|
|
July 2000 Volume 2 Number
3
Modification of the Stutter Position
Label-Filtering Macro
in the PE Biosystems Genotyper® Version 2.5 Software Package:
Resolution of Stutter-Filter Back Talk
Tables
and Figures
Figure
4
|
|
|
|
Partial electropherogram depicting
the Amelogenin, D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci amplified by
the Profiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit. Allele designations
are shown in black, and peak heights (RFUs) are shown in red.
Allele labeling of the sample by Genotyper® with stutter-filter
percentages set at 8 percent, 8 percent, and 18 percent for the
D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci, respectively.
|
Back
to the text
Figure
5
|
|
|
|
Partial electropherogram depicting
the Amelogenin, D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci amplified by
the Profiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit. Allele designations
are shown in black, and peak heights (RFUs) are shown in red.
Allele labeling of the sample by Genotyper® with stutter-filter
percentages set at 8 percent, 8 percent, and 14 percent for the
D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci, respectively, and at 15 percent
for the D5S818 locus.
|
Back
to the text
Figure
6
|
|
|
|
Partial electropherogram depicting
the Amelogenin, D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci amplified by
the Profiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit. Allele designations
are shown in black, and peak heights (RFUs) are shown in red.
Allele labeling of the sample by Genotyper® with stutter-filter
percentages set at 18 percent, 8 percent, and 8 percent for the
D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci, respectively.
|
Back
to the text
Figure
7
|
|
|
|
Partial electropherogram depicting
the Amelogenin, D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci amplified by
the Profiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit. Allele designations
are shown in black, and peak heights (RFUs) are shown in red.
Allele labeling of the sample by Genotyper® with stutter-filter
percentages set at 8 percent, 8 percent, and 16 percent for the
D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 loci, respectively; although with
the order of analysis: D18S51, D8S1179, followed by D21S11.
|
Back
to the text
Back
to the top
To
Figures 1-3
FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS JULY 2000 VOLUME
2 NUMBER 3 |