Drug Intelligence Brief
|
Maximum Trafficking Penalties*
|
|
Country
|
Penalty
|
---|---|
Austria
|
Life
|
Belgium
|
20 years
|
Denmark
|
10 years
|
Finland
|
10 years
|
France
|
Life
|
Germany
|
15 years
|
Greece
|
Life
|
Ireland
|
Life
|
Italy
|
20 years
|
Luxembourg
|
Lifelong forced labor
|
The Netherlands
|
16 years
|
Norway
|
21 years
|
Portugal
|
25 years
|
Spain
|
23 years
|
Sweden
|
18 years
|
Switzerland
|
20 years
|
United Kingdom
|
Life
|
* The maximum penalities may not be applicable in all cases. In many cases, the maximum penalty applies to extenuating circumstances, such as the death of a user. |
While focusing on treating and reducing the harm to the addict population, European nations are also focusing effort and funds against the supply of illicit drugs, increasing penalties against those who traffic in illicit substances. In countries, such as Austria, France, Greece, Luxembourg, and the United Kingdom, drug trafficking can result in sentences up to life imprisonment. Europeans, while relaxing penalties against addicts, are focusing their attention on the dismantlement of organized drug trafficking organizations.
Drug trafficking is a serious offense in Western Europe resulting in a wide range of penalties. Leaders of drug trafficking organizations in Austria could be sentenced to 10 to 20 years in prison, but with the implementation of new legislation in 2001, they will now face the possibility of life imprisonment. In Luxembourg, if a trafficker supplies drugs to minors, the law allows for penalties up to lifelong forced labor, and in Norway, the most serious drug offenses are classified as those having very aggravating circumstances. This categorization is usually reserved for the leaders of large international trafficking organizations; it contains a penalty ¾ equivalent to murder ¾ of up to 21 years in prison.
Over the past decade, the United Kingdom has continued to increase penalties for drug trafficking. In 1995, the 1994 Drug Trafficking Act was implemented and replaced the Drug Trafficking Offenses Act of 1986. While this Act applies only to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have similar laws. 6 Under the Drug Trafficking Act, the court assumes that all current assets, including any owned by the offender during the previous 6 years, are the result of trafficking offenses. Unless the offender can prove otherwise, the court may seize these assets. The penal procedure (summary judgment or indictment) and the drug classification determine the trafficking penalties in the United Kingdom. The 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act divides controlled substances into three classes, A, B, and C. 7 Class A drug trafficking is punishable by up to life imprisonment and, in 2000, the Powers of the Criminal Courts Act established a minimum 7-year sentence for a third conviction of Class A drug trafficking. In 2001, the Criminal Justice and Police Act enabled the courts to strengthen controls on convicted traffickers. Through this act, the court can place a ban on all overseas travel of a convicted trafficker for up to 4 years, in an attempt to reduce his opportunity to re-engage in trafficking activities.
France has also consistently increased penalties for drug trafficking offenses. A 1986 law distinguished between penalties for trafficking and low-level drug dealing or selling, and a 1987 law increased the penalties for those who sell drugs to minors. This law expanded the focus of those prosecutable for drug trafficking offenses to include those who launder drug money. In 1994, the new Penal Code imposed the possibility of life in prison for leaders of organized drug trafficking organizations and up to 30 years for other members of the organization. The French Government continued to expand its attack on drug trafficking with the imposition of a 1996 law that allows the boarding and inspection of vessels on the high seas that are believed to be involved in drug trafficking.
Recent Increases in Trafficking
Penalities
|
||
Country
|
Year
|
Penalty
|
---|---|---|
Austria
|
2001
|
Penalty increased to life in prison
|
Finland
|
1998
|
Those aware of an aggravated narcotics offense,
but who do not alert authorities are punishable by up to 10 years*
|
France
|
1994
|
Penalties for leaders of organizations increased
up to life
|
Greece
|
1993 & 1997
|
93-Increased penalties for trafficking and
penalized trafficking in precursors
97-Penalties increased up to life for recidivist trafficker and dealing to minors** |
Ireland
|
1996 &1999
|
96-Allows a person suspected of trafficking
to be detained for a maximum of 7 days
99-Increased the penalty for trafficking in quantities worth more 10,000 Irish Pounds to life and an unlimited fine*** |
Switzerland
|
1995
|
Introduced a tougher law aimed at foreign drug traffickers,
allowing the detention of illegal residents for up to 9 months
|
United Kingdom
|
2000 & 2001
|
00-Established a minimum 7-year sentence for
a third conviction of Class A drug trafficking
01-Allows the government to ban all overseas travel for convicted traffickers for up to 4 years |
*
An aggravated narcotics offense is one that involves a very
dangerous substance or large quantities of it; considerable
financial profit, the offender acts as a member of an organized drug
trafficking group; serious danger is caused to the life or health
of several people; or narcotics distributed to minors. ** In 1999, Greece made a slight switch, offering leniency to addicts who traffic to support their habit. *** Also introduced a minimum mandatory sentence of 10 years for such a trafficking offense. According to the United States Department of States INCSR 2001, during the first half of 2000, 6 cases fell under the purview of the 1999 Act and in not one case was the mandatory minimum sentence imposed. |
CONCLUSION
In several European countries, such as Germany, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, drug policy is implemented at the regional level, resulting in a diverse system throughout the country. Many of these alternative policies are relatively new and require more time to evaluate their effectiveness. Nevertheless, the trend throughout Europe continues to be a relaxation of criminal penalties for minor drug offenses and an increase in penalties for trafficking, while improving treatment and harm reduction. According to Dutch authorities, harm reduction measures have resulted in significantly lowering their HIV infection rate and drug-related death rate. Unless time shows that these alternative policies have failed, Europe will continue to look toward decriminalization, harm reduction, treatment, and increased trafficking penalties to combat its current drug problems.
1 In Belgium private drug use is not an offense, unless it occurs within a group. In Ireland and the United Kingdom, drug use becomes an offense only in reference to prepared opium.
2 Current EU member nations are: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
3 The 1961 U.N. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs places international control on more than 116 narcotic drugs. The 1971 U.N. Convention on Psychotropic Substances was designed to create a universal control on psychotropic substances, or mood-altering synthetic substances. The 1988 U.N. Convention against Illicit Trafficking in Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances was designed to combat trafficking in illicit substances.
4 Under the concept of the separation of markets, the Dutch Government is attempting to separate the hard drug market from the soft drug market to prevent soft drug users from interacting with hard drugs.
5 Coffeeshop restrictions include a limit of no more than 5 grams sold to a person at any one time, no alcohol or hard drugs, no minors, no advertising, and the shop must not cause a nuisance.
6 Similar regulations are contained in Scotlands Proceeds of Crime Act 1995, the Criminal Law (Consolidation) Scotland Act 1995, and Northern Irelands Proceeds of Crime Order 1996.
7 Under the Misuse of Drugs Act, substances are divided into 3 classes, A, B, and C. Class A substances are those considered to be the most dangerous, including opiates, cocaine, Ecstasy, and LSD. Class B substances are considered to be less dangerous and include cannabis, sedatives, less potent opiates, and synthetic stimulants. Class C substances are the least regulated and include tranquilizers and some less potent stimulants.
This report was prepared by the DEA Intelligence Division, Office of International Intelligence, Europe, Asia, Africa Strategic Unit. The report reflects information prior to February 2002. Comments and requests for copies are welcome and may be directed to the Intelligence Production Unit, Intelligence Division, DEA Headquarters, at (202) 307-8726. |
DEA-02023