Statistics were derived
by a multistage estimation procedure. The procedure produces essentially
unbiased national estimates and has basically four components: 1)
inflation by reciprocals of the probabilities of selection, 2) adjustment
for nonresponse, 3) a ratio adjustment to fixed totals, and 4) weight
smoothing. Each of these components is described briefly below.
1. Inflation of
Reciprocals by Sampling Probabilities Since the survey utilized a three-stage sample design, there were
three probabilities: a) the probability of selecting the PSU; b) the probability of selecting a physician within the PSU; and c) the probability of selecting a patient visit within the
physician's practice.
The last probability
was defined to be the exact number of office visits during the physician's
specified reporting week divided by the number of Patient Record forms
completed. All weekly estimates were inflated by a factor of 52 to derive
annual estimates.
2. Adjustment for
Nonresponse Estimates from the NAMCS data were adjusted to account for sample
physicians who did not participate in the study. This was done in such a
manner as to minimize the impact of nonresponse on final estimates by
imputing to nonresponding physicians the practice characteristics of
similar responding physicians. For this purpose, similar physicians were
judged to be physicians having the same specialty designation and
practicing in the same PSU.
3. Ratio Adjustment
A postratio adjustment was made within each of the 15 physician
specialty groups. The ratio adjustment is a multiplication factor which
had as its numerator the number of physicians in the universe in each
physician specialty group and as its denominator the estimated number of
physicians in that particular specialty group. The numerator was based on
figures obtained from the AMA-AOA master files, and the denominator was
based on data from the sample.
4. Weight Smoothing
Each year there are a few sample physicians whose final visit weights are
large relative to those for the rest of the sample. There is a concern
that those few may adversely affect the ability of the resulting
statistics to reflect the universe, especially if the sampled patient
visits to some of those few physicians should be unusual relative to the
universe. Extremes in final weights also increase the resulting variances.
Extreme weights can be truncated, but this leads to an understatement of
the total visit count. The technique of weight smoothing is used instead,
because it preserves the total estimated visit count within each specialty
by shifting the "excess" from visits with the largest weights to
visits with smaller weights.
Excessively large visit
weights were truncated, and a ratio adjustment was performed. The ratio
adjustment is a multiplication factor that uses as its numerator the total
visit count in each physician specialty group before the largest weights
are truncated, and, as its denominator, the total visit count in the same
specialty group after the largest weights are truncated. The ratio
adjustment was made within each of the 15 physician specialty groups
and yields the same estimated total visit count as the unsmoothed weights.