Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for Transportation Improvements within the Southeast Corridor between Nashville and Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Number 69 FR 40468-40470
07-02-04
[PDF
format]
[Federal Register: July 2, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 127)]
[Notices]
[Page 40468-40470]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jy04-122]
--------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for Transportation
Improvements Within the Southeast Corridor Between Nashville and
Murfreesboro, TN
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
--------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is issuing this
notice to advise interested agencies and the public that, in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act, FTA and the Nashville Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) will prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for proposed transportation improvements in the
Southeast Corridor between downtown Nashville in Davidson County,
Tennessee and Murfreesboro in Rutherford County, Tennessee.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written comments on the scope of the EIS,
including the alternatives and impacts to be considered, should be sent
to the address listed under ADDRESSES below by August 14, 2004.
Interagency Scoping Meeting: An interagency scoping meeting will be
held on Wednesday, July 14, 2004, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. at the
Nashville Downtown Library, 615 Church Street, Conference Room 1,
Nashville, Tennessee 37219. Representatives of agencies likely to have
an interest in, or jurisdiction over any aspect of the project will be
individually contacted and invited to the meeting.
Public Scoping Meetings: Public scoping meetings will be held on:
Monday, July 12, 2004, from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., at Smyrna Town Centre,
100 Sam Ridley Parkway, Smyrna, Tennessee 37167; Tuesday, July 13,
2004, from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. at Rutherford County Courthouse, Courthouse
Square, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130; and Wednesday, July 14, 2004
from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Nashville Downtown Library, 615 Church
Street, Conference Room 1, Nashville, Tennessee 37219.
All scoping meetings will be held in wheelchair-accessible
locations. If additional assistance, such as signing for the hearing
impaired, is needed, please notify Jim McAteer of the Nashville Area
MPO as indicated below under ADDRESSES.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS, including the
alternatives to be analyzed and the impacts to be considered, should be
sent by August 14, 2004 to: Jim McAteer, Transit Planner, Nashville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, 730 2nd Ave South, Nashville,
TN 37201, Phone (615) 862-7204, Fax (615) 862-7209, e-mail
mcateer@nashvillempo.org. Also contact Mr. McAteer to be placed on the
project mailing list or to request a copy of the scoping information
packet which is also on the Nashville MPO website at
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from =leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nashvillempo.org. The locations of the scoping meetings are given above under DATES.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Doug Frate, Federal Transit
Administration, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Suite 17T50, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Phone: (404) 562-3514.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA, the Federal lead agency, in cooperation
with the Nashville Area MPO, the local
[[Page 40469]]
lead agency, is preparing an EIS for proposed transportation
improvements in the corridor between downtown Nashville in Davidson
County, Tennessee and Murfreesboro in Rutherford County, Tennessee,
known as the Southeast Corridor. Issues and alternatives will be
identified through a scoping process in accordance with the regulations
implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as
amended.
I. Scoping
The Nashville Area MPO and FTA invite interested individuals,
organizations, and Federal, State, and local agencies to participate in
scoping the EIS. Scoping participants are invited to comment on the
alternatives to be addressed; the modes and technologies to be
evaluated; the alignments and station locations to be considered; the
environmental, social, and economic impacts to be analyzed; and the
evaluation approach to be used to select a locally preferred
alternative. Interested individuals, organizations, or agencies may
propose the consideration of an additional, specific alternative or the
study of a specific environmental effect associated with an
alternative. Scoping comments should focus on the issues and
alternatives for analysis, and not on preference for particular
alternatives. (Individual preference for particular alternatives should
be communicated during the comment period for the Draft EIS.) Comments
may be made at the scoping meetings or in writing no later than August
14, 2004, as described in DATES and ADDRESSES above. After the scoping
process, the MPO will conduct a planning Alternatives Analysis to
decide what transportation improvements in the Southeast Corridor
should be incorporated into its regional transportation plan. The EIS
will incorporate the planning Alternatives Analysis by reference and
evaluate the surviving alternatives in detail.
II. Description of Study Area
The study area, known as the Southeast Corridor, links the cities
of Nashville in Davidson County and LaVergne, Smyrna and Murfreesboro
in Rutherford County, all of which are within the MPO's area of
responsibility for transportation planning. Nashville is the second
largest city in Tennessee with a population of roughly 570,000. The
central business district houses the Tennessee State Offices, music
attractions, and the Tennessee Titans football team which brings
visitors from across the state. Nashville draws approximately 132,000
commuters from surrounding counties, about 25,000 of whom come from
Rutherford County. Murfreesboro is the southernmost terminus of the
study corridor and lies about 30 miles southeast of Nashville. It has a
population of roughly 75,000 and is home to Middle Tennessee State
University (MTSU), which has an enrollment of about 21,000, of whom
3,500 live on the campus. Smyrna has a population of approximately
25,600 and LaVergne has an approximate population of 18,700. The
estimated population along the corridor is 260,050.
The two primary north-south thoroughfares within the corridor are
Murfreesboro Road, also known as U.S. 41/70S, and Interstate 24 (I-24).
This corridor experiences significant levels of traffic congestion
within the 30-mile segment of I-24 between Nashville and Murfreesboro,
handling between 91,000 and 133,000 average daily annual trips.
Murfreesboro Road has between 20,600 and 37,400 average annual daily
trips. Some of the potential trip attractors/generators along the
corridor include Nashville International Airport, and MTSU and major
employers such as Dell Computer and regional shopping malls, commercial
services, office parks, hospitals and the downtown core of Nashville.
LaVergne and Smyrna form a major employment area known as ``Interchange
City,'' which is home to a Nissan manufacturing plant, Bridgestone and
other major industries.
Few options exist in the corridor to provide alternatives to
driving in heavily congested conditions. Improvements are needed to
address traffic volumes that increase annually and the corresponding
traffic congestion that is projected to occur. The planning
Alternatives Analysis will examine alignments, technologies, station
locations, cost, funding, ridership, economic development, land use,
engineering feasibility, and environmental concerns. During this
Alternatives Analysis process, the MPO will also evaluate options for
transportation improvements in this corridor that do not involve
significant capital investment.
III. Alternatives
The alternatives initially proposed for consideration in the
Southeast Corridor include:
1. No Action Alternative: Based on projects included in the local
transportation improvement plan (TIP) and financially-constrained long-
range transportation plan, with no new change to transportation
services or facilities in the area beyond already committed projects.
2. Transportation System Management Alternative: A low-cost
alternative will be developed to include minor improvements to
intersections, traffic signals, demand management and system management
programs, bus services and facilities and other modifications to the
transportation system that can be made without major investments in
infrastructure or equipment.
3. Build Alternatives: Three alternatives, combining various types
of major investments to meet the travel needs of the corridor, will be
developed. These ``build'' alternatives most likely will include the
development of busway or bus rapid transit, light rail transit, and
conventional commuter rail technology along various existing rights-of-
way in the corridor.
Based on public and agency input received during scoping,
variations of the above alternatives and other transportation-related
improvement options, both transit and non-transit, will be considered
for the Southeast Corridor.
IV. Potential Impacts for Analysis
The FTA and MPO will consider all social, economic, and
environmental impacts associated with the alternatives under
consideration. Potential environmental issues to be addressed include:
land use, historic and archaeological resources, traffic and parking,
noise and vibration, environmental justice, floodplain encroachments,
coordination with other transportation and economic development
projects, and construction impacts. Other issues to be addressed
include: natural areas, ecosystems, rare and endangered species, water
resources, air quality, surface water and groundwater quality,
contaminated sites, displacements and relocations, and parklands. The
potential impacts will be evaluated for both the construction period
and the long-term operations period of each alternative considered. In
addition, the cumulative effects of the alternatives on major resources
identified in the study area will be analyzed. Measures to avoid or
mitigate any significant adverse impacts will be developed.
V. FTA Procedures
In accordance with FTA policy, all Federal laws, regulations, and
executive orders affecting project development, including but not
limited to the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality and
FTA implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and 23 CFR part 771),
the Clean Air Act, section 404 of the Clean
[[Page 40470]]
Water Act, Executive Order 12898 regarding environmental justice, the
National Historic Preservation Act, the Endangered Species Act, and
section 4(f) of the DOT Act, will be addressed to the maximum extent
practicable during the NEPA process. In addition, the MPO may seek
section 5309 New Starts funding for the project and will therefore be
subject to the FTA New Starts regulation (49 CFR part 611). This New
Starts regulation requires the submission of certain specified
information to FTA to support a request to initiate preliminary
engineering, which is normally done in conjunction with the NEPA
process.
After the scoping process, the MPO will conduct a planning
Alternatives Analysis to decide what transportation improvements in the
Southeast Corridor should be incorporated into its regional
transportation plan. The planning Alternatives Analysis will examine
alignments, technologies, station locations, cost, funding, ridership,
economic development, land use, engineering feasibility, and
environmental concerns. The Draft EIS will incorporate the planning
Alternatives Analysis by reference and evaluate the surviving
alternatives in detail. After its publication, the Draft EIS will be
available for public and agency review and comment, and public hearings
will be held on the Draft EIS. The Final EIS will consider comments
received during the Draft EIS public review and will identify the
preferred alternative. Additional opportunities for public involvement
will be provided throughout all phases of project development.
Issued on: June 28, 2004.
Hiram J. Walker,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-15054 Filed 7-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P
|