What is the difference between “mountain,” “hill,” and “peak”; “lake” and “pond”; or “river” and “creek”?
To skip the banner, Customer Care Area and the high level navigation area click here.Link to USGS home page. Banner Graphic a collage of images representing various USGS activities
USGS Home
Contact USGS
Site Map

Advanced Search

125 Years of Science for America - 1879 to 2004
About USGS  Our Science  Publications  Education  Newsroom
   

USGS Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the difference between “mountain,” “hill,” and “peak”; “lake” and “pond”; or “river” and “creek”?

Answer:

There are no official definitions for generic terms as applied to geographic names. Every organization will have a definition that is application driven, and no one office definition is accepted as official. The difference is thematic and beyond that it is highly perceptive. The difference between lake and pond is an example. We, at the USGS Geographic Names Office, in developing the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) database, have devised 63 broad categories of feature types with definitions solely to facilitate retrieval of entries with similar characteristics. So, we define lake as “natural body of inland water,” and not necessarily applicable to another’s needs. We have found 54 different generic terms that have characteristics similar to our definition of lake, but all are classified as lake. The only area of general agreement is that perceptibly, a pond is smaller than a lake, but even this is not always true.

We classify all “linear flowing bodies of water” as stream, a rather neutral term for our use. There are presently 121 generic terms that fit our broad category stream. As another example, many perceptibly insist that a creek must flow into a river. Such hierarchies do not exist in the Nation's namescape as evidenced by Little River flowing into Goose Creek nearby to our offices here in Northern Virginia. Many controversies exist, such as mountain/hill, which we call summit (as are 194 other generic terms applied to features with similar characteristics), and city/town that we classify as populated place, etc. It might be of interest that the British Ordnance Survey once defined a mountain as having 1,000 feet of elevation, and less was a hill, but this was abandoned sometime in the 1920's we believe. There was even a movie with this as its theme in the late 1990's - The Englishman That Went Up a Hill and Down a Mountain. The U.S. Board on Geographic Names once stated that the difference between a hill and a mountain in the U.S. was 1,000 feet of local relief, but even this was abandoned in the early 1970's. For more information contact the GNIS Manager.

Source of this FAQ:
http://geonames.usgs.gov/faqs.html#18

Return to list

  U.S. Department of the Interior

FAQ Home



List FAQ

Ask USGS

Format graphic contains no information