Statements
and Speeches
Statement
to the Government Reform Committee on
US Relations with Saudi Arabia
October
3, 2002
By
Henry A. Waxman
Mr. Chairman,
these are valuable hearings that you are holding.
They remind
us that there are fundamental differences between democratic governments
like ours and Saudi Arabia. The United States is a pluralistic democracy
where religious freedoms are not only tolerated, they are encouraged.
American laws do not differentiate between genders, religions, races,
or ethnicities. People in the United States enjoy freedom of speech
and the right to travel. These are not just American values, these
are basic human rights espoused by many countries around the world.
Saudi Arabia,
on the other hand, is a theocracy and there is no public participation
in government. Religious freedom is prohibited, and there is no
freedom of speech or assembly. Men and women are treated very differently
by Saudi law. Women do not have the same educational opportunities
as men. They cannot be admitted to a hospital without the permission
of their nearest male relative. Women cannot drive, and they cannot
associate freely with men in public. Women cannot travel without
permission from their fathers or their husbands.
These hearings
have focused in particular on an aspect of Saudi Arabia that directly
affects American parents: how Americans who divorce their Saudi
spouses can essentially be denied the right to be a part of their
children's lives.
The Committee
has heard compelling testimony from women who have not had contact
with their children in years because the Saudi fathers would not
grant them permission to come to Saudi Arabia. We have also heard
testimony from women who were force to take extreme measures, such
as orchestrating a rescue or living under discriminatory conditions
in Saudi Arabia, to have any contact with their children. And we
have even heard from a man, Michael Rives, who was denied contact
with his children after his ex-wife kidnapped their children to
Saudi Arabia.
One key question
that I hope we will be able to explore today is: to what extent
is the Saudi government complicit in keeping these families apart?
There appears to be significant evidence of Saudi government involvement.
For example, the Committee heard yesterday from two witnesses who,
fearing that their husbands would violate American court orders
giving them custody of their children, made the Saudi government
aware that their children were not to be taken out of the country.
Nonetheless, in both of these cases, the Saudi government allowed
these men and their children to travel to Saudi Arabia in violation
of American law.
I recognize
that Michael Petruzzello, who has been subpoenaed to appear here
today, is not an official in the Saudi Government. But he has been
hired as a public relations specialist by the Saudis to present
their case to the American public. I hope he will be able to answer
some of these questions.
We have also
heard complaints about the role our own government has played in
these cases. I am glad that we will have witnesses from the State
Department here today, so that we will be able to inquire whether
the U.S. government has done everything that it could.
In closing,
let me thank the Chairman for holding this hearing and tell the
witnesses that I look forward to their testimony.
|