Under its Evidence-based Practice Program, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is developing scientific information for other agencies and organizations on which to base clinical guidelines, performance measures, and other quality improvement tools. Contractor institutions review all relevant scientific literature on assigned clinical care topics and produce evidence reports and technology assessments, conduct research on methodologies and the effectiveness of their implementation, and participate in technical assistance activities.
Select for PDF version (72 KB). PDF Help.
Overview / Reporting the Evidence / Methodology / Findings / Future Research / Availability of Full Report
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive, neurodegenerative disorder with an estimated prevalence of 31 to 328 per 100,000 people worldwide. It is estimated that more than 1 percent of the population over age 65 are afflicted with PD; incidence and prevalence increase with age.
PD is caused by idiopathic degeneration of dopamine-producing cells in the substantia nigra, located in the midbrain. Three "cardinal signs" of PD are resting tremor, cogwheel rigidity, and bradykinesia. Postural instability, typically a late finding in PD, is the fourth cardinal sign. Additional common findings are asymmetrical onset of symptoms and symptomatic response to L-dopa (levodopa). Diagnosis of PD is problematic because of the lack of a reference standard test. The diagnosis is generally made clinically, although up to 25 percent of patients with clinical diagnoses of PD have received different pathological diagnoses at autopsy.
L-dopa is the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for PD; however, its use is limited by the development of motor fluctuations and drug-induced dyskinesias. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are also used, either alone or in combination with L-dopa. DAs act directly on dopamine receptors, mimicking endogenous dopamine. Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors act by inhibiting dopamine catabolism, increasing dopamine levels in the basal ganglia. Catechol O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors act by inhibiting catabolism of dopamine, thereby extending L-dopa's peripheral half-life. Despite the large selection of medications available to treat PD, all PD patients ultimately require L-dopa.
In patients with early PD, the goal of treatment is to alleviate symptoms and maintain independent function. In advanced PD, the focus is aimed toward maximizing "on" time (time when medication is effective), minimizing "off" time (time when medication is not effective), and treating medication-related complications, such as dyskinesias, motor fluctuations, and psychiatric problems.
Surgical treatment for PD is generally considered for patients who respond to medications but have intolerable side effects. Surgical options include ablative procedures (pallidotomy or thalamotomy), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and tissue transplantation.
There are numerous unanswered questions regarding the diagnosis and management of PD. MetaWorks investigators developed an evidence base through a systematic review of the English-language literature from 1990 to 2000 pertinent to patients with PD. This synthesis of the best available and most recent evidence is intended to serve as an information resource for decisionmakers and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. It also should serve to highlight gaps in the literature and areas that require future research.
This report presents the results of a systematic review of published studies of adult patients with PD. The following key questions guided this review:
MetaWorks investigators applied methods derived from the evolving science of systematic review research. The review followed a work plan that had been developed a priori and shared with the Task Order Officer at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the project's nominator (American Academy of Neurology), and a multidisciplinary Technical Expert Panel.
The work plan outlined the methods to be used for the literature search, study eligibility criteria, data elements for extraction, and methodological strategies employed both to minimize bias and to maximize precision during the process of data collection and synthesis.
The published literature from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2000, was searched using MEDLINE®, Current Contents®, and Cochrane Library databases. The electronic searches were supplemented by a manual search of the reference lists of all accepted articles, recent review articles, and relevant Internet sites.
Two levels of screening were applied. Level I screening involved rejection of abstracts on the basis of predefined exclusion criteria, such as animal studies, case reports, or ineligible languages. Level II screening involved assessment for fit with inclusion criteria. To be eligible, a study had to be published in English. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were accepted for pharmacological treatment. For other areas, due to rarity of RCTs, other study designs were accepted, including nonrandomized controlled trials (NRCTs), uncontrolled case series (UCSs), and observational studies. Each study was required to include a minimum of 10 patients.
Relevant data from all accepted studies were entered onto data extraction forms designed specifically for this project. All data elements were extracted by one investigator and reviewed by a second investigator. One hundred percent agreement between the two reviewers was required prior to entry of data elements into the database. At least one physician reviewed all data elements extracted from every study.
All accepted studies were evaluated for quality by using the previously published methods of Level of Evidence and the Jadad Quality Score Assessment.
The information captured from each study included date of publication, location and type of study, primary objective of study, description of interventions (e.g., medications or surgery), PD scale measurements at baseline and after treatment, and adverse events. Summary statistics were calculated and meta-analyses were performed, comparing standardized mean changes in PD severity rating scales.
A group of 19 peer reviewers was assembled to review and provide suggestions for the draft final report describing this project. Their comments, in addition to those of the Technical Expert Panel, were incorporated into the final report.
The studies covered by the review of the literature on diagnosis of PD and review findings are:
The review of pharmacological treatment included:
While most studies reported Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores or other common PD rating scales, comparison of different treatments across studies presented numerous methodologic obstacles. It was not always possible to discern the number of patients who received L-dopa or the doses they received because many studies simply reported that L-dopa was given to patients as needed. Studies were not consistent in reporting the same PD rating scales or in reporting both baseline and endpoint scores, with standard deviations, for all parameters. Studies did not consistently report whether the PD scale scores were measured when patients were in the "off" or "on" state. Given these limitations, however, the following associations were noted:
The review of surgical treatment included:
The findings were:
The review of treatment of psychiatric disorders covered:
The findings were:
The review of ancillary treatment covered:
It was found that:
Standardization of reporting results is essential. Investigators should consistently report baseline, endpoint, and change in UPDRS scores, along with standard deviations. The number of patients who receive L-dopa should be clearly stated, as well as the L-dopa doses. Patients with comorbidities should be included in clinical trials. As nearly all of the studies in the database excluded patients with serious illnesses, the generalizability of study results is limited. In particular, studies should include more elderly patients, patients with young age of disease onset, and members of different racial and ethnic groups. RCTs should be performed to evaluate surgical procedures. Further studies of physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and other nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical treatment modalities should be of longer duration and should measure standardized, clinically meaningful outcomes.
Given the large volume of studies that are published regarding PD, semiannual updates are recommended to keep this database current.
The full evidence report from which this summary was taken was prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) by the MetaWorks, Inc., Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) in Medford, MA, under Contract No. 290-97-0016. Printed copies may be obtained free of charge from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse by calling 800-358-9295. Requesters should ask for Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 57, Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
The Evidence Report can also be or can be downloaded as a set of PDF files or as a zipped file.
AHRQ Publication Number 03-E039
Current as of June 2003
Internet Citation:
Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 57. AHRQ Publication Number 03-E039, June 2003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/parksum.htm
Return EPC Evidence Reports
Clinical Information
AHRQ Home Page
Department of Health and Human Services