Animation displaying the Navy, Marine Corps and Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) seals The one authoritative source for DoN acquisition
Search   
DoN Acquisition One Source

          Site Map | Subscribe | Contact An Expert | Help     


Policy and Guidance

Acquisition Topics
- Program Management
- Contracting
- Business, Cost Estimating and Financial Management
-- Earned Value Management
-- CAIV
-- Financial Management
- Systems Planning, Research, Development and Engineering (SPRDE)
- Manufacturing, Production, and Quality Assurance

Acquisition Career Management

Quick References

Business Opportunities

Tools and Assistance

News and Events

eBusiness

Contract Labor Standards & Contractor Labor Management Relations

Links

Archives

What's New on the Site

Hot Acquisition Topics

Subscribe

Feedback

Help

> Home / Acquisition Topics / Business, Cost Estimating and Financial Management / Financial Management / Financial Management / Applying Commercial Practices to SONAR System Component Development

Applying Commercial Practices to SONAR System Component Development

Applying Commercial Practices to SONAR System Component Development

Organization: NAVSEA, PEO (SUB), PEO (USW), PMS 425

Team Name: Acoustic-Rapid COTS Insertion (A-RCI) and the Advanced Processing Build (APB) Team

Related Acquisition Topic(s): Commercial Practices, Commercial and Non Developmental Items (CANDI), Cycle Time Reduction (CTR), Evolutionary Acquisition, Financial Management, Open Systems, Partnering, Specifications and Standards

Description:

By linking Advanced Development efforts with Engineering Manufacturing & Development efforts using common COTS hardware and system architecture and baseline software has reduced the traditional transition time of anywhere from 5-12 years to a integration effort of approximately eighteen months. Long term savings are expected through continued introduction of future APBs with integration costs of approximately $2.5 - 10M/APB as opposed to independent, stovepiped E&MD costing between $50 to $75M/development. The Acoustics - Rapid COTS Insertion (A-RCI) program has delivered significant improvements to the fleet in just 18 months after approval to enter Milestone II. As part of a joint initiative between Program Executive Officer Submarines (PEO SUBS) and PEO Undersea Warfare (PEO USW), the first Advanced Processing Build (TA APB 98) has been demonstrated (May 98) at sea and has been integrated and delivered with A-RCI Phase II, just one year later, currently there are 11 A-RCI Phase II systems installed in the Fleet. This effort will mark a dramatic shift in the way the Navy procures its technology. The following diagram (See Supporting Documentation) maps out the transition process and lists some of the innovations being applied with their results:

  • Innovative progress based on experimentation and iteration
  • Build-test-build paradigm
  • Evolutionary sonar improvement program
  • Focus on data analysis based on at-sea experimentation
  • Utilize encounter data recorded from existing systems
  • Fleet involvement in testing and improvement of prototypes
  • Seven-fold improvement in Towed Array Broadband detection and tracking ranges
  • Improvements with existing sensors
  • Significant improvement in exploiting unique submarine propulsion transients

Integrating Defense with the Commercial Base and Practices:

The A-RCI contract was issued only citing four MIL-STDs which were needed for ship interface requirements. A-RCI is practically all Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware, built to commercial standard Open Systems Architecture and Interface requirements. One of the cornerstones of the A-RCI program is the MultiPurpose Processor (MPP) developed by an innovative SBIR contractor rather than the traditional Defense Industry OEM/Primes. The A-RCI program and APB process has formalized an open business practices between government, industry, Navy Labs and academia incentivizing industry through Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) and Small Business Innovation Research (SBIRs) to participate upfront and as part of the product selection of candidate solutions to be integrated with the tactical systems. The A-RCI program has partnered with other ASW/USW users in the Navy community and is extending the usage of A-RCI products and APB processes with a common acoustic processor to the IUSS and AN/SQQ-89 Acoustic subsystems programs. This is a significant event of breaking the traditional practice of building one of a kind systems for each requirement.

Institutionalized Continuous Improvement

In a joint effort the A-RCI/APB team has institutionalized a continuous improvement process with all the stakeholders to provide for tactical superiority with current state of the practice technology for the current and emerging threat. The Sonar Development Working Group was created to formalize the process of:

  • accelerating advanced development products to the fleet
  • provide a disciplined process for the evaluation of candidate solutions including features of "peer review", use of real at sea data, and common data sets for the evaluations to arrive at "ground truth" comparisons
  • use of common baseline hardware and software between advanced development to significant reduce the amount of time and effort associated with transitioning products to tactical systems
  • The SDWG is engaged in regular, open communication with Fleet users, LABs, academia, industry and resource sponsors to ensure a cohesive approach to providing improvements to the Fleet
  • The SDWG anticipates change instead of reacting to it. The SDWG has focused the Science and Technology community to ensure their R&D efforts are directly applied to solving the fleets needs. The formal feedback to S&T allows for focused R&D and maintains a continuos technology/capability flow into the APB process.

Reducing Life Cycle Costs:

As stated earlier A-RCI has reduced the traditional transition time of anywhere from 5-12 years to a integration effort of approximately eighteen months. Long term savings are expected through continued introduction of future APBs with integration costs of approximately $2.5 - 10M/APB as opposed to independent, stovepiped E&MD costing between $50 to $75M/development. Leveraging development efforts with NSSN C3I via an Integrated Development Plan provided over $10M of costs savings. Pursuit of the common acoustic processor with the IUSS community, while not producing savings, is making improvements to that program affordable within controls for Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) and PEO-USW for the AN/SQQ-89 program as well. In addition, application of a coordinated effort between providing for COTS technology refreshment requirements with a technology insertion needs to support APB improvements will provide for significant savings in the outyears while maintaining supportable hardware in the fleet with increased capability.

Reduce Cycle Time For Delivering Equipment and Services:

By linking Advanced Development efforts with Engineering Manufacturing & Development efforts using common COTS hardware and system architecture and baseline software has reduced the traditional transition time of anywhere from 5-12 years to a integration effort of approximately eighteen months.

NAVSEA, PEO (SUB), PEO (USW)

Acoustic-Rapid COTS Insertion (A-RCI) and the Advanced Processing Build Team



Accessibility Help and Information Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition)
1000 Navy Pentagon
Washington, DC 20350-1000

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Acquisition Management, DASN (ACQ)
Director, Acquisition Career Management
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Logistics, DASN (LOG)


This is an official U.S. Navy web site (GILS Number: 001883). Please read this Privacy Policy and our External Links disclaimer. For additional information, contact the DON Acquisition Webmaster.

The Navy's Official Website | The Navy Recruiting Site | Official Navy Freedom of Information Act