Return to home page| District Office | # of EEOC Summary Judgment Motions granted | # of Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions defeated by EEOC | # of Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions granted | # of Cases Appealed | Outcome on Appeal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Won | Lost | Settled | Pending | |||||
| Atlanta | 1 | not available | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Baltimore | 1 | not available | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Birmingham |
0 |
not available | 3 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | 0 |
| Charlotte | 0 | not available | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Chicago | 0 | not available | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Cleveland | 0 | not available | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dallas | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | 0 |
| Denver | 0 | not available | 2 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | 0 |
| Detroit | 0 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5(2) | 0 |
| Houston | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Indianapolis | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Los Angeles | 1 | not available | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Memphis | 0 | 16 | 1 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Miami | 1 | not available | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Milwaukee | 0 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| New Orleans | 0 | not available | 1 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | 0 |
| New York | 6 | not available | 6 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Philadelphia | 0 | not available | 0 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Phoenix | 0 | not available | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| San Antonio | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| San Francisco | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Seattle | 2 | not available | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| St. Louis | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTALS | 17 | 77 | 83 | 54 | 16 | 22 | 14 | 3 |
1. The vast majority of these court orders are rulings on summary judgment motions; at least one, however, was a ruling on a motion to dismiss and at least two were default judgments. These characterizations do not change the outcome of the ruling.
2. One case that was won on appeal was ultimately resolved by settlement.
This page was last modified on August 13, 2002.