5 A Day Publication Index
Population-specfic Interventions
Consumers
Balach GI, Loughrey K, Weinberg L, Lurie D, Eisner E. Probing consumer benefits and barriers for the national 5 a day campaign: focus group findings. J Nutr Edu. 29:178- 183; 1997.Dixon H, Ron Borland R, Segan C, Stafford H, Sindall C. Public Reaction to Victoria’s “2 Fruit ‘n’ 5 Veg Every Day” Campaign and Reported Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables. Preventive Medicine. 1998;27:572-582.
Eagan JM, Cullen KW, Barnanowski T, de Moor C. The effect of competitive school foods on students’ fruit, juice and vegetable intake. J Am Dietetic Assoc. (submitted).
Foerster SB, Gregson J, Beall DL, Hudes M, Magnuson H, Livingston S, Davis MA, Joy AB, Garbolino A. The California Children’s 5 a Day—Power Play! Campaign: Evaluation of a Large-Scale Social Marketing Initiative. Fam Community Health. 1998;21(1):46-64.
Kristal AR, Goldenhar L, Muldoon J, Morton RF. Evaluation of a Supermarket Intervention to Increase Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1997;11(6):422-425
Loughrey K, Balch G, Lefebver C, Doner L, Johnston C, Eisner E, Hadley L. Bringing 5 a day consumers into focus: qualitative use of consumer research to guide strategic decision making. J Nutr Edu 1997; 29:172-177.
Nicklas TA, Johnson CC, Myers L, Webber LS. Using a media-marketing campaign for promoting increased awareness about fruit and vegetable consumption among high school students: Gimme 5 Program. J Child Nutr Manage. (in press).
Resnicow K. Baranowski T, Hearn MD, Lin LS, Smith M, Wang DT, Baranowski J, Doyle C. social-cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychology. 1997. 16: 272-276.
Trudeau E, Kristal A, Li S, Patterson R. Demographic and psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes differ: Implications for dietary interventions. J Amer Diet Assoc. 1998;98:1412-1417.
