It is a violation of federal law to broadcast obscene, profane
or indecent programming.
The prohibition is set forth at Title 18 United States Code, Section 1464 (18
U.S.C. § 1464). Congress has given the Federal Communications Commission
the responsibility for administratively enforcing 18 U.S.C. § 1464. In
doing so, the Commission may
issue a warning, impose a monetary forfeiture or revoke
a station license for the broadcast of obscene, profane
or indecent material.
Obscene Broadcasts Prohibited at All Times
Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast
at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test: (1) an
average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the
material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the material must
depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically
defined by applicable law; and (3) the material, taken as a whole, must lack
serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. See Miller v.
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
Indecent Broadcasts Restricted to 10 P.M. - 6 A.M.
The Commission has defined broadcast indecency as language or material that, in
context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by
contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory
organs or activities.
In applying the "community standards for the broadcast medium" criterion,
the Commission has stated, "The determination as to whether certain
programming is patently offensive is not a local one and does not encompass
any particular geographic area. Rather, the standard is that of an average
broadcast viewer or listener and not the sensibilities of any individual
complainant."
Indecent programming contains sexual or excretory references
that do not rise to the level of obscenity.
As such, the courts have held that indecent material is protected by the
First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely.
It may,
however, be restricted in order to avoid its broadcast during times of day when
there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.
For a complete summary of the Commission's case law regarding the indecency
standard, see
Industry Guidance On the Commission's Case Law Interpreting
18 U.S.C. § 1464
and Enforcement Policies Regarding Broadcast Indecency,
16 FCC Rcd 7999 (2001).
Consistent with a subsequent statute and federal court decisions interpreting
the indecency statute, the Commission adopted a rule (47 C.F.R. § 73.3999)
pursuant to which broadcasts - both on television and radio - that fit within
the definition of indecency and that are aired between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
are subject to indecency enforcement action.
Profane Broadcasts Restricted to 10 P.M. - 6 A.M.
The FCC has defined profanity as including language that denot[es] certain
of those personally reviling epithets naturally tending to provoke violent
resentment or denoting language so grossly offensive to members of the
public who actually hear it as to amount to a nuisance.
See
Complaints Against Various Broadcast Licensees Regarding Their Airing of
the Golden Globe Awards Program, FCC 04-43 (released: March 18 2004)
( Golden Globe Awards).
In announcing this definition, the FCC ruled that the single
use of the F-word in the context of a live awards program was profane.
The FCC further stated that it, depending on the context, will also
consider under the definition of profanity the F-Word
and those words (or
variants thereof) that are as highly offensive as the F-Word, to the extent
such language is broadcast between 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. We will analyze other
potentially profane words or phrases on a case-by-case basis.
Enforcement Items
Enforcement Procedures and Filing Complaints
Enforcement actions in this area are based on documented complaints of
indecent, profane or obscene broadcasting received from the public. The
Commission's staff reviews each complaint to determine whether it
alleges information sufficient to suggest that a violation of the
obscenity, profanity or indecency prohibition has occurred. If it appears that a
violation may have occurred, the staff will commence an investigation
by sending a letter of inquiry to the broadcast station. If the
complaint does not contain information sufficient to ascertain that a
violation may have occurred, the complaint will be dismissed. In such
a case, the complainant has the option of re-filing the complaint with
additional information, filing a petition for reconsideration of the
staff action, or filing an application for review (appeal) to the full
Commission. If the facts and information contained in a complaint
suggest that a violation did not occur, then the complaint will be
denied. In that situation, the complainant has the option of filing a
petition for reconsideration of the staff action or an application for
review (appeal) to the full Commission.
In making indecency and profanity determinations, context is key!
The Commission
staff must analyze what was actually said during the alleged broadcast,
the meaning of what was said and the context in which it was stated.
Accordingly, the Commission asks complainants to provide the following
information:
-
Information regarding the details of
what was actually
said
(or depicted)
during the allegedly indecent, profane or obscene broadcast.
There is
flexibility in how a complainant may provide this information. A
complainant may submit a significant excerpt of the program describing
what was actually said (or depicted) or a full or partial tape or
transcript of the material. In whatever form the complainant decides
to provide the information, it must be sufficiently detailed such that
the Commission can determine the words and language actually used
during the broadcast and the context of those words or language.
Subject matter alone is not a determining factor of whether material is
obscene, profane or indecent. Thus, for example, stating only that the
broadcast station discussed sex or had a disgusting discussion of
sex during a program is not sufficient. Moreover,
the FCC must know the context when analyzing whether
specific, isolated words
are indecent or profane.
The FCC does not require complainants to provide tapes or transcripts
in support of their complaints.
Consequently, failure to provide a tape or transcript of a broadcast,
in and of itself, will not lead to automatic dismissal or denial of a
complaint.
See
Indecency Guidelines Policy Statement, 16 FCC Rcd 7999 at para. 24.
The Commission and/or the Enforcement Bureau have proposed or assessed monetary
forfeitures in cases where the complaint did not include a tape or
transcript of the actual broadcast.
See
Emmis FM License Corp. of Chicago, WKQX(FM), Chicago, IL, 17 FCC Rcd 493 (EB
2002) recon. denied,
17 FCC Rcd 18,343 (EB 2002) ;
Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of Los Angeles,
KROQ-FM, Pasadena, CA, 15 FCC Rcd 10,667 (EB 2000), application for review
denied,
17 FCC Rcd 9,892 (2002);
Citicasters Co., KSJO(FM), San Jose, CA, 15
FCC Rcd 19,095 (EB 2000), forfeiture paid.
-
The date and time of the broadcast.
Under the Communications Act
of 1934, if the Commission assesses a monetary forfeiture against a
broadcast station for violation of a rule, it must specify the date the
violation occurred. Accordingly, it is important that complainants
provide the date the material in question was broadcast. Moreover,
under statutory provisions, judicial and Commission case law
and Commission Rules, a broadcaster's right to air
indecent or profane speech is protected between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.
Consequently, the Commission must know the time of day that the
material was broadcast.
-
The call sign of the station involved.
Documented complaints as discussed above should be directed to the
Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations &
Hearing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Any
documentation of the programming, of necessity, becomes part of the
Commission's records and cannot be returned.
|