Presentation: Summary of MDUFMA FY 04
as of 3/31/04
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Center for Devices and Radiological Health |
|
PowerPoint Version |
Summary of MDUFMA FY 04 Notices and Reports
- For the year of 2004; four reports are due to Congress:
- Annual report to Congress on the “timeliness and effectiveness”
of device reviews by centers other than CDRH. Completed August, 2003
- Annual report to Congress on the Office created to coordinate and monitor
the review of combination products. Completed October, 2003
- Annual Financial Report to Congress
Completed March 10, 2004
- Annual Performance Report to Congress
Completed April 23, 2004
- One public meeting was held on December 3, 2003.
- One notice is due to the Federal Register on April 26, 2004 reviewing the
types of semi-critical reprocessed single-use devices currently 510(k) exempt,
and determine which exemptions will be terminated.
- 510(k)s are required by July 30, 2004 for critical reprocessed single use
devices whose exemption from 510(k) has been revoked.
- Fees for FY 2005 are to be published in the Federal Register by August 2,
2004.
FY04 Increase in Fees
- In FY 2003, the statutory revenue target for MDUFMA fees was $25,125,000.
This increased by $2,130,000 to $27,255,000
in FY 2004
- An Inflation Adjustment of $1,163,789 (Federal pay raise
for employees in the Washington DC area was 4.27% the most recent year.)
- A Compensating Adjustment (estimated in July 2003) to compensate for an
unforeseen revenue shortfall in FY 2003 of $5,478,000 below
the MDUFMA revenue target of $25,125,000 for FY 2003.
- This adjustment was revised after October 1, 2003, when actual revenue for
FY 2003 was somewhat higher than the June estimate, so that the actual compensating
adjustment was lowered to $3,235,418.
Revised FY 2004 Revenue Target
|
2004 Orig. |
2004 Rev. |
Statutory Revenue Amount |
$27,255,000 |
$27,255,000 |
Inflation Adjustment |
$1,163,789 |
$1,163,789 |
Compensating Adjustment |
$5,478,000 |
$3,235,418 |
FY 2004 Total |
$33,896,789 |
$31,654,207 |
Fees for Large and Small Businesses
Fiscal Year |
2003 |
2004 |
Fee Type |
Full |
S.B. |
Full |
S.B. |
Full Fees |
$ 154,000 |
$ 58,520 |
$ 206,811 |
$ 78,588 |
180-Day Supps |
$ 33,110 |
$ 12,582 |
$ 44,464 |
$ 16,896 |
Real Time Supps |
$ 11,088 |
$ 4,213 |
$ 14,890 |
$ 5,658 |
510(k)'s |
$ 2,187 |
$ 2,187 |
$ 3,480 |
$ 2,784 |
Total Fees Collected in the Second Quarter of FY 04
MDUFMA Authorized New Hires in CDRH and CBER for FY 03 and 04
Center |
FY03 |
FY04 |
Total |
CDRH |
67 |
23 |
90 |
CBER* |
11 |
9 |
20 |
*CBER data presented as FTEs
CDRH Authorized 65 Additional MDUFMA Hires in FY 04
Office |
Hired FY 03 |
Hired FY 04 |
Total to Date |
Total |
67 |
23 |
90 |
OC |
10 |
1 |
ODE |
26 |
6 |
OHIP |
4 |
0 |
OIVD |
11 |
1 |
OSB |
7 |
7 |
OSM/OCD |
3 |
0 |
OSEL |
6 |
8 |
- 65 CDRH Authorized MDUFMA FY 04 Hires
- 23 Completed MDUFMA Hires 4/17/04
CDRH MDUFMA Hiring by Category FY 03 and the First Six Months of FY 04
CDRH Hiring and Losses FY 2003 - 04
[Link for Accessibility]
CDRH MDUFMA Device Review Process FTEs
CDRH MDUFMA Device Review Process FTE's
Adverse Ex. Reporting |
43 |
44 |
44 |
Lab Based Studies |
36 |
36 |
35 |
Problem ID + Resolution |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Science Based Training |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Domestic Standards |
14 |
14 |
14 |
Epidemiology |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Postmarket Surv. Studies |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Premarket |
529 |
534 |
584 |
CBER/CDRH Collaborations are Productive and Increasing
- Joint CDRH-CBER Training Courses
- CDRH-CBER review collaborations
-Bi-directional
- Orthopedic Working Group
- Policy (in addition to previously mentioned)
- Genomics
- Xenotransplantation
- IVD total product life cycle labeling
- Software
- MATES, other tissue engineering efforts
Effort and Expertise in the Reinvention of CBER Device Management and MDUFMA
- CBER has substantially (~ 25%) increased device related effort in the last
year
- In addition to increased device effort from employees, new hiring has allowed
recruitment of individuals with specialized experience/expertise and diverse
backgrounds - examples
- reviewers with specific device/device related software experience (1 from
industry, 1 IT)
- RPMs with industry manufacturing experience
- reviewers with clinical/academic experience in blood banking, transfusion
medicine, apheresis
CDRH Medical Device Fellowship Program
- What do participating clinicians do?
- Work as part of a team
- Evaluate and consult on clinical trial design
- Provide clinical consults (formal and informal)
- Participate in meetings and conferences
- Represent CDRH at industry meetings
- Assist in developing guidance documents
CDRH Medical Device Fellowship Program FY 04 2nd quarter
- Physicians - 8 currently; 3 new in 2nd qtr
- Visiting Scholar – senior level clinicians, surgeons
- Fellow - physician during fellowship training
- Resident – physician during residency training
- Engineers 15 currently; 6 new in 2nd qtr
- Visiting Scholar – senior level engineer
- Co-op students
- Interns
- Others 3 currently; 0 new in 2nd qtr
Contact information:
Susan A. Homire, D.V.M.
301-827-2890
sah@cdrh.fda.gov
Small Buisness Decisions
Income Distribution of 365 Device Firms Requesting Small Busniess Determinations
from FDA
Through Second Quarter of FY 04 (Oct. 1, 2003 - March 31, 2004)
What do the Goals Mean?
- Some goals are simply a reflection of statutory requirements
- Some goals are for pieces of the process that when added together should
result in a better whole
- Some goals reflect significant changes which will bring new products to
market faster
MDUFMA Decision Goals
Activity |
Review
Time Goal |
Baseline
(FY 1999-2001) |
Performance Level Goals |
|
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
PMA and Panel Track Supplement Review Performance
Goals |
FDA decision (approval, approvable, approvable pending GMP inspection,
not approvable, denial)
|
320 days |
78%-80% |
-- |
-- |
|
80% |
90% |
Expedited PMA Review Decision Goals |
FDA decision (approval, approvable, approvable pending GMP inspection,
not approvable, denial)
|
300 days |
70% |
|
|
70% |
80% |
90% |
180 Day Supplement review Decision Goals |
FDA decision (approval, approvable, approvable pending GMP inspection,
not approvable, denial)
|
180 days |
89% |
-- |
-- |
80% |
80% |
90% |
510(k) Review Decision Goals |
FDA decision (SE/NSE)
|
90 days |
77% |
-- |
-- |
75% |
75% |
80% |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA Decision Goals with CDRH and CBER Data FY 03
Receipt Cohort
(as of 3/31/04)
Expedited PMAs with Decisions within 300 total FDA days
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03
Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Update |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Total |
# Meeting goal |
2 |
0 |
2 (67%) |
# Not Meeting goal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
1 |
0 |
1 (33%) |
Total Received and Filed in Receipt Cohort |
3 |
0 |
3 |
Total Received |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
100% on Time Decisions (2 of 2)
67% MDUFMA Cohort On time (2 or 3)
CBER had no applications |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA Decision Goals with CDRH and CBER Data FY 03
Receipt Cohort
(as of 3/31/04)
Original PMAs and PMA Panel Track Supplements with decisions within
320 total FDA days
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03 Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Report |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Update |
# Meeting goal |
23 |
6 |
29 (58%) |
# Not Meeting goal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
29 |
-8 |
21 (42%) |
Total Received and Filed in Receipt Cohort |
52 |
-2 |
50 |
Total Received |
61 |
0 |
61 |
|
100% On Time Decisions (29 of 29)
58% of MDUFMA Cohort On time (29 of 50)
Includes 3 CBER applications |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA Decision Goals with CDRH and CBER Data
FY 03 Receipt Cohort
(as of 3/31/04)
180 Day PMA Supplements with decisions within 180 total FDA days
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03 Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Report |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Update |
# Meeting goal |
238 |
* |
194 (94%) |
# Not Meeting goal |
11 |
0 |
11 (5%) |
# Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
14 |
* |
1 (1%) |
Total in Receipt Cohort |
263 |
-57 |
206 |
Note: The six month update reports on 206 180 day supplements,
57 less than the 263
reported in the first quarter. The fourth quarter FY 03 data erroneously
included 57 PMA supplements that were not 180 day supplements.
|
95% On time Decisions (194 of 205)
94% MDUFMA Cohort On Time (194 of 206)
Includes 3 CBER applications |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA Decision Goals with CDRH and CBER Data FY 03
Receipt Cohort
(as of 3/31/04)
510(k) Applications with final action within 90 total FDA days
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03 Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Report |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Update |
# Meeting goal |
2,863 |
6 |
2,869 (73%) |
# Not Meeting goal |
631 |
98 |
729 (19%) |
# Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
430 |
-114 |
316 (8%) |
Total MDUFMA Receipt Cohort |
3,924 |
-10 |
3,914 |
Other Decisions |
366 |
10 |
376 |
Total |
4,290 |
0 |
4,290 |
|
80% On Time Decisions (2,869 of 3,598)
73% MDUFMA Cohort On time (2,869 of 3,914)
Includes 65 CBER 510(k)s |
Performance Updates for Selected MDUFMA Cycle Goals with CDRH and CBER Data
FY 03 Receipt Cohorts (as of 3/31/04)
Sample Cycle Goals |
Review Time Standard |
FY 03 Receipt Cohort Performance
(as of 3/31/04) |
FY 05 Performance Level |
Expedited PMA and Panel Track Supplement First Action-
Major Deficiency Letter |
120 days |
2 Actions, 2 on time
100% of actions on time
67% of cohort on time |
70% |
Standard PMA an Panel Track Supplement First Action-
Major Deficiency Letter |
150 days |
25 Actions, 21 on time
84% of actions on time
45% of cohort on time |
75% |
180 Day PMA First action- all other first actions (approval,
approvable, approvable pending GMP inspection, not approvable, or denial) |
180 days |
173 Actions, 166 on time
96% of actions on time
81% of cohort on time |
80% |
510k- First action – “additional information”
letter |
75 days |
1,718 Actions, 1,004 on time
58% of actions on time
26% of cohort on time |
70% |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA BLA Efficacy Supplements
Goal: First action within 10 months total FDA time
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03 Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Report |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Update |
Meeting goal |
3 |
-- |
3 (100%) |
Not Meeting goal |
0 |
-- |
0 |
Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
0 |
-- |
0 |
Total Filed |
3 |
-- |
3 |
Total Received |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
100% On Time Decisions (3 of 3)
100% MDUFMA Cohort On Time (3 of 3)
FY 2003 Cohort
(as of 3/31/04) |
Performance Updates for MDUFMA BLA Prior Approval Manufacturing Supplements
Goal: First action within 4 months total FDA time
|
Fourth Quarter FY 03 Cumulative Total |
Second Quarter FY 04 Report |
Six Month FY 04 Cumulative Update |
Meeting goal |
74 |
0 |
74 (99%) |
Not Meeting goal |
1 |
0 |
1 (1%) |
Awaiting MDUFMA Decision |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total Filed |
75 |
0 |
75 |
Total Received |
75 |
0 |
75 |
|
99% On Time Decisions (74 of 75)
99% MDUFMA Cohort On Time (74 of 75)
FY 2003 Cohort
(as of 3/31/04) |
CDRH has 23 Standard and Expedited PMA Originals and Panel Track Supplements
Under Review in its FY 04 Receipt Cohorts (as of 4/13/04)
[Link for Accessibility]
6 Month Summary of FY 04 MDUFMA Receipt Cohorts in CDRH (as of 3/31/2004)
FDA is not reporting performance on MDUFMA decisions for the FY 04 receipt
cohorts in the second quarter report
because not enough time has unfolded for meaningful performance to report.
FDA will report on the data in this chart in the third quarter.
Original PMA and Panel Track Supplements |
Data being developed to reconcile application receipts and
billing records |
Expedited PMA’s and Panel Track Supplements |
BLAs |
180 Day PMA Supplements |
|
Real Time PMA Supplements |
|
510(k)s |
|
BLA Efficacy Supplements |
|
BLA Prior Approval Manufacturing Supplements |
|
MDFMA Guidances Issued in First Six Months of FY 04
- PMA Performance Assessment guidance:10/08/2003
- PMA Modular review- Guidance for Industry and FDA:11/03/2003
- Guidance for Industry and FDA: User Fees and Refunds for Premarket Approval
Applications: 11/24/2003
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Expedited Review of Premarket Submissions
for Devices :11/26/2003
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Bundling Multiple Devices or Multiple
Indications in a Single Submission: 11/26/2003
15 Total MDUFMA Guidances Issued Since MDUFMA Passed.
MDUFMA Requirements
Section 510(o)
- New provision amended FD&C Act to ensure that certain reprocessed SUDs
to be determined by FDA must include validation data
- Validation data includes cleaning, sterilization & functional performance
data demonstrating substantial equivalence
What FDA Has Done So Far …
- 4/30/2003: FR Notice – Reprocessed SUDs: Termination of exemptions
from premarket notifications: requirements for submission of validation data
- List 1: Critical reprocessed SUDs previously exempted from 510(k) that
will require 510(k) validation data (total:15 categories)
- List 2: Reprocessed SUDs that will now require submission of validation
data (total:51 categories)
What is the Purpose of Third Party Inspection?
- FDA will have greater flexibility to use its limited inspectional resources
- Industry will have ability to schedule AP and other conformity assessment
body (CAB) inspections simultaneously
- 14 Third Party Inspectors are accredited (15 accredited, and one withdrew)
- List of 14 Third Party Inspectors http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ap-inspection/ap-inspection.html#list
Primary Features of Program
- Eligible Establishment:
- Selects AP from list
- Negotiates fee (not funded by FDA)
- Makes request to FDA to use AP
- Very strict conflict of interest provisions
- No effect on US/EC MRA or other agreements
- Assess the Quality System (Q.S.) of eligible Class II and Class III manufacturers
- Determine compliance with other requirements, e.g. MDR
- Pre-approval, BiMo and “For Cause” inspections conducted exclusively
by FDA
- Prepare and submit reports to FDA
Updated June 7, 2004
CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page
Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH