Skip Standard Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z
peer-reviewed.gif (582 bytes)
eid_header.gif (2942 bytes)
Past Issue

Vol. 10, No. 10
October 2004

Adobe Acrobat logo

EID Home | Ahead of Print | Past Issues | EID Search | Contact Us | Announcements | Suggested Citation | Submit Manuscript

PDF Version | Comments Comments | Email this article Email this article



The Study
Conclusions
References
Figure
Table

Dispatch

Nosocomial Acquisition of Dengue

Dirk Wagner,* Katja de With,* Daniela Huzly,* Frank Hufert,* Manfred Weidmann,* Susanne Breisinger,* Sabine Eppinger,* Winfried Vinzent Kern,* and Tilman Martin Bauer*Comments
*University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany

Suggested citation for this article


Recent transmission of dengue viruses has increased in tropical and subtropical areas and in industrialized countries because of international travel. We describe a case of nosocomial transmission of dengue virus in Germany by a needlestick injury. Diagnosis was made by TaqMan reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction when serologic studies were negative.

Dengue viruses are transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes in tropical regions worldwide. The global incidence of epidemic and endemic dengue fever has increased substantially and is estimated at 50–100 million cases per year. International travel leads to imported cases in countries of the Northern Hemisphere (1), where dengue fever is an important differential diagnosis of fever in travelers returning from the tropics. Occupational needlestick injuries continue to pose a substantial risk for healthcare workers and occur at rates of 1.0 to 6.2 per 100 person-years (2). Common concerns are the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus. However, other pathogens can be transmitted as well. We report a case of nosocomial transmission of dengue virus.

The Study

The index patient, a 26-year-old woman, was admitted to the infectious disease ward of a university hospital with a temperature of 40°C and myalgias 3 days after she returned from a 3-week trip to Cambodia and Thailand. Dengue virus infection was subsequently diagnosed, and  mild hepatitis and a rash developed. She was discharged in good condition after the fever subsided. On the day of admission of the index patient (day 0i), a nurse sustained a needlestick injury with a hollow needle that had been used for drawing blood from the index patient. The needlestick resulted in a bleeding puncture wound that was immediately treated with an antiseptic. The index patient did not report any high-risk activity for HIV or hepatitis B virus, and the nurse had been immunized against hepatitis B virus. Therefore, no specific postexposure prophylaxis was performed. The nurse had previously been in good health and had not traveled outside Germany in the preceding 12 months.

Figure
Figure.

Click to view enlarged image

Figure. Time line of the signs, symptoms, and diagnostic tests in the index patient (i) and nurse (n)...

Four days after the needlestick, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias developed in the healthcare worker, for which she took ibuprofen. Seven days later, when she was experiencing an intense headache and noticed a macular rash on her trunk, she sought treatment from a local doctor (day 0n). Physical examination showed bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. On day 2n, she visited our service, where dengue virus infection was diagnosed by using a Light Cycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Her symptoms lessened gradually over the course of 4 weeks, and she was on sick leave for 5 weeks. The time frame of the respective clinical presentation and the virologic results of the index patient and the nurse are shown in the Figure; laboratory data are presented in the Table.

Serologic studies were performed with the PanBio dengue immunoglobulin (Ig) M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and PanBio dengue indirect IgG ELISA (PanBio Ltd., Brisbane, Australia) (3); arbitrary units relative to a simultaneously measured calibrator >11 were considered positive. For detecting virus RNA, RNA was prepared from 140 µL of serum by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To detect specific dengue virus RNA, we adapted a TaqMan-reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (4) to detect any of the four serotypes by using the following: degenerated forward primer (DEN FP), reverse primer (DEN RP); and probe (DEN P): DEN FP 5´AAggACTAgAggTTAKAggAgACCC3´, DEN RP 5´ggCCYTCTgTgCCTggAWTgATg3´ and the probe DEN P 5´ FAM-AACAgCATATTgACgCTgggARAgACC-TAMRA-3´. RT-PCR conditions for the Light Cycler (Roche Diagnostics) were: RT at 61°C for 20 min, activation at 95°C for 5 min, and 40 cycles of PCR at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 60 s. We used the RNA Master Hybridization Probes Kit (Roche Diagnostics) with 500-nM primers and 200-nM probes. The kit includes an aptamer-blocked Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase, which performs RT and, once the aptamer drops out at activation, hotstarts PCR amplification.

Conclusions

This is the fourth reported case, to our knowledge, of nosocomial dengue virus transmission (5–7) and the first in which TaqMan RT-PCR was used to provide evidence of nosocomial transmission before the detection of an antibody response. The index patient had acquired a dengue virus infection in Southeast Asia and experienced typical symptoms. In particular, she was febrile on admission, when the needlestick injury of the nurse occurred. In the health care worker who sustained the injury, cephalgia and myalgias developed after an incubation period of 4 days. A typical rash appeared after 11 days, when she also had a severe headache. The absence of fever, the most common sign of dengue fever, is likely due to the administration of ibuprofen. Both persons completely recovered. However, the healthcare worker was on sick leave for 5 weeks with resulting socioeconomic consequences.

The diagnosis was confirmed in both cases by both seroconversion and detection of dengue viral RNA by TaqMan RT-PCR; the latter gave positive results in both cases 3 and 6 days, respectively, before serum specimens were shown to contain antibody. Dengue viremia is known to correlate well with the presence of fever (8), which was the case in the index patient. Our report illustrates the potential of percutaneous nosocomial transmission of dengue viruses. This risk is likely to increase with the increase in the number of dengue infections imported to countries where dengue viruses are not endemic.

Dr. Wagner is an infectious disease specialist at the University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. His research interests focus on iron metabolism and intracellular survival of mycobacteria.

References

  1. Jelinek T, Muhlberger N, Harms G, Corachan M, Grobusch MP, Knobloch J, et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of imported dengue fever in Europe: sentinel surveillance data from TropNetEurop. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1047–52.
  2. Trim JC, Elliott TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect. 2003;53:237–42.
  3. Groen J, Koraka P, Velzing J, Copra C, Osterhaus ADME. Evaluation of six immunoassays for detection of dengue virus-specific immunoglobulin M and G antibodies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:867–71.
  4. Callahan JD, Wu SJ, Dion-Schultz A, Mangold BE, Peruski LF, Watts DM, et al. Development and evaluation of serotype- and group-specific fluorogenic reverse transcriptase PCR (TaqMan) assays for dengue virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4119–24.
  5. De Wazières B, Helder G, Vuitton DA, Dupond JL. Nosocomial transmission of dengue from a needlestick injury. Lancet. 1998;351:498.
  6. Hirsch JF, Deschamps C, Lhuillier M. Transmission métropolitaine d'une dengue par inoculation accidentelle hospitalière. Ann Med Interne. 1990;141:629.
  7. Langgartner J, Audebert F, Schölmerich J, Glück T. Dengue virus infection transmitted by needle stick injury. J Infect. 2002;44:269–70.
  8. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Suntayakorn S, et al. Dengue in the early febrile phase: viremia and antibody responses. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:322–30.

 

Table. Laboratory data for index patient and health care worker infected with dengue virusa

 

Day

Leukocytes (mL)

Lymphocytes (mL)

Thrombocytes (mL)

Dengue IgM EIA

Dengue IgG EIA (U)

Dengue PCR


Index patient

0i

2.000

420

137.000

+ (16.4)

+

4i

1.900

ND

55.000

+

+ (43.0)

14i

5.000

1.650

375.000

+

+ (30.9)

ND

Health care worker

2n

2.600

590

136.000

– (2.8)

+

8n

4.000

1.040

174.000

+

– (5.9)

ND

15n

4.200

1.190

213.000

+

+ (16.4)

ND

22n

4.800

1.220

215.000

+

+ (21.7)

ND


aIg, immunoglobulin; EIA, enyzyme immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ND, not done.

 

Suggested citation for this article:
Wagner D, de With K, Huzly D, Hufert F, Weidmann M, Breisinger S, et al. Nosocomial acquisition of dengue. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Oct [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol10no10/03-1037.htm

   
     
   
Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Tilman Martin Bauer, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany; fax: +49-761-270 1820; email: bauer@if-freiburg.de

Return email address optional:


 


Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors at eideditor@cdc.gov

Email this article

Your email:

Your friend's email:

Message (optional):

 

 

 

EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page posted September 1, 2004
This page last reviewed September 23, 2004

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
National Center for Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention