ClinicalTrials.gov
skipnavHome|Search|Browse|Resources|Help|What's New|About

Comparison of Two Therapies for UES Dysphagia

This study is currently recruiting patients.

Sponsored by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Information provided by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Purpose

The aim of this research study is to determine the effectiveness of: 1) a traditional therapy regimen focusing on individual exercises for pharyngeal (throat) and laryngeal (voice box) musculature and 2) a new therapeutic exercise, the Shaker exercise.

The primary objective of this 5-year project is to identify which of two therapy programs, the Shaker exercise versus traditional therapy, results in the largest number of stable, non-oral dysphagic patients who can swallow safely and return to full oral feeding after 6 weeks of intervention. The study is powered adequately so that this aim can be tested separately for head and neck cancer and stroke patients. Our primary outcome measure is return to oral feeding, i.e., 100% of nutrition and hydration by mouth.

Condition Treatment or Intervention
Deglutition Disorders
 Procedure: Shaker Exercise vs. Traditional Dysphagia Therapy Regime

MedlinePlus related topics:  Dysphagia

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Efficacy Study

Further Study Details: 

Expected Total Enrollment:  204

Study completion: June 2007

Secondary aims of this research are: 1. Determine in a descriptive manner whether patients with residue in the pyriform sinuses who aspirate the residue after the swallow respond better, i.e., a higher percentage of them can return to 100% oral intake, than patients with residue in the valleculae who aspirate after the swallow or patients with residue in both locations who aspirate after the swallow and thus to define the spectrum of indications for the proposed exercise programs in the two groups of dysphagic patients (stroke and post-chemo radiation treatment for head and neck cancer) and whether postures enable each patient type to swallow more bolus types without aspiration at pre- and post

2.Define the pathophysiology underlying the swallow dysfunction and those pathophysiologic elements which change as a result of each therapy program including changes in – a)anteroposterior and lateral diameter of maximum deglutitive UES opening b)maximum deglutitive laryngeal anterior and superior excursions

Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:  21 Years   -   90 Years,  Genders Eligible for Study:  Both

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria (all required)

Exclusion Criteria


Location and Contact Information

Reza Shaker, M.D.      414-456-6840    rshaker@mcw.edu
Jeri Logemann, PhD       j-logemann@northwestern.edu

Wisconsin
      Medical College University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee,  Wisconsin,  United States; Recruiting

Study chairs or principal investigators

Reza Shaker, M.D.,  Principal Investigator,  Professor and Chief, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Director, Digestive Disease Center, Medical College of Wisconsin   
Jerilyn A. Logemann, Ph.D.,  Principal Investigator,  Professor Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ralph and Jean Sundin Professor of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University   

More Information

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Publications

Shaker R, Easterling C, Kern M, Nitschke T, Massey B, Daniels S, Grande B, Kazandjian M, Dikeman K. Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening. Gastroenterology. 2002 May;122(5):1314-21.

Study ID Numbers:  UESD
Record last reviewed:  May 2004
Record first received:  May 1, 2003
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:  NCT00059670
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2004-11-08
line
U.S. National Library of Medicine, Contact NLM Customer Service
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services
Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act