For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
January 4, 2002
Remarks by Counselor to the President Karen Hughes to the Press Pool
The State Capitol
Austin, Texas
10:50 A.M. CST
MS. HUGHES: Well, how is everybody?
Q Cold. (Laughter.)
MS. HUGHES: Well, I hope that -- it appears that Senator
Daschle went home over the holidays and listened to the American
people, and perhaps did some studying of the President's
package. Because many of the elements that he is talking
about now are things the President has been talking about for months.
For example, he apparently is acknowledging energy security is an
important part of economic recovery. As you know, President
Bush laid out his -- his security package last year and the House voted
on it. The Senate has not. He's talking about
apparently trade being an important part of economic
recovery. The House has voted for trade promotion authority
for the President; the Senate has not.
So I'm hoping that this is an acknowledgement by Senator Daschle
that his posture at the end of the year in obstructing some of this
important legislation was wrong, and that there is finally an
acknowledgement that it's time for action.
As the President said today, it's interesting to be in this
building because we're all reminded of this place where Republicans and
Democrats worked together to get results for people. And
that's certainly the spirit that President Bush is going to be taking
back to Washington with him. And we hope that it is returned
in kind.
Q But he's also saying that the tax cuts the
Republicans envisioned are wrong for the economy, that fiscal
responsibility should be the driving force in any economic plan, and
taking issue with the Republican approach on that.
MS. HUGHES: Well, we agree that fiscal responsibility is
extremely important. And that's why President Bush worked
with Congress to hold the line on fiscal decisions when many members of
Senator Daschle's party wanted to increase spending beyond levels that
the President thought was appropriate. And that's why we
worked so hard to make sure that we all stuck with the budget that we
had agreed on earlier in the year.
Now, obviously, we've had the terrorist attacks that have required
Congress to spend what it takes to wage and win a war on
terrorism. And President Bush will do that. And
to protect our homeland. And those will be his priorities
going into the next year. He'll be focused on the war on
terrorism, continuing to wage and win the war against terrorism and on
the recession here at home.
Senator Daschle seems to be implying that tax increases might be
necessary and nothing would be worse for workers who want to keep their
jobs than to increase taxes at a time when our economy, we hope, is
just beginning to recover. So we feel that the bipartisan
agreement, which President Bush worked with Republicans and Democrats
to accomplish right before the end of the year, is the proper
prescription for economic security and for jobs for Americans.
And we hope that that's what Senator Daschle heard over the
Christmas holidays, because I think the American people -- what I've
heard, I've been out in Texas, people understand there's a need for
action and they want Congress to put partisanship behind them and to
work together, to take action, to help laid-off workers and to
stimulate economic growth.
Q Karen, does the President also think that
these numbers indicate that, in fact, the economy has
recovered? You said, "we hope."
MS. HUGHES: Well, there are some good indications and
there are some still mixed indications. So we hope that, as
you know, David, we felt that the impact of the -- when the President
took office, you recall Vice President Cheney warned that a recession
was imminent. And, unfortunately, that turned out to be the
case. The recession that had -- the slow-down that had begun
during the year 2000 became a recession in March, just after -- shortly
after the President took office. And we feel -- as you know,
he made tax relief package his top priority, to try to begin an
economic recovery.
And we feel that was just beginning to take effect and that there
were some good signs that the economy was just beginning to turn around
when the attacks of September 11th, of course, dealt a terrible blow,
not only to our country in terms of the horrible loss of life, but also
to our economy.
And so we hope that four months later, that we are beginning to
show some signs of recovery. But I would defer to the
economists. I understand from what I read that at this point
it's still somewhat mixed; although, there is some indication of good
news.
Q Karen, the President in his speech talked
about putting politics aside in favor of --
MS. HUGHES: Let me just add onto that,
David. Obviously, with the unemployment numbers -- good news
is good news, but for those who have lost jobs, the only good news is
that they have an opportunity to find another job, to find more work.
Q Where I was going, Karen --
MS. HUGHES: No, I just wanted to say -- obviously, we
still feel there is a need to help those who have lost jobs.
Q If you do believe a recovery is underway,
though, or might be underway, then that would suggest that the interest
rate cuts and last year's tax cut are kicking in. By the
time any additional stimulus kicked in, the recovery would either have
happened or not happened. So I'm wondering if it plays to
Daschle's case, you've got to let all of these other factors begin to,
you know, have their full effects, since we know there's a lag --
MR. McCLELLAN: -- since the President introduced his
economic security plan, 800,000-plus people have already lost their
jobs. And people are hurting. And a number of
people are worried about their current job.
MS. HUGHES: And there are continuing concerns about
lay-offs and about further unemployment. So we feel that we
need to act to make sure that we are going to recover quickly.
Q I was just going to ask about the issue of
politics and partisanship. Are you confident that there is
no element in the sort of what's happened in the last few weeks of what
I would call the blame-Tom-Daschle-for-the-impasse
strategy? There's no political element to that strategy to
try to blunt any political aspirations Senator Daschle may have, say,
in 2004 or more generally?
MS. HUGHES: Well, what we're trying to do is get
results. And when we've got a House that's passed a package
of help for laid-off workers and relief for low-income and
moderate-income American families; and we've got a Senate that we think
has a majority that would vote for such a package, yet, we can't get a
vote scheduled, then we can't get results.
And so what we're focused on is results at a critical time for our
economy. We feel that --
Q So there's no element of trying to beat up
Senator Daschle for a political advantage?
MS. HUGHES: You heard the President out
here. The President is someone throughout his -- since I've
worked for him, for more than seven years, now, his focus is on getting
results. And he had a job to do and he wants to get it
done.
END 11:00
A.M. CST
|