FDA Logo U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
horizontal rule
Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online
January 2001

About the Bacteriological Analytical Manual

General Microbiological Methods Information

About BAM and CFSAN's Use of Microbiological Methods

CFSAN Microbiological Methods Information

BAM online:
Table of Contents
Media
Reagents


Updates and Revisions
since publication of BAM, Edition 8,
Revision A, 1998

Introduction
  March 2000

Chapters

1. Food Sampling
  April 2003
2. Microscopic Examination
  November 2000
4. Escherichia coli
  September 2002
4A. Escherichia coli
  September 2002
5. Salmonella
  April 2003
6. Shigella
  October 2000
7. Campylobacter
  March 2001
9.Vibrio
  May 2004
10. Listeria monocytogenes
  January 2003
18. Yeasts, Molds and Mycotoxins
  April 2000
21A. Canned Foods
  November 2000
23. Microbiological Methods for Cosmetics
  August 2001

Appendices

1. Rapid Methods
  January 2001
2. Most Probable Number
  June 2000

Media

M28a. Campylobacter enrichment broth (Bolton formula)
  December 2000
M29a. Abeyta-Hunt-Bark Agar
  December 2000
M30d. Semisolid Medium, modified, for Biochemical Identification
  March 2001
M52. Enrichment Broth, pH 7.3 ± 0.1
  September 2000
M79. Letheen Broth (Modified)
  August 2001
M103. Motility Test Medium (Semisolid)
  September 2000
M152a. Trypticase Soy Agar-Magnesium sulfate-NaCl
  May 2004
M154b. Trypticase (Tryptic) Soy Broth with 1% NaCl and 24% glycerol
  May 2004
M156. Trypticase Soy Broth Modified
  January 2002
M189. Cellobiose-Colistin (CC) Agar
  May 2004
M190. Vibrio vulnificus Agar
  May 2004

Reagents

R90. Peptone-Tween-salt diluent
  May 2004
R91. Sodium desoxycholate-0.5% in sterile dH2O (String test)
  May 2004
R92. (SDS) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% in sterile dH2O
  May 2004
R93. (SSC/SDS)Sodium dodecyl sulfate-
  May 2004

Advisories for BAM Users

Cycloheximide Supply Update
  January 2001

Microbiological Detection Methods

Methods development has always been driven by the demand for tests that are faster, cheaper, easier, and more accurate. Pressure for improved procedures is particularly apparent in microbial food safety, because traditional tests may involve many steps -- resuscitation of stressed microbial cells, enrichment of the few cells that may be present in a sample, selection that leads to the isolation of pure cultures, followed by identification, which could require a combination of morphological, biochemical, immunological and genetic techniques and, possibly, tests for virulence or toxicity using animal inoculation. Often, such test protocols take longer than the shelf life of the food being analyzed. Ways proposed to accelerate the procedure included, initially, improved media and compacted culturing. Then, automation began to replace manual execution. Also, indirect identification, i.e., by biochemical (e.g., fatty acid profiles, nucleic acid sequences) or biophysical shortcuts (FT-IR) that reveal organisms' pertinent biomarkers or genetic fingerprints, began to make the isolation of viable microbes not as necessary. These newer tests -- known as "rapid methods" if they took hours rather than days and as "real-time" testing if they took minutes -- have not yet, however, made traditional testing obsolete.

There are good reasons why analysts should continue to have the traditional skills to resuscitate, enrich, isolate, and identify microorganisms. Often, some culturing is necessary before there is enough material for the application of a rapid method or real-time test. Then, too, foods may contain substances that interfere with biochemical/molecular test shortcuts. Furthermore, having a viable microbial isolate may still provide quantitative and infectivity information not otherwise available, or be mandatory because of regulatory requirements and legal issues, or be useful later for retrospective investigations such as the characterization of new biomarkers. And, since no two types of test have the same sensitivity, the old ones serve as convenient standards for false positive and false negative rates. Kit versions of rapid methods are interpreted differently depending on whether the results are positive or negative: negative results are considered definitive but positive results require confirmation by another test.

The Bacteriological Analytical Manual

FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (The BAM) is a collection of procedures preferred by analysts in U.S. Food and Drug Administration laboratories for the detection in food and cosmetic products of pathogens (bacterial, viral, parasitic, plus yeast and mold) and of microbial toxins. The manual's contents reflect the history of methods development described above. Except for some rapid methods listed in Appendix 1, all these methods have been used and peer reviewed by FDA scientists as well as by scientists outside FDA. However, not all of these methods have been fully validated by collaborative studies. In some instances, collaborative studies are not possible because uniform test samples can not be prepared (as with encysted parasites). In other instances, FDA needs to use a method before the time it takes to achieve full validation.

At first (1965, Edition 1), the BAM was intended to be only a vehicle for information and standardization within FDA. However, the manual's reputation as useful spread beyond the agency. Requests for copies proliferated and it was decided to make the BAM generally available. It has gone through 8 major editions, with, on occasion, revisions in between. Since 1976 (Edition 4), BAM has been published and distributed by AOAC International. In 1998, Edition 8, Revision A was issued not just as hard copy, but also in an electronic format (a CD-ROM version) by AOAC. Now, in 2000 AD, the BAM is being placed on the FDA/CFSAN internet site and is designated the BAM online. Continuous updating becomes possible, so editions as such will cease. Each section will bear the dates on which it was last reviewed and revised. AOAC will continue to publish a printed version on demand.

Microbiological Methods Information on the CFSAN Website

Advisory for BAM Users on Reported Supply Problems for Cycloheximide

There have been reports of limited supplies of this reagent used in the BAM to prevent growth of yeasts and molds in some media

Microbiological Methods Information on Selected Websites

USDA/FSIS Microbiological Laboratory Guidebook, 3rd Edition

 

Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International

 

Date of final revision: 2001-MAR-05. Composed by: RIM, GJJ, RB.

Top

horizontal rule
horizontal rule