|
Docket
No. 9302
In the Matter of
Rambus Incorporated.
October 6, 2004
October 4, 2004
- Order Granting Complaint Counsel's Motion for Leave to File Appendices to Their Appeal Brief, Denying Rambus's Motion
to Strike Attachment 1 and Appendix A to Complaint Counsel's Brief, and Granting Rambus Leave to File An Appendix [PDF 10K]
- Order Denying Joint Application to Postpone Briefing and Stay Commission Action On Complaint Counsel's Motion to Compel,
and Establishing Briefing Schedule For That Motion [PDF 10K]
- Order Inviting Complaint Counsel to File A Brief Expressing Their Views On the Motion of Non-Party Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
to Enforce the Protective Order [PDF 9K]
- Order Removing Privileged Third Party Document From Trial Record [PDF 8K]
- Order Granting Motions for Leave to File Electronic Versions of Briefs [PDF 8K]
October 1, 2004
September 14, 2004
September 3, 2004
August 20, 2004
August 11, 2004
July 26, 2004
July 16, 2004
July 12, 2004
July 7, 2004
July 2, 2004
June 21, 2004
June 18, 2004
June 14, 2004
June 4, 2004
June 2, 2004
May 25, 2004
May 12, 2004
- Motion
of The American Antitrust Institute for Leave to Filed Amicus
Curiae Brief in Support of Neither Party
- Amicus
Curiae Brief of The American Antitrust Institute in
Support of Neither Party
- Notice
of Appearance of the Undersigned
April 30, 2004
April 23, 2004
- Reply
Of Non-Party Mitsubishi Electric CorporationIn Support Of
Its Motion To Enforce Protective Order [PDF 13K]
- Certificate
Of Service [PDF 8K]
- Declaration
[PDF 10K]
- [Proposed]
Order Granting Motion Of Non-Party Mitsubishi Electric
Corporation For Leave File A Reply In Support Of Its Motion
To Enforce Protective Order [PDF 8K]
- Motion
Of Non-Party Mitsubishi Electric Corporation For Leave To
File A Reply In Support Of Its Motion To Enforce Protective
Order [PDF 9K]
April 22, 2004
April 19, 2004
April 16, 2004
April 15, 2004
- Brief
Amicus Curiae of Economics Professors and Scholars [PDF
67K]
- Motion
of Economics Professors and Scholars - Joseph Farrell,
University of California, Berkeley; Jay Pil Choi, Michigan
State University; Aaron S. Edlin, University of California,
Berkeley; Shane Greenstein, Northwestern University; Bronwyn
H. Hall, University of California, Berkeley; and Garth Saloner,
Stanford University - For Leave to File Brief as Amicus
Curiae [PDF 20K]
March 18, 2004
March 3, 2004
March 1, 2004
February 24, 2004
February 17, 2004
February 3, 2004
December 23, 2003
December 17, 2003
October 29, 2003
October 28, 2003
October 20, 2003
October 10, 2003
October 9, 2003
October 1,
2003
September 29,
2003
September 22,
2003
September 15,
2003
September 9,
2003
September
5, 2003
- Joint Witness Index
[PDF 20KB]
August 27,
2003
August 26, 2003
August 25, 2003
August 22, 2003
- Joint
Request for Revision of Schedule; and [Proposed] Order
[PDF 11KB]
August 20, 2003
August 19, 2003
August 18,
2003
August 13,
2003
August
8, 2003
August
6, 2003
August
5, 2003
August
1, 2003
July 29, 2003
July 28,
2003
July 25,
2003
July 24,
2003
- Notice
of Complaint Counsel's Anticipated Rebuttal Case[PDF 15KB]
- Respondent's
Memorandum in Support of Professor Teece's Testimony
Regarding Royalty Rates [PDF 13KB]
July
10, 2003
July
9, 2003
July 2, 2003
June 26, 2003
June 25, 2003
June 19, 2003
- Response
by Rambus Inc. to Micron Technology Inc.'s Request that
the Court Reconsider its April 21, 2003 Order Regarding
Collusion Among Dram Manufacturers [PDF 22KB]
June 18, 2003
June 11, 2003
- ALJ's
Order Granting in Part, Non-party Micron Technology
Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order [PDF17KB]
June 9, 2003
June 5, 2003
June 3, 2003
June 2, 2003
May 30, 2003
May 29, 2003
May 28, 2003
May 21, 2003
May 20, 2003
- Stipulation
and Order Regarding Admission of Certain Exhibits [PDF
14KB]
- Exhibit
A (Complaint Counsel's Shortened Trial Exhibit List)
[PDF 10KB]
- Exhibit
B (Respondent's Shortened Trial Exhibit List) [PDF
93KB]
- Exhibit
C (Joint Exhibit List) [PDF 19KB]
May 19, 2003
May 14, 2003
May 13, 2003
May 12, 2003
May 9, 2003
May 7, 2003
- Complaint
Counsel’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
to File Opposition to Respondent's Motion For In Camera
Treatment of Documents That Complaint Counsel Identified
on April 17, 2003 as Additional Trial Exhibits, and [Proposed]
Order [PDF 10KB]
May 6, 2003
April 29, 2003
April 28, 2003
April 25, 2003
April 24, 2003
-
Complaint Counsel's Unopposed Motion for Extension of
Time to File Opposition to Respondent's Motion For in Camera
Treatment of Documents That Complaint Counsel Identify as
Potential Trial Exhibits [PDF 10KB]
April 23, 2003
April 22,
2003
April 21,
2003
April 18, 2003
April 17, 2003
April 15, 2003
April 11, 2003
April 10, 2003
April 9, 2003
April 7, 2003
April 4, 2003
- Complaint
Counsel’s Motion For Acceptance Of Corrected Version
Of "tab 9" To Complaint Counsel’s Motion
For Additional Adverse Inferences And Other Appropriate
Relief Necessary To Remedy Rambus Inc.’s Intentional
Spoliation Of Evidence [PDF 9KB]
April 3, 2003
March 27, 2003
- Complaint
Counsel’s Motion For Acceptance Of Corrected Version
Of "attachment A" To Complaint Counsel’s
Motion For Additional Adverse Inferences And Other Appropriate
Relief Necessary To Remedy Rambus Inc.’s Intentional
Spoliation Of Evidence [PDF 151KB]
- Complaint
Counsel’s Motion For Additional Adverse Inferences
And Other Appropriate Relief Necessary To Remedy Rambus
Inc.’s Intentional Spoliation Of Evidence [PDF 282KB]
March 26, 2003
- Administrative
Law Judge’s Order Denying Respondent's Applications
for Review of February 26, 2003, Order (granting Complaint
Counsel’s Motion for Collateral Estoppel) and February
28, 2003, Order (granting Complaint Counsel’s Motion
to Compel Discovery Relating to Subject Matters as to Which
Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were Invalidated on Crime-fraud
Grounds and Subsequently Waived); Denying Respondent’s
Request for Reconsideration of the February 26 Order; and
Granting Respondents Request for Reconsideration of the
February 28 Order [PDF 460KB]
- Memorandum
In Support of Motion In Limine to Bar Presentation,
on Collateral-Estoppel Grounds, of Testimony and Arguments
Regarding Issues That Rambus Has Previously Litigated and
Lost [PDF 24KB]
- Complaint
Counsel's Motion In Limine to Bar Presentation,
on Collateral-Estoppel Grounds, of Testimony and Arguments
Regarding Issues That Rambus Has Previously Litigated and
Lost [PDF 10KB]
- Memorandum
in Support of Motion In Limine To Preclude Report
and Testimony of William L. Keefauver; and [Proposed] Order
[PDF 40KB]
- Memorandum
In Support of Motion In Limine to Bar Presentation
of Testimony and Argument Regarding Purported Collusion
Among DRAM Manufacturers [PDF 20KB]
- Motion
In Limine to Bar Presentation of Testimony and Argument
Regarding Purported Collusion Among DRAM Manufacturers [PDF
10KB]
- [Proposed]
Order Granting Rambus Inc.’s Motion In Limine To
Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony Of R. Preston Mcafee [PDF
10KB]
- Rambus
Inc.'s Motion In Limine to Exclude Certain Opinion
Testimony of R. Preston McAfee [PDF 53KB]
March 25, 2003
March 24, 2003
- Administrative
Law Judge’s Order Granting Rambus Inc.’s Application
for Leave to File Supplemental Rule 3.24 Separate Statement
in Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion for Summary Decision
[PDF 5KB]
March 21, 2003
March 20, 2003
- Proposed Order Granting Respondent's Unopposed
Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum in Support of
Respondent's Application for Review of the 2/28/2003 Order
Granting Complaint Counsel’s Motion to Compel Discovery
Relating to Subject Matters as to Which Rambus’s Privilege
Claims Were Invalidated on Crime-fraud Grounds and Subsequently
Waived, Pursuant to Rule 3.23(b) or, in the Alternative,
Request for Reconsideration of That Order [PDF 15KB]
- Reply
Brief in Support of Respondent’s Application for
Review of the February 28, 2003 Order Granting Complaint
Counsel’s Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Subject
Matters as to Which Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were
Invalidated on Crime-Fraud Grounds and Subsequently Waived,
Pursuant to Rule 3.23(b) or, in the Alternative, Request
for Reconsideration of That Order [PDF 52KB]
- Unopposed
Motion by Respondent Rambus Inc. for Leave to File Reply
Memorandum in Support of Respondent’s Application for
Review of the February 28, 2003 Order Granting Complaint
Counsel’s Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Subject
Matters as to Which Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were
Invalidated on Crime-Fraud Grounds and Subsequently Waived,
Pursuant to Rule 3.23(b) or, in the Alternative, Request
for Reconsideration of That Order [PDF 12KB]
- Verification
of Respondent Rambus Inc.’s Supplemental Responses
to Complaint Counsel’s First Request for Admissions
[PDF 6KB]
March 19, 2003
March 18, 2003
- Supplemental
Declaration of Steven M. Perry in Support of Rule 3.24
Separate Statement in Support of Rambus Inc.'s Motion for
Summary Decision [PDF 11KB]
- Supplemental
Rule 3.24 Separate Statement in Support of Rambus Inc.'s
Motion for Summary Decision [PDF 13KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
- Respondent
Rambus Inc.’s Application for Leave to File (1) Supplemental
Rule 3.24 Separate Statement in Support of Rambus Inc.'s
Motion for Summary Decision; and (2) Supplemental Declaration
of Steven M. Perry in Support of Rule 3.24 Separate Statement
in Support of Rambus Inc.'s Motion for Summary Decision
[PDF 11KB]
March 17, 2003
- Complaint
Counsel’s Opposition To Respondent’s Application
For Review Of The February 28, 2003 Order Granting Counsel’s
Motion To Compel Discovery Relating To Subject Matters As
To Which Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were Invalidated
On Crime-fraud Grounds And Subsequently Waived, Pursuant
To Rule 3.23(b) Or, In The Alternative, Request For Reconsideration
Of That Order [PDF 55KB]
- Administrative
Law Judge's Order Granting Rambus Inc.'s Motion For
Leave To File A Reply Brief In Support Of Respondent's Application
For Review Of The February 26, 2003 Order Granting Complaint
Counsel's Motion For Collateral Estoppel [PDF 69KB]
- Administrative
Law Judge’s Order Setting Prehearing Conference
[PDF 67KB]
March 13, 2003
March 11, 2003
- Response
To Rambus’s Application For Review Of February
26, 2003, Order Granting Complaint Counsel’s Motion
For Collateral Estoppel Or, In The Alternative, Request
For Reconsideration [PDF 70KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
- Memorandum
by Respondent Rambus Inc. and by Third-Party Witness Richard
Crisp in Opposition to Motion to Complaint Counsel's Motion
to Compel an Additional Day of Testimony of Richard Crisp
[PDF 35KB]
March 10, 2003
- Appendix
To Application For Review Of The February 28, 2003 Order
Granting Complaint Counsel’s Motion To Compel Discovery
Relating To Subject Matters As To Which Rambus’s Privilege
Claims Were Invalidated On Crime-Fraud Grounds And Subsequently
Waived, Pursuant To Rule 3.23(B) Or, In The Alternative,
Request For Reconsideration Of That Order [PDF 10KB]
March 7, 2003
- Application
For Review Of The February 28, 2003 Order Granting Complaint
Counsel’s Motion To Compel Discovery Relating To Subject
Matters As To Which Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were
Invalidated On Crime-Fraud Grounds And Subsequently Waived,
Pursuant To Rule 3.23(B) Or, In The Alternative, Request
For Reconsideration Of That Order [PDF 56KB]
-
Declaration of Steven M. Perry in Support of Opposition
to Complaint Counsel’s Motion to Compel an Additional
Day of Deposition Testimony of Richard Crisp [PDF 14KB]
- Proposed Order
on Complaint Counsel’s Unopposed Motion for Extensions
of Time to File Motions to Compel Regarding Requests for
Admissions and Responses to Such Motions [PDF 5KB]
March 6, 2003
- Unopposed
Motion For Extensions Of Time To File Motions To Compel
Regarding Requests For Admissions And Responses To Such
Motions [PDF 6KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
March 5, 2003
- Application
for Review of the February 26, 2003 Order Granting Complaint
Counsel’s Motion for Collateral Estoppel Pursuant to
Rule 3.23(b) or, in the Alternative, Request for Reconsideration
of That Order [PDF 54KB]
March 4, 2003
- ALJ
Order Granting Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to Respond to Complaint Counsel's Motion to Compel
an Additional Day of Deposition Testimony of Richard Crisp
[PDF 10KB]
- Declaration
of Steven M. Perry [PDF 20KB]
- Respondent
Rambus Inc.’s Rule 3.24 Separate Statement of Material
Facts as to Which There is No Genuine Issue [PDF 69KB]
February 28, 2003
February 27, 2003
February 26, 2003
- ALJ
Order on Complaint Counsel's Motions for Default Judgment
and for Oral Argument [PDF 392KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Complaint Counsel's Motion for Collateral
Estoppel [PDF 196KB]
- ALJ
Order Denying Complaint Counsel's Motion to Compel Discovery
Relating to Rambus's Document Destruction[PDF 13KB]
- ALJ
Order Denying Complaint Counsel's Amended Application
to Place Documents on the Public Record [PDF 141KB]
February 24, 2003
- Proposed
Orders [PDF 8KB]
- Rambus,
Inc.’s Opposition to Complaint Counsel’s (1)
Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support
of Motion for Default Judgment, and (2) Motion Seeking Recognition
of the Collateral Estoppel Effect of Prior Factual Findings
Underlying Portions of the Judgment in Infineon Now
Vacated by the Federal Circuit [PDF 46KB]
February 21, 2003
February 19, 2003
- Joint
Motion for Entry of Revised Scheduling Order and Request
for Telephonic Scheduling Conference [PDF 190KB]
February 14, 2003
- Memorandum
by Rambus Inc. in Opposition to Complaint Counsel’s
Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Rambus’s Document
Destruction and Proposed Order [PDF 61KB]
- [Proposed]
Order Granting Complaint Counsel's Motion [PDF 8KB]
- Complaint
Counsel's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support
of Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Rambus's Document
Destruction [PDF 6KB]
February 12, 2003
- Supplemental
Memorandum in Support of Complaint Counsel’s Pending
Motion for Default Judgment, Relating to Collateral Estoppel
Effect of Prior Factual Finding That Respondent Rambus Inc.
Destroyed Material Evidence in Bad Faith [PDF 32KB]
- Motion
for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of
Complaint Counsel’s Pending Motion for Default Judgment
and Proposed Order [PDF 11KB]
- Motion
Seeking Recognition of the Collateral Estoppel Effect
of Prior Factual Findings That Respondent Rambus Inc. Destroyed
Material Evidence in Anticipation of Future Litigation and
Proposed Order [PDF 10KB]
February 11, 2003
February 7, 2003
February 6, 2003
- Memorandum
by Rambus Inc. in Opposition to Complaint Counsel's
Motion to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion
to Compel Discovery Relating to Subject Matters as to Which
Rambus's Privilege Claims Were Invalidated on Crime-Fraud
Grounds and Subsequently Waived [PDF 28KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
January 31, 2003
- Rambus
Inc.’s Response to Complaint Counsel’s Amended
Application to Place Exhibits to the Motion for Default
Judgment on the Public Record [PDF 27KB]
- Declaration
of Edward Larsen [PDF 21KB]
- Rambus
Inc.’s Opposition to Complaint Counsel’s Motion
to Strike Rambus Inc.’s Joinder in Complaint Counsel’s
Request for Oral Argument on the Motion for Default Judgment
[PDF 16KB]
January 30, 2003
-
ALJ’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to Limit Subpoena Filed by Skjerven Morrill LLP
[PDF 10KB]
- Notice
of Rambus Inc’s Intention to File an Opposition to
Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Leave to File Reply
in Support of Motion to Compel [PDF 10KB]
- Complaint
Counsel's Motion to Strike Rambus Inc.’s Joinder
in Complaint Counsel’s Request for Oral Argument on
the Motion for Default Judgment [PDF 14KB]
January 29, 2003
January 28, 2003
January 23, 2003
January 21, 2003
- Declaration
of Joel A. Karp [PDF 10KB]
- Memorandum
by Rambus Inc. in Opposition to Complaint Counsel’s
Motion to Compel Discovery Relating to Subject Matters as
to Which Rambus’s Privilege Claims Were Invalidated
on Crime-Fraud Grounds and Subsequently Waived [PDF 64KB]
January 20, 2003
January 16, 2003
January 15, 2003
January 14, 2003
- Request
By Respondent Rambus Inc. For Dismissal Without Prejudice
Of Rambus’s Motion To Compel The Production Of Documents
In The Possession Of NEC’s Parent Company [PDF 11KB]
January 13, 2003
- ALJ
Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
to File Public Version of Complaint Counsel's Motion to
Compel Discovery Relating to Matters in Which Rambus's Privilege
Claims Were Invalidated on Crime-fraud Grounds and Subsequently
Waived [PDF 14KB]
January 10, 2003
- Unopposed
Motion For Extension Of Time To File Public Record Version
Of Complaint Counsel's Motion To Compel Discovery Relating
To Subject Matters As To Which Rambus's Privilege Claims
Were Invalidated On Crime-Fraud Grounds And Subsequently
Waived [PDF 44KB]
January 9, 2003
January 8, 2003
January 7, 2003
- Memorandum
by Rambus Inc. in Response to Motion by Department of
Justice to Limit Discovery Relating to the Dram Grand Jury
[PDF 899KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Skjerven Morrill LLP an Extension of
Time to Move to Limit Subpoena [PDF 31KB]
- Declaration
of Steven M. Perry in Response to Motion by Department of
Justice to Limit Discovery Relating to the DRAM Grand Jury
[PDF 15KB]
January 6, 2003
- Complaint
Counsel’s Response to Memorandum by Rambus Inc.
in Response to Motion by Department of Justice to Limit
Discovery Relating to the Dram Grand Jury [PDF 725KB]
- Rambus
Inc.'s Reply to Complaint Counsel's Response Regarding
Motion by the Department of Justice to Limit Discovery[PDF
48KB]
- Rambus
Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Admissions to the
Federal Trade Commission [PDF 68KB]
January 3, 2003
- ALJ
Order Denying Motion to Quash Filed on Behalf of Third-Party
De Dios & Associates [PDF 38KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting NEC Electronics, Inc.'s Motion for Extension
of Time to Repsond to Rambus' Motion to Compel [PDF 10KB]
- Complaint
Counsel’s Statement in Support of Department of
Justice’s Motion to Limit Discovery Relating to Dram
Grand Jury [PDF 23KB]
January 2, 2003
December 31, 2002
- ALJ
Order Re: Motion by Rambus to Compel Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. To Produce Certain Documents Withheld on Privilege
Grounds [PDF 39KB]
- Repondent's
Notice of Filing of Revised Proposed Order [PDF 436KB]
December 30, 2002
- ALJ
Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
to File Public Record Version of Complaint Counsel's Motion
for Default Judgment [PDF 34KB]
- Declaration
of Steven M. Perry In Opposition to Motion by De Dios &
Associates to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 273KB]
- Opposition
by Respondent Rambus Inc. to Motion by De Dios &
Associates to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum [PDF 261KB]
- Non-Party
Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.'s Opposition
To Respondent Rambus Inc.'s Motion To Compel; Declaration
of Terrence H. Cross; Declaration of John W. Calkins and
Proposed Order Denying Motion To Compel [PDF 1186KB]
- Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time to File Public Record Version
of Complaint Counsel's Motion for Default Judgment [PDF
8KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
December 27, 2002
- U.S.
Department of Justice Motion for In Camera
Treatment of Documents, DOJ's Motion to Limit Discovery
Relating to the Dram Grand Jury and Proposed Orders [PDF
315KB]
December 26, 2002
-
Motion by Respondent Rambus Inc. for Leave to File a
Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. to Produce Certain Documents Withheld on Privilege
Grounds [PDF 17KB]
December 24, 2002
- Rambus'
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
Complaint Counsel's Motion for Default Judgment [PDF 281
KB]
December 23, 2002
December 20, 2002
-
Complaint Counsel's Motion for Default Judgment Relating
to Respondent Rambus Inc.'s Willful, Bad-Faith Destruction
of Material Evidence [PDF 5044KB]
- Motion
By Respondent Rambus Inc. To Compel Mitsubishi Electric
& Electronics USA, Inc. To Comply With This Court's
Order To Produce Documents Responsive To The Subpoena Served
By Rambus Inc. and Order [PDF 12KB]
-
Rule 3.22(f) Declaration of Steven M. Perry In Support
of Motion [PDF 542KB]
- Motion
by Respondent Rambus Inc. to Compel NEC Electronics,
Inc. to Produce Documents in its Parent Company’s Possession
Responsive to the Subpoena Served by Rambus Inc. [PDF 20KB]
-
Rule 3.22(f) Declaration of Steven M. Perry In Support
of Motion [PDF 1115KB]
December 19, 2002
- Memorandum
of Micron Technology, Inc. In Support of Motion of United
States Department of Justice to Stay Discovery [PDF
10KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Samsung's Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to Respond to Rambus Inc.'s Motion to Compel [PDF
31KB]
December 18, 2002
- Samsung
Semiconductor Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to Respond to Rambus Inc.'s Motion to Compel [PDF
152KB]
- ALJ
Order on Motion by DOJ to Intervene and Stay Discovery
[PDF 89KB]
- Complaint
Counsel's Statement in Partial Support of Department
of Justice's Motion to Intervene and Stay Discovery [PDF
421KB]
-
Preliminary Further Response By Respondent Rambus Inc.
To Motion By U.S. Department Of Justice To Intervene And
Stay Discovery Pending A Ruling On A Motion (That DOJ Proposes
To File On January 10, 2003) To Limit Discovery Relating
To The Dram Grand Jury [PDF 16KB]
December 17, 2002
December 16, 2002
- Response
by Respondent Rambus Inc. to Request by U.S. Department
of Justice for Order Delaying Deposition of Micron Chief
Executive Officer Steve Appleton [PDF 10KB]
-
Memorandum Of Law Regarding Application For Issuance
Of A Subpoena Ad Testificandum On Dr. K. H. Oh And Motion
For Leave To File A Reply Brief In Support Of Amended Application
For The Issuance Of A Subpoena Ad Testificandum On Dr. K.H.
Oh [PDF 25KB]
December 13, 2002
December 11, 2002
- ALJ
Order Denying Micron Technology's Motion to Limit or
Quash Rambus's November 6, 2002 Subpoenas Ad Testificandum
and Subpoenas Duces Tecum [PDF 29KB]
December 10, 2002
- ALJ
Order Approving Respondent's Amended Application for
a Trial Subpoena Ad Testificandum as a Motion [PDF 8KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Motion of Micron Technology, Inc. for
Leave to Supplement Record in Support of Motion to Limit
or Quash Rambus's November 6, 2002, SAT and SDT [PDF 29KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Agreed Motion for Protective Order Filed
by Non-Party Micron Technology, Inc. [PDF 32KB]
- ALJ
Order Granting Motion of Micron Technology, Inc. for
Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Limit or Quash
[PDF 24KB]
- Rambus
Inc.'s Answer to Micron Technology's Motion for Leave
to Supplement Record in Support of Motion to Limit or Quash
Rambus's November 6, 2002 Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and
Subpoenas Duces Tecum [PDF 109KB]
December 9, 2002
- Declaration
of Steven M. Perry In Support of Rambus Inc.’s Motion
to Compel Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to Produce
Certain Documents Withheld On Privilege Grounds [PDF 16KB]
- Rambus
Inc.’s Motion to Compel Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. to Produce Certain Documents Withheld
on Privilege Grounds [PDF 25KB]
December 6, 2002
December 5, 2002
December 4, 2002
-
Respondent’s Application for the Issuance of a
Subpoena Ad Testificandum and Order Granting Respondent’s
Application for Issuance of Subpoena Ad Testificandum [PDF
11KB]
December 3, 2002
-
Reply Brief by Respondent Rambus Inc. in Support of
its Motion to Compel Micron Technology, Inc. to Produce
DRAM Price-Related Documents [PDF 20KB]
-
Motion by Respondent Rambus Inc. for Leave to File a
Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel Micron Technology,
Inc. to Produce DRAM Price-Related Documents [PDF 12KB]
- Rambus
Inc.'s Answer to Micron Technology's Motion to Limit
or Quash Rambus Inc's November 6, 2002 Subpoenas Ad Testificandum
and Subpoenas Duces Tecum [PDF 30KB]
- Declaration
of Andrea Jeffries [PDF 246KB]
- Micron
Technology's Motion for Leave to Supplement Record in
Support of Motion to Limit or Quash Rambus's November 6,
2002 Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Subpoenas Duces Tecum
[PDF 62KB]
- Micron
Technology, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order [PDF
6KB]
December 2, 2002
November 25, 2002
November 20, 2002
-
Rambus Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
re Micron's Motion to Limit or Quash Rambus's November 6,
2002 Subpoeans Ad Testificandum and Subpoenas Duces Tecum
[PDF 10KB]
November 19, 2002
- Micron
Technology’s Motion To Limit Or Quash Rambus’s
November 6, 2002 Subpoenas Ad Testificandum And Subpoenas
Duces Tecum [PDF 31KB]
- Proposed
Order [PDF 5KB]
- Declaration
Of Jared Bobrow In Support Of Micron Technology’s Motion
To Limit Or Quash Rambus’s November 6, 2002 Subpoenas
Ad Testificandum And Subpoenas Duces Tecum [PDF 15KB]
November 18, 2002
November 15, 2002
November 14, 2002
- ALJ
Order Granting International Business Machines Corporation's
Second Unopposed Extension of Time to Move to Limit Subpoena
[PDF 9KB]
November 13, 2002
November 12, 2002
November
8, 2002
November 5, 2002
November 1, 2002
October 31, 2002
October 30, 2002
October 29, 2002
- Motion
of Non-Party Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA,
Inc. to Quash Subpoena or in the Alternative for Protective
Order [PDF 70KB]
October 25, 2002
October 24, 2002
-
ALJ’s Order on Motion to Quash re: Mosaid Technologies
Inc. [PDF 30KB]
October 22, 2002
October 21, 2002
October 17, 2002
October 16, 2002
- Objections
of Smart Modular Technologies, Inc. RE: Subpoena Duces Tecum
Served by Rambus, Inc. [PDF 48KB]
October 15, 2002
October 11, 2002
October 10, 2002
October 2, 2002
September 30, 2002
September 10,
2002
August 6, 2002
August 5, 2002
August 2, 2002
August 1, 2002
July 30, 2002
-
Notice
of Appearance Filed by Gregory P. Stone, Steven M.
Perry, Sean P. Gates, Peter A. Detre of Munger, Tolles
& Olson LLP and Kenneth A. Bamberger of Wilmer, Cutler
& Pickering, Respondents Counsel [PDF 23KB]
July 29, 2002
July 25, 2002
July 18, 2002
July 17, 2002
July 16, 2002
July 15, 2002
July 11, 2002
July 10, 2002
July 9, 2002
July 5, 2002
June 24, 2002
June 18, 2002
Last updated:
Thursday, October 7, 2004
|
