ClinicalTrials.gov
skipnavHome|Search|Browse|Resources|Help|What's New|About

To Determine If Olanzapine Is More Cost Effective Than Haloperidol for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

This study has been completed.

Sponsored by: Department of Veterans Affairs
Eli Lilly and Company
Information provided by: Department of Veterans Affairs

Purpose

Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal.

Condition Treatment or Intervention Phase
Schizophrenia
Schizoaffective Disorder
 Drug: Olanzapine (5 mg to 20 mg/day
 Drug: Haloperidol (5 mg to 20 mg/day)
Phase IV

MedlinePlus related topics:  Mental Health;   Schizophrenia

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study

Official Title: The Clinical and Economic Impact of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Further Study Details: 

Expected Total Enrollment:  600

Study start: June 1998;  Study completion: June 2001

Primary Hypothesis: To determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia. Secondary Hypothesis: Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol.

Intervention: Olanzapine (5 mg to 20 mg/day), haloperidol (5 mg to 20 mg/day).

Primary Outcomes: Total inpatient hospital care costs are the primary outcome. Other major outcomes are total social costs (cost of VA health care, non-VA services and other specified social costs), efficacy measures (PANNS, BPRS, CGI Severity, and neurocognitive battery scores) and safety measures (adverse events, ECG’s).

Study Abstract: Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal.

Approximately 327 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group was prescribed olanzapine with daily dosage ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. The other treatment group was prescribed haloperidol with daily dosage also ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. A semi-structured psychosocial case management treatment program is provided for all study patients. Patients were recruited from 18 VA medical centers over a 24-month period and will be followed for one year. The major objective of the study is to determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol. Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol.

Eligibility

Genders Eligible for Study:  Both

Criteria

Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Location Information


Alabama
      Vamc - Tuscaloosa, Al, Tuscaloosa,  Alabama,  35404,  United States

California
      Vamc - Palo Alto, Ca, Palo Alto,  California,  94304,  United States

Connecticut
      Vamc - West Haven,Ct, West Haven,  Connecticut,  06516,  United States

Florida
      Vamc - Bay Pines, Fl, Bay Pines,  Florida,  33744,  United States

      Vamc - Miami, Fl, Miami,  Florida,  33125,  United States

Georgia
      Vamc - Augusta, Ga, Augusta,  Georgia,  30904-6285,  United States

Indiana
      Vamc - Indianapolis, in, Indianapolis,  Indiana,  46202,  United States

Massachusetts
      Vamc - Bedford, Ma, Bedford,  Massachusetts,  01730,  United States

Michigan
      Vamc - Detroit, Mi, Detroit,  Michigan,  48201,  United States

      Vamc - Detroit, Mi, Detroit,  Michigan,  48201,  United States

New Jersey
      New Jersey Hcs - Lyons, Nj, Lyons,  New Jersey,  07939,  United States

New Mexico
      VAMC - Albuquerque, NM, Albuquerque,  New Mexico,  87108,  United States

New York
      Vamc - Montrose, Ny, Montrose,  New York,  10548-0100,  United States

      Vamc - New York, Ny, New York,  New York,  10010,  United States

North Carolina
      Vamc - Durham, Nc, Durham,  North Carolina,  27705,  United States

Ohio
      Vamc - Brecksville, Oh, Brecksville,  Ohio,  44141,  United States

Pennsylvania
      Vamc - Philadelphia, Pa, Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  19104,  United States

      Vamc - Pittsburgh, Pa, Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania,  15206-1297,  United States

More Information

Study ID Numbers:  451
Record last reviewed:  February 2003
Record first received:  December 29, 2000
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:  NCT00007774
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2004-10-29
line
U.S. National Library of Medicine, Contact NLM Customer Service
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services
Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act