Home | | | Search | | | Browse | | | Resources | | | Help | | | What's New | | | About |
---|
Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
This study is currently recruiting patients.
Sponsored by: | Department of Veterans Affairs University of Michigan
|
---|---|
Information provided by: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
Purpose
This project has three main objectives: 1) to compare total costs of GERD management in subjects managed by step-down care with controls in whom step-down is deferred, 2) to compare quality of life in GERD patients managed by step-down care with controls and determine the cost-effectiveness of step-down care, and 3) to determine patient factors predictive of non-response to step-down care.
Condition | Treatment or Intervention |
---|---|
Gastroesophageal Reflux |
Drug: Disease management of gastroesophageal reflux disease |
MedlinePlus related topics: Gastroesophageal Reflux/Hiatal Hernia
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Single Group Assignment
Expected Total Enrollment: 484
Study start: July 2001;
Study completion: June 2004
This is a prospective study of the Department of Veterans Affairs drug treatment guideline for the pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Our hypothesis is that step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), whereby patients rendered asymptomatic on proton-pump inhibitors are treated with less expensive medication, can decrease resource utilization without adversely affecting patient quality of life. This project has three main objectives: 1) to compare total costs of GERD management in subjects managed by step-down care with controls in whom step-down is deferred, 2) to compare quality of life in GERD patients managed by step-down care with controls and determine the cost-effectiveness of step-down care, and 3) to determine patient factors predictive of non-response to step-down care.
Patients with GERD asymptomatic on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) will be randomized to either immediate or deferred (controls) step-down care. Step-down will commence with discontinuation of PPIs in favor of less expensive medication, while controls will continue PPI therapy. Both groups will be managed through a clinic staffed by clinical pharmacists. Management decisions will be made in a blinded fashion based on the VA guideline. Follow up in both groups will occur at three-month intervals for the period of one year after randomization. Four data sets will be collected: 1) subject baseline characteristics, 2) pharmacy expenditures, 3) non-pharmacy resource utilization, and 4) quality of life (generic and disease-specific instruments). The primary outcome measure is total resource utilization (pharmacy and non-pharmacy) of subjects managed by step-down compared with controls. Secondary outcome measures will examine differences in quality of life and cost-effectiveness of step-down care, and establish predictors of non-response to step-down care (requirement of PPI to control symptoms). Logistic regression and random-effects models will adjust for covariates and clustering effects.
Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and above, Genders Eligible for Study: Both
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Location and Contact Information
More Information
U.S. National Library of Medicine, Contact NLM Customer Service | ||||||||||||||
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services | ||||||||||||||
Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility, Freedom of Information Act |