Back
||NOAA Home
World
Meteorological Organization
56th Executive Council
“Strategies for Stewardship – Development of a Global
Observation System”
Plenary Session—Committee of the Whole
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
9:30 a.m.
[As prepared
for delivery]
Introduction
Thank you and good morning. It is a great pleasure and privilege to
be with you. I thank the WMO for inviting me to meet with you here
to address the WMO Executive Council. I have been deeply impressed
by the achievements that have resulted from the long-standing partnerships
within the WMO and its member countries over many decades –
with one of the most notable being WMO’s World Weather Watch
Global Observing System for weather that has brought so many benefits
to the nations of the world. In short, the WMO is a model international
organization demonstrating to the entire world the enormous benefits
that can be gained by serious cooperative efforts.
Before
I begin, I would also like to recognize some other significant contributions
of the WMO is making in the field of Earth observations: the creation
of the WMO Space Programme, efforts to improve and maintain surface
and upper air systems, and improvements to the GTS to name only a
few.
Last
year, I addressed the WMO Congress speaking on behalf of the US Government
and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Today I am
honored to be here as a representative of the 47 countries and 29
international organizations that make up the intergovernmental ad
hoc Group on Earth Observations (GEO). GEO has truly become an international
movement towards the development of a comprehensive, coordinated and
sustained global system of Earth observations. The WMO has played
a key role in this. The WMO’s active engagement in all of the
GEO working groups & Secretariat, its key role in facilitating
dialogue with other agencies of the United Nations, and in offering
its significant ability to convene world experts to address the key
issues has been a model for all involved.
Development
of the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
Nearly two years ago, I had the pleasure of addressing the World Summit
on Sustainable Development (WSSD) event on the Global Information
for Sustainable Development project. After my presentation, I had
the opportunity to hear about the different applications for the data
and information provided by the GISD, and the extraordinary amount
of international collaboration for making scientifically sound public
policy decisions.
As you
all know, the results of WSSD charged the participating countries
with fostering strengthened cooperation and coordination among global
observing systems and research programs for integrated global observations.
In the following year, the G8 ministers meeting at Evian also issued
a Science and Technology Action Plan calling on the nations of the
G8 to strengthen cooperation on global observations.
Earth
Observation Summit I
Heeding that call, in July of last year, the United States hosted
34 countries and 20 international organizations at the first-ever
Earth Observation Summit at the State Department in Washington, DC.
This meeting marked an important first-step in bringing the nations
of the world together for the purpose of establishing a comprehensive,
coordinated and sustained Earth observing system. The heads of national
delegations participating in the summit agreed to a declaration that
called for a commitment to developing a comprehensive, coordinated
and sustained Earth observation system built on existing systems.
The declaration
reaffirmed the need for Earth systems data and information for sound
decision-making, set forth principles for long-term cooperation in
meeting these goals and committed to improving Earth observation systems
and scientific support in developing countries. It also established
the ad hoc Group on Earth Observations (GEO) to prepare a ten-year
implementation plan for a comprehensive, coordinated Earth observation
system.
The sense
of cooperation and goodwill was palpable – not exactly a small
feat when dealing with such a large and diverse group of international
partners. As an excellent example of the goodwill present in the room,
Canada’s Environment Minister, David Anderson announced the
commitment of his nation to make its climate data – dating back
to 1840 – freely available. Putting actions behind words is
one reason why I believe we will ultimately achieve success. Focusing
on the benefits of a Global Earth Observation System of Systems is
another.
Earth
Observation Summit II
The convening of the Second Earth Observation Summit delivered on
the charge from the initial Washington meeting to have a Framework
for the 10-Year Plan agreed to by Spring of 2004. This Framework for
the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) focuses on
the benefits of a global system, noting current key areas of observations
and pointing out the shortcomings of our existing systems. The Framework
states that the GEOSS will be a system of systems, addressing data
utilization challenges, and facilitating and building-on current and
new capacity building efforts. The Framework also offers a glimpse
of what GEOSS will look like:
GEOSS
will be:
- Comprehensive,
by including observations and products gathered from all components
required to serve the needs of participating members;
- Coordinated,
in terms of leveraging resources of individual contributing members
to accomplish this system, whose total capacity is greater than
the sum of its parts; and
Sustained, by the collective and individual will and capacity of
participating members.
Societal
Benefits: Weather as Benefit and Crosscut:
A comprehensive,
coordinated and sustained system will address nine societal benefits
areas:
- Reducing
loss of life and property from natural and human-induced disasters;
- Understanding
environmental factors affecting human health and well being;
- Improving
management of energy resources;
- Understanding,
assessing, predicting, mitigating, and adapting to climate variability
and change;
- Improving
water resource management through better understanding of the water
cycle;
Improving weather information, forecasting, and warning;
- Improving
the management and protection of terrestrial, coastal, and marine
ecosystems;
- Supporting
sustainable agriculture and combating desertification; and
- Understanding,
monitoring, and conserving biodiversity.
You will
notice that improved understanding of weather was identified as one
of the nine most important benefits areas, but I believe it is clear
that weather is also an important cross-cut of the remaining 8 benefits
areas. I could discuss these linkages at length, but given the short
amount of time I have with you today, I’d like to focus on just
a few:
Weather
and Disasters:
Last month, the Dominican Republic and Haiti suffered the loss of
1500 lives from a weather related disaster. But what if we had space-based
hyperspectral sounders and imagers with advanced physics capable of
measuring temperature and moisture ahead of the storm. Space-based
and in situ aircraft wind measurements from commercial aircraft are
fed into the models.
At the
same time, space-based radiance data detects abnormally high soil
moistures along the northern slopes of the Honduran and Guatemalan
highlands. The numerical forecasts indicate that the tropical storm
will not develop into a major hurricane, but will become a major rain
producer. Using the soil moisture data and input from the new high-resolution
global weather models, hydrological models predict massive run off
and a high probability of major mud slides for a 300 kilometer band.
The peak danger for this potentially disastrous flooding is forecasted
to be from 18 to 24 hours following landfall. Warnings are issued
4 days in advance of the predicted heavy rains.
As expected,
the storm makes landfall with rain totals reaching up to 10 inches
in 6 hours over the higher elevations. Residents in the floodplains
have been evacuated and losses are greatly reduced by advance flood
warnings.
Weather
and Health:
The health of our citizens will also benefit from an integrated system
of observations that will be used for novel applications such as disease
tracking and prediction. These projects have already begun, but are
still in their infancy. Take for instance thefollowing two examples:
Malaria
killed more than a million people last year, primarily in the developing
world. Weather patterns – temperature, soil moisture and rainfall
patterns – often set the stage for optimal conditions for the
spread of diseases like malaria. Earlier this year, NASA and the University
of Alabama-Huntsville announced a program for using satellite-based
monitoring to alert at-risk communities when the conditions are right
for outbreaks.
By feeding
information such as soil-type and recurring standing puddles in to
a GIS database, and adding to this satellite based information, such
as temperature and rainfall, a computer simulation may be used to
estimate the risk of outbreak. The combination of satellite and land
observations gives us a glimpse of the power of a truly integrated
and comprehensive observation system.
Similarly,
in a project called Epidemio, the European Space Agency is working
in the Central African country of Congo to provide GIS information
to the International Center for Medical Research in Gabon to aid in
determining the long-term carriers of the Ebola virus. Ebola, the
fatal hemorrhagic disease, continues to be a mystery due to the fact
that most carriers die quickly after infection, and it is unclear
how it spreads from region to region.
The use
of remote sensing data will hopefully shed new light on the ecological
aspects of the infection sites, allowing prediction of potential outbreaks
in environmentally similar areas.
These
two initiatives are focused on predicting and understanding the movement
of two deadly diseases, but what if we could effectively eliminate
them or at the very least severely restrict their movement? A comprehensive
Earth observation system may provide the tools to accomplish that
goal.
Weather and Energy:
On another important topic, it is not really news that worldwide energy
prices are escalating. What if understanding our planet a little better
could save us enormous sums of money all the while allowing us to
be better stewards of our natural resources? Utilities typically use
weather forecasts to determine what mix of coal, hydroelectric, nuclear,
wind, natural gas and oil plants will be used to meet consumer needs.
According to the Tennessee Valley Authority, annual costs of electricity
could decrease by at least $1 billion if we could improve the accuracy
of weather forecasts by one degree Fahrenheit.
That
difference in just one degree of accuracy could affect the decision
a utility must make in determining whether to buy electricity from
the wholesale market or fire-up an expensive natural gas facility
to meet increased demand. That same difference in forecasting can
prevent the unnecessary purchase or bringing online of a facility,
which wastes both the energy and the consumer’s money.
Likewise,
our more accurate 5-day forecast for hurricanes can save the offshore
oil and gas industry countless sums of money by notifying them when
and if a facility must go offline for a storm. Not only is this a
direct benefit to the company operating the platform, it’s an
indirect benefit that extends to the entire globe, preventing a ripple
in the world energy market that can take weeks or months to recover.
Weather
and Agriculture:
Drought is a worldwide issue affecting planting and harvesting decisions.
It puts serious restraints on water use, and in some countries resulting
in a more active forest fire season. I don’t have global figures
on costs associated with drought in front of me, but estimates of
costs in the US range from $6 to $8 billion annually.
But what
if we knew years in advance that these patterns would be occurring
and could take the necessary precautions to mitigate the effects?
Understanding
the El Nino/La Nina patterns have allowed us to save millions of dollars
in the US alone. Worldwide benefits to agriculture due to El Nino
forecasts are at least $450 to $550 million per year. As an example,
crop planting decisions, seed selection, fertilizer application, water
allocation, etc., can be adjusted to reduce vulnerability to abnormal
weather conditions, making both producers and consumers better off.
It also may be possible to adjust storage of crop inventories in anticipation
of changed yields due to El Niño.
A comprehensive
system of Earth observations may just give us the rest of the missing
pieces to that puzzle, allowing us to predict and plan for droughts
and other phenomena affecting our agricultural outputs.
The
international community has been talking about the benefits of observations
for years from a scientific perspective. This GEO process is working
to capture the imagination of the decision-makers who will use the
information to make sound policy based on sound science.
Developing
the 10-Year Plan:
In the nine months between the first and second Earth Observation
Summits, the GEO gathered four times around the world, meeting very
aggressive schedules for outputs. I have the distinct pleasure of
serving as one of four intergovernmental Co-Chairs of GEO, along with
Mr. Akio Yuki, Deputy Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (MEXT), Japan; Mr. Achilleas Mitsos, Director-General
for Research, European Commission; and Dr. Rob Adam, Director-General
of the Department of Science & Technology, South Africa.
One of
the defining characteristics of GEO is that membership is open to
any country that expresses an interest and designates a point of contact.
Interestingly, the fastest-growing sector of our membership has been
the developing countries – again, evidence that people understand
the societal benefits to be derived from such a system.
I should
also acknowledge the growing number of intergovernmental organizations
such as yourselves who have provided the support and institutional
leadership necessary to get where we are today in the process. I’m
especially encouraged by the joint statement communicated by the WMO
Secretary General, Michel Jarraud, on behalf of the Executive Heads
of FAO, UNESCO (including its IOC), UNEP and WMO at the recent Earth
Observation Summit II in Tokyo.
We want
everyone to have a seat at this table because that is the only way
to ensure that we meet our ultimate goal of complete global coverage.
GEO Highlights:
- We
have accomplished much in the first leg of our mission.
- At
GEO 1 in Washington, we approved Terms of Reference and established
five working subgroups to address Architecture, Data Utilization,
User Requirements & Outreach, Capacity Building and International
Cooperation components of the Plan.
- At
GEO 2 in Baveno, we received initial reports from those subgroups,
and reached consensus on the societal benefit / user focus for the
Plan. Initial discussions also began on an international cooperation
mechanism for post-GEO implementation of the Plan.
- At
GEO 3 in Cape Town, the Framework document and accompanying Communiqué
were fully negotiated and prepared for distribution to countries
for comment/clearance. In addition, GEO agreed that each Co-Chair
would designate a representative for the Implementation Plan Task
Team, to serve as the Co-Chair’s point person organizing the
writing of the Plan.
- At
GEO 4 in Tokyo, we held final discussions on the negotiated text
of the Framework and Communiqué, which would be presented
to ministers at the second summit, and received the first reports
of the Implementation Plan Task Team. Discussions also continued
on a governance structure for a successor mechanism to GEO, and
we decided to hold a special session this fall in Brussels to come
to agreement on that issue.
Governance:
The members of GEO are currently considering and providing comments
on the following 9 principles that converged from the discussions
at the last GEO meeting –
- High
level participation
- Government
primacy, with open participation by organizations
- Membership
open to all countries
- Regular
meetings at senior official level, with periodic ministerial meeting
- Coordinate,
not duplicate work of existing mechanisms
- Draw
fully on international scientific community
- No
new international organization, but clearly defined terms of reference
- Should
evolve incrementally, following Framework guidelines
- Form
should follow function
GEO
5
Once an agreement to the governance question is in place, we will
be working towards finalizing the Implementation Plan, the Technical
Blueprint and the ministerial Communique. Both the Implementation
Plan and ministerial Communique will be fully negotiated, and hopefully
agreed to for the most part by the conclusion of GEO 5 which is scheduled
for November 29-30 in Ottawa, Canada. Only 75 days separate the GEO
5 meeting and the final Earth Observation Summit in February 2005,
so much work will have to be done between now and then, and GEO 5
in Ottawa is critical to our success.
Near
Term Observation Activities:
In the meantime, we need to be thinking about near-term observation
projects that will fill some of the most pressing gaps in our capacity
– as my South African Co-Chair puts it the “low-hanging
fruit.” Just before the Earth Observation Summit II in Tokyo,
the US hosted a G8 Science Ministers meeting to discuss progress on
the Science and Technology Action Plan from the Evian meeting. The
participants in that meeting strongly endorsed the activities of GEO
in working toward a comprehensive long-term plan, but they also discussed
areas of partnership that can be undertaken somewhat quickly, and
at relatively low cost compared to the benefit gained.
Each
minister was asked to forward ideas in advance of that meeting to
facilitate the discussion. The US submitted four papers on monitoring
sea level rise, operationalizing satellite altimetry, synthetic aperture
radar (SAR) use in addressing disasters, and improving global land
observing capacity. Although I was unable to attend that meeting due
to the ongoing GEO meeting in Tokyo, my understanding is that the
discussion on these and other ideas was productive and plans are being
made for a follow-up meeting later this year.
U.S.
Discussion Papers for G8: Sea Level Rise
Just for a moment, I’d like to take off my “GEO hat”
and put my “NOAA hat” back on to talk a little about the
US discussion papers at that meeting. Global sea level rise is a high
priority issue that requires strengthened international cooperation
in the sustained collection of high-quality observations as the basis
for sound decision-making. Present estimates of globally averaged
sea level rise – based on historical tide gauge records and
a decade of observations by the U.S. (NASA)/France (CNES) TOPEX/Poseidon
(T/P) and Jason-1 altimeter satellites – are anywhere from 1
to 3 mm/year, more likely 1.5 to 2.0 mm/year. The major causes of
uncertainty in these estimates result from inadequate observations
of:
- Sea
level by tide gauges, especially in the Southern Hemisphere, due
to poor data reporting (both quality and timeliness), as well as
vertical movement of the land
Sea level by satellite altimetry, due to the relatively short record
- Changes
in the volume of the ocean, due to changes in the temperature and
salinity structure of the ocean
- Changes
in the mass of the oceans, due to changes in the volume of glaciers
and ice caps, as well as storage by lakes and reservoirs.
The U.S.
discussion paper pointed out several specific steps that can be taken
to address these observational gaps:
- About
170 tidal gauges, reporting hourly data in real time, and with co-located
GPS receivers to measure the vertical movement of land
- At
least three decades of coverage by satellite altimetry
- Continuing
observations of the upper-ocean temperature and salinity structure
by a global array of 3,000 Argo profiling floats
- Improved
understanding of the re-distribution of water mass on the surface
of the Earth
U.S.
Discussion Papers for G8: Operationalizing Altimetry
The discussion paper on operationalizing altimetry pointed out that,
beginning in 1960, the U.S. has launched a continuing series of
more than 50 operational polar-orbiting satellites. While these
satellites serve a range of users, their principal purpose has been
to provide meteorological observations in support of operational
weather forecasting. But with limited exceptions, the international
community has not yet implemented a continuing operational capability
to collect oceanographic observations.
The paper
suggested that the G-8 nations should build on the partnerships already
in place (such as the extensive collaboration between the U.S. and
France with TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1), and strongly support the
participation of operational environmental agencies in programs that
bridge between research and operations.
G8
Science & Technology for Sustainability Action Plan/Progress Report
As you all know, the G8 just concluded its 2004 meeting in Sea Island,
Georgia, and released its 2004 Science and Technology for Sustainability
Action Plan and Progress Report. The Action Plan/Progress report noted
the two Earth Observation Summits held since the Evian Summit, the
work of GEO, the adoption of the Framework, and the ongoing progress
at developing a 10-year plan.
Wrap
Up:
A comprehensive system of systems will necessarily build upon and
capitalize on the work that organizations like the WMO have been conducting
for many years. In essence, we are standing on the shoulders of groups
like yours and the scientific discoveries that have led us to this
place in time.
As an
author, a naturalist and a keen observer of the great outdoors, Henry
David Thoreau once said: "All this worldly wisdom was once the
amiable heresy of some wise man." We’ve come a long way
from the “flat earth” theories of the past, but we still
have so much to learn about this planet.
The Global
Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) will indeed provide a
fresh perspective of the mysteries of Earth, and will put us on a
path to new discoveries and a new understanding of the planet
Conclusion:
I hope I have provided you with some insight as to where we have come
from over the past year and where GEO is going. I’d like to
encourage those of you who are from countries who are not members
in GEO to take this information back and consider joining us. Again,
speaking as a co-chair of GEO, your active engagement in developing
GEOSS is greatly appreciated within our community, and we look forward
to WMO’s continued contributions and leadership in the field
of Earth observations.
|