Congressional Testimony

 

THOMAS R. KITSOS, ACTING DIRECTOR

MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES

 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999


Madam Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to testify today on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 budget request for the Minerals Management Service (MMS). This request reflects our best assessment of monies needed to carry out critical MMS programs during the upcoming year.

MMS is requesting $240.2 million, which is $16.2 million more than that enacted in FY 1999. We have looked closely at our ongoing operations and responsibilities, and the MMS budget request for FY 2000 reflects the need for additional funding balanced against savings from streamlined operations. The remainder of my testimony will focus on some of our more recent achievements in improving our operations; challenges and opportunities confronting the agency; and an overview of the funding requested to meet those challenges.

 

Background

Prior to discussing MMS’s budget request in detail, it is important to put that request into perspective by providing a brief overview of the agency and its programs as well as the benefits derived from those programs. As you are aware, MMS’s mission is:

To carry out this mission, MMS manages two very important programs-- the Offshore Minerals Management (OMM) Program and the Royalty Management Program (RMP). These programs provide major economic and energy benefits to the Nation, taxpayers, States, and the Indian community--benefits that have both national and local significance. While we have noted these benefits in previous testimony, we believe they bear repeating.

MMS has leased and currently manages more than 42 million acres of Federal lands. Production from those lands accounts for approximately 27 percent of the Nation’s domestic natural gas production and 20 percent of our domestic oil production. Further, the OCS lands currently produce about 1.3 million barrels of oil/day, and natural gas production is currently at 13.9 billion cubic feet of gas/day. By the end of 2000, MMS estimates an increase in oil production to as much as 1.8 million barrels/day, and natural gas is projected to remain steady (but could increase to as much as 17 billion cubic feet/day).

From an economic standpoint, in FY 2000, MMS will account for an estimated $4.0 billion in Federal receipts, including $2.8 billion from OCS receipts and $1.2 billion from onshore receipts. From a taxpayer’s perspective, that converts to:

Maintaining Steady Progress in a Changing Climate

In many ways, the FY 2000 budget request for MMS can be viewed as a bridge from the 20th to the 21st centuries. Our request reflects monies needed to carry out core mission responsibilities as well as monies needed to implement recent initiatives aimed at better positioning the agency to meet the challenges of the next century. These FY 2000 initiatives, which will be discussed in more detail later in my testimony, are a direct result of MMS’s desire to continually improve on the way it does business as well as in response to an array of outside factors.

During its relatively short history, MMS has experienced dramatic and profound changes in business, energy and governmental climates. These changes have challenged MMS to keep pace, and the agency has risen to the challenge. These challenges come from many sources, such as--

! Evolving offshore technology

! Dramatically changing energy markets

! Emerging global markets

! Compelling safety and environmental challenges

! Transforming legislation

! Increasingly sophisticated constituent needs

! Advancing information technology

! Challenging governmental initiatives

It is likely that the same forces listed above will continue to have a profound effect on MMS and its programs for the foreseeable future. For that reason, MMS has and will continue to look at ways of doing its business more efficiently while still meeting its missions and responsibilities. As part of that effort, the agency has been aggressive in analyzing its processes and procedures to make them more responsive to our customers. MMS’s vision is to be recognized as the best minerals resource manager--i.e., to be "the best in the business."

Although that vision is a lofty one, it has challenged the agency to make steady progress over the years, and some of those achievements have been discussed in previous testimony before this Committee. At this time, I would like to highlight some of MMS’s most recent achievements as well as discuss some of the challenges the agency faces as we approach the next millennium.

 

 

Royalty Management Program (RMP) Achievements

The Federal government has been collecting revenues associated with mineral production on Federal onshore lands since 1920 and from offshore lands since 1953. However, it was not until 1982, with the establishment of MMS and the enactment of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act (FOGRMA), that a comprehensive system was put into place for properly collecting, accounting for, distributing, and valuing these revenues. Since 1982, MMS has worked hard to develop systems, policies, and procedures to respond to the mandates of the Act as well as the expectations of its constituencies and numerous oversight organizations. In 1996, the Act was substantively amended by the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Simplification and Fairness Act (RSFA).

The proper implementation of these two Acts forms the core of the RMP mission. In particular, RSFA significantly changed many historical RMP operating assumptions and revenue processing methods. That, combined with changing energy markets, constituent needs, and government streamlining has caused the RMP to totally rethink and retool its various business processes so they are more responsive to the constituents they serve.

Some more recent achievements include:

Federal crude oil was taken by MMS in October 1998 under the Wyoming pilot program. A second Invitation for Bids was issued January 4, 1999, and we will take, beginning April 1999, RIK crude oil from both State of Wyoming and Federal leases located in Wyoming.

The State of Texas section 8(g) natural gas pilot began in late 1998 when MMS began taking natural gas from the Texas 8(g) zone. This gas is being delivered to the General Services Administration for use in Federal agencies. Discussions are also underway with the State of Texas to mutually explore ways to cost-effectively market Federal and State natural gas production.

The third pilot, taking natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico OCS, is scheduled to begin in late 1999.

While the agency has made significant progress in implementing this legislation, there is still much to be done. In 1999, work will continue on the proposed rules published this year and further rulemakings are scheduled that will further contribute to our success in this effort. These include:

 

Recent Innovations -

 

 

Future RMP Challenges and Opportunities

To test the latter process, which is a dramatic change from current operations, teams have been established to conduct three operational models – oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico, onshore leases in the Uintah Basin of Utah/Colorado, and solid mineral leases in Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and Montana. A sub-group within the solids team will focus on geothermal issues. These pilots will be conducted in a live environment beginning in early 1999 with the offshore model.

As part of furthering the reengineering initiative, MMS has put several partnerships into place with our customers in order to actively involve them in further defining future business processes, refining planned changes in reporting requirements, and developing the best information technology solutions for the future--Amoco, Texaco and Chevron are participating in the model for the oil and gas leases offshore the Gulf of Mexico; the States of Utah, Colorado, and the Ute Tribe will participate in the similar onshore model; industry representatives on the solids team are BHP, New Mexico Coal, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Kennecott Energy Company, PacifiCorp, Peabody Group, and Westmoreland Resources Inc. They join Colorado, Montana, Utah, Wyoming and the Navajo Nation and Crow Tribe.

 

While we have reached consensus in many areas of this proposed rule, there are still a few remaining areas of disagreement – areas that have been thoroughly reviewed during the course of the rulemaking process. Nevertheless, to the extent that industry has new, not-previously-considered ideas or concepts to resolve the issues that divide us, consistent with our criteria and statutory responsibilities, further discussion may be beneficial. Department of the Interior staff have recently been in contact with the industry to urge its representative to provide more specific information about their ideas for addressing the unresolved components of the proposed rule.

 

However, when the FY 1999 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 105-277) prohibited MMS from publishing any crude oil valuation final rulemakings prior to June 1, 1999, that prohibition included the Indian oil valuation rule as well as the Federal crude oil valuation rule. MMS remains committed to assuring that Indian lessors receive market value for their crude oil resources and to finalizing the rulemaking in a timely manner.

 

 

Offshore Minerals Management (OMM) Achievements

The Federal OCS program has been ongoing and active since 1953. During that time, the program has changed dramatically in response to changing technology, national energy priorities, and enviornmental considerations. Today, the OCS program has matured into a focused leasing program, with concentrated emphasis on safe and sound development of about 8,000 leases.

Recent achievements include:

 

 

- Developing and/or extending MOU’s with various countries to exchange scientific and technical information related to offshore mineral leasing and development activities such as resource assessment, administrative procedures and practices, safety, environmental protection, and royalty accounting assistance. In 1998, MMS expanded its cooperative efforts and developed working arrangements with several new foreign nations, including Australia, Norway, and the Republics of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

- Organizing and convening the first-ever Panel of International Regulators at the 1998 Offshore Technology Conference. The panel was comprised of industry represenatives and government regulators from nine countries and addressed the challenges and opportunities for industry and government regulators in achieving clean and safe operations around the world.

- Helping organize an international workshop in Indonesia on the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms. The workshop was conducted under the auspices of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Marine Resources Conservation Working Group, and included representatives from MMS, universities, U.S. oil and gas companies, and other industry organizations.

- Finalizing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in December 1998 with the U.S. Coast Guard concerning shared responsibilities under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. The two agencies based the MOU on input from affected groups.

- Developing an MOU in conjunction with the Special Programs Office of the Department of Transportation governing the regulation of offshore pipelines. With help from the regulated groups, the two agencies arrived at an agreement that gives pipeline owners a role in determining which agency will regulate a given pipeline.

- Implementing a series of agreements with other Federal agencies and coastal State governments to cooperatively develop Federal/State boundaries, describing data relevant to leasing as well as State regulatory and enforcement actions. Many of the agreements with coastal States will lead to fixing of the Federal/State boundary by Joint Motions filed with the United States Supreme Court. The latest effort has lead to a Supplemental Decree fixing the Offshore Boundary with the State of Texas.

- Working in close association with the American Petroleum Institute to develop industry standards and with the Offshore Operators Committee to develop performance measures for operators and contractors working on the OCS.

 

 

Future OMM Challenges and Opportunities

In addition, MMS will likely see increased requests for royalty relief and lease extensions if companies do not have the resources available to explore and develop them. How best to address these issues may not be as clear cut in areas subject to leasing restrictions.

Finally, there may be other ramifications which are not yet identified. MMS is adopting a pro-active approach by meeting with offshore operators to see where we can reduce their costs without compromising safety, the environment, or royalties owed to the Treasury. We are considering several applications for royalty relief submitted by companies that believe that their production will cease at the current royalty rate.

We also are cooperating with the Department of Energy to place additional oil in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) while oil prices are relatively low. We will being this Spring to take a limited amount of oil royalties in kind from leases in the Gulf of Mexico and transfer the oil to DOE for placement in the SPR.

Through its Marine Minerals Program, MMS will continue to work cooperatively with interested States, focusing its efforts on integrating geologic and environmental information to identify sand deposits in Federal waters suitable for beach nourishment. Past and ongoing partnerships with States along the East Coast and the Gulf of Mexico are designed to collect and analyze in an organized and cost-effective fashion the information needed to make decisions on beach restoration projects. This proactive approach will help ensure that when OCS sand resources are most needed, the necessary groundwork will have already been accomplished--thereby expediting the overall beach restoration process.

In addition to maintaining U.S. leadership in developing international standards, as offshore petroleum operations are expanding around the globe, MMS is increasingly being called on to participate in international projects that further U.S. foreign policy goals. The agency is developing relationships with other regulatory bodies around the world and assisting when asked to develop in-country expertise in nations with both emerging or developed oil and gas programs.

In addition to the various program achievements and challenges listed above, MMS is also working on two important government-wide issues--implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and Year 2000 (Y2K) compliance.

With respect to GPRA implementation, MMS has woven strategic planning and accountability for results into its culture. MMS has developed, through a team approach, a mission, goals, and performance indicators that are being used to measure the performance of the bureau’s critical systems. As part of this process, the organization has examined political, legislative, judicial, administrative, environmental, and economic factors while developing its Strategic Plan and has focused on programmatic outcomes.

To date, MMS has made great strides with the development of its first strategic and annual performance plans and the development of a methodology to gather and report performance information as required by GPRA. The bureau views implementation of this Act as one of the cornerstones of its management efforts. As more experience and knowledge is gained, MMS will continue to refine its strategic thinking, will reevaluate its goals and measures, and will improve its capacity to gather, analyze and make performance information available to its managers as well as its customers and stakeholders.

Continuing efforts in 2000 and beyond will focus on:

With respect to Y2K issues, MMS has published a Y2K readiness statement on the Internet. All four MMS mission-critical systems have been independently validated as being Y2K compliant. At this point, MMS is dealing with embedded and telecommunication system compliance. With respect to telecommunications, about 80 percent of MMS routers and telephone exchanges are compliant, and the remainder will by compliant by March 1999. MMS now will give greater attention to business continuity plans and take steps to work with offshore operators to ensure that their Y2K programs are sufficient to prevent potential safety concerns or oil spill hazards.

As you can see, MMS has accomplished much, but there are still many challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. I would like to devote the remainder of my testimony to MMS’s Fiscal Year 2000 budget request, and specifically, how this budget request will help us meet the challenges identified and discussed earlier.

 

 

OVERVIEW OF FY 2000 MMS BUDGET REQUEST

 

 

FY 2000 Proposed Operating Appropriations/Offsetting Collections

dollars in thousands

Royalty and Offshore Minerals Management

$110,082

Offsetting Collections

$124,000

Oil Spill Research

$6,118

Total

$240,200

 

 

With the submission of the FY 2000 budget request, the largest single source of funding for the MMS operating budget will be obtained from Offsetting Collections. Direct appropriations under the Royalty and Offshore Minerals Management Appropriation (ROMM) have been declining since FY 1993, when Congress granted MMS the authority to retain a portion of the OCS rental receipts and other fee increases as offsetting collections. Since that time, Congress has regularly increased the cap on MMS’s offsetting collections authority and reduced its direct appropriations. The FY 2000 MMS budget proposes raising the offsetting collections cap to $124,000,000.

In addition to appropriations for operations, the MMS receives appropriations for distribution of the States share of onshore mineral receipts. Those permanent appropriations are:

FY 2000 Proposed Permanent Appropriations

(dollars in thousands)

Mineral Leasing Associated Payments (MLAP)

606,581

National Forest Fund Payments to States (Forest Fund)

3,311

Payments to States from Lands Acquired for Flood Control,

Navigation, and Allied Purposes

(Flood Control)

756

Total

$610,648

 

 

 

FY 2000 Budget Request

 

The MMS budget request totals $240.2 million, an increase of roughly $16.2 million above the 1999 enacted level of $224.0 million. The $16.2 million increase will continue the activities funded by the $8.7 million increase provided in FY 1999 to meet legislative and workload increases. The FY 2000 proposed increases are covered by raising the cap on offsetting receipts from $100.0 million to $124.0 million. In turn, the request for direct appropriations is only $116.2 million, a decrease of $7.8 million from the 1999 level of $124.0 million. At the FY 2000 request level, offsetting collections would cover over 50 percent of MMS’s operating budget.

 

The net increase of $16.2 million, over the FY 1999 enacted level, includes:

wpe1.jpg (38120 bytes)

 

The $10 million proposed in 2000 for RMP reengineering will be used to continue implementation of new applications and technologies supporting RMP’s future concept of operations. The RMP faces the dilemma of responding to new legislative requirements, most notably the Royalty Simplification and Fairness Act (RSFA), with aging systems that already exceed accepted life cycle standards and have been criticized by the Department’s Office of Inspector General. Without this investment, a major risk of system failure and operational instability exists. Furthermore, the RSFA-authorized delegation of royalty management functions to States cannot be accommodated fully with the current RMP systems configuration. The RMP modernization is also essential for MMS to continue fulfilling its basic goal of ensuring the timely collection, accounting, verification, and disbursement of mineral revenues.

This initiative will improve the timeliness and accuracy of payments to States, Indian tribes and others. It will improve the cost effectiveness of our collections and disbursements and increase compliance with lease terms, regulations and laws. In short, this initiative is expected to reduce MMS operating costs by $3.5 million per year and reduce reporting requirements on industry by 40 percent, thereby saving them millions of dollars.

The Royalty Reengineering initiative is one of the principal Sub Projects of the Secretary’s Trust Fund Management Improvement Initiative and will play an important role in the trust managment improvements of the Bureau Of Indian Affairs and Office of Special Trustee.

The Gulf of Mexico workload continues to grow. While lower oil prices may reduce FY 1999 lease sale bonuses, industry has, over the past several years, accumulated a large inventory of new leases, particularly in deep water. Industry appears committed to the exploration and possible future development of those leases. Consequently, there is an increasing demand on MMS to review exploration and development plans, issue permits, and provide inspection and oversight of offshore operations. A increase of $1.4 million dollars is requested to support Gulf of Mexico Region activities.

The MMS has a strong commitment to safety and environmental protection. The offshore oil and gas industry is international in scope and its activities in other parts of the world are having a growing effect on our domestic activities. Numerous international organizations and fora play a significant role in developing offshore oil and gas standards that directly impact operations in U.S. waters and worldwide. An increase of $250 thousand is requested for FY 2000 to allow MMS to participate in these international organizations and fora. The MMS’s participation in these types of exchanges will support U.S. policy objectives, assist U.S. industry interests, and advance the Nation’s commitment to safe and environmentally sound offshore oil and gas management practices.

Reductions of $0.8 million have been proposed which include -$600 thousand for the Marine Minerals Research Center and -$250 thousand in reduced well log data conversion funding.

 

 

CONCLUSION

Madam Chairman, that concludes my written testimony. However, I would be happy to answer any questions you or other Members of the Subcommittee may have regarding any aspect of our budget request for FY 2000.


webmaster@smtp.mms.gov
updated July 1, 1996