RESPONDENTS
Most allegations of research misconduct are
not substantiated. Nevertheless, respondents should take such allegations
seriously because they can have a negative effect on research careers.
When accused of research misconduct, a respondent should
- review the PHS regulation on research misconduct,
- review the institution’s policies on responding
to research misconduct,
- gather documentation and identify witnesses,
- consider whether an advisor, expert, or counsel
is needed,
- avoid
actions which are or could be perceived as,
retaliatory against the whistleblower, and
- maintain
the confidentiality of the proceedings.
In responding to an allegation, an institution must provide the
respondent with
- confidential treatment to the maximum extent
possible,
- an opportunity to comment on allegations and
findings,
- a copy of the inquiry report for comment,
- a prompt and thorough investigation,
- a copy of the investigation report for comment,
and
- a
diligent effort, as appropriate, to restore your
reputation if the allegation is not confirmed.
Questions/suggestions about this web page? Webmaster
Updated May 18, 2002
|
