Overview
>
Evolution
of MUTCD
Who Uses MUTCD
Who
Uses the MUTCD? And How?
Probably many
more folks in more diverse professions than you might imagine. And
they use the information for very different reasons! Here's how.
In the public
sector, the most obvious MUTCD users are the State and local transportation
planners and traffic engineers who design our roads and locate the
traffic control devices that help drivers navigate them safely.
There are the public works department employees who must understand
how to install and maintain the Traffic Control Devices. The engineers
and planners work closely with Federal FHWA Division Office personnel
who interpret and clarify MUTCD standards for their State and local
partners. The FHWA also conducts extensive materials research, often
in cooperation with the private sector designers and developers,
to improve the effectiveness and visibility of Traffic Control Devices.
In the private
sector, the construction and engineering contractors who
in fact design and build the roads that we all travel each day rely
on the MUTCD. There are businesses whose employees design, test,
manufacture, and market the TCDs that road managers apply and install.
Organizations
with completely different charters and constituents depend on the
MUTCD. For example, law enforcement personnel rely on the MUTCD
as they monitor driver behavior and investigate traffic incidents.
The insurance and legal communities frequently refer to the MUTCD
when investigating claims or proceeding with legal activities that
arise from traffic-related incidents.
The MUTCD is
a valuable reference tool for the media. Design and engineering
students rely on it for their academic work. Also, a variety of
professional and safety organizations, whose members represent the
various stakeholders, consult the MUTCD for information used in
their materials, for training courses and workshops, or for rulemaking
recommendations, and when providing technical assistance.
Click
here to view links to the professional organizations that use
the MUTCD in their activities.
Given the different uses
of the MUTCD throughout the Nation by such differing groups, there
is no question that users must have access to the most recent amendments
to the MUTCD.
See for Yourself
It is interesting
to note that the MUTCD is the authorized national guide in all facets
of using TCDs, but State transportation agencies differ in how they
comply with MUTCD standards. For example, some States adopt the
MUTCD as their standard. Other States adopt the national MUTCD along with a State supplement that might prescribe which of several allowable options are selected for the State's specific purposes. Still other States use
the national MUTCD as the basis for developing their own State Traffic
Control Device manuals, which must be in substantial conformance to the national MUTCD.
Status of the National MUTCD (2000 Edition)
Information
as of August 2003.
State
MUTCD |
National MUTCD |
Natl MUTCD with State Supplement |
Michigan Minnesota
New York Ohio Texas |
Alabama Arkansas District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Mississippi Missouri Montana Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico North Dakota Oklahoma Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Utah Vermont Wyoming |
Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Idaho Illinois Indiana Maryland Massachusetts Nebraska North Carolina Oregon Pennsylvania Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin |
Note 1--California,
Delaware, Indiana, and Pennsylvania are in the process of adopting
the National MUTCD with State Supplements. Anticipated date: December
2003
Note 2--Arizona plans to adopt the National MUTCD with State
Supplement after the Revision 2 proposed changes are published in
a Final Rule. Anticipated date: October 2003
Note 3--Michigan plans to adopt the National MUTCD after
the Revision 2 proposed changes are published in a Final Rule. Anticipated date: October 2003
|