ClinicalTrials.gov
skipnavHome|Search|Browse|Resources|Help|What's New|About

The Addition of Indinavir to Anti-HIV Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients

This study has been terminated.

Sponsored by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Information provided by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of immediate versus deferred indinavir (IDV) in addition to background therapy on disease progression or death in patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV RNA levels >= 10,000 copies/ml. This study aims to examine two management strategies, immediate versus deferred IDV therapy, for their clinical effects in the context of background antiretroviral (AR) therapy, given according to current clinical practice. There is an urgent need to identify the optimal use of IDV in patient management, since clinical endpoint studies have not been completed in the United States. Since there is little information about the long term durability of clinical effects, and even less information about the timing of the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy, exploring the disease progression and survival impact of immediate versus delayed use of IDV will yield important information to guide clinical decision making for this group of patients.

Condition Treatment or Intervention
HIV Infections
 Drug: Indinavir sulfate

MedlinePlus related topics:  AIDS

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Double-Blind, Efficacy Study

Official Title: A Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Deferred Indinavir in Addition to Background Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients with CD4+ Cell Counts Between 200 and 500/mm3 and Plasma HIV RNA Levels >= 10,000 Copies/ml

Further Study Details: 

Expected Total Enrollment:  1900

This study aims to examine two management strategies, immediate versus deferred IDV therapy, for their clinical effects in the context of background antiretroviral (AR) therapy, given according to current clinical practice. There is an urgent need to identify the optimal use of IDV in patient management, since clinical endpoint studies have not been completed in the United States. Since there is little information about the long term durability of clinical effects, and even less information about the timing of the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy, exploring the disease progression and survival impact of immediate versus delayed use of IDV will yield important information to guide clinical decision making for this group of patients.

Prior to randomization the patient and clinician will determine whether the background therapy will be zidovudine (ZDV) plus lamivudine (3TC) or other background antiretroviral therapy (OBAT). Patients will then be randomized to IDV or matching placebo. AS PER AMENDMENT 06/27/97: The protocol was closed as of 03/25/97, and all patients have been unblinded to their assigned treatment. Patients still on study medication are eligible for the protocol extension. Patients who were randomized to immediate IDV may continue on therapy for up to an additional 4 months. All study therapy, both for those on immediate or delayed therapy, must be discontinued on 10/24/97.

Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:  16 Years and above,  Genders Eligible for Study:  Both

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Concurrent Medication: Allowed:

Patients must have:

NOTE:

Exclusion Criteria

Co-existing Condition: Patients with any of the following conditions or symptoms are excluded: Febrile illness with temperature > 38.5 degrees C (101.3 degrees F) within 3 days prior to study entry.

Concurrent Medication: Excluded:

Patients with any of the following prior conditions are excluded:


Location Information


California
      Community Consortium of San Francisco, San Francisco,  California,  94110,  United States

Colorado
      Denver CPCRA / Denver Public Hlth, Denver,  Colorado,  802044507,  United States

District of Columbia
      Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS Program, Washington,  District of Columbia,  20422,  United States

Georgia
      AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Atlanta,  Georgia,  30308,  United States

Illinois
      AIDS Research Alliance - Chicago, Chicago,  Illinois,  60657,  United States

Louisiana
      Louisiana Comm AIDS Rsch Prog / Tulane Univ Med, New Orleans,  Louisiana,  70112,  United States

Michigan
      Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit,  Michigan,  48202,  United States

      Comprehensive AIDS Alliance of Detroit, Detroit,  Michigan,  48201,  United States

New Jersey
      North Jersey Community Research Initiative, Newark,  New Jersey,  071032842,  United States

      Southern New Jersey AIDS Cln Trials / Dept of Med, Camden,  New Jersey,  08103,  United States

New York
      Harlem AIDS Treatment Group / Harlem Hosp Ctr, New York,  New York,  10037,  United States

Oregon
      Portland Veterans Adm Med Ctr / Rsch & Education Grp, Portland,  Oregon,  972109951,  United States

Pennsylvania
      Philadelphia FIGHT, Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  19107,  United States

Virginia
      Richmond AIDS Consortium, Richmond,  Virginia,  23298,  United States

Study chairs or principal investigators

Saravolatz L,  Study Chair
Crane L,  Study Chair
Mayers D,  Study Chair

More Information

Click here for more information about Indinavir sulfate

Publications

Spector SA, Barker C, Buhles W, Feinberg J, Montague P, Weingeist T, DeArmond B. A randomized, controlled study of immediate vs deferred ganciclovir therapy in AIDS patients with cytomegalovirus peripheral retinitis. Int Conf AIDS. 1991 Jun 16-21;7(1):44 (abstract no MB86)

Study ID Numbers:  CPCRA 041
Record last reviewed:  April 1997
Record first received:  November 2, 1999
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:  NCT00000861
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2004-10-14
line
U.S. National Library of Medicine, Contact NLM Customer Service
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services
Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act