U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Homefeedback

spacer.gif (845 bytes)
Knowledge
spacer.gif (845 bytes)
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Overview
spacer.gif (845 bytes) 2003 Edition with Rev.1, eff 7/21/04
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Amendment Process
spacer.gif (845 bytes) SHS Book
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Sign Quiz
spacer.gif (845 bytes) FAQs
Technical Assistance
spacer.gif (845 bytes)
Peer-to-Peer Program
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Discussion Area
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Editorial Comments
Resources
spacer.gif (845 bytes)
23 CFR 655
Official Rulings
Interim Approvals
spacer.gif (845 bytes) FHWA Contacts
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Related Links
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Federal Register
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Policy Statements
spacer.gif (845 bytes) 2003 MUTCD, Original, 11/03/2003
spacer.gif (845 bytes) 2000 MUTCD, Rev. 1
spacer.gif (845 bytes) 1988 Edition, Rev. 3, 9/3/1993, Part VI
Services
spacer.gif (845 bytes)
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Publications
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Training
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Outreach
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Upcoming Events
spacer.gif (845 bytes) Broadcast Message
home2.GIF (606 bytes)

Overview >

Evolution of MUTCD
Who Uses MUTCD

Who Uses the MUTCD? And How?

Probably many more folks in more diverse professions than you might imagine. And they use the information for very different reasons! Here's how.

In the public sector, the most obvious MUTCD users are the State and local transportation planners and traffic engineers who design our roads and locate the traffic control devices that help drivers navigate them safely. There are the public works department employees who must understand how to install and maintain the Traffic Control Devices. The engineers and planners work closely with Federal FHWA Division Office personnel who interpret and clarify MUTCD standards for their State and local partners. The FHWA also conducts extensive materials research, often in cooperation with the private sector designers and developers, to improve the effectiveness and visibility of Traffic Control Devices.

In the private sector, the construction and engineering contractors who in fact design and build the roads that we all travel each day rely on the MUTCD. There are businesses whose employees design, test, manufacture, and market the TCDs that road managers apply and install.

Organizations with completely different charters and constituents depend on the MUTCD. For example, law enforcement personnel rely on the MUTCD as they monitor driver behavior and investigate traffic incidents. The insurance and legal communities frequently refer to the MUTCD when investigating claims or proceeding with legal activities that arise from traffic-related incidents.

The MUTCD is a valuable reference tool for the media. Design and engineering students rely on it for their academic work. Also, a variety of professional and safety organizations, whose members represent the various stakeholders, consult the MUTCD for information used in their materials, for training courses and workshops, or for rulemaking recommendations, and when providing technical assistance.

Click here to view links to the professional organizations that use the MUTCD in their activities.

Given the different uses of the MUTCD throughout the Nation by such differing groups, there is no question that users must have access to the most recent amendments to the MUTCD.

See for Yourself

It is interesting to note that the MUTCD is the authorized national guide in all facets of using TCDs, but State transportation agencies differ in how they comply with MUTCD standards. For example, some States adopt the MUTCD as their standard. Other States adopt the national MUTCD along with a State supplement that might prescribe which of several allowable options are selected for the State's specific purposes. Still other States use the national MUTCD as the basis for developing their own State Traffic Control Device manuals, which must be in substantial conformance to the national MUTCD.

Status of the National MUTCD (2000 Edition)
MUTCD usage breakdown by State (refer below for text-based list)

Information as of August 2003.


State MUTCD National MUTCD Natl MUTCD
with State Supplement
Michigan
Minnesota
New York
Ohio
Texas
Alabama
Arkansas
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Vermont
Wyoming
Alaska
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Nebraska
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Note 1--California, Delaware, Indiana, and Pennsylvania are in the process of adopting the National MUTCD with State Supplements. Anticipated date: December 2003

Note 2--Arizona plans to adopt the National MUTCD with State Supplement after the Revision 2 proposed changes are published in a Final Rule. Anticipated date: October 2003

Note 3--Michigan plans to adopt the National MUTCD after the Revision 2 proposed changes are published in a Final Rule. Anticipated date: October 2003


FHWA

FHWA Home | Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices | Feedback
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration