nvironmental Impact Statement Process
General Overview
The 1969 National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) directs that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for any major Federal activity having the
potential of significantly affecting the quality of the human, marine, and coastal
environments. An EIS serves as an information document for government decisionmakers and
the public. The purpose of an EIS is:
- To help public officials make decisions that are based on an understanding of
environmental consequences and take actions that protect, restore, and enhance the
environment;
- To identify ways that environmental effects can be avoided or significantly reduced;
- To prevent significant, avoidable effects to the environment by requiring changes in
projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when the governmental
agency finds the changes to be feasible; and
- To disclose to the public the environmental information and analyses upon which Federal
decisions will be based.
The EIS describes the proposed activity and the natural and human environments,
presents an analysis of potential adverse effects on these environments, describes
potential mitigation measures to reduce adverse environmental effects, describes
alternatives to the proposal, and presents a record of consultation and coordination with
others during EIS preparation. The following text briefly describes the EIS process. The
first step of the analysis is the identification of significant environmental and
socioeconomic resources through the scoping process.
Scoping
Scoping is the process used to determine the appropriate content of an EIS. Scoping
begins before any analysis of impacts is done, and it continues until the EIS is finished.
Public participation is an integral part of scoping. The first scoping step is to announce
to the public, by a Federal Register notice and press release, that an EIS will
be prepared and to ask for comments about what should be included. Typically, the lead
Federal agency holds one or more public meetings in communities that might be affected by
the proposed activities. The purpose of soliciting input is to properly identify as many
relevant issues, alternatives, mitigation measures, and analytical tools as possible so
they can be incorporated into the EIS. The scoping comments assist in determining the
breadth and depth of the analysis.
Getting input from as many affected and interested parties as possible is an important
part of preparing an EIS. This usually includes:
- Citizens who live, work, or recreate in the area where OCS-related activity may occur;
- Public interest groups and native communities that have concerns about possible impacts
to environmental, social, or economic resources;
- Federal, State, and local government agencies that have responsibilities for managing
public resources or services;
- Oil industry and oil industry support businesses that might conduct oil and gas
development activities;
- Scientists and other technical experts with knowledge of the area's natural resources
and the possible impacts of oil and gas development.
An important objective of scoping is to identify specific elements of the environment
that might be affected if the proposal is carried out. For OCS activities, environmental
concerns that commonly arise include:
- Ecological concerns such as the possible impacts of oil and gas activities on marine
mammals, birds, fish and shellfish, and the natural habitats that support these resources;
- Sociological concerns such as development-related changes in population or demands for
public transportation, education, or health care services. Other social factors involved
may include possible changes in the cultural, religious, or recreational traditions of
affected communities;
- Economic concerns often center about marine-related employment like commercial fishing
and tourism.
Based on the information received during the initial scoping effort and other
information, such as the location of sensitive natural resources, estimates of oil and gas
resources, or projected oil and gas activity, alternatives to the proposal are identified
that might reduce possible impacts. In addition, any reasonable measures suggested to
mitigate possible impacts are considered for analysis in the EIS.
Analytical Scenarios
Scenarios for proposed OCS oil and gas delineation drilling activity were developed
by MMS based on proposals submitted by industry. The EIS identifies and assesses potential
impacts and mitigation measures associated with the proposals. Two cumulative
analyses are included in the draft EIS. The cumulative analysis most directly
associated with the delineation drilling proposals covers other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable activities in the area of proposed exploration drilling. This
analysis covers 2002-2006. The EIS also includes a discussion of potential impacts
associated with the build-out of production facilities as part of the cumulative analysis.
This second cumulative impact analysis, covering 2002-2030, was developed in
response to requests received from the Governor of California and the Chair of the
California Coastal Commission in 1999. If operators decide to pursue future
development of the subject leases subsequent to the proposed delineation drilling,
detailed Development and Production Plans (DPPs) will be prepared by operators and
submitted to the MMS. The DPPs would be subjected to separate NEPA analyses.
Impact Analysis
The EIS analyzes the particular environmental concerns identified through scoping.
A separate analysis is prepared for the proposal and each alternative. The objective of
the analysis is to estimate the nature, severity, and duration of impacts that might occur
and to compare the impacts of the proposal and alternatives. Numerous technical aids are
used in making the assessment including ecological and socioeconomic studies
sponsored by MMS and others and computer models that simulate the movements of accidental
oil spills or air emissions from operations.
Draft EIS and Public Review
The draft EIS is made available to the public for review and comment. The
availability of the draft EIS is announced in a Federal Register notice and in
press releases. Copies of the document are made available to the public through individual
mailings and through repositories such as public
libraries. The public may either comment in writing, by email, or by making oral
comments at a public hearing held in the region by the agency. A table of contents for the Adobe pdf
files is available.
Final EIS
The principal concern in developing the final EIS is to address public comments on
the draft EIS in a responsive fashion. After the comments are reviewed, the document is
revised to correct technical errors and to add any relevant new information that became
available since the draft EIS was published. On occasion, a new alternative or mitigation
measure will be added and evaluated. A summary of the comments received on the draft EIS
and responses to those comments is also included in the document. Availability of the
final EIS is announced in a Federal Register notice and press release.
IMPORTANT
MILESTONES IN THE DELINEATION DRILLING EIS PROCESS
November 22, 2000 |
Notice of Intent to prepare EIS published in Federal
Register |
December 6, 2000 |
Public scoping meeting in Santa Barbara, CA |
January 22, 2001 |
Public scoping meeting in Santa Maria, CA |
June 15, 2001 |
Draft EIS filed with U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and available to public for comment |
July 10, 2001 |
Public hearings on draft EIS in Santa Barbara, CA
Fess Parker Doubletree Hotel
633 East Cabrillo Blvd.
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
|
July 12, 2001 |
Public hearing on draft EIS in Santa Maria, CA
Ethel Pope Auditorium
901 S. Broadway St.
Santa Maria, CA 93458
|
August 6, 2001 |
Close of public comment period on draft EIS |
Fall 2001 |
Final EIS filed with EPA and available to the
public |
November 2001 |
MMS issues Record of Decision |
Page content last updated 4/1/2004
Page last published 9/21/2004