skip banner navigation
National Cancer Institute
NCI Home Cancer Topics Clinical Trials Cancer Statistics Research & Funding News About NCI

Clinical Trial Results

Summaries of Newsworthy Clinical Trial Results

< Back to Main

    Posted: 06/21/2002    Updated: 06/14/2004
Page Options
Print This Page  Print This Page
E-Mail This Document  E-Mail This Document
Search by Cancer Type
Breast Cancer

Lung Cancer

Prostate Cancer

More Results
Search Results

    Go  
Quick Links
Dictionary
Cancer-related terms

Funding Opportunities
Research and training

NCI Publications
Order/download free booklets

NCI Calendar
Scientific meetings

Español
Informacion en español
NCI Highlights
Chemo Extends Life in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Temozolomide Plus Radiation Helps Brain Cancer

Confirmed: Raloxifene Drops Risk of Breast Cancer

Bortezomib Delays Progression of Multiple Myeloma

Annual Report to the Nation

Past Highlights
Need Help?
Related Pages
Prostate Cancer Home Page
NCI's gateway for information about prostate cancer.

Supportive Care Trial Results
Provides links to clinical trial results about supportive care (care given to improve a patient's quality of life).

Coping with Cancer
Managing side effects and complications caused by cancer and its treatment.
Zoledronic Acid Reduces Bone Complications of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Key Words: prostate cancer, zoledronate. (Definitions of many terms related to cancer can be found in the Cancer.gov Dictionary.)

Patients with advanced prostate cancer have a high risk of developing bone complications such as fractures, spinal cord compression, and bone pain. In a study published in the October 2, 2002, issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (see the journal abstract), patients with prostate cancer that had spread to the bones had fewer fractures and other bone complications when they took a new drug, zoledronic acid (also called zolendronate or Zometa®) than when they took a placebo (a dummy substance).

However, the reduction in bone complications did not delay disease progression, lengthen survival, or improve quality of life for the men treated with zoledronic acid compared with those who received a placebo.

In an accompanying editorial, Christina Canil, M.D., and Ian Tannock, M.D., both of the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, write that “Zoledronic acid is a reasonable option for patients who do not respond to alternative therapies and who are at high risk for bone fractures or spinal cord compression, but currently zoledronic acid cannot be recommended as a standard therapy….”

William Dahut, M.D., agrees. Dahut is chief of the Genitourinary Clinical Research Section for the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.

“I hope that doctors will resist the temptation to recommend zoledronic acid for all patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone,” says Dahut. “This study showed no survival advantage and a higher risk of some adverse effects for patients taking zoledronic acid. In addition, the cost of adding treatment with this drug is significant. For patients whose risk for bone complications is low, these disadvantages may outweigh the benefits of treatment.”

The multicenter trial, led by Fred Saad, M.D., of the University of Montreal’s Notre Dame Hospital in Quebec, Canada, involved 643 men with bone metastases of prostate cancer whose disease had progressed after hormonal therapy. The men’s average age was 72. They were randomly assigned to receive either 4 milligrams or 8 milligrams of zoledronic acid or a placebo by infusion every three weeks for 15 months. The trial was double-blinded—that is, neither doctors nor patients knew who was receiving the drug and who was receiving the placebo until the study’s end.

All study participants had a bone scan when they enrolled; follow-up bone scans were performed after six months and 15 months. Part way through the trial, the investigators reduced the 8 milligrams dose of zoledronic acid to 4 milligrams because some men receiving the higher dose developed kidney problems.

About a third of the men who entered the trial completed it. Of those who did not complete the study, most withdrew because of adverse effects or for other reasons; 77 men died.

Among the men who received 4 milligrams of zoledronic acid, 13 percent suffered bone fractures, compared with 22 percent of the men who received a placebo. Bone complications other than fractures occurred in 26 percent of the men treated with 4 milligrams of zoledronic acid, compared with 35 percent of those who received a placebo. These complications included spinal cord compression, bone surgery or radiation therapy, or a change in treatment as a result of bone pain.

Men in the group that began the study being treated with 8 milligrams of zoledronic acid (later reduced to 4 milligrams) did less well than those who received 4 milligrams from the start. Fifteen percent of them suffered fractures and 30 percent suffered another bone complication.

Average survival and time to disease progression were not significantly different in the three groups. Patients’ assessments of their quality of life, including pain, also did not differ significantly. Flu-like symptoms (fatigue, anemia, joint pain, fever, and swelling in the legs) were slightly more common among men in the two groups treated with zoledronic acid than in those who received a placebo.

It is puzzling that patients who started the study on a higher dose of zoledronic acid did less well than those on the lower dose, says NCI’s Dahut. “There is no obvious explanation why patients who received 8 milligrams of the study drug should have more bone complications than those who received 4 milligrams.”

Zoledronic acid is a new drug in a class known as bisphosphonates. Other bisphosphonate drugs are used to treat cancer that has spread to the bones in patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February 2002 for the prevention of bone complications in prostate cancer.

Preliminary data from this study were presented in May 2002 at the American Urological Association annual meeting. A brief follow-up report was published in the June 2, 2004, issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (see the journal abstract), providing 24 months of data.

Back to TopBack to Top

skip footer navigation

A Service of the National Cancer Institute
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health FirstGov.gov