Testimony
Statement by
Charles G. Curie, M.A., A.C.S.W. Administrator Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration U.S.Department of Health and Human Services
on
Providing Substance Abuse and Mental Health Prevention and Treatment Services to Adolescents
before the
Subcommittee on Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions,
United States Senate
|
June 15, 2004
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, good morning. I
am Charles G. Curie, Administrator of the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), part of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Thank you for providing me the opportunity to describe how SAMHSA
and our Federal, State, and local community-level partners are
working to provide effective substance abuse treatment to people
who want and need it, including young Americans.
Drug abuse and mental illness are major public health problems that
affect us all. In terms of dollars, substance abuse,
including alcohol, illicit drugs, and tobacco use, costs our Nation
more than $484 billion per year. The economic costs of mental
illness are also staggering. The President’s New
Freedom Commission on Mental Health reports the cost in the U.S.
from both direct (treatment-related) and indirect (productivity
loss) expenses may exceed $150 billion per year with rapid annual
increases, especially in the drug treatment area. Mental
illnesses, including depression, account for four of the top six
causes of disability among 15-44 year olds in the Western world.
Although not as well known as the deaths due to substance abuse,
mental illnesses are a substantial source of mortality. Of
the 30,000 Americans who die by suicide each year, 90 percent have
a mental illness. The fact that deaths from suicide outnumber
deaths from homicide (18,000) is often a surprising finding.
Suicide rates are high among several ethnic minority groups, though
it remains highest in older white males. Between 1952 and
1992, the incidence of suicide among adolescents and young adults
nearly tripled; currently it is the third-leading cause of death in
adolescents. We know that substance use increases the
probability of a person with mental illness attempting suicide and
increases the person’s likelihood of succeeding
Addiction’s toll on individuals, their families, and the
communities they live in is a cumulative devastation with a ripple
effect. This ripple effect leads to costly social and public
health problems including HIV/AIDS, domestic violence, child abuse,
and crime in general, as well as accidents and teenage pregnancies.
Addiction often begins during childhood and adolescence.
Research has shown that substance use dependence, while once
thought to be an adult-onset disease, is actually a
“developmental disease.” It is
developmental in terms of having its start during the early stages
of adolescence and even childhood, when children use drugs or
consume alcohol. The introduction of an illicit drug or of
alcohol to the adolescent brain has a dramatic impact because of
the changes occurring in the brain during this developmental
stage.
The data from SAMHSA’s 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and
Health provides the scope of the problem. In 2002, there were
2.3 million youths aged 12 to 17 who needed treatment for an
alcohol or illicit drug problem. Of this group, only 186,000
received treatment. Without help, it is very likely that
these young people, at the very beginning of their lives, will
continue on a destructive path of addiction, disability, criminal
involvement, and premature death.
Overall, there are an estimated 22 million Americans struggling
with a drug or alcohol problem. There is a clear correlation
between age of first use of drugs and alcohol and the potential for
developing a serious problem. For example, in 2000, 18
percent of people age 26 and older who had begun using marijuana
before age 15 met the criteria for either dependence or abuse of
alcohol or illicit drugs, compared to 2.1 percent of adults who
never used marijuana. Among past year users of
marijuana age 26 and older who had first used marijuana before age
15, 40 percent met the criteria for either dependence or abuse of
alcohol or illicit drugs.
The story is very similar for alcohol. One-third, 2.3
million, of alcohol-dependent adults age 21 or older in 2002, had
first used alcohol before age 14. Over 80 percent, 5.8
million, had first used before they were age 18. And 96
percent, 6.6 million, had first used before age 21. The rate
of dependence for those who first drank at age 21 or older was only
1 percent. Conversely, 99% of adults 21 and older who first
drank alcohol at age 21 or older do not have a dependence problem.
It is plain to see why improving treatment services for adolescents
and bolstering prevention programs targeted to this age group are
top priorities for SAMHSA.
THE SAMHSA ROLE
SAMHSA is working to improve how we approach substance abuse
treatment and prevention, not only at the Federal level, but also
at the State and community levels. During my tenure, we have
restructured our work around the vision of “a life in the
community for everyone” and our mission of “building
resilience and facilitating recovery.”
To focus and to guide our program development and resources, we
have developed a Matrix of program priorities and cross cutting
principles that pinpoints SAMHSA’s leadership and management
responsibilities. These responsibilities were developed as a
result of discussions with members of Congress, our advisory
councils, constituency groups, people working in the field, and
people working to attain and sustain recovery.
The Matrix priorities are also aligned with the priorities of
President Bush and HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson, whose support for
our vision of a life in the community for everyone we appreciate.
The Matrix has produced concrete results by focusing SAMHSA staff
and the field on planting a few “redwoods” rather than
letting “a thousand flowers bloom.” I see my
responsibility as Administrator to make solid program and
management improvements that will last beyond my tenure.
I am proud of our success over the past two and half years since I
came to SAMHSA. I believe the SAMHSA Matrix is the
underpinning of our success and has helped us to focus on solid
investments in the future of mental health and substance abuse
prevention and treatment services. In particular, I will
highlight the ways we support the prevention and treatment of
adolescent substance abuse.
On our matrix you will see the program “Strategic Prevention
Framework.” Through this Framework we are working to
more effectively and efficiently align our prevention
resources. The Framework is aligned with the
President’s and Secretary Thompson’s HealthierUS
initiative. HealthierUS is a plan to improve overall public
health by capitalizing on the power of prevention to help prevent,
delay, and/or reduce disability from chronic disease and illnesses,
including substance abuse and mental illnesses.
I am pleased to report that the most recent data confirms that the
President’s two-year goal to reduce illicit drug use among
youth by 10 percent in 2 years has been exceeded, with an 11
percent reduction in the past two years. This is a clear
indication that our work with our many Federal and State partners,
along with schools, parents, teachers, law enforcement, religious
leaders, and local community anti-drug coalitions, is paying
off. But our work is far from over, and prevention is
key.
Fortunately, we know more about what works in prevention,
education, and treatment than ever before. Over the years, we
have shown prevention programs can and do produce results.
Currently, we have 60 model programs listed in our National
Registry of Effective Programs. These programs yield, on
average, a 25 percent reduction in substance use and affect a broad
range of behavioral issues, from violence and delinquency to
emotional problems. Primary access to the programs in the
Registry is through the SAMHSA Model Programs website, www.modelprograms.samhsa.gov.
The website describes and provides contact information for each of
the programs in the Registry.
Unfortunately, as we all know, individuals, communities, or State
and Federal agencies do not always translate, or make it easy to
translate, into action what is known about prevention. To
help provide a structured approach to substance abuse prevention
and mental health promotion that is based on the best that science
has to offer, Secretary Thompson launched the Strategic Prevention
Framework during the national HealthierUS Prevention Summit in
Baltimore on April 29. This new $45 million competitive grant
program will enable States, Territories, and the District of
Columbia to bring together multiple funding streams from multiple
sources to create and sustain a community-based, science-based
approach to substance abuse prevention and mental health
promotion.
The Framework is based on the risk and protective factor approach
to prevention. For example, family conflict, low school
readiness, and poor social skills increase the risk for conduct
disorders and depression, which in turn increase the risk for
adolescent substance abuse, delinquency, and violence.
Protective factors such as strong family bonds, social skills,
opportunities for school success, and involvement in community
activities can foster resilience and mitigate the influence of risk
factors.
Clearly, these risk and protective factors exist at several levels
– at the individual level, the family level, in schools, the
community level, and in the broader environment. People
working in communities with young people and adults understand the
need to create an approach to prevention that is citizen centered,
cuts across existing programs and system levels, and has common
outcome measures.
Just as when we are promoting exercise and a healthy diet or
advancing vaccination, when we speak about abstinence or rejecting
drugs, tobacco, and alcohol and promote mental health, we really
are all working towards the same objective – reducing risk
factors and promoting protective factors. The challenge is to
build a national framework for prevention on that common
foundation.
Moving the framework from vision to practice will require the
Federal government, States, and communities to work in
partnership. Under the new grant program, States will provide
leadership, technical support, and monitoring to ensure that
participating communities are successful in implementing a
five-step public health process that will promote youth
development, reduce risk-taking behaviors, build assets and
resilience, and prevent problem behaviors across the life
span. The five steps are:
First, communities assess their mental health and substance
abuse-related problems including magnitude, location, and
associated risk and protective factors. Communities also
assess assets and resources, service gaps, and readiness.
Second, communities must engage key stakeholders, build coalitions,
and organize, train, and leverage prevention resources.
Third, communities establish plans that include strategies for
organizing and implementing prevention resources. They must
be based on documented needs, build on identified resources, and
set baselines, objectives, and performance measures.
Fourth, communities implement evidence-based prevention efforts
specifically designed to reduce risk and promote protective factors
identified.
Finally, communities will monitor and report outcomes to assess
program effectiveness and service delivery quality, and to
determine if objectives are being attained or if there is a need
for correction.
The success of the Strategic Prevention Framework will be measured
by specific national outcomes that are true measures of whether our
programs are helping young people achieve our vision of a life in
the community, for example, whether they are in stable homes, in
school, and are not involved with the criminal justice
system. We are rapidly moving to implement these national
outcomes across all of SAMHSA’s programs.
In the area of substance abuse treatment, we are already using
national outcomes. This year we commenced the
President’s Access to Recovery program with a $100 million
investment. The Administration’s commitment to expand
clinical treatment and recovery support services to reach those in
need extends beyond the immediate fiscal year, with its FY 2005
request to double Access to Recovery’s appropriation to $200
million and to increase the Substance Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Block Grant by $53 million for a total of $1.8 billion.
As you may know, Access to Recovery is based on the knowledge that
there are many pathways to recovery. It empowers people with
the ability to choose the path best for them - whether it is
physical, mental, medical, emotional, or spiritual. In
particular, we know that for many Americans, treatment services
that build on spiritual resources are critical to recovery.
Access to Recovery ensures a full range of clinical treatment and
recovery support services are available, including the transforming
powers of faith. Critically, Access to Recovery provides
States the opportunity to target resources to providing treatment
to adolescents.
Over the years, SAMHSA, through its Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment (CSAT), has made significant strides in addressing the
shortage of adolescent substance abuse treatment. Between
1970 and 1997, there were only 14 published studies of the
effectiveness of adolescent substance abuse treatment. In
response, SAMHSA funded the Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study in
1997. Its purpose was to explore whether proven adult models
of intervention could be made developmentally appropriate for
adolescents and achieve effective outcomes in real-world,
community-based treatment settings. The CYT study of over 600
youth randomized to five different treatment interventions resulted
in five effective treatment protocols that are now available in
manuals that are in use across the country. The five
volumes of the CYT Series are based on treatment approaches
specifically designed for use with adolescents. The CYT
manuals are part of SAMHSA’s larger Science to Services
Initiative that is working to speed the delivery of effective,
evidence-based programs into communities where clinical
intervention and treatments are put into practice.
In 1999, a few years after the CYT study began, SAMHSA funded the
Adolescent Treatment Models program. The purpose was to
identify potentially exemplary programs that existed in the field
and to have them rigorously evaluated to determine their
effectiveness. The same core assessment and follow-up
instruments, as well as data collection points from CYT, were used,
which afforded the opportunity to draw critical comparisons.
The outcomes of this study generated 10 treatment program manuals
that include effective programs for intensive outpatient,
short-term residential and long-term residential programs that are
available on-line and are being adopted within the adolescent
treatment field as we speak.
Having worked to identify effective treatment interventions, SAMHSA
proceeded to develop the Strengthening Communities – Youth
(SCY) program in 2001. With a $39 million investment, twelve
sites were funded for five years to develop a continuum of
adolescent services and a system of care for youth within their
communities.
Although these programs have clearly and undoubtedly strengthened
treatment programs for this age group, an identified weakness is
the lack of continuing care models for youth after they complete
the active phase of treatment. For example, too often when
youth complete residential placements and return to their families
and communities, they are cut-off from treatment services and
quickly resume their substance abuse and other destructive
behaviors. In response, SAMHSA awarded grants under its
program to Improve the Quality and Availability of Residential
Treatment and its Continuing Care Component for Adolescents (ART)
during 2002. As a result, numerous residential programs have
developed and implemented models of providing continuing care to
youth.
Along with improving after-care services for adolescents, SAMHSA
launched the Effective Adolescent Treatment (EAT) program in 2003
to assist the field in adopting a previously proven effective
approach of the CYT initiative. This approach, Motivational
Enhancement Therapy/Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, for adolescents
with substance use disorders is now being implemented in 22 sites
around the country. In 2004, an additional 16 sites will be
funded, which will result in a total of 38 programs implementing a
practice for which there is evidence of effectiveness and will
directly impact success rates for adolescents who are in a battle
for their very lives.
In tandem with improving and extending the continuum of care in
residential settings, which often include court-adjudicated youth
from the criminal justice system, CSAT also provides for critical
treatment services through the Juvenile Justice Drug Treatment
Court. Six programs are up and running smoothly, and others
will be operational soon through our Youth Offender Re-entry
Program, which will support 12-14 new programs in Fiscal Year 2004.
CSAT also supports treatment programs for adolescents through its
Targeted Capacity Expansion program (TCE), Targeted Capacity
Expansion/HIV (TCE/HIV), and HIV Outreach programs. These
grantees are encouraged and supported to adopt only effective
treatment practices. They are included in meetings and
trainings to further facilitate the evolution and improvement of
the field of adolescent substance abuse treatment.
Each of these efforts to expand treatment services for adolescents
have been well thought out, and each resulting program has been
funded based on the underlying and undeniable fact that all we can
to do to help our Nation’s youth is what must be done –
nothing less is acceptable. The treatment services afforded
through the opportunities I just mentioned are improving services
for adolescents, and we are improving and building upon the
services for consumers of all ages -- children, adolescents, young
adults, adults, and older adults alike.
I am particularly proud to tell you that improving services for all
of these age groups, from this Nation’s elderly down through
and including our youngest citizens, is the driving force behind
achieving our agency goals – goals which are independent yet
interconnected and goals which are clearly outlined in our Matrix
of agency priorities.
Key to achieving our goals is developing an ability to report on
meaningful outcomes. These outcome measures must be concise,
purposeful, and useful. They must get at real outcomes for
real people. We are changing the emphasis from, “How
did you spend the money?” and, “Did you spend the money
according to the rules?” to, “How did you put the
dollars to work?” and, “How did your consumers
benefit?”
Through an internal data strategy workgroup we are conducting a
thorough examination of our data collection and analysis
systems. The goal is to take steps now to ensure that
decisions related to SAMHSA’s priorities are based on the
most comprehensive and accurate information available.
As I mentioned previously, an essential component of SAMHSA’s
data strategy is development of “National Outcomes” and
related “National Outcome Measures.” Through
collaboration with the States we have identified a set of key
domains. These domains are:
-
abstinence from drug use and alcohol abuse, or decreased symptoms
from mental illness;
-
increased or retained employment and school enrollment;
-
decreased involvement with the criminal justice system;
-
increased stability in family and living conditions;
-
increased access to services;
-
increased retention in services for substance abuse treatment or
decreased utilization of psychiatric inpatient beds for mental
health treatment; and
-
increased social connectedness to family, friends, co-workers, and
classmates.
As I mentioned, these national outcomes are already being
implemented through the President’s Access to Recovery
program and the Strategic Prevention Framework. Ultimately
the National Outcomes will be aligned across all of SAMHSA’s
programs, including the Community Mental Health Services Block
Grant and the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant.
The National Outcomes are an attempt to provide greater flexibility
and accountability while limiting the number of reporting
requirements on the State. Ultimately we are confident this
approach will ensure the data collected is relevant and useful and
helps to improve services for the people we serve.
Putting the data to work is a responsibility that SAMHSA is happy
to shoulder. We can now clearly and definitively demonstrate
that Federal investments in prevention and treatment are
beneficial. Prevention works. Treatment works -- it
helps people triumph over addiction and leads to recovery.
The vital treatment and prevention efforts and programs that I have
discussed today are working to improve services for adolescents,
and for people of all ages.
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the
opportunity to appear today. I will be pleased to answer any
questions you may have.
|