To sustain the right kind of readiness for our FRP requirements, we must understand
and adapt our training and warfare doctrine, and seek greater integration with
joint forces. We must refine our training, maintenance, and interdeployment
readiness processes to increase our operational availability. But most of all,
we must continue to exert leadership at every level to deliver the right readiness
and ensure this tremendous force remains a decisive force that will be prepared
to fight and win, both now and in the future.
Guidance for Leaders:
- Win the Global War on Terrorism.
- Fully develop and analyze OEF and OIF lessons learned. Report corrective
actions by Mar 04. Include recommendations for doctrinal solutions to joint
Combat ID and joint Command & Control problems. (CFFC)
- Integrate additional allied/coalition navies into deploying CSG, ESG, or
SAG deployments, building upon Canadian and Argentine models. Expand the opportunity
for additional deployments with U.S. groups by Dec 04. (CFFC, CPF)
- Assess feasibility and requirements to secure allied participation in sea-based
missile defense missions. (OPNAV N6/7 lead, N3/5, CFFC, CNE, CPF)
- Determine training and procurement requirements for implementing the President’s
Proliferation Security Initiative and provide resource recommendations for POM
06 by Mar 04. (CFFC lead w/ OPNAV N3/5, N6/7)
- Study and recommend improvements in our ability to detect, protect against,
and respond to lethal and non-lethal chemical and biological agents by Sep 04.
Include specific recommendations for both afloat units and shore installations.
(SG lead, OPNAV N6/7)
- Improve our readiness to respond with decisive power.
- Conduct a zero-based review of the Interdeployment Readiness Cycle and report
findings by Apr 04. Implement the principle of progressive readiness. Challenge
the assumptions of each phase as well as range requirements. Include options
for expanding simulation and for achieving Composite Training and Joint Task
Force exercise equivalencies in selected Joint National Training Capability,
overseas, joint, and/or service Theater Security Cooperation exercises. (CFFC)
- Establish Task Force SIM to study alternative acquisition strategies and
use of simulation and simulators to enhance training and efficiency and replace
outdated training systems. Report initial findings not later than Jul 04. Include
the following options at a minimum (CFFC lead, TYCOMs, OPNAV N6/7):
- Strike group training
- Multi-platform, mission-linked tactical flight training
- Integrated Bridge and CIC training
- Shipboard engineering and damage control
- Nuclear prototype training (NAVSEA-08)
- Technical Training Equipment (TTE) (CNETC)
- Develop a Fleet Aviation Simulator Trainers (FAST) plan that maximizes the
utility of simulator effectiveness. Update trainer contribution to Training
& Readiness matrices and analyze the resulting efficiencies for the Flying
Hour Program following FAST introduction in Jun 04. Initial Progress Report
by Jul 04. (CFFC lead w/ COMNAVAIRFOR, NAVAIR)
- Establish a linkage between Base Operating Support Service Levels and Required
Operational Capabilities. Report not later than Jun 04. (CNI)
- Develop concepts and plans for integrating the Fleet Response Plan and the
Flexible Deployment Concept with existing and emergent strategic and operational
guidance, including the Joint Presence Policy, Security Cooperation Guidance
and other planning documents. (CFFC lead w/ OPNAV N3/5)
- Develop proposals for a multi-CSG surge demonstration to be conducted in
2004. Initial report by Feb 04. (CFFC)
- Align the manning of Fleet, Numbered Fleet, Type Commander and training battle
staffs to increase efficiency and better support contingency operations, ad
hoc headquarters, and the Fleet Response Plan. (CFFC)
- Determine the need for an expeditionary, globally deployable Navy CFMCC
capability and report by Dec 04.
- Evaluate options to enhance our participation in CFACC and standing CAOC
organizations by Sep 04.
- To continue on the correct glide slope to meet the DoD goal of a 50% class
“A” mishap reduction by the end of FY05, reduce class "A"
mishaps by 25% in FY04. (All Fleets)
- Fully develop the Lessons Learned package to accompany return of ESG One
from pilot deployment. Brief not later than 45 days after deployment. (CFFC
lead, CPF)
- Continue development of options for the optimal Expeditionary Strike Group
command and control structure as well as supporting C4I system upgrades and
installations on ESG platforms and report NLT Jun 04. (CFFC)
- Develop a performance measurement system within the Integrated Readiness
Capabilities Assessment (IRCA) process to equate funding inputs to expected
levels of readiness outputs. Report by Jul 2004. (OPNAV N4)
- Develop a Navy-wide standard measurement system for Regional, Depot, and
Intermediate Maintenance Activities to ensure processes and performance levels
achieve the expected results in productivity, cycle time, efficiency, first-time
quality and skill proficiency. (OPNAV N4)
- Establish a Navy Maintenance Oversight Board (NMOB) to quarterly report impact
of ship maintenance and the repair/new construction industrial base to support
the Fleet Response Plan. (NAVSEA lead, CFFC, OPNAV N4)
- Implement the improved planning process and metrics for ship maintenance
developed by the SHIPMAIN team by Jul 04. (CFFC)
- Transition all naval shipyards to mission funding in POM 06. (OPNAV N4)
- Improve transparency of OCONUS logistics support. (NAVSUP lead, OPNAV N4)
- Provide homeland security and force protection.
- Develop global maritime awareness to reduce port vulnerability in partnership
with the US Coast Guard, to ensure timely dissemination of actionable intelligence,
and to assist in littoral identification of potential surface threats and MIO/LIO
suspects. (CFFC lead)
- Define the Navy and Naval Intelligence roles in global merchant ship
tracking in relation to Navy homeland security/defense missions. Report proposed
options by Apr 04. (DNI)
- Identify, in conjunction with the USCG, the technologies required for
global surface vessel tracking and identification and report by May 04. (OPNAV
N3/5, N2)
- Review attaché manning and Foreign Area Officer program. Recommend
options to optimize Navy country and cultural expertise, and to revitalize Navy
HUMINT efforts. Report not later than Jun 04. (OPNAV N2, N3/5)
- Present options by Aug 04 to inject technology and reduce the long-term cost
and manning of ashore AT/FP. Consider increased efficiencies obtained through
risk rationalization. (CFFC lead, OPNAV N3/5, N4, CNI, All Fleets)
- Partner with USMC to determine requirements for USMC support of USN assets.
Include analysis of alternatives for Marine detachments aboard ship for AT/FP
and MIO. Report findings not later than Jun 04. (OPNAV N3/5)
- Conduct a global review of ATFP to ensure we are balanced in our approach,
have set standards which are both consistent and clear, possess required command
and control, and have properly resourced the manpower and technology requirements
for both now and the future. Report by Jul 04. (CFFC lead, OPNAV N3/5, N6/7)
Future Readiness. The tremendous improvements made in the battle for people,
quality of service, current readiness, and alignment allow us to focus much
more intently on the future - and future readiness. If we are to extend our
current advantage, we must capitalize on revolutions in information, stealth
and precision technologies and develop new warfare concepts that will lead us
not just to improved jointness, but true interdependence. Sea Power 21 is our
roadmap. This year, we will pursue distributed and networked solutions that
could revolutionize our capability. We will focus on the power of Sea Basing
and our complementary capability and alignment with the Marine Corps. We will
exploit investments made in joint research and development wherever possible.
We will enhance our capabilities investments and become a leader in defense
modeling and analysis. Finally, we will continue to improve our position for
the future by increasing new ship and aircraft procurement in 2004.
Guidance for Leaders:
- Sea Power 21
- Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our platforms and operations.
- Conduct a zero-based review of aircraft productive ratios. Assess expected
accident rates, anticipated combat attrition, and spares policies to improve
operational availability and determine inventory for all current and planned
aviation acquisitions. Report results and options not later than Jul 04. (CFFC
lead w/ NAVAIR, COMNAVAIRFOR)
- Building on lessons learned from Navy-USMC TACAIR Integration, develop
a concept of operations for naval airpower that leverages our partnership with
the USMC and reduces the total number of type/model/series of aircraft. (CFFC
lead, OPNAV N6/7)
- Develop a plan to incorporate open architecture into all new construction
ships and retrofit into current ships as appropriate. (OPNAV N6/7)
- In light of current weather forecasting capability and modern stability
designs (CFFC),
- Conduct a zero-based review of surface ship operational fuel reserve
policy. Report recommendations not later than May 04.
- Conduct a zero-based review of CLF requirements. Report recommendations
not later than May 04.
- Incorporate fuel efficiency into acquisition and modernization plans.
(SYSCOMs)
- Develop and experiment with alternative propulsion and power generation
systems for all naval applications. (NAVSEA)
- Establish OPNAV as the leader in defense modeling and analysis. Conduct a
zero-based review of common database requirements for naval and joint operations
modeling, analysis, and accomplishments. Report results not later than May 04.
(DNS)
- Study the need for and brief options for mid-term modernization plan for
all surface ships. Report not later than May 04. (OPNAV N6/7)
- Sea Strike
- Partner with the Marine Corps to identify and develop enablers to achieve
Ship-to-Objective Maneuver (STOM). Produce a concept of operations for both
ashore and afloat forces. Recommend key metrics required to increase reach,
enhance mobility, improve connectivity, and reduce overall footprint and daily
sustainment ashore. (OPNAV N6/7 lead, N3/5, ONR)
- Initiate efforts to develop an all-Service advanced weapons roadmap for fixed,
re-locatable and mobile target sets. (OPNAV N6/7)
- Present plans for providing enhanced tactical support to SOF in our Navy
capability pillars (to include training, equipment and tactics, techniques and
procedures). (OPNAV N6/7)
- Partner with USSOCOM to identify and develop enablers to improve capabilities
to conduct and support maritime and other special operations. Produce a concept
of operations for special operations in the littoral. Recommend key metrics
required to increase tactical effectiveness, improve connectivity and information
exchange and increase responsiveness to emergent tasking. (CFFC lead, SPECWARCOM)
- Sea Shield
- Coordinate with the MDA to deploy an Initial Defensive Operations (IDO) ballistic
missile defense capability by the end of 2004. (OPNAV N6/7 lead, CFFC, CPF)
- Develop an integrated, Navy-wide ASW strategy, concept of operations and
master plan for investment. (CFFC w/ CPF)
- Develop an integrated SUW requirements roadmap. (CFFC w/ CPF)
- Continue to refine and upgrade the Mine Warfare Roadmap to expedite the fielding
of new technologies and capabilities into the fleet. (CFFC lead, OPNAV N6/7)
- Sea Basing
- Propose optimal ship mix for future ESG and MPF(F) squadrons by Jul 04. (OPNAV
N6/7)
- Develop an overarching sea base concept of operations. Consider the following:
(OPNAV N6/7 lead, CFFC)
- 2015 MEB
- MEB-size force closure
- High-speed sealift
- MPF(F) AoA results
- Aviation capacity
- Surface connectors
- Force architecture
- Logistics
- Trades and timelines
- FORCEnet
- Define the naval C4 capability required to achieve the joint standards for
the common operational and tactical picture within the joint theater architecture.
(OPNAV N6/7 lead, CFFC, NNWC)
- As part of Task Force ISR, develop a plan for increased use of unmanned systems
for tactical ISR. Leverage extant UAV/UUV systems residing in other DoD components
for maintenance, training, and support. (OPNAV N6/7)
- Define baseline architecture and open standards required for the use of secure
web, email, chat, and collaboration in an ad hoc coalition. Capitalize on our
experience with the Coalition-Wide Area Network (COWAN) and NATO-like systems.
(NNWC lead, OPNAV N6/7, CFFC, All Fleets, SPAWAR)
- Fully implement NMCI throughout the Navy and investigate enterprise-wide
solutions that will exploit the power of the web and improve our productivity
and return on investment. (NAVY CIO (OPNAV N6F) lead, Director NMCI)
- Sea Trial
- Accelerate prototyping and experimentation of autonomous and semi-autonomous
naval unmanned vehicles. (CFFC lead, NWDC, OPNAV N6/7, N8)
- Incorporate SOF/Strike C2 integration in support of improved time critical
strike and the development of lighter, more lethal expeditionary forces into
our fleet/joint experimentation plan. (CFFC lead, NWDC, OPNAV N3/5)
- Formalize the concept of operations (CONOPs) for SSGN. (CFFC lead, NWDC,
CSF)
- Integrate Navy Sea Trial concept development, experimentation and wargaming
with Joint Concept Development and Experimentation efforts. (CFFC lead, NWDC)
- Refine the concept of operations for Missile Defense Surface Action Groups
(SAGs). (CFFC lead, NWDC)
- Develop a plan to conduct accelerated ASW experimentation of both improvements
to existing systems and promising new technologies with a focus on distributed
and off-board systems. (CFFC)
- Develop proposals to use HSV-2 and X-Craft in future concept development
and experimentation by May 04. (CFFC)
- Streamline our testing and evaluation (T&E) processes through a collaborative
effort among Navy, OSD, and contractor entities, using modeling and simulation
where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the cost of T&E by 20 percent.
(OPTEVFOR lead, OPNAV N6/7, N4, SYSCOMs)
- Report to CFFC quarterly on the promising Science & Technology and Research,
Development, Testing & Evaluation (RDT&E) developments for Sea Trial.
(ONR)
Quality of Service. Our Sailors are the capital asset that makes our Navy great.
If we are to give full meaning to their service and, by extension, give full
range to their talents, we must constantly strive to improve the quality of
their work and the quality of their lives. We will fund technologies that reduce
our manpower costs and make us leaner. We must ensure that every billet enhances
combat readiness and that every job makes maximum use of the technology and
tools available. We will strengthen our partnership with Navy families. We must
deliver the training and education that deepens their contribution to the Navy
and the nation, and that their life of service is honorable and rewarding.
Guidance for Leaders:
Alignment. Our goal is to enhance our mission accomplishment and deliver a
combat-credible Navy now and in the future. That means focusing warfighting
commanders on warfighting and improving our joint partnerships. It means development
of a requirements process that recognizes the power of joint solutions and integration.
It demands enterprise-wide approaches and innovation to achieve greater effectiveness
and efficiency in afloat and ashore operations, readiness and infrastructure.
At its most fundamental level, alignment ensures that we share a common understanding
of the mission and objectives, and that we speak one message with many voices
across the entire organization. We will continue to pursue organizational and
operational alignment to ensure that our Navy is consistent and credible.
Guidance for Leaders:
- Continue Fleet and organizational alignment.
- Better align for joint warfare.
- Conduct a study to identify those ratings for which opportunities exist to
merge ship-relevant training between USN/USCG/USA and commercial activities.
Report findings by Jun 04. (CNETC lead, OPNAV N6/7, CFFC)
- Conduct a study to identify those ratings for which opportunities exist to
merge aviation relevant training between USN/USCG/USAF/USMC/USA and commercial
activities. Report finding by Jun 04. (CNETC lead, OPNAV N6/7, CFFC)
- Continue aviation flight training joint integration efforts. (CNETC lead,
CFFC, COMNAVAIRFOR, OPNAV N6/7)
- Stand up QDR organization by Mar 04. (VCNO)
- Continue to improve our joint development and acquisition opportunities.
Provide five proposals by Mar 04 that leverage other service programs to reduce
system development costs and increase joint interoperability/integration (SYSCOMs)
- Develop and assess alternative OPNAV staff structures to ensure enhanced
engagement in the capabilities-based planning process at appropriate levels
with OSD and the Joint Staff. Consider alignments that account for the Joint
Capability and Integrations Development System (JCIDS), Functional Capability
Boards, ongoing Operational Availability studies, the Enhanced Planning Process
and development of OSD's Analytic Agenda. (DNS)
- Develop a culture of improved productivity and find the resources
to create the Navy of the future through Sea Enterprise.
- Apply the following Sea Enterprise principles (All Echelon II Commands):
- Leverage technology to improve performance and minimize manpower costs
- Promote competition and reward innovation and efficiency
- Challenge institutional encumbrances that impede creativity and boldness
in innovation
- Aggressively divest non-core, under-performing or unnecessary products,
services and production capacity
- Merge repetitive, redundant, or superfluous efforts
- Minimize acquisition and life-cycle costs
- Maximize in-service capital equipment utilization
- Challenge every assumption, cost and requirement
- Apply findings and recommendations from formal CNO Sea Enterprise visits
by Apr 04. Set and achieve a cost reduction objective of three to five percent
annually depending on Sea Enterprise BOD guidance, circumstances and savings
generated to date. Establish and brief the implementation organizations and
mechanisms during all subsequent Echelon II visits. (All Echelon II Commands)
- Track and harvest Sea Enterprise generated savings and align them to Sea
Power 21 capability investment accounts. (OPNAV N8)
- Establish a metrics program to track the accomplishment of Sea Enterprise
objectives and initiatives and validate savings. (OPNAV N4)
- Establish a cost effective means to share best practices and assist Echelon
II commands in the achievement of Sea Enterprise objectives. (OPNAV N4)
- Integrate the Marine Corps into appropriate Sea Enterprise process methodologies
and structures. (SEBOD)
- Improve Level-of-Effort program metrics and costing. Develop the analytical
tools and metrics to effectively transition the analysis that supports these
programs to models where possible. (OPNAV N4)
- Conduct cost-benefit analysis of the virtual SYSCOM concept. Include analysis
of real savings and manpower reductions. Report initial findings by April 04.
(NAVSEA)
- Conduct a study on potential opportunities to partner with other services
on SYSCOM functions. Report findings not later than May 04. (SYSCOMs)
- Draft legislation for establishment of an Enterprise Fund (Venture Capital
Fund) for unfettered investment in promising new technologies. (OPNAV N4 lead,
OLA)
- Develop a plan to introduce activity-based costing for fleet training by
Oct 04. Determine methodology to link training and readiness to investment requirements
along with commander incentive concepts. (CFFC)
- Conduct a zero-based review of NETWARCOM global manpower requirements. (CNP
lead, NNWC)
- Revitalize the Beneficial Suggestions (BENNYSUGG) program. (NAVSUP)
- Continue to Improve Our Communications Alignment.
- Promulgate the strategic communications plan. (CHINFO)
Leadership/management follow-up: To assist me in tracking the progress of these
efforts, all executive agents listed above are to provide updated status reports
on each assigned task to the Director, Navy Staff by the final business day
of each quarter.
III. Steering the Course – On Leadership
The U.S. Navy has an unmatched history of success. While we must be informed
by, and take endless pride in that history, we cannot consider all of our past
practices to be the key to our future. Our greatest legacy after all is our
legacy for innovation. From nuclear power to the then unlikely prospect of flying
aircraft from ships, our willingness to improve our position, to adopt transformational
technologies, and to develop new operating concepts is at the very core of our
combat success. To continue our legacy is to continue to reevaluate our position
and to challenge all of our assumptions. We will adapt to the changing world
around us by getting out in front of it, by leading change, and embracing the
innovations and improvements needed to guarantee our future success.
We are a winning organization. We have instituted and paid for a great many
improvements over the past three years, and you have embraced them and made
them better. Because of you, talented American warriors are bringing combat
power to bear on the enemies of our country, wherever they may be hiding. We
are winning the battle for people in a marketplace full of opportunity. And,
we are winning the fight to remake our great institution, to innovate and improve
for the dangerous decades ahead.
Our strategic objectives are straightforward. For us, winning the Global War
on Terrorism is our number one objective. Victory is the only acceptable outcome
and through our collective efforts, it will be achieved.
We will deliver enhanced warfighting capability to the joint force, using the
extended reach of naval weapons and sensors to reach farther and more precisely
with striking power, to deliver broader defensive protection for joint forces
ashore and to leverage our command of the largest maneuver space on earth: the
sea.
We will continue to improve upon the operational availability of fleet units,
providing forward deployed forces for enhanced regional deterrence and contingency
response, while at the same time, retaining the ability to rapidly surge decisive
joint combat power in times of crisis. We are creating a culture of readiness.
However, readiness at any cost is not acceptable. We do not live in a risk free
world. Our leaders will assess risk and determine how to create a balance between
risk to mission accomplishment and excessive readiness costs.
We will understand and attack costs at every level of our Navy. We will seek
innovative means to improve productivity, leverage joint solutions and achieve
the improvements necessary to ensure both our combat readiness and our capability
now, and in the future.
We will create an environment that attracts, retains and relies upon bold,
creative, effective and competitive people. We will foster a culture that cherishes
these attributes and rewards them accordingly. We will invest in the tools,
the information technology and the training that delivers more meaningful job
content to them because it is they who offer us our greatest advantage. It is
they who will continue to generate our legacy for years to come.
The business of the Navy is combat. Our obligation to succeed in combat stretches
beyond the here and now, we must help guarantee combat success to the Navy of
the future. That’s why the decisions we all make on a day-to-day basis
are so important. I could not be more pleased with your effort and your accomplishments
this past year. You have taken aboard the idea that warfighting effectiveness
and resourcefulness is the key to mission accomplishment and have produced the
finest Navy the nation has ever seen. It is our job as leaders to accelerate
the advantages we bring this nation over the coming year.
Strategic Objectives
- Win the Global War on Terrorism
- Improve readiness for global response
- Integrate Sea Strike, Sea Shield, and Sea Basing into the Joint Force
- Capture Sea Enterprise improvements to build a 375-ship Navy
- Develop the 21st century warrior force
|
For further assistance,
contact CNO's Public Affairs office at 703-692-5304
Effective date: 4 January 2004
Return to the CNO's top page