HUD
implemented the Tier Ranking System (TRS) in 2000 as a pilot to
measure servicer's utilization of HUD's loss mitigation program.
There is some confusion between the TRS and the Loss Mitigation
Performance Analysis (LMPA). Hopefully this page will clarify the
differences.
Why
TRS?
TRS rankings are used by HUD to determine which servicers are utilizing
HUD's loss mitigation tools. Servicers in Tiers 3 and 4 (the lowest
rated tiers) are routinely targeted for training by the NSC as well
as possible investigation or audit by the Office of Lender Activities.
Additionally,
regardless of a servicer's TRS ranking, every servicer's use of the
three loss mitigation retention tools (special forbearance, mortgage
modification, and partial claim) is reviewed. HUD determines those
servicers that use one initiative exclusively at the expense of the
others. HUD also reviews servicers that use one initiative more than
300% of the national average use or less than one-third of the national
average use. Numbers far outside the national average may indicate
servicer abuse or lack of training. Again, those servicers whose ratios
of loss mitigation use are far outside the boundaries of normal servicers
and who do not have a reason for such usage are targeted for training,
investigation, or audit.
TRS
and LMPA: Two different calculations to measure lender performance
Loss
Mitigation Performance Analysis (LMPA)...
- measures
a servicer's performance against other servicers.
- cannot
be calculated by a servicer because the data for the whole universe
of servicers is required to calculate LMPA scores.
- designates
those servicers in the Top 25th percentile for each volume category
as eligible for increased loss mitigation incentives, increased
foreclosure reimbursement, and longer PFS time frames.
- scores
are released once per year (by Mortgagee Letter) and are based
on data from the previous federal fiscal year (October 1 through
September 30).
Tier
Ranking System (TRS)...
- measures
a servicer's performance alone.
- can
be calculated by a servicer because the data of other servicers
is not required to make the calculation.
- does
NOT determine increased loss mitigation incentives, increased
foreclosure reimbursement, or longer PFS time frames.
- scores
are released quarterly and are based on data from a rolling
12 month rating period.
TRS
Work Out (WO) Ratio
The
most significant change to the TRS formula occurred effective Round
6, when it evolved into the WO Ratio. In Round 12, Accelerated Claims
Disposition (ACD) cases were added as an additional loss mitigation
factor. (Additional information about ACD can be found in HUDClips.
We also have information about the changes
to the TRS parameters and benchmarks). Simply put, the work
out ratio is loss mitigation divided by loss mitigation plus foreclosures.
The actual formula is:
Forbearances + LM Retention Claims + PFSs + DILs + ACDs
|
Forbearances
+ LM Retention Claims + PFSs + DILs + ACDs + Foreclosures
|
Where
HUD gets the data
HUD
collects information on formal forbearances (FFs) through the SFDMS
system. Servicers that initiate forbearances and report codes
09 (forbearance), 12 (repayment), and 32 (military indulgence) during
a rating period are given credit for that forbearance. For TRS,
HUD uses the mortgage status date (as reported to SFDMS by the servicer)
as the date of record.
HUD
collects information on loss mitigation home retention options through
the paid claims that servicers file. The loss mitigation home retention
options are: special forbearance (SF), mortgage modification (MM),
and partial claim (PC). For credit in TRS, HUD uses the date the
claim was paid as the date of record.
HUD
collects information on terminations (PFSs, DILs, ACDs, and FCs)
through paid conveyance claims that servicers file. For TRS, HUD
uses the FHA insurance termination date as the record date.
TRS
Scoring Criteria
- A
maximum of one loss mitigation event (forbearance, special forbearance,
mortgage modification, partial claim, preforeclosure sale, deed-in-lieu,
or accelerated claims disposition) is counted for each loan per
ranking period.
- All
foreclosures are counted.
- Servicers
whose HUD approval was terminated more than 6 months prior to
the beginning of the ranking period are not ranked.
- Servicers
with less than 11 foreclosures and a ratio that puts them into
Tiers 3 or 4 are not ranked. However, servicers with less than
11 foreclosures and ratio that puts them into Tiers 1 or 2 are
ranked in their respective Tier.
- Tier
1 is the highest ranking (indicating best servicing performance
insofar as the application of HUD's loss mitigation is concerned)
-
Tier 4 is the lowest ranking (indicating worst servicing performance
insofar as the application of HUD's loss mitigation is concerned)
WO
Ratio determines Tier Ranking
A
tier ranking is assigned to servicers based on their Work Out (WO)
Ratio. The current tier benchmarks were assigned at Round 14:
Tier
|
Work
Out (WO) Ratio
|
1
|
Greater
than 0.79999
|
2
|
0.60
to 0.79999
|
3
|
0.40
to 0.59999
|
4
|
Less
than 0.40
|
Publication
of TRS Scores
At
this time, TRS scores are not public information. Servicers are
notified of their score by individual letter. However, announcement
letters and scoring summary data is available below and by following
the links provided in the table.
Tiering
Rounds to Date
The
following table outlines the TRS rounds to date. It shows the period
reviewed and the dates those scores were released. Links to scoring
announcement letters from Round 6 to present are in the "Scores
Released" column. Links to scoring summaries from Round 11
to present are in the "Scoring Summary" column.
TRS
Round
|
Ranking
Period
|
Scores
Released
|
Scoring
Summary
|
Beginning
|
Ending
|
1
|
01/01/1999
|
12/31/1999
|
12/08/2000
|
|
2
|
10/01/1999
|
09/30/2000
|
01/18/2001
|
|
3
|
01/01/2000
|
12/31/2000
|
06/12/2001
|
|
4
|
04/01/2000
|
03/31/2001
|
07/30/2001
|
|
5
|
07/01/2000
|
06/30/2001
|
10/17/2001
|
|
6
|
10/01/2000
|
09/30/2001
|
|
|
7
|
01/01/2001
|
12/31/2001
|
|
|
8
|
04/01/2001
|
03/31/2002
|
|
|
9
|
07/01/2001
|
06/30/2002
|
|
|
10
|
10/01/2001
|
09/30/2002
|
|
|
11
|
01/01/2002
|
12/31/2002
|
|
|
12
|
04/01/2002
|
03/31/2003
|
|
|
13
|
07/01/2002
|
06/30/2003
|
|
|
14
|
10/01/2002
|
09/30/2003
|
|
|
15
|
01/01/2003
|
12/31/2003
|
|
|
The
following table provides a breakdown of servicers in each tier.
TRS
Round
|
Number
of Ranked Servicers in Each Tier
|
Percent
of Ranked Servicers in Each Tier
|
Tier
1
|
Tier
2
|
Tier
3
|
Tier
4
|
Total
Ranked
|
Tier
1
|
Tier
2
|
Tier
3
|
Tier
4
|
Total
Ranked
|
6
|
110
|
73
|
58
|
8
|
249
|
44.2%
|
29.3%
|
23.3%
|
3.2%
|
100%
|
7
|
123
|
71
|
49
|
6
|
249
|
49.4%
|
28.5%
|
19.7%
|
2.4%
|
100%
|
8
|
120
|
91
|
38
|
10
|
259
|
46.3%
|
35.1%
|
14.7%
|
3.9%
|
100%
|
9
|
127
|
82
|
40
|
6
|
255
|
49.8%
|
32.2%
|
15.7%
|
2.3%
|
100%
|
10
|
128
|
84
|
37
|
5
|
254
|
50.4%
|
33.1%
|
14.6%
|
2.0%
|
100%
|
11
|
113
|
89
|
34
|
3
|
239
|
47.3%
|
37.2%
|
14.2%
|
1.3%
|
100%
|
12
|
105
|
83
|
33
|
6
|
227
|
46.3%
|
36.6%
|
14.5%
|
2.6%
|
100%
|
13
|
97
|
88
|
33
|
6
|
224
|
43.3%
|
39.3%
|
14.7%
|
2.7%
|
100%
|
14
|
96
|
76
|
28
|
21
|
221
|
43.4%
|
34.3%
|
12.7%
|
9.5%
|
100%
|
15
|
98
|
77
|
26
|
21
|
222
|
44.1%
|
34.7%
|
11.7%
|
9.5%
|
100%
|
Comments
and Questions
|