcohol and Antigen Presentation
Alcohol has been clearly shown to modulate
the ability of monocytes to process antigens and express immunogenic
peptides to T helper cells (Szabo et al., 1993). In vivo studies suggest
that this effect is mediated primarily by alcohol-induced reduction
of IL-1b and an increase in TGF-b . Studies of delayed type hypersensitivity
(DTH) have demonstrated that the effect of alcohol on APC activity is
genetically linked, reversible, and is the main cause of DTH suppression
(Waltenbaugh and Peterson, 1997). The clinical significance of these
observations is that both quantitative and qualitative changes in an
immune response can result in sub-optimal destruction of infectious
agents with resultant clinical disease. Thus, any decrease in antigen
processing efficiency can lead to increased bacterial or viral burdens
and clinical infections.
Alcohol and Helper T Cells
Recent findings suggest that chronic exposure
to excessive alcohol induces TH2 excesses with increased IL-10, decreased
IL-12, and decreased INF-g production (Peterson et al., 1998). The consequences
of this TH2 functional excess is a polyclonal increase in immunoglobulins
following chronic alcohol ingestion, development of selective immunodeficiencies
to specific infectious agents, blunted response to primary infections,
and altered cytokine milieu causing abnormal inflammatory and fibrinogenic
responses. While these findings suggest that chronic alcohol consumption
results in increased TH2 function and potential dysregulation, its significance
in human disease is still untested.
Alcohol and Immune Cell Differentiation/Proliferation
Acute and chronic alcohol exposure inhibits
antigen-specific T cell proliferation (Szabo, 1999), but produces minimal
effects on total B cell number (Romagnani, 1991). However, in vivo studies
suggest that B cell differentiation is altered by alcohol, particularly
by a decrease in IL-4 levels, which can inhibit both B cell proliferation
and immunoglobulin class switching (Aldo-Benson et al., 1992). Chronic
alcohol administration is associated with reduced natural killer (NK)
cell numbers and activity (Cook et al., 1997).
Alcohol and Immune Regulation
Although many studies have correlated chronic
or acute alcohol exposure with various cytokine changes, it is still
unclear which isolated change may be biologically important. While in
vitro studies suggest that alcohol has minimal effect on the ability
of T cells to produce IL-2, in vivo studies suggest that chronic
alcohol administration affects T cell utilization of IL-2, decreasing
proliferation and ultimately down-regulating cell mediated responses
(Jerrells et al., 1990). Human studies have documented a decrease in
serum IFN-a , IFN-g , and IL-2 levels following alcohol exposure (Vicente-Gutierez
et al., 1991). Acute alcohol administration has been shown to stimulate
the production of prostaglandin E2, which also down regulates T cell
proliferation and differentiation. Elevation of TNF-a following alcohol
exposure has been described (McClain et al., 1993).
Alcohol and Effector Mechanisms
One of the most consistent immune abnormalities
in alcoholics is a significant increase in serum immunoglobulin levels.
It is often difficult to determine whether the elevated immunoglobulins
are a consequence of chronic alcohol exposure or the result of subsequent
liver disease. However, alcoholics without liver disease typically have
elevations in IgA levels, while those with alcohol liver disease primarily
have elevations of IgG. While the effect of alcohol in B cell function
is probably minimal, a selective decreased antibody response is probably
secondary to abnormal T cell function (Romagnani, 1991). Chronic alcohol
exposure results in a generalized polyclonal activation of antibody
production while at the same time there is often a decrease in specific
antibody response following vaccinations. This pattern is also seen
in classic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus
and rheumatoid arthritis. T cell function is diffusely decreased following
high dose alcohol ingestion (Israel et al., 1986). Abnormal delayed
type hypersensitivity has been demonstrated by a significant reduction
in tuberculin and fungal skin tests, and T cell mitogenic stimulation
is usually markedly reduced. Decreased cytotoxic T cell activity against
viral infected cells has also been reported.
Special Considerations
There is inadequate evidence to determine
whether alcohol is a co-factor either in HIV susceptibility or in disease
progression.
The consumption of alcohol has been linked
with the clinical progression of chronic hepatitis C infection leading
to progressive liver damage (Ostopowicz et al., 1998). Individuals who
are both alcoholics and positive for hepatitis C infection have additive
effects in the development of liver disease. However, it is unclear
whether these are two independent processes, or whether both conditions
may directly interact to produce progressive tissue damage.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine the mechanisms and significance
of alcohol-induced TH1/TH2 polarization; including
- which intracellular signaling pathways
are affected by alcohol and contribute to the TH1/TH2 change,
- which changes in cell surface receptors
accompany alcohol exposure result in TH2 activation,
- what cytokine environmental milieu is
inducted by alcohol to produce a TH2 effect,
- what modalities can reverse the TH1/TH2
phenotype (cytokines, cytokine inhibitions, anti-oxidants, etc.).
(2) Determine whether the development
of immunoreactive products, e.g., aldehyde adducts, directly cause fibrinogenesis
and liver damage and
- by which molecular mechanism,
- by which cytokines.
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON IMMUNOLOGY
AND HOST DEFENSE
(Leslie S. Isaki, Ph.D.)
I. Overview
Research Mechanisms
In FY 1999, the NIAAA Immunology and
Host Defense Research Program funded 38 extramural grants for a total
of $5.5 million. Of these, 32 were basic research project grants with
an average cost of $184,000 (excluding two active grants in no-cost
extension). The Program also funded three Career Development Awards
and three fellowships (Table 1). Table
2 lists grant mechanisms that exclude AIDS-related projects.
Descriptions of Projects Supported
The Immunology program consists of research
on alcohol-related impairments to innate and acquired host defenses.
Investigations range from ethanol-induced disruptions of molecular
mechanisms of transducing cellular signals in gene expression to studies
on developing animal models of liver injury after alcohol consumption.
The goal of these projects is to understand how ethanol alters host
defense systems. To achieve this, investigators utilize a variety
of biological endpoints and approaches.
- Majority (61%) of investigators examines
the chronic effects of ethanol on host systems, whereas about 20%
of researchers study the acute effects of ethanol. Another 20% of
investigators study both chronic and acute effects of ethanol. Of
this group, two projects examine the acute (or binge) effects within
a chronic model of alcohol consumption in animals. (Table
3)
- Table 4 summarizes
the grant distribution by organs targeted for study. These studies
include both the direct and indirect effects of ethanol in promoting
pathological conditions of the targeted organs and tissues.
- Clinical studies in human subjects
are generally preclinical in nature and consist of isolation of
peripheral blood cells and manipulation of these cells ex vivo.
- All grants in this portfolio focus
on basic molecular mechanisms and include investigations into aspects
of alteration of mediator profiles and function.
II. Summary of Research
(Table 5)
Table 5 provides a summary of the scientific
disciplines of the research projects within the Immunology portfolio.
The table is divided first into two general areas: Innate and Adaptive
defenses. Innate responses refer to non-immune host resistance which
act as first-line defense whereas adaptive responses consist of acquired
immunity involving antigen-specific lymphocytes.
Innate resistance
Research grants examine the early phases
of host defense mechanisms that are altered by ethanol exposure and
include:
- Signaling changes in ethanol-induced
phosphorylation of proteins that transduce signals for transcription
and cell growth factors.
- Molecular targets of ethanol, which
result in impairment of mechanical barriers of host, defense in the
lung (surfactant and ciliary motility).
- Protein modification of ethanol-related
alterations in the regulation and processing of proinflammatory cytokines
and ribosomal proteins in hepatic mitochondria.
- The effects of ethanol on respiratory
function following traumatic brain injury in a swine model.
Adaptive responses
Research projects investigate the ethanol-related
impairments to mechanisms of host defense. The grants can be divided
into two research classes: studies on cellular and molecular aspects
of the function of the immune system and studies on the effects of alcohol
exposure on the pathogenesis of infectious microorganisms.
- In both humans and mice, two types
of CD4-bearing T helper lymphocytes (Th cells), termed Th1 and Th2,
are defined both by the types of cytokine secreted and immune function.
Alcohol-consumption is associated with impaired antigen-specific
cell-mediated immunity, whereas antibody responses are unimpaired
or enhanced in vivo after alcohol exposure. Grants that focus
on ethanol-altered cellular immune processes examine the early events
in antigen recognition, evaluate accessory cell function and mediator
production, and elucidate the mechanism of polarization of the immune
response toward Th2-driven humoral immunity and away from Th1-driven
cell-mediated immunity.
- Identifying the cellular and molecular
targets of ethanol are the goals of researchers who study infectious
agents and alcohol exposure. Compromise of host immunity, by excessive
alcohol consumption, is associated with impaired or altered mediator
production and function. These dysregulated cytokine activities
can result in altered recruitment of effector cells to sites of
infection and diminished pathogen killing.
- Research grants on tissue and organ
damage as a consequence of excessive alcohol consumption focus on
mechanisms of ethanol-induced immunodeficiency and autoimmunity
as primary factors that lead to tissue and organ injury. Similar
to events in resolving infections, ethanol-induced injury is generally
preceded by inflammation that is associated with parenchymal infiltration
of leukocytes (neutrophils and lymphocytes) and increased release
of reactive oxygen species.
- Investigators who examine the effects
of alcohol exposure in utero on the developing immune system
focus on both B and T cell lymphopoiesis.
III. Future Directions
Ethanol-induced impairments to host defense
has progressed rapidly within the last decade. Although both cell-mediated
and humoral (antibody) immune responses are affected by alcohol, the
underlying mechanism(s) of alcohol's effects on immune responses are
unknown. The emerging mechanisms are based primarily on dysregulation
or disruption of cytokine interactions rather than on the direct effects
of ethanol. Recent evidence indicates that the primary outcome of excessive
alcohol consumption, whether it be infection or tissue injury, may have
an etiological basis in exacerbation or prolonged inflammation. It is
likely that there will be many targets that underlie the ethanol-induced
alteration of host defense responses. Table
6 lists the research projects that target emerging areas of study.
Innate Responses
Alterations in both innate and adaptive
immune responses by alcohol are manifested in the increased frequency
and severity of infections and in alcoholic liver injury seen in alcoholics.
To better understand the effects of alcohol on the entire immune response,
projects on innate host defenses and interactions of the innate and
adaptive immune responses need to be significantly expanded. Innate
immune recognition appears to be primarily mediated through Toll proteins
which recognize conserved molecular patterns that are associated with
microbial pathogens (such as lipopolysaccharide, LPS). Upon encounter
with pathogens or after LPS stimulation, these pattern-recognition receptors
activate intracellular signaling, most notably via the transcription
factor NF-6 B, which results in the induction of a variety of effector
genes. The role of Toll-like receptors in alcohol-induced tissue injury
and immune system impairments are specific investigations that can be
pursued to further understand the relationship between innate responses
and initiation and progression of alcohol-related injury.
Trauma
Alcohol consumption is an integral causal
factor in most types of traumatic injury. Not only does alcohol increase
the frequency and severity of injury, but both the acute and chronic
usage of alcohol impair the bodys normal physiological response
to injury and significantly complicates medical management of the trauma
patient. Basic science trauma research focussing on ethanol-impaired
mechanisms that lead to dysregulation of cytokines, increase in immunosuppression,
and exacerbation of complications arising from infectious agents, burns,
and surgical procedures are important areas for the conduct of research.
Withdrawal
Although the neurological and behavioral
aspects of withdrawal are well studied, little is known about the immunology
and host responsiveness to infectious agents and injury during alcohol
withdrawal. Data from the research supported in this portfolio are mainly
generated from either active drinking models (or during the period of
ethanol exposure with in vitro models) or immediately after ethanol
administration has been halted.
Scant data indicate that during the period
of alcohol withdrawal, the host may still be vulnerable to the damaging
effects of ethanol. Results from an alcohol binge model in animals suggest
that elevated levels of oxygen-derived radicals detected during withdrawal
may be a significant contributory factor to tissue injury. In a study
of cardiovascular risk factors involving male alcoholics, cytokine profiles
were altered compared to control subjects, and alcohol withdrawal induced
potentially atherogenic changes in lipoprotein (a). Host responses during
withdrawal have been observed for a period of several days to one year
post-drinking, when differences in levels of proinflammatory cytokines
were detected in groups of alcoholics with and without liver disease.
Appendix: Portfolio of the
Immunology/AIDS (HOST DEFENSE) Program
FY 1999
Table 1:
Grant Mechanisms
Grant Mechanism |
No. of Grants |
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
R01 |
25*
|
68%
|
$5,397,096
|
82%
|
R03, R21 |
4**
|
11
|
435,638
|
7
|
R29 |
3
|
8
|
279,677
|
4
|
RPG SUBTOTAL |
32
|
84
|
$6,112,411
|
93
|
K02, K08, K21 |
3
|
8
|
350,442
|
6
|
F30, F32 |
3
|
8
|
80,886
|
1
|
TOTAL |
38
|
100%
|
$6,697,497 |
100%
|
* One active R01 grant in no-cost extension.
** One active R21 grant in no-cost extension.
Table 2.
Grant Mechanisms of the Immunology (non-AIDS) Program
Grant
|
Immunology (Non-AIDS)
|
Mechanism
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
R01 |
13
|
$2,640,319
|
R03, R21 |
4
|
242,950
|
R29 |
3
|
279,677
|
RPG SUBTOTAL |
20
|
$3,162,946
|
K08 |
2
|
238,640
|
F30,
F32 |
2
|
57,850
|
TOTAL |
24
|
$3,459,436
|
Table 3:
Distribution by Duration of Alcohol Exposure
Duration
|
No. of Grants
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
Acute
|
7
|
21
|
$1,009,812
|
18
|
Chronic
|
20 |
61
|
3,839,581 |
69
|
Acute/Chronic
|
6 |
18
|
721,764 |
13
|
TOTAL |
33 |
100%
|
$5,571,157 |
100%
|
Table 4:
Grant Distribution by Research on Target Organs
Organ
|
No. of Grants
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
Lung
|
8
|
35
|
$ 1,143,291
|
32
|
Liver
|
10 |
44
|
2,122,968 |
59
|
Gut
|
1
|
4 |
73,426 |
>1 |
Brain |
4*
|
17
|
312,099 |
9
|
TOTAL |
23 |
100%
|
$3,578,358 |
100% |
* Two active grants in no-cost extension.
Table 5:
Grant Distribution by Alcohol-Related Impairments to Host Defenses
Area
|
No. Grants
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
INNATE HOST
DEFENSES |
10
|
26%
|
$1,834,634
|
29%
|
Signaling |
4 |
11% |
$961,102 |
16% |
Mechanical
Barriers |
2 |
5 |
506,447 |
8 |
Protein Modification |
3 |
8 |
208,635 |
3 |
Brain Trauma |
1 |
2 |
158,450 |
2 |
ADAPTIVE RESPONSES |
28
|
74%
|
$4,013,207
|
71%
|
Cellular Processes |
8 |
21% |
$1,504,611 |
24% |
Infections |
9* |
24 |
1,203,578 |
19 |
Organ/Tissue
Injury |
8* |
21 |
1,305,018 |
20 |
Developmental |
3 |
8 |
528,067 |
8 |
TOTAL |
38
|
100%
|
$6,375,908 |
100%
|
* One grant in no-cost extension.
Table 6:
Grant Distribution by Targeted Areas of Research
Area
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Gene Therapy
|
3
|
$432,325
|
Trauma
|
3
|
668,411
|
Endocrine
|
4
|
567,874
|
Withdrawal |
1
|
146,276
|
Cancer |
2
|
536,517
|
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON AIDS
(Thomas F. Kresina, Ph.D.)
- Overview
Research Funding
The NIAAA AIDS research support is an
allocation determined by the Office of AIDS Research (OAR). This allocation
is a specific set-aside and can be only used to support AIDS research
applications or AIDS related research applications. In addition, the
OAR establishes targeted fiscal expenditures for the seven AIDS Areas
of Emphasis. For FY 99, the Targeted appropriations for the AIDS Areas
of Emphasis are presented in Table 1.
The NIAAA categories AIDS funding by
Division corresponding to the Area of Emphasis: Division of Biometry
and Epidemiology-AIDS Natural History and Epidemiology; Division of
Clinical and Prevention Research- AIDS Behavioral & Social Science
Research; Division of Basic Research- AIDS Etiology and Pathogenesis.
The AIDS Programs in the Division of Basic Research are divided into
Neurological AIDS research portfolio housed in the Neuroscience and
Behavior Branch and the Biomedical AIDS research portfolio housed
in the Biomedical Research Branch.
The Biomedical AIDS research portfolio
supported 14 extramural research grants and 1 research supplement
for a total of $2,779,645. Of these, 11 were basic research project
grants, two were career development awards and one was an exploratory
grant. (Table 2)
The Neuroscience AIDS research portfolio
supported 3 extramural research grants for a total $2,199,032. Two
grants were research project grants and one grant was a program project
grant.
Scope of Research Funding
The Biomedical AIDS research portfolio
supports a wide range of research that is both AIDS and HIV/AIDS related
research where alcohol is a co-factor in the etiology or pathogenesis
of HIV infection. As presented in Table 3, the scope of the portfolio comprises research addressing:
- The role of alcohol in enhanced susceptibility
to HIV infection through biological mechanisms such as depressed
immunity or reduced barrier function
- The role of alcohol in the progression
of HIV infection via augmented viral replication and/or viral load
- The role of alcohol in enhanced progression
to AIDS through increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections
- The role of alcohol in the progression
of morbidity due to opportunistic infections such as hepatitis C,
tuberculosis or pneumococcus
- The role of alcohol in the modification
of pharmacodynamics of drug treatment for HIV/AIDS
The Neuroscience and Behavior AIDS research
portfolio supports a wide range of research that is both AIDS and HIV/AIDS
related research where alcohol is a co-factor in the etiology or pathogenesis
of neurological manifestations of HIV infection. The scope of the portfolio
comprises research addressing:
- Alcohol use and cognitive and neurobehavioral
dysfunction in HIV infection and AIDS
- Alcohol use and central nervous system
morbidity
- Alcohol use and brain damage and neurological
impairment in HIV infection and AIDS
- AIDS dementia complex and alcohol
II. Summary of Research
The Biomedical and Neuroscience AIDS research
portfolios address important questions related to alcohol consumption
as a co-factor the etiology and pathogenesis of HIV/AIDS. For example:
Is drinking harmful to individuals with HIV infection? Such medical
management issues are increasingly important in the era of Highly Active
AntiRetrovial Treatment (HAART). As successful treatment regimens progress,
HIV infection is being transformed into a chronic asymptomatic viral
infection where cofactors, such as alcohol consumption, play a larger
role in disease burden. As such, alcohol and HIV biomedical and neurological
research investigations are becoming important research issues. It is
now important to investigate whether alcohol consumption will induce
immune changes in individuals who are responders to HAART and undergoing
immune reconstitution. The Biomedical and Neuroscience AIDS research
portfolios are predominantly R01 research portfolios that supports research
related to the broad issues of immunosuppression, viral enhancement,
susceptibility and pathogenesis of opportunistic infections and alcohol.
Recent initiatives at NIAAA have promoted
specific research areas of the portfolio. A workshop in March 30-31,
1999, entitled " Workshop on Alcohol and Immunology/AIDS"
brought together experts in the fields to formulate research directions
in the immunology of alcohol-HIV/AIDS. The NIAAA has cosponsored two
RFA 's in the biomedical aspects of alcohol and HIV infection. The NIAAA
cosponsored an NIAID RFA on Hepatitis C Centers that was open to HIV/alcohol/hepatitis
C research investigations. A current RFA from NIDA entitled "Viral
Hepatitis and HIV in Drug and Alcohol Users" provides a R01-based
grant mechanism to support research in alcohol/HIV and hepatitis C research.
A symposium entitled "Alcohol Use and HIV Pharmacotherapy"
is scheduled for April 26-28, 2000 and will bring together pharmacologists,
alcohol researchers and HIV experts to define issues in the field. This
initiative promotes new collaborations for investigators in the field
of alcohol research.
III. Future Directions and Initiatives
The Biomedical and Neuroscience AIDS research
portfolios can be augmented by future initiatives supporting the broad
research areas of the portfolio. For FY 2001, NIAAA is participating
in an NIAID-sponsored Program Announcement entitled " Collaborations
for Advanced Strategies in Complications of HIV Infection". This
PA requests research applications on alcohol-induced metabolic complications,
such as triglyceridemia, as well as the role of alcohol-induced immune
modulation in the pathogenesis of opportunistic infections, such as
tuberculosis. In neuroscience, an RFA is planned to augment the R01
research base.
Table 1. The
NIAAA Extramural AIDS Allocation by OAR AIDS Area of Emphasis
Area of
Emphasis |
FY 99 Estimate
(dollars in thousands)
|
Natural History
and Epidemiology
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Therapeutics
Vaccines
Behavioral & Social Science Research
Training and Infrastructure
Information Dissemination
Total
|
610
6,402
0
0
8,428
685
70
16,195
|
Table 2. Biomedical
& Neuroscience AIDS Grant Distribution by Funding Mechanism
Grant Mechanism |
# Grants
|
Percentage of $
|
Amount
|
R01
R21
K02/K21
P01
Total
|
13
1
2
1
17
|
58
2
4
36
100
|
2,865,084
78,606
188,676
1,786,886
4,919,252
|
Table 3. Scope
of HIV/AIDS Research by Topic and Grant Mechanism
Topic |
R01
|
P01
|
R21
|
K02/K21
|
Immunosuppression
Viral enhancement
Susceptibility to OI's
Pathogenesis of OI's
Pharmacology of treatment
|
5
2
1
5
0
|
0
0
0
1
0
|
0
0
1
0
0
|
2
0
0
0
0
|
ALCOHOL-RELATED PANCREATIC
DISEASE
State of Knowledge
(Stephen J. Pandol, M.D.)
Alcohol-related pancreatitis in humans
accounts for about one half of the cases of acute pancreatitis and a
majority of the cases of chronic pancreatitis.
Mechanisms of Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis
Several animal models of acute pancreatitis
have been investigated over the past three decades (Kaiser et al., 1995).
In all of the models, there is development of an acute inflammatory
response and digestive enzyme activation in the organ associated with
cell death (necrosis and apoptosis) of parenchymal cells.
There have been two main areas of investigation
of the mechanisms of acute pancreatitis. One area has been devoted to
determining the mechanism of digestive enzyme activation in the pancreas
(Steer and Meldolesi, 1987), and it is known that alcohol enhances the
sensitivity of the pancreas to digestive enzyme activation from in
vitro studies (Katz et al., 1996). The other major area of research
involves the inflammatory response in the pancreas (Denham and Norman,
1999). It has been learned that acinar cells are capable of expressing
a wide variety of proinflammatory ctyokines that are responsible for
both mediating the inflammatory response as well as regulating the cell
death responses of the parenchymal cells. Moreover, the processes of
inflammation and intracellular digestive enzyme activation are linked.
Preliminary data suggest that alcohol metabolites, acetaldehyde and
fatty acid ethyl esters, regulate transcription factors involved in
mediating the inflammatory response (e.g., NF-kB and AP-1).
Investigations into the mechanisms of chronic
pancreatitis have been hampered by the lack of experimental models (Vaquero
et al., 1999).
Alcohol Metabolism in the Pancreas
Knowledge about alcohol metabolism in the
pancreas is limited and controversial. Little is known about the alcohol
dehydrogenase (ADH) system that mediates oxidative metabolism in the
pancreas (Wilson and Pirola, 1997). In contrast, a major pathway for
alcohol metabolism in the pancreas is via non-oxidative metabolism (Wilson
and Pirola, 1997). Although fatty acid ethyl esters may mediate toxic
effects of alcohol on the pancreas, the enzyme systems that metabolize
alcohol to non-oxidative metabolites are not fully characterized and
there is controversy about whether they are regulated by chronic alcohol
intake (Hamamoto et al., 1990; Laposata, 1998).
Effects of Alcohol on Pancreatic Acinar
Cell Metabolism
Pancreatic triglyceride accumulation has
been observed in some animal studies after chronic alcohol administration
(Iimuro et al., 1996). Furthermore, both reactive oxygen species and
lipid peroxidation products have been demonstrated in the pancreas with
alcohol administration (Iimuro et al., 1996). However, the roles of
reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation products on the pathologic
effects of alcohol in the pancreas have not been determined.
Animal Models of Alcohol-Induced Pancreas
The greatest limitation to the investigation
of the pathologic effects of alcohol on the pancreas is the lack of
animal models of acute and chronic alcohol-induced disease.
Factors Making the Pancreas susceptible
to the Pathologic effects of Alcohol in Humans
One of the most puzzling aspects of alcohol-induced
pancreatic disease is the individual susceptibility to alcohol-induced
pancreatic disease (Wilson and Pirola, 1997). Although alcoholic pancreatitis
incidence is proportional to the amount of alcohol consumed, only a
small percentage of individuals who drink heavily develop alcohol-induced
pancreatic disease. The factors responsible for this variability in
susceptibility have not been found. It is possible that endogenous hormones
and neurotransmitters or signals they regulate in the pancreatic acinar
cell may be involved in the sensitization of the pancreas to the pathologic
effects of alcohol.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine the metabolism of ethanol
in the pancreas and the effects of ethanol on metabolic events in the
pancreas, e.g., mitochondrial effects (methionine, SAM, and glutathione
metabolism) and phospholipid effects.
(2) Determine the effects of ethanol and
its metabolites in modulating the signals that regulate the processes
of acute and chronic pancreatitis, e.g., inflammation, cell death, and
fibrosis.
Back to Top
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON ALCOHOLIC
PANCREATITIS
(Vishnudutt Purohit, D.V.M.,
Ph.D.)
Background
Alcohol abuse is a major cause of pancreatitis,
and up to 60-70% cases of pancreatitis are associated with alcoholism.
Several factors have been suggested to mediate injurious effects of
alcohol on pancreas including cholecystokinin (CCK), premature activation
of pancreatic enzymes, oxidative stress, NF-kB activation, cytokines,
chemokines, and inflammatory cells. However, the exact mechanisms of
alcoholic pancreatitis are not clear.
Rearch Funding
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholism currently supports three projects that investigate relationships
between alcohol and pancreatitis. The portfolio consists of one R01
grant, and two center-grant components, with a total funding of about
435 K (Table 1).
Rearch Summary
Altered Pancreatic Enzyme Secretion:
This project is testing a hypothesis that alcohol impairs pancreatic
enzyme secretion by altering the gene expression of certain proteins
in a subset of cells in pancreas, brain, and duodenum. The investigators
have shown that chronic ethanol ingestion significantly elevates the
mRNA levels of rat pancreatic monitor peptide (MP) which may contribute
to pancreatic hypersecretion by stimulating the release of cholecystokinin.
The expression of pancreatic cholesterol esterase mRNA is upregulated
in rats by chronic ethanol ingestion. This may play a role in the pathogenesis
of pancreatitis due to the ability of the esterase to metabolize cholesterol
and form fatty acid ethyl esters.
Interactive Role of Alcohol and Cholecystokinin
(CCK): The hypothesis of this
project is to test that an ethanol diet alone or in combination with
a low dose of CCK induces an activation of transcription factors that
are involved in regulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines
and chemokines. The project is investigating the roles of transcription
factors (NF-kB and AP-1), cytokines, and chemokines in the development
of pancreatitis. The investigators have developed a rat model of alcoholic
pancreatitis by administering alcohol and CCK, an intestinal hormone
known to stimulate the secretion of pancreatic enzymes. Rats that were
administered ethanol intragastrically for 2 or 6 weeks followed by intravenous
infusion of CCK showed significant increases in serum amylase and lipase
levels, number of inflammatory cells (neutrophils and macrophages),
number of apoptic acinar cells, mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines
(TNF and IL-6) and chemokines (MCP-1 and MIP-2), mRNA expression of
inducible nitric oxide synthase, and pancreatic NF-kB activity. Rats
treated with either ethanol or CCK did not show significant changes
in these parameters.
Role of Ethanol Metabolites on Pancreas:
This project investigates the effects of both oxidative (acetaldehyde
and acetate) and nonoxiadtive (fatty acid ethyl esters) ethanol metabolites
on pancreas. It is hypothesized that these metabolites activate transcription
factors (NF-kB and AP-1) which in turn activate the expression of proinflammatory
cytokines, leading to inflammation, cell death, and fibrosis. This project
has shown that NF-kB plays an important role in the development of CCK-induced
pancreatitis.
Future Directions:
1. Determine
mechanisms by which alcohol sensitizes pancreas to CCK effects.
2. Molecular
mechanisms by which alcohol alters pancreatic enzyme secretion.
3.
Role of acetaldehyde in initiating pancreatic injury.
4.
Roles of cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and inflammatory
leukocytes in the process of inflammation of the pancreas.
Table 1.
Alcoholic Pancreatitis
Category |
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Pancreatic
secretion |
1
|
$225,567
|
Cholecystokinin |
1
|
$163,300
|
Ethanols
metabolites |
1
|
$44,800
|
Total |
3
|
$434,667
|
LIVER INJURY
State of Knowledge (Hide
Tsukamoto, D.V.M., Ph.D.)
Although Lieber and colleagues (1975) suggested
that progressive ALD proceeds despite adequate nutrition, compelling
evidence exists for the role of nutritional deficiency in alcoholic
liver disease (ALD) (Mendenhall et al., 1995). Moreover, it has been
demonstrated that nutrients such as polyunsaturated fat or iron can
have profound effects on alcoholic liver injury. Currently, ALD is thought
to result from priming (Tsukamoto et al., 1999) and sensitizing (Colell
et al., 1998) mechanisms produced by cross-interactions of primary mechanistic
factors (acetaldehyde, oxidative stress, immune responses, hypermetabolism,
membrane alterations, redox shift) and secondary risk factors (nutrition,
genetic factors, gender, viral hepatitis, concomitant use of drugs).
The multifactorial nature and complex interactions among primary mechanistic
factors and between primary and secondary factors, appear to be the
basis for the heterogeneous response that alcoholics exhibit for ALD.
Even though hepatocytes account for 65%
of the total cell population and 85% of total volume of the liver, the
five non-parenchymal liver cell types (endothelial cells, Kupffer cells/hepatic
macrophages, hepatic stellate cells, bile duct epithelial cells, and
pit cells/liver NK cells) possess distinct and important cellular functions
in support of liver homeostasis and actively participate in pathologic
processes.
Hepatic Macrophages and ALD
Administration of antibodies against TNFa
, the cytokine predominantly expressed by Kupffer cells, attenuates
alcoholic liver injury (Iimuro et al., 1997), and the importance of
TNFa is confirmed by the absence of alcoholic liver injury in TNF receptor
1 knockout mice (Yin et al., 1999). It is, however, unclear whether
resident macrophages (Kupffer cells), newly recruited monocyte-derived
macrophages, or both serve as the primary effector cell type for expression
of TNFa in experimental ALD. Further, what primes hepatic macrophages
for TNFa expression is not known.
Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells and Inflammation
Ethanol and LPS induce similar morphologic
and functional changes in sinusoidal endothelial cells typically characterized
by reduced fenestration and hyaluronan uptake (Sarphie et al., 1996;
Deaciuc and Spitzer, 1996), both of which are preventable by elimination
of Kupffer cells. Chronic ethanol intake impairs receptor-mediated endocytosis
by sinusoidal endothelial cells at the level of internalization (Thiele
et al., 1999). Intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression
by endothelial cells is unregulated in experimental ALD and correlates
with plasma endotoxic, hepatic TNFa mRNA, and liver inflammation and
injury (Nanji et al., 1995). Expression of a receptor component for
the adhesion molecule such as CD18 (b 2-integrin) is unregulated on
neutrophils of ethanol-fed rats (Bautista, 1997). However, ethanol-induced
neutrophilic inflammation in the liver, the hallmark of alcoholic hepatitis,
has been largely unsuccessful in experimental animals, suggesting the
models are missing critical factor(s). Endotoxin challenge to ethanol-sensitized
livers results in coagulative necrosis and accompanying neutrophilic
inflammation, but most critical changes appear to occur initially at
the sinusoidal endothelium, such as cellular swelling, blood cell aggregation,
and microcirculation disturbance (McCuskey et al., 1995).
Hepatic Stellate Cells and Alcoholic Fibrogenesis
Knowledge of the mechanisms of hepatic
stellate cell (HSC) activation in ALD is limited because of difficulties
in both inducing diffuse liver fibrosis in ethanol-fed animals and isolating
sufficient numbers of HSC from ethanol-fed rats. HSC show expected changes
of cellular activation after exposure to ethanol, including increased
collagen and DNA synthesis (Matsuoka et al., 1990), induced expression
of a -smooth muscle actin, and depletion of retinyl palmitate (Tsukamoto
et al., 1996). HSC isolated from rats fed diet high in polyunsaturated
fat with or without ethanol, show increased responsiveness to hepatic
macrophage-derived factors for stimulation of either collagen or DNA
synthesis, providing the potential cellular basis for increased alcoholic
liver fibrogenesis under the high polyunsaturated fat diet regimen (Matsuoka
et al., 1990). Besides the paracrine mode of HSC stimulation involving
soluble factors, oxidative stress may particularly be relevant to the
mechanisms of HSC activation in alcoholic liver fibrogenesis. Although
the role of oxidative stress in hepatocellular injury in ALD is convincing,
the direct involvement of oxidative stress in HSC activation is still
controversial.
Priming and Sensitization
Even though there is a close correlation
between induction of CYP2E1 and experimental ALD (Nanji et al., 1994)
and inhibitors for CYP2E1 ameliorate alcoholic liver injury (Morimoto
et al., 1995), a recent study using CYP2E1 knockout mice demonstrated
no suppression of alcoholic liver injury and a similar induction of
other CYP families (CYP1A, CYP2A, CYP2B, and CYP3A) in ethanol-fed wild
and knockout mice (Kono et al., 1997). Furthermore, gadolinium chloride
blocks experimental alcoholic liver injury despite induction of CYP2E1
(Koop et al., 1997), demonstrating dissociation of CYP2E1 induction
from liver injury. However, these latter two studies only examined the
early stage of experimental ALD and whether CYP2E1 plays a role in progression
of experimental ALD is yet to be tested.
Another important subcellular site that
contributes to both priming and sensitizing effects of ethanol is mitochondria.
Depletion of mitochondrial GSH is the most important sensitizing mechanism
associated with ethanol exposure (Fernandez-Checa et al., 1991) to TNFa
-induced cell death (Colell et al., 1998). This ethanol-induced defect
is caused by impaired transport of GSH into mitochondria and is corrected
by administration of S-adenosylmethionine but not by that of N-acetylcysteine
(Colell et al., 1997). It is not known what molecular mechanisms underlie
the ethanol-induced impairment in mitochondrial GSH transport except
for the observation that fluidization of mitochondria with a fatty acid
derivative restores their ability to transport GSH (Colell et al., 1997).
Ethanol is known to induce apoptosis in
human primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells in culture (Neuman et al.,
1999), and mitochondria from rats chronically fed ethanol are more sensitive
to induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition by ceramide,
GD3 ganglioside, and Bax (Pastorino et al., 1999). Whether and how ethanol
sensitizes hepatocytes for apoptosis are key questions that need to
be pursued. What determines the type of cell death (apoptosis versus
necrosis) in ALD is another important question, with the extent of ATP
depletion perhaps being a critical factor. UCP-2 is expected to be upregulated
in ALD, and this may make hepatocytes more vulnerable to cell death
by compromising the mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP generation.
Liver Regeneration versus Progressive ALD
Ethanol exposure has been shown to inhibit
calcium mobilization and DNA synthesis in hepatocytes induced by HGR
(Saso et al., 1996) and TGFa -stimulated receptor autophosphorylation
(Tuma et al., 1998). The HGF finding is consistent with the observation
that improved recovery from ethanol-induced fatty liver followed the
administration of HGF, the most potent mitogen for hepatocytes (Tahara
et al., 1999). Ethanol also inhibits TNFa dependent increase in NF-K
B binding in partially hepatectomized rat livers while not affecting
IL-6 induced Stat-3 phosphorylation and DNA binding (Yang et al., 1998).
Specific recommendations:
(1) Define/identify the missing secondary
risk factors for development of progressive alcoholic liver disease.
This will help improve animal models.
(2) Determine the mechanisms of PMN transmigration
in alcoholic liver disease.
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON LIVER
DISEASE
(Vishnudutt Purohit, D.V.M.,
Ph.D.)
Background
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a major
cause of illness and mortality in the USA. It is the fourth leading
cause of death among adult men of 24-65 years residing in urban areas.
While the early stages of the disease - fatty liver and hepatitis
are reversible, the end stage cirrhosis is irreversible and fatal. Cirrhosis
is the tenth leading cause of death in this country. Of the 25,000 people
who died of this disease in 1992, at least 12,000 deaths were attributed
to alcoholic cirrhosis. NIAAA-funded researchers are investigating the
underlying cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms by which
chronic alcohol consumption leads to the development of ALD. Results
obtained from this research could be used to design strategies for the
treatment and prevention of the disease.
Research Funding
Currently, NIAAA is supporting 54 research
projects on ALD, with a total funding of $10.9 million (Table 1). The
breakdown of the portfolio by grant mechanism is: regular research projects
(R01), 64.8%; small grants (R03), 3.7%; developmental/exploratory grants
(R21), 5.5%; MERIT awards (R37), 5.6%; center grant components (P50),
11.1%; independent/senior scientist awards (K02/K05), 5.5%; and fellowships
(F30/F31), 3.7% (Table 1).
Research Summary
The program portfolio is classified into
ten categories as presented in Table 2, and described
below.
Role of Intestinal Macrophages and Permeability
(Table 3)
Alcohol increases intestinal permeability
to endotoxin that plays a significant role in the initiation of liver
injury since endotoxin activates Kupffer cells which, in turn, can stimulate
the inflammatory cascade. In addition, intestinal lamina propria macrophages
may get activated by intestinal endotoxin that may lead to increased
production of inflammatory cytokines. Currently, this portfolio has
two projects with a total funding of $285 K.
Lamina propria macrophages:
This project examines the role of bacteria and endotoxin in the activation
of intestinal macrophages and associated production of TNF that can
reach the liver and initiate the inflammatory cascade.
Intestinal permeability:
Investigating the mechanisms by which alcohol and acetaldehyde increase
permeability of intestine to endotoxin. The main focus of the study
is the tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanism.
Role of Kupffer Cell Activation
(Table 4)
Researchers are investigating the mechanisms
of Kupffer cell activation that leads to the generation of various inflammatory
mediators such as cytokines, oxidants, chemokines and adhesion molecules.
In addition, researchers are developing molecular techniques for the
suppression of the inflammatory cascade. At present NIAAA is supporting
seven projects that are directly related to Kupffer cell activation
by alcohol, with a total funding of $1.5 million. The portfolio consists
of the following categories:
Endotoxin, TNF, MIP-2, CYP2E1, and
ICAM cascade: Researchers are
investigating the role of endotoxin and its receptor (CD14), and free
radicals on the activation of Kupffer cells. The mechanisms by which
Kupffer cells produce TNF, MIP-2, and ICAM-1 are being investigated.
Knockout mice are being used to ascertain the role of endotoxin receptors,
TNF receptors, and CYP2E1. In addition, antisense oligonucleotide targeting
is used to suppress the generation of TNF and ICAM-1 in order to interrupt
the inflammatory cascade.
NF-kB activation:
These studies examine mechanisms of NF-kB activation in Kupffer cells
that leads to expression of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules.
The focus is on the sources of oxidative stress involved in NF-kB activation,
including iron, NADPH oxidase, CYP2E1, xanthine oxidase, lipooxgyenase,
and iNOS.
Cyclic AMP:
This project is investigating the modulating role of cAMP on the activation
and deactivation of Kupffer cells and associated impact on liver injury.
Lipid peroxidation:
Investigating the mechanisms by which acetaldehyde and aldehyde products
of lipid peroxidation alter normal Kupffer cell functions and provoke
cellular activation.
Role of Leukocytes (Table
5)
Under the influence of chemoattractants
and adhesion molecules, leukocytes migrate from the circulation to the
hepatic parenchyma to produce their toxic effects by releasing cytokines,
free radicals, and proteases. Currently, NIAAA is supporting three projects
(610 K) to investigate the role of leukocytes in alcoholic liver disease.
Neutrophils:
This project focuses on the role of neutrophillic proteinases which
provoke critical changes in the hepatic perisinusoidal matrix, leading
to hepatic stellate cell activation and development of fibrosis.
Lymphocytes: This
project addresses the role of activated T lymphocytes in damaging
hepatocytes either by direct cytotoxicity or through increased production
of cytotoxic cytokines in ethanol treated mice.
Monocytes: Investigating
the role of monocytes in ALD through activation of NF-kB, increased
production of TNF and chemokine (MCP-1), and increased ICAM expression
on endothelial cells.
Stellate Cell Activation and Fibrosis
(Table 6)
Liver fibrosis results from excessive deposition
of extracellular matrix components, especially collagen, resulting in
an imbalance between the amount of collagen produced and degraded in
the liver. Hepatic stellate cells are the primary source of excessive
extracellular components, regardless of the causal agent. Upon activation,
quiescent stellate cells undergo distinct cellular changes leading to
myofibroblastic transformation and increased production of matrix components.
NIAAA currently supports ten research projects ($1.9 million) that investigate
the role of various factors in the activation of stellate cells and
increased production of collagen. The portfolio is briefly described
below:
Role of Vitamin A:
The Researchers in this field will characterize the catalytic and molecular
properties of retinyl palmitate hydrolases and retinol dehydrogenases
that are expressed during the activation of stellate cells when retinol
esters are hydrolyzed. These studies may help to elucidate the role
of retinol metabolism in stellate cell activation.
Role of Acetaldehyde:
Acetaldehyde - an immediate metabolite of ethanol has been implicated
in the development of hepatic fibrosis by increased collagen production.
Investigators are focussing on cellular and molecular mechanisms by
which acetaldehyde stimulates type I collagen gene transcription in
the liver. One group is investigating the role of interaction of acetaldehyde
with cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors of a 2(I) collagen
gene, transcription factors, and transforming growth factorb (TGFb )
in the up-regulation of a 2(I) collagen gene in human stellate cells.
The other group is defining acetaldehyde and TGFb responsive elements,
and investigating the roles of oxidative stress and c/EBPb on acetaldehyde
and TGFb -mediated up-regulation of mouse a 1(I) collagen gene in hepatic
stellate cells.
Transcription Factors:
One group of researchers is examining the transcriptional regulation
of a 1(I) collagen gene in stellate cells to understand the molecular
mechanisms of increased collagen expression in activated stellate cells.
The locations of cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors required
for transcription of collagen genes are being determined. The other
group is investigating the roles of NF-kB and tissue transglutaminase
in the process of hepatic injury and fibrogenesis. Yet another group
is testing the role of NF-kB and AP-1 transcription factors in the activation
of quiescent stellate cells.
Cytokines:
This group is investigating the molecular mechanisms by which IL-6,
Il-1, and TNF modulate type I collagen gene expression in hepatic stellate
cells.
Gene Manipulations:
Researchers in this group are using TNFR1, ICAM-1 and protein kinase
A RIIb subunit knockout mice, and antisense to TGFb to understand the
role of specific proteins and enzymes in the development of hepatic
fibrosis.
Treatment and Prevention:
Researchers are investigating the mechanisms by which dilinoleoylphosphatidylcholine
prevents alcohol-induced liver fibrosis.
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants (Table
7)
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been
implicated in the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced liver injury. Researchers
have been working on the following aspects of ROS: 1) sources and mechanisms
of ROS generation; 2) mechanisms by which ROS produce tissue injury;
3) mechanisms of the depletion of endogenous antioxidants by alcohol;
and 4) potential use of antioxidants to prevent ROS-induced tissue injury.
Currently NIAAA is funding 10 projects on oxidative stress, with a total
funding of $1.9 million. The portfolio includes:
CYP2E1, NADH, NADPH, Iron:
Researchers are investigating the role of CYP2E1, NADH, NADPH, and iron
in the generation of ROS and associated tissue injury in liver using
HepG2 cell line transfected with human CYP2E1.
Lipid Peroxidation:
This portfolio addresses the role of lipid peroxidation products such
as MDA, and 4-HNE in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver injury. Three
potential mechanisms by which these products may cause tissue damage
are being investigated: a) inactivation of glutathione-S-transferase,
a major hepatic antioxidant enzyme; b) adducts formation with proteins
which results in cytotoxic autoantibodies; and c) effects on collagen-1
gene expression in stellate cells and fibrosis.
Free radicals from Fatty Liver used
for Transplant: Investigating
the role of SOD/Catalase insensitive free radicals from fatty
liver, lipid peroxidation, and expression of adhesion molecules (selectin
and ICAM-1) in transplant failure.
Mitochondrial glutathione-S-transferase:
Examines the role of this enzyme in the detoxification of 4-HNE that
inhibits cytochrome c oxidase, a key component of the respiratory chain
in mitochondria.
Mitochondrial GSH transporter:
Identifying the mechanism by which alcohol impairs GSH transporter and
the role of defective transporter in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver
disease.
S-adenosyl methionine (SAM):
Investigating the role of SAM deficiency in the development of ALD.
Gene therapy for ALD:
Examines how to attenuate alcohol-induced liver injury by adenovirus-mediated
delivery of genes for SOD and catalase.
Role of Ethanol-Derived Protein Adducts
(Table 8)
Ethanol, acetaldehyde, and lipid peroxidation
products can react with various proteins to form adducts which can be
injurious to liver through immunotoxicity. This portfolio is comprised
of four projects with a total funding of $729 K.
Acetaldehyde and malondialdehyde-protein
adducts: Acetaldehyde and MDA
can react together with proteins in a synergistic manner to form distinct
hybrid adducts (MAA adducts). Researchers are trying to understand the
chemistry and formation of these adducts, raising antibodies against
these adducts, and investigating immune response. In addition, they
are investigating mechanisms by which the adducts impair liver function
and induce hepatotoxicity.
Ethanol-derived hydroxyethyl radicals-protein
adducts: These studies investigate
mechanisms of ethanol radical formation, covalent binding of ethanol
radicals with mononuclear leukocyte proteins, identification of the
adducted proteins, and correlation of adduct formation with liver injury.
Role of Chemokines (Table
9)
Investigating the role of C-X-C
chemokines in the parenchymal migration and subsequent activation of
neutrophils that leads to hepatitis. This project is funded at $223
K.
Diet-Ethanol Interaction: Animal Model
of ALD (Table 10)
This portfolio examines the interactive
role of diet and ethanol on the development of ALD. The focus is on
the role of carbohydrate deficiency, increased CYP2E1 activity and associated
increased ROS generation in liver injury. Findings from this research
may contribute in the development of a better model of ALD. The funding
of this portfolio is $401 K.
Impaired
Functions of Hepatocytes (Table 11)
Chronic alcohol consumption may impair
many functions of hepatocytes, rendering them susceptible to alcohol-induced
cell damage that may eventually lead to the development of alcoholic
liver disease. NIAAA is currently supporting eleven projects that target
the effects of alcohol on various functions of hepatocytes. The current
funding of this portfolio is about $2.4 million, and it can be categorized
into the following areas:
Impairment of signaling system: This
portfolio investigates the effects of alcohol on G-protein, protein
kinase C, phospholipase C, and calcium signaling in the liver.
Altered secretory vesicle transport:
Researchers are studying the
molecular mechanisms by which alcohol disrupts the formation and transport
of vesicles. The results of these studies may help explain mechanisms
of alcohol-induced protein retention, hepatocyte swelling, and hepatomegaly.
Effects of ethanol on receptor-mediated
endocytosis in hepatocytes: Ethanol
induced- inactivation of asialoglycoprotein receptor leads to altered
receptor function and impaired receptor-mediated endocytosis. Researchers
are investigating molecular mechanisms of this phenomenon.
Proteolytic system- lysosomes-proteosomes:
Chronic ethanol impairs lysosome
biogenesis, inactivates proteosomes, and impairs hepatocyte capacity
to degrade protein modified by ethanol metabolism. This can result in
unwanted protein accumulation and liver injury. Mechanisms of this alcohol
effect are being investigated.
Altered energy state of the liver-mitochondrial
function: This portfolio is investigating
the effects of chronic ethanol ingestion on mechanisms involved in maintaining
the energy state of the liver and associated changes in hepatocyte structural
and functional integrity. The studies include oxidative phosphorylation,
mitochondrial ribosomes, oxidative damage to mitochondria, and relationship
between oxidative stress and energy state.
Impaired mitochondrial function by
obesity and ethanol: This project
examines the combined effect of obesity and ethanol on hepatic mitochondria
by evaluating mitochondrial UCP2 expression, vital mitochondrial parameters,
ROS generation, and associated hepatotoxicity.
Mallory Body (MB) Formation: Researchers
are seeking to identify the molecular mechanisms by which cytokeratin
proteins aggregate in the cell that leads to MB formation.
Impaired Hepatic Regeneration (Table
12)
Chronic alcohol ingestion impairs liver
regeneration by inhibiting the effects of various growth factors that
are essential for proliferation and growth of hepatocytes. Currently
NIAAA supports five projects that are investigating the molecular mechanisms
by which alcohol inhibits the effects of hepatocyte growth factors.
These projects fall into the following categories: 1) impairment of
G proteinadenylyl cyclase-cAMP signaling process; 2) impairment
of TNF-dependent hepatocyte proliferation; 3) impaired EGF signaling
pathway; and 4) altered IL-6 and associated JAK-STAT signaling pathway.
The current funding of this portfolio is about $967 K.
Recent Significant Findings
New model of ALD: A
new rat model of ALD has been developed by intragastric administration
of alcohol (9% calories) only once a day by using an oral syringe. In
this model, rats are fed ad libitum a liquid diet containing
47% carbohydrate, 35% fat, and 18% protein calories. After 8 weeks of
alcohol administration, rats developed severe fatty changes and mild
necrosis and inflammation.
Role of TNF in ALD: Simultaneous
administration of TNF antibodies and alcohol attenuated alcohol-induced
liver injury in a rat model of ALD. Furthermore, in a mouse model of
ALD, long term ethanol administration caused severe pathological liver
injury (fatty liver, necrosis, and inflammation) in wild and TNF receptor
2 knock out mice, but failed to cause severe injury in TNF receptor
1 knock out mice. These results further confirm a central role of TNF
in ALD.
Role of glutathione and TNF: Chronic ethanol
administration to rats caused a selective mitochondrial glutathione
depletion. Hepatocytes from these animals were more susceptible to TNF-induced
toxicity. Administration of S-adenosyl methionine, but not glutathione,
to ethanol fed rats prevented the mitochondrial glutathione defect,
restored mitochondrial glutathione pool in vivo, and prevented
the susceptibility of hepatocytes to TNF-induced injury in vitro.
Role of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)
and TNF: Administration of SAM
to SAM-deficient rats attenuated serum TNF levels and LPS-induced liver
injury. Furthermore, addition of SAM attenuated LPS-stimulated TNF synthesis
and TNF mRNA expression in murine macrophage cell lines, suggesting
a protective role of SAM in liver injury.
Role of TNF antisense in preventing
ALD: Researchers have developed
triple helix and antisense constructs that can effectively inhibit up
to 90% of TNF production in Kupffer cells stimulated by LPS. Furthermore,
they have developed a technique that preferentially delivers antisense
nucleotide to Kupffer cells. Thus, use of antisense nucleotide may provide
interventions for the prevention of ALD.
Role of SOD in attenuating ALD: Administration
of adenovirus-associated superoxide dismutase gene to rats attenuated
alcohol-induced liver pathology and serum AST levels.
Allopurinol prevents ALD: Administration
of allopurinol a xanthine oxidase inhibitor and free radical
scavenger to male rats significantly blunted alcohol-induced
NF-kB activation, serum transaminase levels, and liver pathology, suggesting
that allopurinol prevents early alcohol-induced liver injury by blunting
oxidant-dependent activation of NF-kB.
Role of iron in ALD:
Iron-mediated potentiation of alcoholic liver injury is associated with
enhanced NF-kB activation, upregulation of NF-kB-responsive chemokine
gene expression, and mononuclear cell infiltration. Recently, using
an animal model of ALD, researchers have shown that increased iron storage
in Kupffer cells is associated with potentiated NF-kB activation that
can be normalized by administering an iron chelator. In addition, erythrophagocytosis
by cultured Kupffer cells increases intracellular iron concentration
and promotes LPS-induced NF-kB activation. These results suggest that
iron primes Kupffer cells for NF-kB activation in ALD.
Gender differences in ALD - Role of
estrogen: In response
to chronic ethanol administration, female rats developed liver
pathology faster and more severe, exhibited greater plasma endotoxin
levels and CD14 expression on Kupffer cells, and showed greater TNF
mRNA expression and NF-kB binding in hepatic nuclear extract when compared
to male rats. These results shed some light on why women are more susceptible
to ALD. In another study, ovariectomy attenuated ethanol-induced increases
in liver pathology, plasma endotoxin levels, CD14 mRNA expression, and
Kupffer cell TNF levels. Estrogen replacement reversed the effects of
ovariectomy, suggesting that sensitivity of rat liver to alcohol-induced
injury is related to estrogen.
Mitochondrial damage by alcohol:
Chronic ethanol impairs respiratory activity of hepatic mitochondria,
selectively deplete mitochondrial glutathione, and stimulate mitochondrial
free radical generation. Recently researchers have shown that chronic
ethanol feeding for 11-13 months decreases hepatic mitochondrial DNA
content, and increases mitochondrial single-stranded breaks. These alterations
may have been caused by alcohol-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress.
Role of CYP2E1 and oxidative stress
in fibrogenesis: CYP2E1-dependent
oxidative stress can increase collagen production in rat hepatic stellate
cell line transfected with human CYP2E1.
NF-kB and collagen gene transcription:
Transfection of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts
and hepatic stellate cells with NF-kB p50, p65, and c-Rel expression
plasmids with collagen gene reporter gene significantly inhibited the
transcription of collagen gene promoter. Nuclear run-on assay showed
that NF-kB inhibited transcription of the endogenous a 1 (I) collagen
gene. These results demonstrate that NF-kB decreases transcription of
the a 1 (I) collagen gene.
Role of polyenylphosphatidylcholine
(PPC) in preventing ALD: PPC
prevents alcohol-induced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in baboons,
and carbon tetrachloride-induced fibrosis and cirrhosis in rats. Recently
researchers have shown that PPC provides protection against liver injury
by attenuating alcohol-induced oxidative stress, and apoptosis of hepatocytes.
Role of Kupffer cells in hepatic regeneration:
Kupffer cell depletion significantly
delayed hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats. This
was associated with complete depletion of hepatic mRNA expression of
IL-6 and IL-10, and decreased mRNA expression of hepatic TNF, TGFb ,
and hepatocyte growth factor. This suggests that Kupffer cells play
important role in hepatic regeneration via cytokine production.
Role of ethanol on TNF signaling during
liver regeneration: During hepatic
regeneration, TNF increased mitochondrial ROS production that is toxic
to the cells. On the other hand, TNF promoted the activation of NF-kB,
Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK), and various mitochondrial membrane proteins,
which may permit hepatocytes to escape apoptosis and oxidant stress.
Prior ethanol exposure inhibited the normal regenerative induction of
NFkB and JNK. These results suggest that ethanol compromises the balanced
induction of toxic and trophic (beneficial) signals by TNF. Further,
in liver regenerating mice, TNF-dependent increases in mitochondrial
oxidant production is associated with increased expression of uncoupling
protein-2.
FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
Genetic susceptibility to alcohol-induced
liver injury: Since only
a small proportion of alcoholics develops cirrhosis, genetic differences
in susceptibility need to be investigated.
Ethnic differences associated with
the severity of alcohol-induced liver damage: Available
data suggest that African Americans and Hispanics have higher rates
of mortality from alcoholic cirrhosis than whites or Asian Americans.
Research is required to determine whether factors such as genetics,
diet, and pattern of drinking can help to explain the increased vulnerability
of some ethnic groups to ALD.
Gender differences in the susceptibility
to alcohol-induced liver injury: Women
are more susceptible than men to alcohol-induced liver injury. Researchers
have shown that female rat Kupffer cells are more sensitive than male
cells to activation by alcohol administration, and this has been attributed
to estrogen. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms
of gender differences at the level of stellate cell activation.
Mechanisms whereby alcohol increases
intestinal permeability to endotoxin: Chronic
alcohol administration leads to increased plasma levels of endotoxin
that result in the activation of Kupffer cells and development of liver
injury. Simultaneous administration of antibiotics attenuates endotoxin
levels and associated liver injury. Further research is required to
understand mechanisms by which alcohol increases intestinal permeability
to endotoxins.
Mechanisms of oxidative stress in ALD:
Although several types of free
radicals have been implicated in the pathogenesis of ALD, further work
is required to establish cause and effect relationship. An important
source of free radicals is the induction of CYP2E1 that is associated
with the pathogenesis of ALD. The role of CYP2E1 in alcohol-induced
liver injury has been further confirmed using HepG2 cell line and rat
hepatic stellate cells transfected with human CYP2E1. However, recently
the role of CYP2E1 has been questioned since simultaneous administration
of CYP2E1 inhibitors did not prevent the development of ALD. This raises
a question about the sources of oxidative stress that are relevant to
liver injury. In this context, roles of NADH, NADPH, lipid peroxidation,
iron, and, iNOS need evaluation. This information is required before
an effective antioxidant therapy can be developed for the treatment
of ALD.
Mechanisms of leukocytic infiltration
of hepatic parenchyma in ALD: Studies
are required to understand the underlying mechanisms by which leukocytes
infiltrate into hepatic parenchyma during the progression of ALD. In
addition, the relative role of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes
in the pathogenesis of ALD needs to be investigated.
Mechanisms of stellate cell activation:
Research is required to understand
the mechanisms by which alcohol administration leads to the transformation
of quiescent stellate cells to collagen-producing cells. In addition,
research is required to understand the molecular mechanisms whereby
PDGF stimulates stellate cell proliferation, and acetaldehyde and TGFb
stimulate collagen production.
Role of diet in the development of
ALD: Diet plays an important
role in modulating the course of ALD. While unsaturated fatty acids
potentiate the development of ALD, saturated fatty acids attenuate it.
In addition, while carbohydrate deficiency potentiates the development
of ALD, adequate carbohydrate prevents it. Further research is required
to understand the interactive effects of alcohol and diet on the pathogenesis
of ALD.
Table 1.
Alcoholic Liver Disease Portfolio: Grant Distribution by Grant Mechanisms
Grant Mechanism
|
No. of Grants
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
R01
|
35
|
64.8
|
$8,130,504
|
74.8
|
R03
|
2
|
3.7
|
$146,400
|
1.3
|
R21
|
3
|
5.5
|
$299,680
|
2.8
|
R37
|
3
|
5.6
|
$825,951
|
7.6
|
Subtotal (RPGs)
|
43
|
79.6
|
$9,402,535
|
86.5
|
P50 components
|
6
|
11.1
|
$1,146,480
|
10.5
|
K02/K05
|
3
|
5.5
|
$279,749
|
2.6
|
F30/F31
|
2
|
3.7
|
$46,840
|
0.4
|
Total
|
54
|
100
|
$10,875,604
|
100
|
Table 2.
Alcoholic Liver Disease Portfolio: Grant Distribution by Areas of Research
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
Intestinal permeability
and macrophage
|
2
|
3.7
|
$285,118
|
2.6
|
Kupffer cell
activation |
7
|
13.0
|
$1,539,791
|
14.2
|
Leukocyte activation |
3
|
5.5
|
610,068
|
5.6
|
Stellate cell
activation |
9
|
16.7
|
$1,812,282
|
16.7
|
Oxidative stress |
10
|
18.5
|
$1,901,313
|
17.5
|
Protein adducts |
4
|
7.4
|
$728,503
|
6.7
|
Chemokines |
1
|
1.9
|
$223,291
|
2.0
|
Diet-ethanol
interaction |
2
|
3.7
|
$400,544
|
3.7
|
Impaired hepatocyte
functions |
11
|
20.4
|
$2,407,462
|
22.1
|
Impaired hepatic
regeneration |
5
|
9.3
|
$967,232
|
8.9
|
Total
|
54
|
100
|
$10,875,604
|
100
|
Table 3.
Role of Intestine: Permeability and Macrophage
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Intestinal
macrophage |
1
|
$73,900
|
Endotoxin permeability |
1
|
$211,218
|
Total
|
2
|
$285,118
|
Table 4.
Kupffer Cell Activation
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Endotoxin-TNF-MIP2-ICAM-1
cascade and CYP2E1 |
3
|
$757,025
|
NF-kB activation |
2
|
$545,198
|
Role of CamP |
1
|
$215,585
|
Lipid peroxidation |
1
|
$21,983
|
Total |
7
|
$1,539,791
|
Table 5.
Role of Leukocytes
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Neutrophils |
1
|
$101,202
|
Monocytes |
1
|
$345,611
|
Lymphocytes |
1
|
$163,255
|
Total |
3
|
$610,068
|
Table 6.
Stellate Cell Activation and Fibrosis
Category
|
Number of Grants
|
Amount
|
Vitamin A |
1
|
$104,475
|
Acetaldehyde |
2
|
$446,228
|
Cytokine |
1
|
$205,262
|
Transcription
factors |
3
|
$567,077
|
Gene manipulation |
1
|
$274,237
|
Treatment and
Prevention |
1
|
$215,003
|
Total |
9
|
$1,812,282
|
Table 7.
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
CYP2E1-NADH-NADPH-Iron |
3
|
$804,532
|
Lipid peroxidation |
2
|
$397,741
|
Free radicals-Fatty
liver |
1
|
$199,663
|
Mitochondrial
glutathione-s-transferase |
1
|
$100,979
|
Mitochondrial
glutathione transporter |
1
|
$274,398
|
S-adenosyl
methionine |
1
|
$00
|
Gene therapy
by SOD/catalase |
1
|
$124,000
|
Total |
10
|
$1,901,313
|
Table 8.
Ethanol-Derived Protein Adducts
Category |
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Acetaldehyde-MDA-protein
adducts |
3
|
$482,266
|
Hydroxyethyl-protein
adducts |
1
|
$246,237
|
Total |
4
|
$728,503
|
Table 9.
Role of Chemokines
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Chemokines
|
1
|
$223,291
|
Table 10.
Role of Diet-Ethanol Interaction
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Diet-ethanol interaction
|
2
|
$400,544
|
Table 11.
Impaired Functions of Hepatocytes
Category
|
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
G-protein-PKC-PLC-Calcium
signaling |
3
|
$882,542
|
Secretary vesicle
transport |
1
|
$196,987
|
Receptor-mediated
endocytosis |
1
|
$222,411
|
Proteolysis |
2
|
$296,793
|
Obesity-mitochondrial
functions |
1
|
$251,735
|
Energy state-mitochondrial
functions |
2
|
$345,488
|
Mallory body
formation |
1
|
$211,506
|
Total
|
11
|
$2,407,462
|
Table 12.
Hepatic Regeneration
Category |
No. of Grants |
Amount |
G-protein-adenylyl
cyclase-cAMP signaling |
1 |
$186,383 |
EGF signaling |
1 |
$212,067 |
TNF signaling |
1 |
$319,532 |
IL-6-JAK-STAT
signaling |
2 |
$249,250 |
Total |
5 |
$967,232 |
Back to Top
EMERGING CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
ALCOHOL METABOLISM
State of Knowledge (William
Bosron, Ph.D. and Vijay A. Ramchandani, Ph.D.)
The pharmacokinetics of ethanol determines
the time course of ethanol concentration in blood after the ingestion
of an alcoholic beverage, and thus the degree of exposure of organs
to its effects
Ethanol Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution and Elimination
After oral ingestion, ethanol is almost
completely absorbed, primarily from the small intestine, by passive
diffusion (Holford, 1987). Ethanol ingested on an empty stomach is very
rapidly absorbed with peak concentrations occurring between 30 to 90
minutes. The rate of absorption after oral administration is greatly
influenced by the nature and concentration of the alcoholic beverage
(Dubowski, 1985), rate of ingestion ( O'Neill et al., 1983), fed or
fasted state (Sedman A et al., 1976), nature and composition
of food (Sedman et al., 1976), rate of gastric emptying (Kalant, 2000),
as well as other psychological, genetic, and temporal factors.
The distribution of ethanol throughout
the body is largely governed by the water content of various organs
and tissues, especially at equilibrium, because ethanol is a small,
polar, completely water-soluble molecule. The volume of distribution
of ethanol is comparable to total body water (Holford, 1987). No plasma
protein binding has been reported for ethanol.
Elimination of ethanol occurs primarily
through metabolism with minute fractions of the administered dose being
excreted in the breath (0.7%), sweat (0.1%), and urine (0.3%) (Holford,
1987). Alcohol elimination occurs mainly via oxidation in the liver
and is governed by the catalytic properties of the alcohol metabolizing
enzymes, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH),
as well as the miscrosomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOS). Alcohol
metabolic rates show a considerable degree of inter-individual and ethnic
variability, due to the expression of ADH and ALDH isozymes and polymorphic
variants (alleles). The ADH1B and ALDH2 polymorphisms
have been shown to increase the variability in alcohol metabolism among
individuals. Additionally, a multitude of environmental factors can
influence the metabolic regulation of alcohol metabolism, which results
in a large 3- to 4-fold variability in the alcohol elimination rate
in humans (Eckardt et al., 1998).
Gender and Body Composition
Women absorb and metabolize alcohol differently
than men. In general, women have a lower proportion of body water than
men of similar body weight, so that women achieve higher concentrations
of alcohol in the blood after drinking equivalent amounts of alcohol
(Chen et al., 1999). Some studies have reported that differences in
peak concentrations following equivalent doses of ethanol administered
to men and women could be due to differences in first-pass metabolism
of ethanol in the gastrointestinal tract, which was significantly correlated
with gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity (Baraona et al., 1998).
Some investigators concluded that females have lower gastric alcohol
dehydrogenase activity resulting in a lower degree of first-pass metabolism
and therefore in higher concentrations compared to males. However, other
studies have demonstrated no differences in the first-pass metabolism
of ethanol between males and females (Ammon et al., 1996).
Gender differences in the elimination of
alcohol have also been reported. This may be partly due to the differences
in blood alcohol concentrations achieved following alcohol consumption
and the nonlinear nature of alcohol pharmacokinetics, particularly at
higher doses (Rangno et al., 1981). Thomasson et al. (1995), have found
a higher b 60 (pseudo-zero-order disappearance rate calculated
over 60 min) in women compared to men of comparable ADH1B genotype
following oral administration of alcohol to achieve similar peak concentrations.
The authors speculate that these differences could be due to differences
in daily alcohol intake, influence of sex hormones (estrogen and testosterone),
or differences in liver size relative to body weight or lean body mass.
Other gender-related studies, evaluating
the effect of menstrual cycle and of oral contraceptives on alcohol
pharmacokinetics were reviewed recently (Mumenthaler et al., 1999).
The authors concluded that the menstrual cycle had no effect on alcohol
pharmacokinetics, and could not account for gender differences in alcohol
disappearance rates in women. Studies of the effects of sex hormones
and oral contraceptives on alcohol pharmacokinetics in women have been
less conclusive, with some studies showing that women taking oral contraceptives
show lower peak BACs and slower elimination of women compared to women
not taking oral contraceptives (Mumenthaler et al., 1999). Other studies
have shown no effect of oral contraceptives on alcohol pharmacokinetics.
Food and Food Composition
Most studies evaluating the effect of food
and food composition on alcohol pharmacokinetics show a decrease in
the rate of absorption and peak alcohol levels (Jones et al., 1997).
This is probably due to food-induced delays in gastric emptying (Rasmussen
et al., 1996). However, possible mechanisms for increased alcohol elimination
include food-induced increases in liver blood flow and increases in
activity of alcohol metabolizing enzymes.
Ethnicity and Genetic Polymorphisms
Due to the genetic polymorphisms of the
alcohol metabolizing enzymes, ADH and ALDH, and due to differences in
prevalence of these polymorphic forms of the isozymes in different ethnic
populations, ethnic differences in alcohol metabolism and the influence
of the ADH and ALDH genotypes has been the subject of many studies.
The isozymes coded by the polymorphisms have highly divergent catalytic
properties in vitro (Bosron et al., 1993) and influence
the exposure to alcohol in individuals. Progress in characterizing differences
in alcohol metabolism in the different polymorphic genotypes has been
substantial.
Alcohol Dehydrogenases (ADHs)
Genetics
Alcohol dehydrogenases are cytosolic, dimeric
enzymes with 40 KDD subunits that catalyze the NAD+-dependent
oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols. In humans, there are 7
genes encoding the medium chain ADHs. The progress in the characterization
of the enzyme kinetic properties of ADH isoenzymes with ethanol and
NAD+ has been excellent.
Tissue-Specific Expression of ADHs
The human ADH genes are expressed in different
tissues, which is a very important feature for the physiological consequences
of alcohol metabolism in specific cells and tissues (Edenberg, 2000).
Liver contains a large amount of ADH (about 3% of soluble protein) and
expresses the widest number of different isoenzymes. There has been
good progress recently in the characterization of ADH promoters and
tissue-specific expression of isoenzymes.
Enzyme Kinetics
The enzymes encoded by the six human ADH
genes (excluding ADH5) all prefer NAD+
as coenzyme and exhibit broad substrate
specificity (Edenberg and Bosron, 1997). They exhibit highest catalytic
efficiency with primary alcohols of 2 to 8 carbon lengths. The isoenzymes
exhibit widely different affinities for ethanol and NAD+.
These differences can be explained by specific amino acid substitutions
in the active site. Progress in the characterization of the enzyme kinetic
properties of ADH isoenzymes with ethanol and NAD+ has been
excellent.
Retinol and Other Alcohol Substrates
Considerable effort has been devoted to
identification of true "physiological" substrates of ADHs
(Yin et al., 1999). The broad substrate specificity, redundancy of enzyme
forms and high expression in liver suggests that the family of ADHs
play a general role in elimination of alcohols from virtually all organisms.
There are, however, several important physiological alcohols metabolized
by ADHs. Vitamin A is distributed throughout the body as RBP-bound retinol.
It can be oxidized to retinal by alcohol dehydrogenases and to retinoic
acid by aldehyde dehydrogenases. All-trans and 9-cis retinoic
acids are important transcriptional activators that act through the
RAR and RXR receptors. They play a key role in developmental biology
and cell signaling. The role of ethanol substrate competition and inhibition
of the oxidation of physiological alcohols by medium chain ADHs is a
potentially important issue in alcohol-mediated toxicology.
Enzyme Structures
In the past decade, there has been excellent
progress in the determination of the 3-dimensional structures of human
alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes by X-ray crystallography.
Knockout Animals and Transfected Cell
Systems
Transgenic knockout mice having null mutations
in Adh1, Adh3 and Adh4 have been prepared (Delatour
et al., 1999; Delatour et al., 1999) and developed normally.
The facts that the knockout mice developed normally and are not totally
deficient in alcohol oxidation are consistent with the so-called "redundancy"
in the ADH system where several of the broad substrate specificity isoenzymes
can oxidize ethanol, retinol or other physiologically important alcohols.
Hence, no single gene is solely responsible for oxidation of ethanol,
retinol or other alcohols. Cell lines transfected with alcohol dehydrogenase
have been successfully used to investigate the effects of ethanol metabolism
on lipid metabolism key metabolic processes.
Microsomal Ethanol Oxidizing System (MEOS)
The term microsomal ethanol oxidizing system
(MEOS) describes all enzymatic activity for ethanol oxidation in the
subcellular endoplasmic reticulum (Lieber, 2000).
Genetics
There are at least three cytochrome P-450
proteins encoded by: CYP2E1, CYP1A2 and CYP3A4.
The major enzyme system is CYP2E1 that catalyzes the NADPH- and O2-dependent
oxidation of ethanol to form acetaldehyde, NADP+ and water.
There are as many as 13 different CYP2E1 polymorphisms. Polymorphic
sites in the 5-flanking region of CYP2E1 have been reported
that are differentially expressed in different racial populations (Hayashi
et al., 1991). The c1/c2 polymorphism was shown to influence
gene transcription in vitro. However, the linkage of CYP2E1
expression polymorphisms to frequency of alcoholic liver disease
remains to be controversial (Lieber, 2000).
Regulation of Microsomal Expression
While MEOS accounts for a much smaller
fraction of ethanol oxidation than that through the cytosolic alcohol
dehydrogenase system under normal circumstances (probably less than
10% in humans), MEOS represents a major adaptive response of alcohol
metabolism with chronic ethanol consumption (Lieber, 2000). This is
due to the direct effect of chronic ethanol consumption on the expression
of hepatic CYP2E1.
Enzyme Substrate Specificity
CYP2E1,
CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 exhibit broad substrate specificity
and catalyze the oxidation of a variety of alcohol and non-alcohol substrates.
There are no 3-dimensional structures for the microsomal ethanol oxidizing
enzymes, in large part because of a lack of knowledge of the protein
arrangements in microsomal membranes.
Knockout Animals and Transfected Cell
Systems
Gene knockout mice have been prepared with
disruptions in both the CYP2E1 and CYP1A2 genes (Gonzalez,
1998). HepG2 cell lines that are transfected with Cyp2E1 have been used
to show that the substrates ethanol, acetaminophen and arachidonic acid
are cytotoxic to the cells that over-express CYP2E1 but not to control
cells lacking the oxidase (Chen et al., 1998). It is proposed
that the generation of reactive oxygen species cause the cellular damage.
In the case of cells preloaded with arachidonic acid the reactive intermediates
initiate lipid peroxidation, which subsequently causes apoptosis and
cellular damage (Chen et al., 1998).
Catalase
Catalase is an enzyme that catalyzes the
H2O2-dependent oxidation of ethanol yielding acetaldehyde
and two waters. It is found in cytosolic and mitochondria but its main
expression and function is in peroxisomes. Most investigators indicate
that it contributes very little to total ethanol elimination, because
of the limited availability of H2O2 (Lieber, 2000).
However, the activation of peroxisomal catalase by increased generation
of H2O2 via peroxisomal-oxidation leads to a hypermetabolic
state and a swift increase in alcohol metabolism (Bradford et al.,
1999). This state may contribute to alcohol-related inflammation and
necrosis in alcoholic liver disease.
Aldehyde Dehydrogenases (ALDHs)
Genes and polymorphic variants
The human ALDH gene family is composed
of 12 related genes (Yoshida et al., 1998). The whole eukaryotic
gene family of 86 known gene or protein sequences had been divided into
18 families based on evolutionary analysis of the sequences and chromosomal
mapping (Vasiliou et al., 1999). Only two of the genes, ALDH1A1
and ALDH2, encode enzymes that catalyze the NAD+-dependent
oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate. ALDH1 or ALDH1A1 in the new nomenclature
(Vasiliou et al., 1999) is the cytosolic ALDH form found in almost all
tissues that exhibits relatively low catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM)
for acetaldehyde oxidation. ALDH2 is the mitochondrial enzyme that is
highly expressed in liver. It exhibits high catalytic efficiency for
acetaldehyde oxidation and is primarily responsible for acetaldehyde
oxidation in vivo. There are as many as four ALDH2 polymorphic
variants.
Tissue-Specific Expression
ALDH1A1 is ubiquitously distributed in
tissues including brain, whereas ALDH2 is strongly expressed fewer tissues
like liver and stomach (Yoshida et al., 1998). Polymorphisms in the
proximal ALDH2 promoter that could affect ALDH expression were
recently reported (Harada et al., 1999).
Substrate and Inhibitor Specificity
The cytosolic ALDH1A1 and mitochondrial
ALDH2 exhibit similar Vmax values for acetaldehyde
oxidation (0.2 U/mg) but ALDH2 has a lower KM value, 1 mM,
versus ALDH1A1 with a KM of about 50 mM (MacKerell et al.,
1987). Hence, the mitochondrial ALDH2 isoenzyme is thought to be the
major acetaldehyde-oxidizing enzyme in liver.
Enzyme Structures
In the last 3 years, structures for the
major acetaldehyde metabolizing enzymes, ALDH2 (Steinmetz et al., 1997)
and ALDH1 (Moore et al., 1998) have been solved. They exhibit
similar overall folds, which have unique characteristics among the dehydrogenases.
They have a 3-stranded oligomerization domain that allows communication
between subunits. The loops "embrace" each other in the dimer
units and form part of the substrate-binding channel (Lamb and Newcomber,
1999).
Transfected Cell Systems
The wild-type form of the mitochondrial
ALDH2*1 and the ALDH2*2 "Oriental" variant were express separately
and together in HeLa cell lines (Crabb et al., 1998). This cell
system was used to examine the observation that individuals having both
heterozygous and homozygous genotypes for ALDH2*2 exhibit the
alcohol flush reaction and have low ALDH activity (Crabb et al.,
1989). Hence, the ALDH2*2 allele has a dominant phenotype. The
study confirmed that the co-expression of both alleles decreases the
basal activity of the wild-type enzyme (Crabb and Xiao, 1998).
Effects of Ethanol Consumption on Intermediary
Metabolism
NAD+/NADH Effects
The first effect of ethanol on liver metabolism
is a rapid decrease of NAD+/NADH ratio primarily due to an
increased NADH concentration while ethanol is being oxidized by the
NAD+-dependent alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases. This
leads to changes in the ratios of intermediary metabolites like lactate/pyruvate
etc. that are sensitive to NAD+/NADH ratio or NADH concentration
through their respective NAD+-dependent dehydrogenases (Kitson,
1999). This reduced cytosolic NAD+/NADH ratio, in turn, causes
a reduction in the mitochondrial NAD+/NADH ratio, which reduces
the cellular ability to oxidize fatty acids and acetyl-CoA and leads
to fatty liver. In addition to the disturbance of metabolites sensitive
to NAD+/NADH, ethanol oxidation causes a rapid increase in
acetate concentration, which in then exported to peripheral tissues
for metabolism (Kitson, 1999).
Ethylation Reactions
Fatty acid ethyl esters are produced by
the esterification of fatty acids with ethanol. A variety of hydrolases
can catalyze the transesterification of fatty acid esters with ethanol
including carboxylesterases and lipases (Brzezinski et al., 1994;Laposata,
1999). More recently there was evidence for the role of an acyl-CoA:ethanol
O-acyltransferase catalyzing fatty acid ethyl ester synthesis in rat
liver microsomes (Diczfalusy et al., 1999).
Acetaldehyde Adducts
Acetaldehyde is a highly reactive and cytotoxic
metabolite. Acetaldehyde-protein adducts have been postulated to alter
cellular function by direct toxicity as well as producing immune-mediated
tissue damage. Acetaldehyde is also known to form adducts with amine
groups of intermediary metabolites
Substrate Competition
Retinol oxidation by the medium chain ADHs
can be substantially inhibited by physiological concentrations of ethanol
(Yin et al., 1999).
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine the regulation of expression
of alcohol metabolizing enzymes in specific cell types and conditions,
using "metabolic chip assay", quantitative PCR, and polymorphisms.
(2) Study pharmacokinetic models
for alcohol metabolites, especially acetaldehyde adducts, ethylated
metabolites, and competitive substrates.
NIAAA PORTFOLIO ON ALCOHOL METABOLISM
(Leslie S. Isaki, Ph.D.)
I. Overview
Research Mechanisms
In FY 1999, the NIAAA Metabolism Research Program funded 29 extramural
grants for a total of almost $7 million. Of these, 25 were basic research
project grants with an average cost of $270,000. The Program also funded
one Career Development Award and three fellowships (Table
1).
Descriptions of Projects Supported
The scope of the Metabolism Research Program covers the physiological
and functional activities and genetic expression of the ethanol metabolizing
enzymes. The principal enzymes responsible for these reactions are the
alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), the aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs),
and the cytochrome P450s (CYPs; Table 2). The
goals of these projects are to understand how metabolic changes produced
by ethanol oxidation can result in pharmacological, addictive, and pathological
consequences. The primary areas of research are shown in Table
3.
The Structural grants focus on crystallographic analyses of
human ALDH2 (mitochondrial) and ALDH3 (cytosolic) to determine kinetic
properties and provide a structural context for the understanding of
functional information obtained through other studies.
Investigators primarily employ kinetic analyses to determine
rate constants for oxidation and reduction of substrates and cofactors.
These studies range from determining transient and steady-state and
stopped-flow kinetics to measure parameters for binding of substrates
and coenzymes of ADH and ALDH, to determining the mechanisms of reactive
species formation by CYPs. The goals of the Transport/Trafficking
studies seek to understand the mechanisms of translocating proteins
through cellular compartments. Research projects determine how nascent
ALDH protein is targeted to mitochondria, determine the topology of
transmembrane insertion of metabolizing enzymes into microsomal membranes,
and evaluate the orientation and trafficking of ethanol-modified CYPs.
Investigators who study Protein Degradation examine basic molecular
mechanisms of how CYPs and ethanol-transformed proteins are targeted
for elimination. Research projects in this area identify regions of
the protein that signal for degradation and define proteosome-dependent
proteolytic pathways.
The goals of the Endogenous Substrates research are to identify
biologically important substrates for ethanol metabolizing enzymes so
that the physiological functions of the enzymes and their participation
in alcoholism can be understood. Methods used to investigate potential
substrates employ reconstituted CYP 2E1 and 2E2 systems, and kinetic
analyses and x-ray crystallographic methods to understand the basic
catalytic and structural properties of the ADH isozymes.
Research on Regulation of Expression of the ethanol metabolizing
enzymes focuses primarily on cis- and trans-acting transcription
factors and translational events that exert control over expression
of the genes. Many investigations also include the identification of
tissue-specific DNA patterns to study tissue/organ distribution.
Research on Retinoid Metabolism centers primarily on ADH4 with
a few studies on CYPs, ALDHs, and short-chain dehydrogenases with retinoid
catalytic activity. Computational biological grants focus on structural
and kinetic studies and computer simulation to develop quantitative
models of retinoid metabolism. Biomedical studies examine tissue distribution
of retinoid metabolizing enzymes and regulation of expression of several
ADHs in transgenic and null-mutant mice.
II. Disease-Oriented Research
The objectives of the Metabolism Program are to investigate factors
that control ethanol elimination and metabolism which result in the
pharmacological, pathological, and behavioral effects of alcohol consumption.
To accomplish these goals, the portfolio supports an increasing number
of biomedically-oriented studies that are defined in Table 4. The program
supports two pre-clinical studies that involve human subjects.
Cancer. Studies examine mechanisms of ALDH specificity in detoxification
of aldehydes, especially those used in chemotherapy and metabolic activation
of procarcinogens.
Diabetes. The mechanism of regulation of P450 2E1 by insulin
and ethanol are investigated in liver microsomes.
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Preclinical studies examine the effects
of ethanol metabolism by cytochrome P450 2E1 and ADHs on the developing
fetus in African-American and South African women, respectively. Studies
in mice identify ADHs and ALDHs involved in inhibition of vitamin A
utilization.
Liver Injury. Majority of these grants examines mechanisms
of CYP regulation by or generation of reactive oxygen species as a basis
of liver injury. A novel experimental system of ADH-transfected HepG2
cells was developed to study the role of ethanol metabolites in epidermal
growth factor signaling.
III. Future Directions
Our knowledge of ethanol elimination and metabolism has progressed
greatly within the last decade. Previous research, especially the enzymological
studies and the many kinetic constants determined under appropriate
physiological conditions have laid the framework for asking more complex
questions toward understanding the mechanisms of ethanol metabolism.
Current research extends knowledge of the basic catalytic nature of
the isozymes by examining the nature of the relationships between enzyme
monomers, the specificity of substrates and inhibitors, and the structure/function
relationships. Future studies in the Metabolism program represent further
extensions of current investigations and focus on the clinical consequences
of ethanol metabolism.
Quantitative Aspects of Metabolism
The ongoing research activities are envisioned to require continued
resources. Central research themes continue to be factors that control
ethanol elimination and investigations in pharmacokinetics - concentration
of the enzymes and substrates and kinetic properties of the metabolizing
enzymes. Research that asks focused questions and methodologies that
utilize current technologies will be expanded - basis of enzyme subunit
behavior in interactions with other monomers, computer modeling to provide
a more accurate description of ethanol metabolism, and the development
and use of experimental model systems with targeted mutations.
Endogenous Substrates
There is clearly a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, and therefore,
a biochemical basis. Although it is unclear whether ethanol, and/or
its metabolites, are responsible for the sequelae and medical consequences
of alcohol consumption, it is generally accepted that the class I liver
ADHs are primarily responsible for oxidation of ethanol in humans. The
multiplicity of forms (6 in humans), broad substrate specificity, and
differential temporal expression in the human fetus/neonate imply multiple
functions for the ADHs. The catalytic activities and structural homologies
do not establish the enzymes as ethanol dehydrogenases. Moreover, aside
from the retinoids, the identities of the physiological compounds on
which the ethanol-metabolizing enzymes act catalytically remain unknown.
From accumulated data, it is reasonable to advance the notion that metabolism
of ethanol affects the metabolism of endogenous compounds, and this
in turn, may contribute to alcohol-related behaviors. One potential
biochemical basis for alcohol-related consequences may result from a
shift in balance between reduced and oxidized molecular species, subsequently
affecting critical signaling interactions. Addressing these complex
problems of homeostatic disruption by ethanol requires innovative approaches
and sensitive methods of analyses and methodologies.
Retinoid Signaling
Retinol, or vitamin A, must be metabolized to retinoic acid to carry
out its role in vertebrate reproduction and growth and epithelial development.
Enzymes able to metabolize retinol to retinoic acid have been identified
as the same enzymes that metabolize ethanol to acetate. Retinol can
be oxidized to retinal by members of the ADH family, followed by oxidation
of retinal to the active ligand, retinoic acid by ALDHs. Retinoic acid
functions as a ligand controlling retinoic acid receptor signaling pathways,
which are conserved in all vertebrate animals. In response to retinoic
acid binding, the retinoic acid nuclear receptors function by directly
interacting with DNA regulatory sequences leading to modulation of gene
transcription. Recent advances in retinoid signaling show that targeted
mutations in retinoid receptors result in deficits in cognitive and
motor skills in affected animals.
The potential dual role of ADHs and ALDHs in both ethanol and retinol
metabolism provides a common pathway through which disruption in metabolism
of one substrate may affect metabolism of the other, ultimately resulting
in host impairments. Specifically, inhibition of retinoic acid synthesis,
and hence disruption of retinoid signaling resulting in interference
in gene regulation, are likely mechanisms of ethanol-related injury.
This direction of research has direct bearing especially on fetal alcohol
syndrome and on activation of hepatic stellate cells that lead to liver
fibrosis.
Protein Degradation
Cellular protein concentrations are controlled by a continual balance
of synthetic and proteolytic pathways that are dependent on the metabolic
status of the cell. Misfolded and malfunctioning proteins, prone to
aggregation, must be scavenged and degraded for the normal execution
of many cellular functions. Chronic ethanol exposure has recently been
shown to increase protein oxidation in the liver of rats and to decrease
proteasome activity in vitro. (Proteasomes are complex cytoplasmic protease
structures involved in the removal of nonfunctional proteins. Mammalian
cells exhibit only limited direct repair mechanisms and most oxidized
proteins undergo selective proteolysis primarily through the actions
of the proteasome.) The fate of proteins covalently modified by ethanol
metabolism or lipid peroxidation is a new direction of research. New
insights into the effects of ethanol on the removal of abnormal and
damaged proteins arising from oxidative processes or misfolding may
have a direct impact on liver injury, immunity, and inflammatory responses.
Interactions with Therapeutic Drugs
This research program focuses on the bioavailability of medications.
Alterations in pharmacokinetics can result from the induction of hepatic
cytochrome P450 enzymes by ethanol and by AIDS therapeutic drugs. Because
of the success of combined antiviral therapies in reducing viral burdens,
the use of multiple medications in HIV patients has become standard
practice. With most HIV-infected patients taking 3 to 8 medications
or more per day, the potential for clinically significant drug interactions
leading to toxicity and modifications in pharmacokinetics is enormous.
Many of the drug interactions involve alterations in or competition
for the hepatic enzymes responsible for drug metabolism. Ethanol is
a potent inducer of CYP2E1, which can metabolize commonly used drugs
such as caffeine, theophylline, and acetaminophen. Induction of CYP2E1
by ethanol can contribute to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity leading to
organ injury, and death. In HIV-infected patients who are on multiple
medications, the more clinically relevant hepatic P450 isoforms are
CYP3A, CYP2D6, and CYP1A2, all of which are involved in the metabolism
of AIDS therapeutic drugs. CYP3A4 has specifically been shown to be
ethanol-inducible and to be involved in metabolism of all of the currently
approved HIV protease inhibitors and several of the non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors. Furthermore, many of the agents used for prophylaxis
of AIDS-associated opportunistic infections either require CYP3A4 for
their clearance or are inducers of the enzyme. The possibility of altered
pharmacokinetics in those HIV-infected individuals who use alcohol excessively
(or moderately), may have a significant impact on the course of their
disease.
Appendix: Portfolio of the Metabolism Program, FY 1999
Table 1: Grant Distribution by Mechanisms
Grant Mechanism |
No. of Grants |
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
R01, R37 |
23
|
80%
|
$6,560,434
|
94%
|
R21 |
1
|
3
|
96,663
|
1
|
R29 |
1
|
3
|
86,003
|
1
|
RPG SUBTOTAL |
25
|
86
|
$6,743,100
|
96
|
K01 |
1
|
3
|
109,202
|
2
|
F30, F32 |
3
|
11
|
119,735
|
2
|
TOTAL |
29
|
100%
|
$6,974,037
|
100%
|
Table 2. Grant Distribution by Ethanol Metabolizing Enzymes
Enzyme |
No. of Grants*
|
Amount
|
Alcohol Dehydrogenase
(ADH) |
12
|
$ 3,008,834
|
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
(ALDH) |
8
|
2,362,723
|
Cytochrome
P450 (CYP) |
11
|
2,560,242
|
Other Enzymes |
1
|
109,202
|
* Multiple enzymes (ADH plus ALDH/CYP) are being studied in four grants,
and these grants are each counted in two enzyme categories.
Table 3: Grant Distribution by Areas of Metabolism Research
Area |
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Structural
(including crystallography) |
4
|
$ 927,592
|
Kinetics |
11
|
2,110,970
|
Transport/trafficking |
5
|
1,074,058
|
Protein Degradation |
2
|
288,928
|
Endogenous
Substrates |
2
|
609,196
|
Regulation
of Expression |
9
|
2,442,553
|
Retinoid Metabolism |
7
|
2,025,874
|
Table 4: Grant Distribution by Disease-oriented Areas of Research
Area |
No. of Grants
|
Amount
|
Cancer |
2
|
$276,245
|
Diabetes |
1
|
301,359
|
Fetal Alcohol
Syndrome |
4
|
1,404,141
|
Liver Injury |
7
|
1,914,056
|
EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON EPITHELIAL CELLS
State of Knowledge (Emanuel Rubin, M.D.)
Using the liver as the exemplar of epithelial tissues, the chronic
effects of ethanol involve virtually all functions of the hepatocyte,
including those labeled synthetic (albumin, lipoproteins), detoxifying
(P450), metabolic (carbohydrates, gluconeogenesis), excretory (bilirubin),
regulatory (blood glucose), and storage (glycogen). Ethanol has also
been implicated in profound and complex changes in signal transduction
mechanisms, including receptor-ligand interactions (hormones, growth
factors, cytokines) and downstream signaling (protein kinases). Calcium
flux, transcription factors (NFkB), nuclear translocation pathways,
and apoptotic mechanisms are all affected by chronic ethanol exposure.
Contractile proteins and the flux through and gating of a number of
ion channels are also altered.
Phospholipid Membranes
There are changes in the phospholipid bilayer produced by both acute
and chronic ethanol, leading to opposite effects. The actual presence
of ethanol results in an immediate disordering of the membrane bilayer,
commonly expressed as a reduction in the order parameter, which reflects
the intercalation of ethanol molecules between the acyl chains. By contrast,
cellular membranes from animals fed ethanol chronically display a resistance
to disordering by the presence of ethanol. Importantly, the baseline
order parameter of membranes from chronically treated animals is not
changed; rather they exhibit resistance to disordering. These chronic
effects are mediated by anionic phospholipids, although the precise
mechanism has not been established.
Interactions of Ethanol with Proteins
The earliest effects of ethanol probably represent physical binding
to proteins. It is well established that ethanol binds to enzymes (ADH,
CYP2E1) that are involved in its metabolism. However, ethanol binding
has also been demonstrated in a variety of proteins that do not participate
in ethanol metabolism, e.g., luciferase, lactalbumin, hemoglobin, ion
channels, and protein kinase C. Some of the characteristics of hydrophobic
pockets that are capable of binding ethanol and other alcohols have
been described, and these generally predict a Meyer-Overton relationship.
Inhibition of purified enzymes in solution by physiologic concentrations
of ethanol implicates direct physical effects.
Ethanol Metabolites
The binding of a number of ethanol metabolites
to cell constituents has been demonstrated, and it has been postulated
that subsequent impairment of key functions may lead to tissue injury.
The most thoroughly studied is the primary metabolite acetaldehyde.
This compound is rapidly metabolized by the aldehyde dehydrogenase of
hepatic mitochondria, and its circulating level during ethanol metabolism
is hardly detectable, i.e., < 1 m M (although it is somewhat higher in chronic alcoholics). Despite
numerous conjectures that acetaldehyde may be involved in extrahepatic
tissue injury, experimental damage of any kind at low micromolar levels
of acetaldehyde has yet to be demonstrated. Covalent binding of acetaldehyde
to proteins has been described, especially to lysine residues, but correlation
with altered hepatocyte functions is lacking.
The oxidative stress produced by ethanol metabolism, augmented by a
decrease in antioxidant defenses (e.g., glutathione), results in the
formation of hydroxyethanol. This molecule is highly reactive and has
been shown to interact with a number of proteins. Ethanol also complexes
with fatty acids to form fatty acid ethyl esters. These compounds are
active in vitro, but their role in organ damage remains obscure.
Ethanol also interacts with phospholipids to form phosphatidylethanol
(PEth) through the activity of phospholipase D. PEth has been shown
to increase the intrinsic curvature of model bilayers and may therefore
affect intracellular vesicle trafficking. Moreover, the formation of
PEth diverts phospholipase D from the production of phosphatidic acid,
which has important signaling properties.
Chronic Effects of Alcohol Exposure
Studies of the chronic effects of alcohol exposure pose a more difficult
problem than those of acute changes because of the lack of adequate
experimental models. Despite more than three decades of serious commitment
to alcohol research, models that mimic the human condition are still
inadequate, in that all of the effects produced by current acute or
chronic models of ethanol intoxication lead only to reversible changes.
By contrast, in human alcoholic liver disease, the most severe consequences
are progressive and irreversible. Alcohol-related maladies seem to be
dose-related, particularly when expressed as the total lifetime dose
of ethanol.
Hepatic Stem Cells
The role of so-called stem cells in the development of chronic liver
damage is not clear at this time. Most forms of experimental chronic
injury, including the administration of hepatotoxins CCl4, ethionine, dimethylnitrosamine) and human viral and
alcoholic liver injury, are characterized by the proliferation of so-called
ductular or oval cells, which have been postulated to represent stem
cells of the liver. In view of the fact that the liver develops from
a bile duct anlage, it is intriguing that the connections between the
biliary system and the bile canaliculi, names the canals of Hering,
are the location of putative stem cells. Interestingly, older research
has demonstrated a quantitative correlation between ductular proliferation
and the deposition of collagen in the liver.
Mitochondrial Respiratory Function and mtDNA Replication
Respiratory functions of liver mitochondria are affected by chronic
ethanol treatment, at least in part reflecting the impairment of the
synthesis of protein subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation machinery
encoded on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). However, both the causes and the
consequences of this defect have remained poorly characterized. Mitochondrial
integrity and mitochondrial energization are critical parameters in
mechanisms controlling cell death by apoptotic or necrotic mechanisms.
Ethanol-induced depletion of mtDNA is age-dependent, suggesting that
aging apparently reduces the capacity of liver mitochondria to cope
with the challenged imposed by ethanol intake.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Study the interactions of ethanol with phospholipids and
proteins and protein-lipid interactions.
(2) Develop new models for chronic alcohol-induced tissue injury.
Back to Top
CELL-CELL COMMUNICATION AND INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING
State of Knowledge (Jan B. Hoek, Ph.D.)
A wide variety of intracellular signaling processes are affected by
acute or chronic ethanol treatment. However, studies have generally
focused on changes in specific cellular signaling systems and have not
yet resulted in a good understanding of the potential importance of
these processes for the (patho) physiological actions of ethanol. The
explosive growth of insight into signaling processes in cells and tissues
in recent years has resulted in an increased appreciation of the interactive
nature of signaling processes, which are best viewed as an integrated
network that links the responses of extracellular signals to physiological
responses with distinctive temporal and spatial patterns in a cell.
These views suggest that interactions of ethanol with the signaling
network will often be indirect and may have implications well beyond
the direct target processes. Appreciation of the impact of the interactions
of ethanol with the cellular signaling network is further complicated
by the fact that compensatory processes, including adaptive responses
to chronic ethanol exposure, may occur at sites that are distant from
the processes that are affected by acute ethanol exposure.
Signaling Processes as a Target of Ethanol
Despite the large number of studies characterizing detailed conditions
where acute or chronic ethanol treatment results in changes in signaling
processes in defined experimental conditions, it is still difficult
to place this information in a more integrated picture of the actions
of ethanol. Secondary processes that control the actions of channels
(such as protein phosphorylation) are likely to be involved in several
of the actions of ethanol, and even these actions have only rarely been
characterized at a molecular level and may well be indirect. Actions
of ethanol on a particular process that appear to be prominent in a
particular cell context may disappear under different conditions, e.g.,
at different levels of expression of the presumed target protein or
when the target process is stimulated by different pathways or in different
cells or tissues. Chronic ethanol treatment, either in vitro or
in vivo, often is associated with changes in levels or activities
of signaling elements that can be interpreted as representing adaptation
or tolerance (Diamond and Gordon, 1997).
Ethanols Interactions with the Signaling Network
As noted earlier, effects of ethanol on the signaling network often
are indirect and may not originate in a primary action of ethanol with
signaling proteins (Diamond and Gordon, 1997).
Interpretation of mechanisms underlying physiological effects of ethanol
is further complicated by the relatively non-specific nature of the
interactions of ethanol with cellular processes. Ethanol may act on
specific cellular processes by binding directly to hydrophobic sites
on proteins or interacting with lipids, or may be the consequence of
metabolic products of ethanol.
Ethanols effects on specific signaling processes are not proportionally
translated into effects on downstream branches and are dependent on
the cellular context. To some extent, this reflects the variable sensitivity
of different pathway branches to the upstream signaling reactions (Hoek
and Kholodenko, 1998), which depends fundamentally on the other components
of the network. In addition, the spatial and temporal specificity of
signaling reactions suggests that effects of ethanol may occur only
in restricted time domains and in specific environments.
An acute interference by ethanol with a particular signaling reaction
will intrinsically elicit compensatory responses from other parts of
the system that may either enhance or suppress the actions of ethanol.
There is a hierarchy in the extent and time frame of compensatory responses.
Some early compensation may be metabolic or involve protein phosphorylation.
However, compensation for chronic ethanol exposure invariably involves
alterations in gene expression.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Use of transgenics and gene microarray analysis, combined
with appropriate computational approaches, will accelerate study of
the interactions of ethanol with intracellular signaling networks.
(2) Studies of individual signaling reactions (bottom-up approaches)
should be combined with analysis of integrated response systems, at
the level of intact cells and tissues (top-down approaches).
MECHANISMS OF DISEASE IN ALCOHOL RESEARCH
State of Knowledge (Neil Kaplowitz, M.D.)
Oxidative stress is the biological consequence of exposure
to excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), and alcohol is known to induce
an oxidative stress in the liver and other organs (Kaplowitz and Tsukamoto,
1996; Lieber, 1997). The major potential sources of ROS in ethanol abuse
include CYP2E1, mitochondria (particularly TNF induced), transition
metals (iron), and inflammatory infiltrate (neutrophils). In addition,
the interaction of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates is of
potential importance. Exposure to reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates
also is determined by antioxidant defense such as those associated with
GSH, GSH-related enzymes, tocopherol, and their cellular and subcellular
compartmentation. The chemical consequences of oxidative stress include
oxidation of lipids, proteins, and DNA. The biological consequences
include altered pro-inflammatory gene expression (through effects on
signal transduction and transcription factors), apoptosis, and necrosis.
Three types of alcohol-induced cell injury and death have been
described. First, profound metabolic disturbance have been associated
with mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA deletion associated with microvesicular
steatosis and overall variable disturbance of liver function as reflected
in cholestasis, coagulopathy, and hypoalbuminemia (Fromenty et al.,
1995). It is presumed that oxidative stress in mitochondria causes this
problem, but little is known about its frequency and significance. Second,
an increase in apoptotic hepatocytes have been observed in alcohol-fed
animals Nanji, 1998). However, the significance and contribution of
this to liver disease is unclear. Third, alcohol-associated necrotic
cell death has been observed.
Alcoholic liver disease manifests as the cumulative appearance of
hepatocyte steatosis and injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. The
relative contribution and interdependence of these processes remain
a major area of uncertainty. Clinically, patients are seen either with
end-stage cirrhosis or a more fulminant acute liver failure (alcoholic
hepatitis). Steatohepatitis is ominous as either a life-threatening
phenomenon or as a prognostic feature indicating a high likelihood of
evolution to cirrhosis with continued drinking. The insidious progression
to cirrhosis raises questions as to the relative contribution and
interplay of Kupffer cells (source of inflammatory mediators), hepatocyte
necrosis versus apoptosis, inflammatory infiltration, stellate cell
activation, and fibrogenesis. Liver failure involves the interplay of
the various cellular constituents, inflammation, and mediators along
with other factors such as viral infections (HIV, HCV). Nonalcoholic
steatohepatitis has intriguing similarities and should provide an important
contrast.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine the contributions of polymorphisms of the genes
involved in the production, detoxification, and response to oxidative
stress that are associated with the susceptibility to ethanol-induced
organ damage.
(2) Study the influence of ethanol on the expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic
genes and their responses to stress and choice of mode of cell death.
MODEL SYSTEMS IN ALCOHOL RESEARCH
State of Knowledge (David A. Brenner, M.D.)
Animal models have been established with varying degrees of success
to study different aspects of the effects of alcohol in vivo.
Currently used models include alcoholic liver disease in rodents (Thurman,
1998), liver transplantation using fatty donors in rats (Zhong et al.,
1997), rodent models of ethanol preference (Crabbe et al., 1994), and
rodent models of fetal alcohol syndrome (Becker et al., 1994). In each
example, specific insights into the human disease have been gained from
carefully controlled studies in animal models. The role of oxidant stress
and apoptosis in alcohol-induced injuries has been investigated in these
animal models (Ikonomidou et al., 2000) and has been confirmed in part
in patients. Failure to develop a model of alcohol-induced pancreatitis
has led to the questioning of whether alcohol alone is sufficient or
perhaps is only permissive for this disease. Simpler animal models,
including Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Costa et al., 1997),
Drosophilia melanogaster (Moore et al., 1998), and zebrafish
(Blamer and Strahle, 1998) have been used to a limited extent to study
the effects of alcohol. There have been surprisingly good correlation
between observations in these simple models and in mammalian cells.
Although rodent models have been used to study the effects of alcohol
on behavior, a note of caution was expressed by a recent study that
demonstrated wide variability in the results of behavioral assays depending
upon species strain and laboratory location (Crabbe et al., 1999). Further
studies will be required to assess the cause of this surprising variability.
Specific recommendations:
(1) Determine the mechanism by which ethanol induces hepatic
stellate cells.
(2) Determine the molecular mechanisms that result in liver fibrosis
evolving to alcohol-induced cirrhosis.
Back to Top
REFERENCES
Adams MA, Hirst M: Metoprolol suppresses the development of ethanol-induced
cardiac hypertrophy in the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990;68: 562-567.
Adams MF, Cicero TJ: Effects of alcohol on beta-endorphin and reproductive
hormones in the male rat. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1991;15: 685-692.
Aldo-Benson M, Pratt L, Hardwick J: Alcohol can inhibit effect of IL-4
on activated murine B cells. Immunol Res 1992;11: 117-124.
Altura BM, Zhang A, Cheng TP, Altura BT: Ethanol promotes rapid depletion
of intracellular free Mg in cerebral vascular smooth muscle cells: Possible
relation to alcohol-induced behavioral and stroke-like effects. Alcohol
1993;10: 563-566.
Altura BM, Zou LY, Altura BT, et. al.: Beneficial vs. detrimental actions
of ethanol on heart and coronary vascular muscle: Roles of Mg2+ and
Ca2+. Alcohol 1996;3: 499-513.
Ammon E, Schafer C, Hofmann U, Klotz U: Disposition and first-pass
metabolism of ethanol in humans: Is it gastric or hepatic and does it
depend on gender? Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996;59: 503-513.
Anderson P, Cremona A, Paton A, et. al.: The risk of Alcohol. Addiction
1993;88: 1493-1508.
Baraona E, Dohnmen K, Pozzato G, Lieber CS: Decreased activity of gastric
class III (x) ADH can explain increased bioavailability of alcohol in
women. Gastroenterology 1998;114: A1208.
Barbour RL, Gebrewold A, Altura BM: Optical spectroscopy and cerebral
vascular effects of alcohol in the intact brain: Effects on tissue deoxyhemoglobin,
blood content, and reduced cytochrome oxidase. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res
1993;17: 1319-1324.
Bautista AP: Chronic alcohol intoxication induces hepatic injury through
enhanced macrophage inflammatory protein-2 production and intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 expression in the liver. Hepatology 1997;25: 335-342.
Beard JD, Orr WE, Li T-K: Does liver weight play a role in the ethnic
and gender differences in ethanol pharmacokinetics? Alcohol: Clin Exp
Res 1998;21: 51A.
Becker HC, Randall CL, Salo AL, et. al.: Animal Research: Charting
the course for FAS. Alcohol Health Res World 1994;18: 10-16.
Blader P, Strahle U: Ethanol impairs migration of the prechordal plate
in the zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol 1998;210: 185-201.
Booyse FM, Aikens ML, Grenett HE; Endothelial cell fibrinolysis: Transcriptional
regulation of fibrinolytic protein gene expression (t-PA, U-PA, and
Pal-1) by low alcohol. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1111-1124.
Bosron W, Ehrig T, Li T-K: Genetic factors in alcohol metabolism and
alcoholism. Sem Liver Dis 1993;13: 126-135.
Bradford BU, Enomoto N, Ikejima K, et. al.: Peroxisones are involved
in the swift increase in alcohol metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeut
1999;288: 254-259.
Brzezinski MR, Abraham TR, Stone CL, et. al.: Purification and characterization
of a human liver cocaine carboxylesterase that catalyzes the production
of benzoylecgonine and the formation of cocaethylene from alcohol and
cocaine. Biochem Pharmacol 1994; 48: 1747-1755.
Chen CC, Lu RB, Chen YC, et. al.: Interaction between the functional
polymorphisms of the alcohol-metabolism genes in protection against
alcoholism. Am J Human Gen 1999;65: 795-797.
Chen Q, Galleano M, Cederbaum, AI: Cytotoxicity and apoptosis produced
by arachidonic acid in HepG2 cells over expressing human cytochrome
P-4502E1. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 782-784.
Ching M, Valenca M, Negro-Vilar A: Acute ethanol treatment lowers hypophysealportal
plasma LHRH and systemic LH levels in rats. Brain Res 1988;443: 325-328.
Cicero TJ: Alcohol-induced deficits in the hypothalamic-pituitary-luteinizing
hormone axis in the male. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1982;6: 207-215.
Colell A, Garcia-Ruiz C, Miranda M, et. al.: Selective glutathione
depletion of mitochondria by ethanol sensitizes hepatocytes to tumor
necrosis factor. Gastroenterology 1998;115: 1541-1551.
Colell A, Garcia-Ruiz C, Morales A, et. al.: Transport of reduced glutathione
in hepatic mitochondria and mitoplasts from ethanol-treated rats: Effect
of membrane physical properties and S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Hepatology
1997;26: 699-708.
Cook RT, Feng L, Vandersteen D, et. al.: Ethanol and NK cells I. Activity
and immunophenotype in alcoholic humans. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1997;21:
974-980
Costa V, Amorim MA, Reis E, et. al.: Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase
is essential for ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
in the post-diauxic phase. Microbiology 1997;143: 1649-1656.
Crabb DW, Edenberg HJ, Bosron WF, Li T-K: Genotypes for aldehyde dehydrogenase
deficiency and alcohol sensitivity. The inactive ALDH22
allele is dominant. J Clin Invest 1989;83: 314-316.
Crabb DW, Xiao Q: Studies on the enzymology of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase-2
in genetically modified HeLa cells. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 780-781.
Crabbe JC, Belknap JK, Buck KJ: Genetic animal models of alcohol and
drug abuse. Science 1994;264: 1715-1723.
Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC: Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions
with laboratory environment. Science 1999;284: 1670-1672.
Creighton-Taylor JA, Rudeen PK: Prenatal ethanol exposure and opiatergic
influence on puberty in the female rat. Alcohol 1991;8: 187-191.
Cunningham CC, Spach PI: Alcoholism and myocardial energy metabolism.
Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1994;18: 132-137.
Deaciuc IV, Spitzer JJ: Hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell in alcoholemia
and endotoxemia. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1996;20: 607-614.
Delatour L, Foglio MH, Duester G: Metabolic Deficiencies in alcohol
dehydrogenase Adh1, Adh3, and Adh4 null mutant mice: Overlapping
roles of Adh1 and Adh4 in ethanol clearance and metabolism
of retinol to retinoic acid. J Biol Chem 1999;274: 16796-16801.
Delatour L, Foglio MH, Duester G: Impaired retinol utilization in Adh4
alcohol dehydrogenase mutant mice. Develop BIOS 1999;25: 1-10.
Denham W, Norman J: The potential role of therapeutic cytokine manipulation
in acute pancreatitis. Surg Clin North Am 1999;79: 767-781.
Devaud LL, Purdy RH, Finn DA, Marrow AL: Sensitization of GABA-aminobutryic
acid-A receptors to neuroactive steroids in rats during ethanol withdrawal.
J Pharmacol Ther 1996;278: 510-517.
Diamond I, Gordon AS: Cellular and molecular neuroscience of alcoholism.
Physiol Rev 1997;77: 1-20.
Diczfalusy MA, Bjorkhem I, Einarsson C, Alexson EH: Formation of fatty
acid ethyl esters in rat liver microsomes: Evidence for a key role for
acyl-CoA:ethanol O-acyltransferase. Eur J Biochem 1999;259: 404-411.
Dubowski KM: Absorption, distribution and elimination of alcohol: Highway
safety aspects. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1985;10: 98-108.
Eckardt MJ, File SE, Gessa GL, et. al.: Effects of moderate alcohol
consumption on the central nervous system. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22,
998-1007.
Edenberg HJ: Regulation of the mammalian alcohol dehydrogenase genes.
Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2000;64.
Edenberg HJ, Bosron WF: Alcohol dehydrogenases. In: Guengerich FP (Ed.),
Biotransformation. Pergamon, New York pp. 119-131, 1997.
el-Mas MM, Abdel-Rahman AA: Direct evidence for selective involvement
of aortic baroreceptors in ethanol-induced impairment of baroreflex
control of heart rate. J Pharm Exp Ther 1993;264: 1198-1205.
Emanuele MA, Tentler JJ, Emanuele NV, Kelley MR: In vivo effects of
acute EtOH on rat alpha- and beta-luteinizing hormone gene expression.
Alcohol 1991;8: 345-348.
Emanuele NV, Emanuele NV: The endocrine system: Alcohol alters critical
hormonal balance. Alcohol Health Res World 1997;21: 53-64.
Emanuele NV, LaPaglia N, Steiner J, et. al.: Reversal of chronic ethanol-induced
testosterone suppression in peripubertal male rats by opiate blockade.
Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1999;23: 60-66.
Eskay RL, Ryback RS, Goldman M, Majchrowicz E: Effect of chronic ethanol
administration on plasma levels of LH and estrous cycle in the female
rat. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1981;5: 204-206.
Fernandez-Checa JC, Garcia-Ruiz C, Ookhtens M, Kaplowitz N: Impaired
uptake of glutathione by hepatic mitochondria from chronic ethanol-fed
rats. Tracker kinetic studies in vitro and in vivo and susceptibility
to oxidant stress. J Clin Invest 1991;87: 397-405.
Fernandez-Sola J, Estruch R, Nicolas JM, et. al.: The effects of alcohol
on the heart: Detrimental or beneficial? Postgrad Med 1997;101: 165-176.
Figueredo VM, Chang KC, Baker AJ, Camacho SA: Chronic alcohol-induced
changes in cardiac contractility are not due to changes in the cytosolic
Ca2+ transient. Am J Physiol 1998;275: H122-H130.
Froehlich JC: Interactions between alcohol and the endogenous opioid
system. In: Zakhari S (Ed.), Alcohol and the Endocrine System. Bethesda,
MD, NIH, 1993.
Fromenty B, Grimbert S, Monsouri A, et. al.: Hepatic mitochondrial
DNA deletion in alcoholics. Association with microvesicular steatosis.
Gastroent 1995;108: 193.
Garbutt JC, Silva SG, Mason GA: Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH):
Clinical neuroendocrine and neurobehavioral findings of relevance to
alcoholism. In: Watson RR (Ed.), Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews, Vol
6: Alcohol and Hormones. Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, pp: 127-145, 1995.
Gianoulakis C: Characterization of the effects of acute ethanol administration
on the release of beta-endorphin peptides by the rat hypothalamus. Eur
J Pharm 1990;180: 21-29.
Gianoulakis C, Krishhnan B, Thavumdayil
J: Enhanced sensitivity of pituitary b -endorphin to ethanol
in subjects at high risk of alcoholism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:
250-257.
Goldberg DM, Soleas GJ, Levesque M: Moderate alcohol consumption: The
gentle face of Janus. Clin Biochem 1999;32: 505-518.
Gonzalez FJ: The study of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and their
role in toxicity in vivo using targeted gene disruption. Tox.Lett. 1998;102-103:
161-166.
Gorelick PB, Kelly MA: Alcohol as a risk factor for stroke. Heart Dis
Stroke 1992;1: 255-258.
Grattagliano I, Vendemiale G, Errico F, et. al.: Chronic ethanol intake
induces oxidative alterations in rat testis. J Appl Toxicol 1997;17:
307-311.
Guillo P, Mansourati J, Maheu B, et. al.: Long-term prognosis in patients
with alcoholic cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure after total abstinence.
Am J Cardiol 1997;79: 1276-1278.
Hamamoto T, Yamada S, Hirayama C: Nonoxidative metabolism of ethanol
in the pancreas: Implication in alcoholic pancreatic damage. Biochem
Pharmacol 1990;39: 241-245.
Harada S, Okubo T, Nakamura T, et. al.: A novel polymorphism (-357
G/A) of the ALDH2 gene: Linkage disequilibrium and an association with
alcoholism. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1999;23: 955-957.
Hill GE, Miller JA, Baxter BT, et. al.: Association of malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde
(MAA) adducted proteins with atherosclerotic-induced vascular inflammatory
injury. Athersclerosis 1998;141: 107-116.
Hillbom M: Alcohol consumption and stroke: Benefits and risks. Alcohol:
Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 352S-358S.
Hiney JK, Dearth RK, Lara F, et. al.: Effects of ethanol on leptin
secretion and the leptin-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) release from
late juvenile female rats. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1999;23: 1785-1792.
Hiney JK, Dees WL: Ethanol inhibits lutenizing hormone-releasing hormone
release from the median eminence of prepubertal female rats in vitro:
Investigation of its action on norepinephrine and prostaglandin E2.
Endocrinology 1991;128: 1404-1408.
Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN: The intracellular signaling network as a target
for ethanol. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22(5 Suppl): 224S-230S.
Holford NHG: Clinical pharmacokinetics of ethanol. Clin Pharmacokinet
1987;13: 273-292.
Iimuro Y, Bradford BU, Gao W, et al.: Detection of alpha-hydroxyethyl
free radical adducts in the pancreas after chronic exposure to alcohol
in the rat. Mol Pharmacol 1996;50: 656-661.
Iimuro Y, Gallucci RM, Luster MI, et. al.: Antibodies to tumor necrosis
factor alpha attenuate hepatic necrosis and inflammation caused by chronic
exposure to ethanol in the rat. Hepatology 1997;26: 1530-1537.
Ikonomidou C, Bittigau P, Ishimaru MJ, et. al.: Ethanol-induced apoptotic
neurodegeneration and fetal alcohol syndrome. Science 2000;287: 1056-1060.
Israel Y, Hurwitz E, Niemela O, Arnon R: Monoclonal and polyclonal
antibodies against acetaldehyde-containing epitopes in acetaldehyde-protein
adducts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83 7923-7927.
Jerrells TR, Perritt D, Eckardt MJ, Marietta C: Alterations in interleukin-2
utilization by T-cells from rats treated with an ethanol-containing
diet. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1990;14: 245-249.
Jones AW, Jonsson KA, Kechagias S: Effect of high-fat, high-protein
and high-carbohydrate meals on the pharmacokinetics of a small dose
of ethanol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;44: 521-526.
Johnston DE, Chiao YB, Gavaler JS, Van Thiel DH: Inhibition of testosterone
synthesis by ethanol and acetaldehyde. Biochem Pharm 1981;30: 1827-1831.
Kaiser AM, Salujia AK, Sengupta A: Relationship between severity, necrosis,
and apoptosis in five models of experimental acute pancreatitis. Am
J Physiol 1995;269: C1295-C1304.
Kalant H: Effects of food and of body composition on blood alcohol
curves. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 2000.
Kaplowitz N, Tsukamoto H: Oxidative stress and liver disease. Prog
Liver Dis 1996;14: 131.
Katz M, Carangelo R, Miller LJ, Gorelick FS: Effect of ethanol on cholecystokinin-stimulated
zymogen conversion in pancreatic acinar cells. Am J Physiol 1996;270:
G171-G175.
Kitson KE: Regulation of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase activity:
A metabolic balancing act with important social consequences. Alcohol:
Clin Exp Res 1999;23: 955-957.
Klatsky AL: Epidemiology of coronary heart disease Influence
of alcohol. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1994;18: 88-96.
Kojima S, Wu ST, Wikman-Coffelt J, Parmley WW: Acute effects of ethanol
on cardiac
function and intracellular calcium in perfused rat heart. Cardiovascular
Res 1993;27: 811-816.
Kono H, Bradford BU, Yin M, et. al.: CYP2E1 is not involved in early
alcohol-induced liver injury. Am J Physiol 1999;277: G1259-G1267.
Koop DR, Klopfenstein B, Iimuro Y, Thurman RG: Gadolinium chloride
blocks alcohol-dependent liver toxicity in rats treated chronically
with intragastric alcohol despite the induction of CYP2E1. Mol Pharmacol
1997;51:944-950.
Lamb AL, Newcomber ME: The structure of retinal dehydrogenase type
II at 2.7 A resolution: Implications for retinal specificity. Biochem
1999;38: 6003-6011.
Langer RD, Criqui MH, Reed DM: Lipoproteins and blood pressure as biological
pathways for effect of moderate alcohol consumption on coronary heart
disease. Circulation 1992;85: 910-915.
Laposata M: Fatty acid ethyl esters: Ethanol metabolites which mediate
ethanol-induced organ damage and serve as markers of ethanol intake.
Prog Lipid Res 1998;37: 307-316.
Laposata M: Fatty acid ethyl esters: current facts and speculations.
Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes Essential Fatty Acids 1999;60: 313-315.
Lieber CS, DeCarli LM, Rubin E: Sequential production of fatty liver,
hepatitis, and cirrhosis in sub-human primates fed ethanol with adequate
diets. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 1975;72: 437-441.
Lieber CS: Role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in alcoholic
and nonalcoholic liver disease. Adv Pharm 1997;38: 601.
Lieber CS: Microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system (MEOS): The first 30
years (1968-1998) - A review. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 2000;23: 991-1007.
Lin HZ, Yang SQ, Zeldin G, Diehl AM: Chronic ethanol consumption induces
the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and related cytokines
in liver and adipose tissue. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 231S-237S.
Little PJ, Adams ML, Cicero TJ: Effects of alcohol on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal
axis in the developing male. J Pharm Exp Ther 1990;255: 707-715.
Lox CD, Messiha FS, Heine W: The effects of oral contraceptives on
reproductive function during semichronic exposure to ethanol by the
female rat. Gen Pharmacol 1982;13: 56.
MacKerell AD Jr, Blatter EE, Pietruszko R: Human aldehyde dehydrogenase:
Kinetic identification of the isozyme for which biogenic aldehydes and
acetaldehyde compete. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1987;10: 266-270.
Majumdar SK: Serum prolactin in chronic alcoholics. The Practitioner
1979;222: 693-695.
Matsuoka M, Zhang MY, Tsukamoto H: Sensitization of hepatic lipocytes
by high-fat diet to stimulatory effects of Kupffer cell-derived factors:
Implication in alcoholic liver fibrogenesis. Hepatology 1990;11: 173-182.
McClain C, Hill D, Schmidt J, Diehl AM: Cytokines and alcoholic liver
disease. Sem Liver Dis 1993;13: 170-182.
McCuskey RS, Nishida J, Eguchi H, et. al.: Role of endotoxin in the
hepatic microvascular inflammatory response to ethanol. J Gastroenterol
Hepatology 1995;10 Suppl 1: S18-S23.
Mendenhall CL, Moritz TE, Roselle GA, et. al.: Protein energy malnutrition
in severe alcoholic hepatitis: Diagnosis and response to treatment.
The VA Cooperative Study Group #275. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1995;19:
258-265.
Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY: Ethanol intoxication in Drosophilia:
Genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling
pathway. Cell 1998;93: 997-1007.
Moore SA, Baker HM, Blythe TJ, et. al.: Sheep liver cytosolic aldehyde
dehydrogenase: The structure reveals the basis for the retinal specificity
of class 1 aldehyde dehydrogenase. Structure 1998;6: 1541-1551.
Mumenthaler MS, Taylor JL, O'Hara R, Yesavage JA: Gender differences
in moderate drinking effects. Alcohol Res Health 1999;23: 55-64.
Nanji AA: Apoptosis and alcoholic liver disease. Sem Liver Dis 1998;18:
187.
Nanji AA, Griniuviene B, Yacoub LK, et. al.: Intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 expression in experimental alcoholic liver disease: Relationship
to endotocemia and TNF alpha messenger RNA. Exp Mol Path 1995;62: 42-51.
Nanji AA, Zhao S, Lamb RG, et. al.: Phospholipase A and C in intragastric
feeding rat model for alcoholic liver disease: Relationships to dietary
fats and pathologic liver injury. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1994;18: 902-908.
Neuman MG, Shear NH, Cameron RG, et. al.: Ethanol-induced apoptosis
in vitro. Clin Biochem 1999;32: 547-555.
Ogilvie KM, Held HK, Roberts ME, et. al.: The inhibitory effect of
intracerebroventricularly injected interleukin 1-beta 1 on testosterone
secretion in the rat: Role of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.
Biol Reproduction 1999;60: 527-533.
Ogilvie KM, Rivier C: Effect of alcohol on the proestrous surge of
luteinizing hormone (LH) and the activation of LH-releasing hormone
(LHRH) neurons in the female rat. J Neuroscience 1997;17: 2595-2604.
Okamoto Y, Fjuimori Y, Nakano H, Tsujii T: Role of the liver in alcohol-induced
alteration of high-density lipoprotein metabolism. J Lab Clin Med 1988;111:
482-485.
O'Neill B, Williams A, Dubowski KM: Variability in blood alcohol concentrations.
J Stud Alcohol 1983;44: 224-230.
Orpana AK, Orava MM, Vihko RK, et. al.: Role of ethanol metabolism
in the inhibition of testosterone biosynthesis in rats in vivo: Importance
of gonadotropin stimulation. J Steroid Bio Chem Mol Biol 1990;37: 273-278.
Ostapowicz G, Watson K, Locarnini S, Desmond P: Role of alcohol in
the progression of liver disease caused by hepatitis C infection. Hepatology
1998;27: 1730-1735.
Pastorino JG, Marcineviciute A, Cahill A, Hoek JB: Potentiation by
chronic ethanol treatment of the mitochondrial permeability transition.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;265: 405-409.
Peterson JD, Herzenberg LA, Vasquez K, Waltenbaugh C: Glutathione levels
in antigen presenting cells modulate Th1 and Th2 response patterns.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95: 3071-3076.
Rangno R, Kreft JH, Sitar DS: Ethanol 'dose dependent' elimination:
Michaelis-Menten v classical kinetic analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1981:12; 667-673.
Rasmussen DD, Bryant CA, Boldt BM, et. al.: Acute alcohol effects on
opiomelanocortinergic regulation. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 780-801.
Rasmussen L, Oster-Jorgensen E, Ovist N, et. al.: The relationship
between gut hormone secretion and gastric emptying in different phases
of the migrating motor complex. Scan J Gastroenterol 1996;31: 458-462.
Regan TJ: Alcohol and the cardiovascular system. JAMA 1990;264: 377-381.
Rettori V, Skelley CW, McCann SM, Dees WL: Detrimental effects of short-term
ethanol exposure on reproductive function in female rat. Biol Reproduction
1987;37: 1089-1096.
Rivier C: Alcohol rapidly lowers plasma testosterone levels in the
rat: Evidence that a neural brain-gonadal pathway may be important for
decreased testicular responsiveness to gonadotropin. Alcohol: Clin Exp
Res 1999;23: 38-45.
Rivier C: Alcohol stimulates ACTH secretion in the rat: Mechanisms
of action and interactions with other stimuli. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res
1996;20: 240-254.
Rodgers H, Aitken PD, French JM, et. al.: Alcohol and stroke. A case-control
study of drinking habits past and present. Stroke 1993;24: 1473-1477.
Romagnani S: Human Th1 and Th2 subsets: Doubt no more. Immunol Today
1991;12: 256-257.
Rosenqvist M: Alcohol and cardiac arrhythmias. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res
1998;22: 318S-322S.
Rossinen J, Sinisalo J, Partanen J, et. al.: Effects of acute alcohol
infusion on duration and dispersion of QT intervals in male patients
with coronary artery disease and in healthy controls. Clin Cardiology
1999;22: 591-594.
Rubin E, Urbano-Marquez A: Alcoholic cardiomyopathy. Alcohol Clin Exp
Res 1994;18: 111-114.
Rubin R: Effects of ethanol on platelet function. Alcohol: Clin Exp
Res 1999;23: 1114-1118.
Russ R, Abdel-Rahman AR, Wooles WR: Role of the sympathetic nervous
system in ethanol-induced hypertension in rats. Alcohol 1991;8: 452-457.
Sarphie TG, DSouza NBD, Spitzer JJ, Deaciuc IV: Chronic alcohol
feeding in liquid diet or in drinking water has similar effects on electron
microscopic appearance of the hepatic sinusoid in the rat. Alcohol:
Clin Exp Res 1996;20: 973-979.
Saso K, Higashi K, Nomura T, et. al.: Inhibitory effect of ethanol
on hepatocyte growth factor-induced DNA synthesis and Ca2+mobilization
in rat hepatocytes. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1996;20: 330A-334A.
Schuckit MS, Risch SC, Gold EO: Alcohol consumption, ACTH level, and
family history of alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 1988;145: 1391-1395.
Sedman A, Wilkinson PK, Sakmar E, et. al.: Food effects on absorption
and metabolism of alcohol. J Stud Alcohol 1976;37, 1197-1214.
Shi Q, Hales DB, Emanuele NV, Emanuele MA: Interaction of ethanol and
nitric oxide in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the male
rat. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1998;22: 1754-1762.
Srivastava V, Hiney JK, Nyberg CL, Dees WL: Effect of ethanol on the
synthesis of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and the IGF-I receptor
in later prepubertal female rats: A correlation with serum IGF-I. Alcohol:
Clin Exp Res 1995;19: 1467-1473.
Steer ML, Meldolesi J: The cell biology of experimental pacreatitis.
N Engl J Med 1987;316: 144-150.
Steiner JC, LaPaglia N, Hansen M, et. al.: Effect of chronic ethanol
on reproductive and growth hormones in the peripubertal male rat. J
Endocrinol 1997;154: 363-370.
Steinmetz CG, Xie P, Weiner H, Hurley TD: Structure of mitochondrial
aldehyde dehydrogenase: the genetic component of ethanol aversion. Structure
1997;15, 701-711.
Subramanian MG, Chen XG, Bergeski BA, Savoy-Moore RT: Alcohol inhibition
of suckling-induced prolactin release in lactating rats: Threshold evaluation.
Alcohol 1991;8: 203-206.
Swade TF, Emanuele NV: Alcohol and diabetes. Comprehensive Therapy
1997;23: 135-140.
Szabo G: Consequences of alcohol consumption on host defense. Alcohol
Alcoholism 1999;34: 830-841.
Szabo G, Verma B, Catalona D: Selective inhibition of antigen-specific
T lymphocyte proliferation by acute ethanol exposure: The role of impaired
monocyte antigen presentation capacity and mediator production. J Leuk
Biol 1993;54: 534-544.
Tahara M, Matsumoto K, Nukiwa T, Nakamura T: Hepatocyte growth factor
leads to recovery from alcohol-induced liver disease in rats. J Clin
Invest 1999;103: 313-320.
Thiele GM, Miller JA, Klassen LW, Tuma DJ: Chronic ethanol consumption
impairs receptor-mediated endocytosis of formaldehyde-treated albumin
by isolated rat liver endothelial cells. Hepatology 1999;29: 1511-1517.
Thomas AP, Rozanski DJ, Renard DC, Rubin E: Effects of ethanol on the
contractile function of the heart: A review. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1994;18:
121-131.
Thomasson HR, Beard JD, Li T-K: ADH2 gene polymorphisms are determinants
of alcohol pharmacokinetics. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1995;19: 1494-1499.
Thurman RG: Mechanisms of hepatic toxicity II. Alcoholic liver injury
involves activation of Kupffer cells by endotoxin. Am J Physiol 1998;275:
605-611.
Tsukamoto H, Cheng S, Blaner WS: Effects of dietary polyunsaturated
fat on ethanol-induced Ito cell activation. Am J Physiol 1996;270: G581-G586.
Tsukamoto H, Lin M, Ohata M, et. al.: Iron primes hepatic macrophages
for NF-kappaB activation in alcoholic liver injury. Am J Physiol 1999;277:
G1240-G1250.
Tuma DJ, Todero SL, Barak-Bernhagen M, et. al.: Chronic ethanol ingestion
impairs TGF-alpha-stimulated receptor autophosphorylation. Alcohol 1998;15:
233-238.
Turnbull AF, Smith GW, Lee S, et. al.: CRF type I receptor-deficient
mice exhibit a pronounced pituitary-adrenal response to local inflammation.
Endocrinology 1999;140: 1013-1017.
Uddin S, Wilson J, Emanuele MA, et. al.: Ethanol-induced alterations
in the postranslational processing, but not secretion of luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone in vitro. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1996;20: 556-560.
Vaquero E, Molero X, Tian X, et al: Myofibroblast proliferation, fibrosis,
and defective pancreatic repair induced by cyclosporin in rats. Gut
1999;45: 269-277.
Vasdev S, Sampson CA, Prabhakaran VM: Platelet-free calcium and vascular
calcium uptake in ethanol-induced hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1991;18:
116-122.
Vasiliou V, Bairoch A, Tipton KF, Nebert DW: Eukaryotic aldehyde dehydrogenase
(ALDH) genes: Human polymorphisms, and recommended nomenclature based
on divergent evolution and chromosomal mapping. Pharmacogenetics 1999;9:
421-434.
Vicente-Gutierrez MM, Ruiz AD, Extremera BG, et. al.: Low serum levels
of alpha-interferon, gamma-interferon, and interleukin-2 in alcoholic
cirrhosis. Dig Dis Science 1991;36: 1209-1212.
Volpi R, Chiodera P, Gramellini D, et. al.: Endogenous opioid mediation
of the inhibitory effect of ethanol on the prolactin response to breast
stimulation in normal women. Life Sci 1994;54: 739.
Waltenbaugh C, Peterson JD: Ethanol impairs the induction of delayed
hypersensitivity in C57BL/6 mice. Alcohol 1997;14: 149-153.
Wand G: Alcohol, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and hormonal
tolerance. In: Zakari S (Ed.), Alcohol and the Endocrine System. Bethesda,
MD, NIH, pp. 251-270, 1993.
Wand G, Schumann H: Relationship between plasma adrenocorticotropin,
hypothalamic opioid tone, and plasma leptin. J Clin Endocrinology Metabolism
1998;83: 2138-2142.
Wilson JS, Pirola RC: The drinkers pancreas: Molecular mechanisms
emerge. Gastroenterology 1997;113: 355-358.
Yang SQ, Lin HZ, Yin M, et. al.: Effects of chronic ethanol consumption
on cytokine regulation of regeneration. Am J Physiol 1998;275: G696-G704.
Yin M, Wheeler MD, Kono H, et. al.: Essential role of tumor necrosis
factor alpha in alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Gastroenterol
1999;117: 942-952.
Yin S-J, Han C-L, Lee A-L, Wu C-W: Human alcohol dehydrogenase family:
Functional classification, ethanol/retinol metabolism and medical implications.
Proc Exp Soc Exp Biol Med 1999:265-274.
Yoshida A, Rzhetsky A, Hsu LC, Chang C-P: Human aldehyde dehydrogenase
gene family. Eur J Biochem 1998;251: 549-557.
Zakhari S: Vulnerability to cardiac disease. Recent Dev Alcohol 1991;9:
225-260.
Zhang A, Cheng TP, Altura BM: Ethanol decreases cytosolic free calcium
ions in vascular smooth muscle cells as assessed by digital image analysis.
Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 1992;16: 55-57/
Zhong Z, Connor H, Stachlewitz RF: Role of free radicals in primary
nonfunctions of marginal fatty grafts from rats treated acutely with
ethanol. Mol Pharm 1997;52: 912-919.
Back to Top
APPENDIX A
Subcommittee for Review of Biomedical Research Portfolio
Chair
Dwight M. Bissell Jr., M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Division of Gastroenterology
Box 0538, Science 357
513 Parnussus Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94110
Phone: (415) 476-5072
Experts in Alcohol-Related Areas
Arthur Cederbaum, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustav L. Levy Place, Box 1020
New York, NY 10029
Phone: (212) 241-7285
Carol C. Cunningham, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
Wake Forest University
School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Phone: (910) 716-4254
Anna Mae Diehl, M.D.
Gastroenterology Division
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
912 Ross Building
720 Rutland Street
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: (410) 955-7316
Experts in Non-Alcohol-Related Areas
John G. Fitz, M.D.
Department of Medicine
University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center
4200 E 9th Avenue, B-158
Denver, CO 80262
Phone: (303) 315-2537
Fred S. Gorelick, M.D.
Yale University
Department of Internal Medicine
& Digestive Diseases
333 Cedar Street (LMP1080)
New Haven, CT 06520
Phone: (203) 932-5711 Ext. 3680
Ann L. Hubbard, Ph.D.
Johns Hopkins Medical School
Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy
725 N. Wolfe Street
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: (410) 955-2333
Ronald Lindahl, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology
University of South Dakota
Basic Biomedical Sciences
School of Medicine
Vermillion, SD 57069
Phone: (605) 677-5237
Back to Top
APPENDIX B
Experts in Biomedical Research
William Bosron, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
Indiana University Medical Center
405 Medical Sciences
635 Barnhill Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46202-5122
Phone: (317) 274-7211
David A. Brenner, M.D.
Department of Medicine
School of Medicine
University of North Carolina
156 Glaxo Building, Campus Box 7038
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Phone: (919) 966-0650
Mary Ann Emanuele, M.D.
Loyola Medical School
2160 S. First Avenue, #117N
Maywood, IL 60153
Phone: (708) 216-6200
Jan B. Hoek, Ph.D.
Department of Pathology, Anatomy,
and Cell Biology
Thomas Jefferson University
Room 271, Jefferson Alumni Hall
1020 Locust Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Phone: (215) 503-5016
Neil Kaplowitz, M.D.
University of Southern California
School of Medicine
Division of GI & Liver
2011 ZONAL Avenue, HMR 101
Los Angeles, CA 90033
Phone: (323) 442-5576
Lynell W. Klassen, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, NE 68198-3025
Phone: (402) 559-7288
Stephen J. Pandol, M.D.
Brentwood Biomedical Research Institute
West Los Angeles VAMC
Department of Research & Development
11301 Wilshire Blvd. (151)
Los Angeles, CA 90073
Phone: (310) 268-4437
Emanuel Rubin, M.D.
Thomas Jefferson University
1020 Locust Street, #279
Philadelphia, PA 19107-6799
Phone: (215) 955-5060
Andrew P. Thomas, Ph.D.
UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
Department of Pharmacology & Physiology
185 South Orange Avenue
Newark, NJ 07103-2714
Phone: (973) 972-4460
Hidekazu Tsukamoto, DVM, Ph.D.
Keck School of Medicine of USC
1333 San Pablo Street, MMR 402&
Los Angeles, CA 90033
Phone: (323) 442-5107
Russell T. Turner, Ph.D.
Mayo Foundation
Department of Orthopedics
200 First Street, Southwest
Rochester, MN 55905
Phone: (507) 284-2267
Back to Top
APPENDIX C
NIAAA Program Staff
Leslie Isaki, Ph.D.
Division of Basic Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 402
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 594-6228
Thomas Kresina, Ph.D.
Division of Basic Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 402
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-6537
Vishnudutt Purohit, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Division of Basic Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 402
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-2689
Sam Zakhari, Ph.D.
Division of Basic Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 402
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-0799
Back to Top
APPENDIX D
NIAAA Staff and Guests
Henri Begleiter, Ph.D., M.D.
Department of Psychiatry
Box 1203
State University of New York
Health Science Center at Brooklyn
450 Clarkson Avenue
Brooklyn, New York 11203
Phone: (718) 2702024
Susan Cahill
Planning and Financial Management Branch, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 412
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-2369
Faye Calhoun, D.P.A.
Office of Collaborative Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-1269
Mary Dufour, M.D., M.P.H.
Deputy Director, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-3851
Michael J. Eckardt, Ph.D.
Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-6107
Vivian Faden, Ph.D.
Division of Biometry and Epidemiology, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 514
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 594-6232
Laurie Foudin, Ph.D.
Division of Basic Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 402
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-0912
Susan Farrell, Ph.D.
Division of Biometry and Epidemiology, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 505 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-2238
Richard K. Fuller, M.D.
Division of Clinical and Prevention Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 505
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-1206
Enoch Gordis, M.D.
Director, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-3885
Mark R. Green, Ph.D.
Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-2860
Harold D. Holder, Ph.D.
Director, Prevention Research Center
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 900
Berkeley, California 94704
Phone: (510) 486-1111
Nancy Hondros
Planning and Financial Management Branch, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 412
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-5733
Robert Huebner, Ph.D.
Division of Clinical and Prevention Research, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 505
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-4344
William M. Lands, Ph.D.
Office of the Director, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-0276
Ting-Kai Li, M.D.
Department of Medicine
Indiana University School of Medicine
Emerson Hall 421
545 Barnhill Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46202-5124
Phone: (317) 274-8495
Edward Linehan, Jr.
Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-4624
Stephen Long
Office of Planning and Resource Management, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-4374
Matt McGue, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Elliot Hall, Room N-218
75 East River Road
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Phone: (612) 625-8305
Suzanne Medgyesi-Mitschang, Ph.D.
Office of the Director, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 405
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-3756
Carrie L. Randall, Ph.D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science
Medical University of South Carolina
171 Ashley Avenue
Charleston, SC 29425
Phone: (843) 792-5205
Carmen Richardson
Planning and Financial Management Branch, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 412
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-1285
Ronald Suddendorf, Ph.D.
Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-2926
Kenneth Warren, Ph.D.
Office of Scientific Affairs, NIAAA
6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003
Phone: (301) 443-4375
Migs Woodside
35436 Indian Camp Trail
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
Phone: (602) 488-5158
|