R 241344Z FEB 03 ZDK
FM NAVCRANECEN LESTER PA//00//
TO AIG ZERO ZERO ONE FIVE FOUR
UNCLAS //11262//
MSGID/GENADMIN/NAVCRANECEN LESTER PA//
SUBJ/SUMMARY OF WEIGHT HANDLING EQUIPMENT ACCIDENTS, FIRST QUARTER FY03//
REF/A/DOC/NAVFAC P-307/01SEP2000//
REF/B/MSG/NAVCRANECEN LESTER PA/171842ZDEC2002//
REF/C/DOC/OPNAVINST 3500.39/26SEP2000//
NARR/REF A IS MANAGEMENT OF WEIGHT HANDLING EQUIPMENT. REF B IS CONTRACTOR
OPERATED MOBILE CRANES MOUNTED ON BARGES. REF C IS OPERATIONAL RISK
MANAGEMENT.//
POC/WES HILL/GS/NAVY CRANE CENTER/LOC:LESTER PA/TEL:610-595-0948
/TEL:DSN 443-0505/EMAIL:HILLWX@NCC.NAVFAC.NAVY.MIL//
RMKS/1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MESSAGE IS TO DISSEMINATE
SHORE ACTIVITY WEIGHT HANDLING EQUIPMENT (WHE) ACCIDENT LESSONS LEARNED TO
PREVENT REPEAT ACCIDENTS AND IMPROVE OVERALL SAFETY.
2. REF A REQUIRES COMMANDS TO SUBMIT TO THE NAVY CRANE
CENTER (NCC) A FINAL, COMPLETE ACCIDENT REPORT (INCLUDING
CORRECTIVE/PREVENTIVE ACTIONS) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF AN ACCIDENT, REGARDLESS OF
SEVERITY OR TYPE. IN ADDITION, CONTRACTING OFFICERS ARE REQUIRED TO FORWARD
TO
NCC REPORTS ON ALL CONTRACTOR ACCIDENTS.
3. FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FY-03, 51 NAVY WHE
ACCIDENTS AND 3
CONTRACTOR WHE ACCIDENTS WERE REPORTED. SEE PARAGRAPH 8 FOR CONTRACTOR
WHE ACCIDENTS. SERIOUS ACCIDENTS THIS QUARTER INCLUDED 1 INJURY, 5
DROPPED LOADS, 5 OVERLOADS AND 5 TWO-BLOCKINGS.
4. INJURY:
A MACHINE SHOP SUPERVISOR WAS BRIDGING A CRANE WHILE PERFORMING THE
OPERATOR'S MONTHLY CRANE INSPECTION. AS THE CRANE TRAVELED ON THE
RAILS IT COLLIDED WITH A CEILING MOUNTED HEATER DUCT THAT HAD RECENTLY BEEN
EXTENDED INTO THE CRANE'S TRAVEL PATH. THE COLLISION CAUSED SOME
PARTICLES TO FALL INTO THE SUPERVISOR'S EYE, DAMAGING A
BLOOD VESSEL.
LESSONS LEARNED: AFTER INSTALLING NEW EQUIPMENT IN THE VICINITY OF
OVERHEAD CRANES, THE CRANE TRAVEL PATH MUST BE CHECKED CAREFULLY TO VERIFY
THAT THERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES.
5. DROPPED LOADS:
A. IN SEPARATE LIFTS AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS DURING INCLEMENT
WEATHER A CATEGORY 4 CRANE WITH A POWER BLOCK CABLE REEL ASSEMBLY WAS USED
TO PLACE SHORE POWER CABLES ONTO TWO SHIPS. DURING BOTH OF THESE
LIFTS, THE POWER CABLE SLIPPED FROM THE POWER BLOCK REEL AND FELL ONTO THE
PIER. A REVIEW OF THE ACTIVITY'S ACCIDENT DOCUMENTATION REVEALED THAT
THE CABLES HAVE A TENDENCY TO SLIP OUT OF POWER BLOCK REEL ASSEMBLIES DURING
WET CONDITIONS.
LESSONS LEARNED: OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF POWER BLOCK REEL
ASSEMBLIES FOR THE PLACEMENT OR REMOVAL OF SHORE POWER CABLES MUST BE
REVIEWED. IF A POWER REEL HAS A TENDENCY TO LOSE THE CABLE DURING WET
CONDITIONS, ALTERNATIVE MEANS SHOULD BE USED WHENEVER RAIN OR INCLEMENT
CONDITIONS ARE A POSSIBILITY.
B. A CRANE TEAM WAS PRACTICING THE REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF A
MOCK-UP ONTO A STAND. THESE LIFTS WERE ASSUMED TO BE SIMPLE IN NATURE
SO THERE WERE NO PRE-LIFT BRIEFS CONDUCTED. PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT, THE
REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OPERATION WAS CONDUCTED NUMEROUS TIMES WITHOUT
INCIDENT. DURING THE LAST PRACTICE RUN, THE LOAD SHIFTED AND FELL WHEN
THE OPERATOR LANDED THE MOCK-UP AND
RELEASED THE TENSION ON THE HOISTING AND RIGGING LINES. THE
ACTIVITY'S REVIEW OF THE ACCIDENT REVEALED THAT THE MOCK-UP WAS NOT PROPERLY
SEATED AND ALIGNED ON THE SUPPORT STAND. THE CRANE TEAM WAS UNABLE THE
SEE THE IMPROPER POSITIONING DUE TO OBSTRUCTIONS IN THEIR LINE OF SIGHT.
LESSONS LEARNED: THERE ARE INHERENT HAZARDS IN EVERY LIFTING
OPERATION. PRIOR TO ANY LIFTING OPERATION, TIME SHALL BE DEVOTED TO
ASSESSING THE HAZARDS. ONE OF THE CONTROL ELEMENTS IN THE LIFTING
OPERATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS AN UNOBSTRUCTED
SIGHT LINE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE LOAD AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURE.
C. A MOBILE CRANE WAS BEING USED TO LIFT A PUMP
WEIGHING 350
POUNDS. THE CYLINDRICALLY SHAPED PUMP WAS RIGGED IN THE VERTICAL POSITION.
THE OPERATOR WAS INSTRUCTED TO RETRACT THE BOOM. WHEN THE BOOM
HIT THE FIRST SECTION OF THE BOOM STOP IT SHOOK THE LOAD AND THE LOAD
SLIPPED THROUGH THE SLINGS AND FELL TO THE PIER. IMPROPER RIGGING ALLOWED
THE PUMP TO SLIP AND FALL TO THE PIER DURING THE LIFT.
LESSONS LEARNED: CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO USE THE PROPER RIGGING CONFIGURATION
WHEN HOISTING CYLINDRICALLY SHAPED OBJECTS. OBJECTS OF THIS TYPE
SHOULD BE HOISTED IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION WHEN POSSIBLE. USING A
DOUBLE CHOKER HITCH SLING CONFIGURATION WILL FACILITATE A BETTER CONTROL OF
THE LOAD.
D. DURING THE LIFT OF AN AXLE ONTO A TRAILER, THE
AXLE BECAME
DISLODGED AND DROPPED. THE TWO-LEG WIRE ROPE SLING BEING USED HAD
A SAFETY LATCH MISSING FROM ONE OF THE HOOKS. THIS ALLOWED THE
HOOK TO SLIP OUT OF THE SHACKLE CAUSING THE AXLE TO DROP.
LESSONS LEARNED: PRIOR TO ANY LIFTING OPERATION, RIGGING GEAR MUST BE
CHECKED FOR DEFICIENCIES. IF THE RIGGING IS FOUND TO BE DEFICIENT, IT
SHALL BE REPLACED.
6. OVERLOADS:
A. RIGGING GEAR WAS OVERLOADED DURING THE LIFT OF A SHAFT DOLLY
SECTION AND TILT TABLE THAT WEIGHED 8,500 POUNDS. THE RIGGER ASSUMED
THAT THE WEIGHT WAS 6,200 POUNDS. THE RIGGER'S INFORMATION WAS
OBTAINED FROM THE DOLLY'S LABEL PLATE BUT THE ANNOTATED WEIGHT DID NOT
INCLUDE THE WEIGHT OF THE TILT TABLE. IN ADDITION, THE RIGGING
GEAR WAS INCORRECTLY SIZED FOR THE ASSUMED WEIGHT OF 6,200
POUNDS. THE RIGGER DID NOT CONSIDER THE FOUR-POINT LIFT REQUIREMENT
OR THE DOWNGRADE FOR THE LIFT ANGLE
LESSONS LEARNED: WHEN LIFTING A LOAD HAVING MULTIPLE
SECTIONS, THE RIGGER MUST VERIFY THE WEIGHT OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SECTION.
B. A MOBILE CRANE WAS OVERLOADED ON FOUR DIFFERENT OCCASIONS AS A
RESULT OF THE TEST DIRECTOR'S MISINTERPRETATION OF THE OEM'S LOAD
CHART. THE ORIGINAL HOIST WIRE ROPE HAD BEEN REPLACED WITH A ROTATION
RESISTANT WIRE ROPE. ALTHOUGH THE ROTATION RESISTANT WIRE ROPE HAS A
HIGHER BREAKING STRENGTH THAN THE ORIGINAL ROPE, THE REQUIRED FACTOR OF
SAFETY IS HIGHER, RESULTING IN A LOWER RATED CAPACITY THAN THE ORIGINAL WIRE
ROPE. THE TEST DIRECTOR DID NOT NOTICE THE LOWER RATED CAPACITY OF THE
ROTATION RESISTANT WIRE ROPE AND TESTED THE CRANE ON FOUR DIFFERENT
OCCASIONS BASED ON THE RATED CAPACITY OF THE ORIGINAL WIRE ROPE.
LESSONS LEARNED: DURING THE REVIEW OF THE LOAD CHART, THE TEST DIRECTOR MUST
NOTE THE TYPE OF WIRE ROPE USED ON THE CRANE AND CALCULATE THE TEST LOAD
BASED ON THE ALLOWABLE LOAD OF THAT PARTICULAR WIRE ROPE.
C. DURING A LOAD TEST OF A PORTAL CRANE, THE AUXILIARY HOIST WAS
OVERLOADED. THE TEST DIRECTOR FAILED TO VERIFY THE TEST LOAD'S WEIGHT
PRIOR TO HOISTING THE LOAD.
LESSONS LEARNED: TEST DIRECTORS MUST VERIFY THAT THE TEST LOAD IS
WITHIN THE TEST LOAD LIMITATIONS AS REQUIRED BY REF A, PARAGRAPH 3.7.1.
D. A SLING WAS OVERLOADED WHEN IT WAS USED TO HOIST A LAUNCH THAT
CONTAINED WATER. DURING THE PRE-LIFT BRIEF, THE CRANE TEAM WAS TOLD
THAT THE WEIGHT OF THE LAUNCH WAS 24,000 POUNDS. SLINGS WERE SELECTED
BASED UPON THIS WEIGHT. THE ACTUAL WEIGHT WAS 36,000 POUNDS DUE TO
WATER BEING RETAINED INSIDE THE HULL. SEVERAL OTHER ERRORS
OCCURRED: THE CRANE OPERATOR DID NOT IMMEDIATELY SET THE LOAD BACK
DOWN WHEN THE LAUNCH BECAME UNSTABLE DUE TO THE SHIFTING
WATER INSIDE THE HULL; THE CRANE OPERATOR DID NOT STOP THE OPERATION AFTER
SEEING THAT THE CRANE'S LOAD MOMENT INDICATOR READ MORE THAN 24,000 POUNDS;
THE RIGGER-IN-CHARGE DID NOT VERIFY THE SLING CERTIFICATION DATES (ONE SLING
WAS NOT CERTIFIED); THE CRANE TEAM MEMBERS DID NOT KNOW THAT THEY COULD HALT
A LIFT IF THEY SUSPECTED A PROBLEM; AFTER THE CRANE ACCIDENT, THE RIGGING
SUPERVISOR DID NOT PRESERVE THE ACCIDENT SITE, NOR DID HE WAIT FOR THE
INVESTIGATION TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE CONTINUING WITH THE LIFTING OPERATION.
LESSONS LEARNED: IF A LOAD BECOMES UNSTABLE, THE CRANE OPERATOR MUST
RE-ESTABLISH CONTROL OF LOAD BEFORE CONTINUING WITH THE LIFT. THE
OPERATOR MUST SET THE LOAD DOWN WHEN AN OVERLOAD IS SUSPECTED. THE
RIGGER-IN-CHARGE MUST INSPECT THE RIGGER GEAR PRIOR TO USE AND VERIFY THAT
THE GEAR HAS A CURRENT CERTIFICATION. DURING PRE-LIFT BRIEFINGS,
MEMBERS OF THE CRANE TEAM SHOULD BE REMINDED THAT ANY
MEMBER OF THE TEAM CAN HALT A LIFT IF THEY SUSPECT A PROBLEM.
E. WHEN TAKING UP THE SLACK ON A JIB CRANE THAT WAS BEING TIED DOWN TO
A PIERSIDE CLEAT, THE FORCE APPLIED OVERLOADED THE CRANE. THE SHACKLE
ATTACHED TO THE CLEAT HAD BREAKING STRENGTH WAS HIGHER THAN THE RATED
CAPACITY OF THE CRANE.
LESSONS LEARNED: WHEN TYING DOWN HOOKS, ONLY ENOUGH TENSION SHOULD BE
APPLIED THAT WILL HOLD THE HOOK IN PLACE. A WEAK LINK CONNECTION SHALL
BE USED TO SECURE THE CRANE'S HOOK AS PRESCRIBED IN REF A, PARAGRAPH 10.17.
7. TWO-BLOCKINGS:
A. A MONORAIL AND A BRIDGE CRANE WERE TWO-BLOCKED AT DIFFERENT NAVY
ACTIVITIES WHEN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS PERFORMING WORK IN THE BUILDINGS
ACCIDENTALLY REVERSED THE PHASE CONNECTION IN THE POWER PANEL THAT FED THE
MONORAIL AND BRIDGE CRANE.
LESSONS LEARNED: WHEN ELECTRICAL WORK IS COMPLETED IN AN ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTION PANEL BOX, THE EQUIPMENT ENERGIZED BY THAT PANEL BOX MUST BE
TESTED FOR PROPER OPERATION. SUCH OPERATIONS MUST BE PERFORMED VERY
SLOWLY IN ORDER TO AVOID TWO-BLOCKING THE HOIST.
B. A MOBILE CRANE OPERATOR INADVERTENTLY ACTIVATED THE MAIN HOIST
HOISTING CONTROL LEVER WHILE ROTATING THE BOOM, WHICH RESULTED IN
TWO-BLOCKING. THE OPERATOR STATED THAT HE FELT PRESSURE TO COMPLETE
THE TASK AT HAND AND TO MOVE QUICKLY TO THE NEXT ASSIGNMENT. THIS
PRESSURE MAY HAVE DIVERTED THE OPERATOR'S ATTENTION FROM THE SAFE COMPLETION
OF THE CURRENT ASSIGNMENT.
LESSONS LEARNED: CRANE OPERATORS SHALL BE ALERT WHEN OPERATING CRANES,
ESPECIALLY MOBILE CRANES. THE COMPLEXITY OF MOBILE CRANE OPERATIONS
MAKES THE OPERATOR'S ATTENTION TO DETAIL IMPERATIVE. OPERATORS SHOULD REPORT
TO THEIR SUPERVISORS ANY UNDUE PRESSURE TO COMPLETE THE JOB QUICKLY.
C. A PENDANT CONTROLLED BRIDGE CRANE WAS TWO-BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF AN
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION, WHICH INADVERTENTLY DISABLED THE UPPER LIMIT
SWITCH. THE CRANE WAS MANUFACTURED WITH A 110 PERCENT TORQUE LIMIT
SWITCH. THE ACTIVITY INSTALLED AN OVERRIDE SWITCH TO PERMIT THE CRANE
TO BE TESTED AT 125 PERCENT FOR THE ANNUAL LOAD TEST.
HOWEVER, THIS SWITCH ALSO DEACTIVATED THE UPPER LIMIT SWITCH.
THE IMPROPER ALTERATION WAS DISCOVERED BEFORE THE ACCIDENT BUT WAS NOT
CORRECTED.
LESSONS LEARNED: ALTERATIONS TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY DEVICES REQUIRE NCC
REVIEW AND APPROVAL. CRANE OPERATORS MUST BE AWARE OF THE OPERATING
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CRANES THEY OPERATE. WHEN THE HOOK BLOCK
APPROACHES THE UPPER BLOCK, OPERATING SPEEDS MUST BE REDUCED.
D. DURING THE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION OF A MOBILE CRANE, DAMAGE TO THE
BOOM TIP SHEAVES AND TO THE WIRE GUIDE WERE FOUND. THE DAMAGE APPEARED
TO BE CAUSED BY A TWO-BLOCKING. A REVIEW OF OPERATORS' ODCL'S
SUBMITTED AFTER THE ACCIDENT SHOWED THAT NO DEFICIENT CONDITIONS WERE FOUND
DURING THEIR INSPECTIONS.
LESSONS LEARNED: CRANE OPERATORS SHALL BE TRAINED THAT IF A CRANE ACCIDENT
OCCURS, OPERATIONS SHOULD BE HALTED AND THE INCIDENT REPORTED. ALSO,
DURING THE PRE-USE CHECK, OPERATORS MUST INSPECT CLOSELY ENOUGH TO FIND ANY
DAMAGE TO THE CRANE AND REPORT THE DAMAGE TO SUPERVISION.
8. CONTRACTOR CRANE ACCIDENTS:
A. A CONTRACTOR RECENTLY HAD A SERIOUS CRANE ACCIDENT
INVOLVING A CRAWLER/RINGER CRANE MOUNTED ON A BARGE. WHILE LIFTING THE
UPPER WORKS OF A SHIPYARD PORTAL CRANE, THE BARGE CRANE'S BOOM COLLAPSED AND
THE LIFTED LOAD LANDED IN THE RIVER. THE BARGE CRANE OPERATOR'S CAB
WAS CRUSHED BUT FORTUNATELY NO ONE WAS SERIOUSLY INJURED.
LESSONS LEARNED: SEE REFERENCE B.
B. A CONTRACTOR WAS HOISTING A CRATE OF TRANSFORMERS THAT WAS HOISTED
WITH PALLET BARS RIGGED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE CRATE. WHEN THE OPERATOR
HOISTED THE CRATE APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET INTO THE AIR, THE BOTTOM OF THE
CRATE FAILED. THE TRANSFORMERS FELL ONTO A DISHWASHER UNIT STAGED ON
THE PIER.
LESSONS LEARNED: CRATES SHOULD BE PLACED ON LIFTING PALLETS. THIS WILL
INSURE THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE CRATE IS PROPERLY SUPPORTED.
C. A MOBILE CRANE WAS BEING USED TO REMOVE A WOODEN PALLET LOADED WITH
A HOSE REEL WHEN THE PALLET LIFTING BEAM DISENGAGED FROM THE RIGGING GEAR
CAUSING THE HOSE REEL TO SLIDE OFF THE PALLET AND FALL APPROXIMATELY 40
FEET. THE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT TWO OF THE SLING HOOKS'
SAFETY LATCHES WERE DAMAGED AND DID NOT WORK
PROPERLY, THE HOSE REEL WAS NOT PROPERLY SECURED, SHACKLES WERE NOT USED
BETWEEN THE PALLET LIFTING BEAM ATTACHMENTS AND THE SLING HOOKS, AND THE
RIGGER FAILED TO THOROUGHLY CHECK THE RIGGING CONNECTION.
LESSONS LEARNED: SEE LESSONS LEARNED IN PARAGRAPH 5.D. ALSO,
PALLETED LOADS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SECURED.
9. WEIGHT HANDLING PROGRAM MANAGERS AND SAFETY
OFFICIALS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONSIDER THE POTENTIAL RISK OF ACCIDENTS
OCCURRING AT YOUR ACTIVITY SIMILAR TO THOSE HIGHLIGHTED ABOVE AND APPLY THE
LESSONS LEARNED TO PREVENT SIMILAR ACCIDENTS. REF C PRESCRIBES METHODS
FOR ASSESSING HAZARDS AND CONTROLLING AND MINIMIZING RISKS IN HAZARDOUS
OPERATIONS. NAVY ACTIVITIES SHOULD INCORPORATE THESE
PRINCIPLES INTO BOTH TRAINING AND DAY-TO-DAY WEIGHT HANDLING OPERATIONS.
10. E-MAIL SUBMISSION OF REPORTS OF ACCIDENTS,
UNPLANNED
OCCURRENCES AND NEAR MISSES IS ENCOURAGED. THE E-MAIL ADDRESS IS ACCIDENT@NCC.NAVFAC.NAVY.MIL.
THE REPORTS MUST INCLUDE A COMPLETE AND CONCISE SITUATION DESCRIPTION,
CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS, PROBABLE CAUSE AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS,
AND AN ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE. FOR EQUIPMENT MALFUNCTION OR FAILURE
INCLUDE SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPONENT AND THE RESULTING EFFECT OR
PROBLEM CAUSED BY MALFUNCTION OR FAILURE.//
|