.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
Fire Research  . Link to NIST  .
 .
Link to Home Link to Research Areas Link to BFRL Publications Link to BFRL Software Link to BFRL Staff Information Link to Contact Information Link to Ask the Experts Section  .

Fire Research Division

Home Smoke Alarm Tests


Overview

While there is no question that smoke alarms have successfully prevented thousands of residential fire deaths, their beneficial effect may be beginning to plateau. It is recognized that reducing the number of non-working alarms may produce some further reduction in fire deaths. Further, introducing more effective alarms in residential dwellings could have a greater impact in reducing deaths. However, there seems to be little incentive to produce and install better residential fire alarms until performance improvements can be demonstrated through objective, realistic, and accurate testing.

In co-operation with the United States Fire Administration (USFA), other sponsors, and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), NIST has conducted an evaluation of current and emerging smoke alarm technology responses to common residential fire scenarios and nuisance alarm sources. The research was performed at by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), under the general guidance of a steering committee of the sponsoring organizations.

Final Project Report

The results of the project provide details of the response of a range of residential smoke alarm technologies in a controlled laboratory test and in a series of real-scale tests conducted in two different residential structures. These are intended to provide both insight into siting and response characteristics of residential smoke alarms and a set of reference data for future enhancements to alarm technology based on fires from current materials and constructions. Several areas of focus were included in the project:

Smoke alarms of either the ionization type or the photoelectric type consistently provided time for occupants to escape from most residential fires, although in some cases the escape time provided can be short. Consistent with prior findings, ionization type alarms provided somewhat better response to flaming fires than photoelectric alarms, and photoelectric alarms provide (often) considerably faster response to smoldering fires than ionization type alarms.

Escape times in this study were systematically shorter than those found in a similar study conducted in the 1970's. This is related to some combination of faster fire development times for today's products that provide the main fuel sources for fires, such as upholstered furniture and mattresses, different criteria for time to untenable conditions, and improved understanding of the speed and range of threats to tenability.

The final report, executive summary, and table of contents are available. Table 27 on page 240 of the report has been changed to reflect a correction of a rounding error and to add a footnote for the best-case scenario; the corrected table is available. All of the documents are in pdf format, requiring Adobe Acrobat Reader to access the files. To install Adobe Acrobat Reader, click here.  (Posted July 2004).

Test Data

Project Sponsors

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, www.cpsc.gov 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov 
U.S. Fire Administration, www.usfa.fema.gov 
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Healthy Homes Initiative, www.hud.gov 
Underwriters Laboratories, www.ul.com 
National Fire Protection Association, www.nfpa.org (In-kind contribution)
National Research Council Canada, scitech.gc.ca/  (In-kind contribution)

For further information, contact Richard W. Bukowski, richard.bukowski@nist.gov, (301) 975-6853, fax: (301) 975-4052


Graphic Rule

Privacy Statement/Security Notice  |  Disclaimer  |  FOIA

Technical Website Questions: bfrlwebmaster@nist.gov

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration.

BFRL Logo

Date created: 3/12/2001
Last updated: 7/31/2004